Archives for the year of: 2014

Someone sent me this clip from Tennessee, where Arne Duncan was trying to salvage the federally-funded online Common Core test called PARCC.

“DUNCAN: TENNESSEE CAN STILL SALVAGE TESTS: At Brick Church College Prep in Nashville, Tenn., Education Secretary Arne Duncan showered the state with praise for becoming the fastest improving state in the country. But it still has a long way to go, he said after a town hall event [http://bit.ly/1tgEe8P ] with state chief Kevin Huffman. The legislature delayed Common Core-aligned PARCC tests for a year, but Tennessee has time for a fix, he said. “I think that having high standards is really important,” Duncan said. “Having an honest way to measure that you’re hitting those high standards and to have transparency across the country. So if all you’re able to do is measure Tennessee students against Tennessee students and not have any sense of how you’re doing versus Massachusetts or Kentucky or Mississippi, I think that misses the point. I think the state still has a chance to do the right thing going forward.”

Question: has Secretary of Education Duncan heard about the federally-funded National Assessment of Educational Progress? Since 1992, it has been measuring academic progress in the states. Using NAEP, it is possible to compare students in Tennessee to students in Massachusetts, Kentucky, Mississippi, and other states. Instead of testing every single student, it tests scientific samples in every state and nationally. It has no stakes attached. Isn’t that as much testing as we need to compare states?

Regular reader Lloyd Lofthouse has gathered some useful information on teacher salaries.

He writes:

Here’s a link to a map that was published by The Washington Post that shows the average annual public school teachers pay for each state for 2013. Now, to be clear, an average means many teachers are paid less and some paid more.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/wp/2013/12/15/how-much-teachers-get-paid-state-by-state/

Then here’s an opinion piece by Dave Eggers that appeared in the New York Times in 2011

The High Cost of Low Teacher Salaries. What does Eggers say? Here’s a pull quote:

At the moment, the average teacher’s pay is on par with that of a toll taker or bartender. Teachers make 14 percent less than professionals in other occupations that require similar levels of education. In real terms, teachers’ salaries have declined for 30 years. The average starting salary is $39,000; the average ending salary — after 25 years in the profession — is $67,000. This prices teachers out of home ownership in 32 metropolitan areas, and makes raising a family on one salary near impossible.

So how do teachers cope? Sixty-two percent work outside the classroom to make ends meet.

Laurel Sturt says that old-fashioned schoolyard bullying has evolved into Internet malice, protected by anonymity. She says bullying has become a national pastime for some political leaders. New Jersey Governor Chris Christie has cultivated a reputation as a bully, jabbing his finger at lesser mortals.

And then bullying is built into education policy–federal, state, and local.

She writes:

“Though the psychopathic rush of inflicting pain on another human being is not one most of us would appreciate, we have only to look at the realm of education to see an acceleration of bullying, in multiple guises. Take, for example, the oppressive federal mandates sent down from on high, No Child Left Behind, and its successor, Race to the Top. Here we have, for all intents and purposes, sadistic edicts impossible to fulfill, the charge of NCLB, “proficiency” for all children by 2014, nothing short of an iron mask for teachers and kids alike; states were bullied to participate to get millions in federal school funding. One would think subjecting kids to the torture of test prep and testing while losing a decade of authentic education, tilting futilely at an arbitrary data windmill, would have been consigned to the mistakes file. Yet, showing that arm twisting through policy is an equal opportunity, bipartisan affront, through his Bully of Education Arne Duncan, the very premise of Obama’s RTTT has relied on the legalized notion of bullying, bribery and extortion: sign on to our agenda or you’ll starve for funds.

“Within the Race to the Top straitjacket, then, the bullying theme has continued with the individual mandates: bullying standards developed undemocratically by not educators but profit-motivated bullies; bullied instruction forced on teachers by these standards; and parents bullied to share their children’s private data, their rights to privacy stripped by education business lobbyist cum bullies. Then there’s the bullying of teachers through evaluations unfairly tied to the test scores of the bullied kids, victimized students who, subjected to impossible work and tests, are displaying symptoms of bullying–depression, anxiety, insomnia, nausea, hopelessness, with the added bonus of a PTSD scar for life.

“Move down to the next level of power, and state and local bullying is flourishing. Here in New York we have a governor and education officials stonily unmoved by the pain they’ve signed us onto with RTTT, with no movement in sight to end it, notwithstanding a coming fall election; their intransigent coercion in the face of hardship is bullying. New York City teachers and students recently endured a decade of bullying micromanagement under the dictator Michael Bloomberg, a mayor in control of the schools, a nationwide experiment which has yielded low achievement results but a much higher degree of yes, bullying.”

Bullying moves into the classroom, where teachers are compelled to violate their professional ethics by authoritarian principals.

The bullying will continue until teachers stand united and resist. Those who bully them, steal their reputations and their profession can and must be stopped. Resistance is the best defense against the bullies. Don’t stand alone. Stand together.

The Oklahoma legislature voted decisively to drop the Common Core standards.

“On May 23, 2014, both the Oklahoma House (71-18) and Senate (31-10) voted to dump the Common Core State Standards (CCSS).

“All that is left is for Oklahoma Governor Mary Fallin to sign the legislation, HB 3399, into law. (Fallin was not governor when Oklahoma signed on for CCSS as part of Race to the Top {RTTT} in 2010.)”

If the governor does not sign, the bill is vetoed.

Here is a first for this blog: Governor Jay Nixon joins the honor roll for his courage in promising to veto a voucher bill passed by the State Legislature.

The State Senate has enough votes to override his veto, but the House does not.

Governor Jay Nixon recognizes that the state has an obligation to provide quality public education for every child. It must meet that obligation by providing every school with the resources and staff it needs, not by sending public funds to private schools.

Governor Nixon may also be aware of the overwhelming research showing that private schools do not get better results than public schools when they enroll the same children.

The bottom line is that Governor Nixon bravely stood up for the principle that the public has an obligation to support public education.

Now it his responsibility to fight for adequate funding and oversight to improve schools that are struggling. In most cases, the schools need more help for children and families that are in need, not just academic programs. The most reliable predictor of low test scores is poverty. Missouri, like other states, must avoid the pursuit of illusory quick fixes. Vouchers don’t “work” better than public schools. Missouri must improve its public school system for all.

Thanks to Governor Jay Nixon for protecting one of the basic democratic institutions that made our country great.

As you know, I went for knee surgery on May 9. From that date until now, I have been blogging on either an iPad or a cell phone. When I got back to my desk computer, I just discovered over 300 comments that somehow went missing. I approved those that were real.

 

My apologies for losing them during the period. I am sure you understand.

Crazy Crawfish has gotten wind of test score manipulation in the Louisiana Department of Education. He believes employees were directed to scrub the scores to make Néw Orleans and the Recovery School District look good, while making traditional schools look bad. Only a few high-level employees are in the know. He calls on them to blow the whistle now.

A few people who remember the world that preceded the Brown decision felt inspired to write about it. This is by Sue M. Legg of Florida. She is a retired faculty member from The University of Florida “who used to run the ‘dreaded’ statewide assessments for the Florida DOE back in the days before everyone in every grade seems to be tested everyday.”

Sue Legg writes:

“Reflections on Segregation”

Two years after the 1954 Brown decision, I graduated from Richmond High School in California. You know, Richmond High of Coach Carter fame, but that was later.

In the Richmond of 1956, segregation was in some ways, a non-issue. Richmond had been a small company town with a little over 20,000 people in 1942. The port then became a center for ship building in WWII. By 1944, the city had over 100,000 people of every description. People came from the dust bowl, from small southern towns, from everywhere to find jobs in the ship yards. The federal government built miles of barracks and families moved in.

Children from those families hit schools which were totally unprepared. Double sessions were required; schools could not be built fast enough. The Richmond High class of 1956 had 1,000 graduates. After all, it was the only high school in town. We were tracked into different programs, but the college bound were accepted at the nearby University of California, Berkeley if they achieved a B average in the required courses. We were told on arrival that half of us would likely not make it through, but most of us did.

After graduating from Berkeley, I taught in Richmond, and things were different. New schools had been built outside of town. Richmond High had been split into three schools, one for blacks and two for whites. Residential segregation ensured school segregation. Even today Richmond High makes news across the country as it struggles to solve its social and educational problems.

In 1966, I moved to Gainesville, Florida and saw the struggle for desegregation first hand. The town was in an uproar over bussing; riots broke out. Lines were painted in one school to separate the races. A group of women, black teachers and white faculty wives, formed the Gainesville Women for Equal Rights. Those of us involved found ways to make peace in the community.

Over time the district has shifted zone lines, bussed white children to formerly black schools and vice versa, and created magnet schools. We have maintained a reasonable racial/socio economic balance in most schools. We have taxed ourselves to provide what the state fails to provide. Housing is more integrated, but areas with declining populations are a challenge.

They are surrounded by private religious and charter schools. None of these schools has enough money to serve the students well because they are all too small. Yet, that seems to be their appeal, and the district has no control over these unnecessary schools that the legislature promotes.

Parents of low income minority children are getting the short end of the stick yet again. School choice is not improving learning. If we are to stop the slide, we need to offer parents the best choice, not the easy choice. We found a way 50 years ago. We can do it again.”

Sue Legg

Edushyster asks the inevitable question: what is the one sure way to improve medicine? The Obama administration has found it: pay for performance!

It hasn’t worked in education, but that’s no reason not to try it in medicine.

What happened: totally unexpected side effects:

“Here’s where our story takes a completely unexpected and yet astonishingly familiar turn. Intended to reward *high quality health care,* the Obama administration’s introduction of pay for performance for doctors and hospitals has ended up punishing those that treat *large numbers of poor people.* Also, also the payment policies are *unintentionally worsening disparities* between rich and poor by shifting money away from doctors and hospitals that care for disadvantaged patients. Also, also, also providers with a disproportionate share of disadvantaged patients appear to *provide lower quality care* than they actually do.”

What lessons can be learned? Read the link.

Robert M. Berkman, veteran mathematics teacher in New York City, posted this graphic contrast on his blog, called Better Living Through Mathematics.

 

This is not a multiple-choice quiz.

 

Who is the Reformer? Who is the Deformer?

 

One guess.