Archives for the year of: 2013

Lee Barrios in a national board certified teacher in Louisiana who blogs as Geaux Teacher.

She writes an open letter to the state legislators, recommending the book as the necessary antidote to the fluff they are certain to hear from Bobby Jindal.

She begins;

“Dear Louisiana Senators/Representatives:

“I just finished reading Reign of Error:The Hoax of the Privatization Movement and the Danger to America’s Public Schools.

“I can’t think of a better cheat sheet for reference this next legislative session when you are expected to slog through hours of reform rhetoric from the likes of Superintendent John White’s silver tongued young Teach for America graduates come education policymakers.

“Just in case you are looking to redeem yourselves leading up to the next year’s election cycle, and in the waning months of our not-soon-enough -to-be-former-Governor Bobby Jindal’s own two term “reign of error,” Dr. Ravitch offers this primer to justify your telling him that your constituents are mad as hell and you can’t take it anymore if you expect to be re-elected. …..”

I was interviewed by Jake Silverstein of the Texas Monthly and we talked
about testing, accountability, poverty, and what’s happening today. It is a very good interview, I think. He asked interesting questions.

 
Funny side note: my birth name was Silverstein but my parents
changed it to Silvers by the time I was in kindergarten. I don’t
think Jake and I are related because Silverstein was not my real family
name either. My grandfather had a different name, the story goes,
when he came from Europe as a young boy in 1858, but then he worked for a grocer in Georgia named Silverstein and took his name. Sounds crazy, but
that’s the story we were told by my father. Another story that I heard, which was confirmed by surviving family members, is that my grandfather ran the commissary on Henry Ford’s plantation in Georgia. But when Mr. Ford found out that he had a Jew on the property, he kicked my grandfather out. Then he opened a kosher butcher shop in the Savannah central market (who knew there were enough Jews in Savannah to support a kosher butcher shop?). Neither the shop nor the old market exists anymore. I never met my grandfather; he died long before I was born. But I digress.

I have heard this expression hundreds of times.

Sometimes at staff development, they show cartoon figures building a plane in mid-air.

Note that the engineers are wearing parachutes.

Note that the passengers–students and teachers–have no parachutes.

Bear in mind that the idea of building a plane as it is in mid-air is insane.

The next time you hear this expression, do one of these things:

Get up and walk out.

Hiss loudly (no one ever knows who is hissing)

Boo loudly (riskier than hissing)

Do not quietly sit by while your leader spouts idiotic platitudes.

Protests are gathering steam against high-stakes testing. Parents, students, and educators are organizing to fight the data-driven mechanistic view of schooling that is ruining education.

Politicians follow, they don’t lead. Most have no idea of the damage done by NCLB and Race to the Top. They think that “reform” is positive. They don’t know that the language has been distorted to hide the barrage of damaging policies now harming our community public schools and hurting children.

When our grassroots movement grows large enough, they will hear us. And they will rush to get in front of the parade.

This reader wrote:

“You are not overly optimistic Diane. The ground IS shifting, the tide turning! Western New York students are opting out of tests already this year. Like many other students, my kids are refusing any test used to evaluate a teacher. This is our way of protesting current education “reform.” But this battle will be won with everyone using their voice, and showing opposition, in their own way. The Partnership for Smarter Schools does not promote opting out or public protest. They are committed to bringing about real, common sense reform through legislation. They are playing an important role in the fight against the use of standardized, high stakes assessments.”

A comment on the blog:

I have been recently forced out of Education after 30 years – perhaps there’s a truth that I am tired, a bit worn out and old school – I cared as much about the child as their progress. But I still have a child in the midst of it (although not in the US) and am appalled at what is happening.

Good teaching is paramount and that means good training and an understanding of educational theories and practises, such that most children can be taught and more importantly they will learn. I feel for young teachers who are led by inexperienced leaders, too many who have come through these ‘fast track’ programs. It’s the business-ification of teaching – cheaper teachers, profit and quick turn over if you fail to meet all these silly targets based on dubious data.

The persistent dismantling of the teaching profession in many Western countries is doing untold damage – to the profession and more importantly to the students. It’s very hard to delivery good quality lessons when you are constantly under attack, being observed by others, criticised by politicians and others who should know better. Our under-achievers need more consistency, more calm and continuity in order to feel secure in their learning, take some risks, learn and make the needed progress.

Teachers are being scape-goated for years of political interference in the US and UK especially: two countries that have NOT improved outcomes for the poorest students. Check the various reports and look to Finland and Australia if you really want to do something about social mobility.

If reformers genuinely want to improve education and not just grand-stand and parade their egoes, they should talk to classroom teachers and perhaps some exit-polling might be informative…

George Schmidt is a veteran Chicago teacher and writer. I recall that when my 2010 book came out, wherein I renounced my long-held views on testing, accountability, and choice, Schmidt was unimpressed. He gave me a tongue-lashing for being a latecomer to the issues he knew so well. To put it mildly, he was angry at me and suspicious of my sincerity.

In his review of “Reign of Error,” he accepts that I have joined him on the right side of history. This is one of the most thorough and comprehensive analyses of the book and its themes. Among many wonderful comments, this may be the one I treasure most:

“”Uncle Tom’s Cabin” and “J’Accuse!” came to my mind very early as I was reading the latest Ravitch book while sitting in front of a bookshelf that includes most of her earlier books. Some writers reach the perfect timing in their lives, and they get to write at the peak of their skills to make points that don’t need to be repeated. Whether it was Harriet Beecher Stowe’s stunning fictional polemic against American chattel slavery, Emile Zola’s confrontation with anti-Semitism in France, or any of the other works we read when we are allowed to learn history, some books arise out of their times but transcend those times by the confrontation they make with the enemies of human freedom and democracy. “Reign of Error” is one of those books.”

Here are the events that I have scheduled to talk about Reign of Error, the misguided policies that afflict education today, and what we should be doing instead of the status quo of the past generation.

Tuesday, October 8:

BROOKLYN, NY

7:30 pm

Brooklyn By the Book, Congregation Beth Elohim and Community Bookstore

274 Garfield Place, Brooklyn, NY 11215.

(Diane will be in conversation with David Denby of the New Yorker)

Thursday, October 10:

MARQUETTE, MI

7:30 pm

Northern Michigan University

Northern Michigan University Center

1401 Presque Isle Avenue

Marquette, MI 49855

Tuesday, October 15:

KINGSTON, RI

6:30 pm

University of Rhode Island School of Education

Kingston, RI 02881

Thursday, October 17:

New Jersey Principals and Superintendents Association

Long Branch, New Jersey

This event is limited only to members of the association.

9:30 am

Friday, October 18:

WASHINGTON, DC

Economic Policy Institute: noon-2:30

1333 H St., NW.

Open to all, but call to register.

 

7:00 pm

Politics & Prose

5015 Connecticut Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20008.

October 23:

Dartmouth College and Vermont School Boards Association

Dartmouth College

Alumni Hall

7:30 pm

October 24:

Citizens for Public Schools

Cambridge, Massachusetts

Memorial Hall

7:30 pm

Friday, November 1:

ATLANTA, GA

United Way

Women’s Breakfast Leadership Event

Georgia Tech Hotel and Conference Center

8 am.

Monday, November 4:

PRINCETON, NJ

4 pm: Community Forum: Open to all

Princeton High School

Followed by Lecture at

Princeton University

8 p.m.

Tuesday, November 12:

NYC Council of Supervisors and Administrators

5 pm.

Details TBA

Wednesday, November 13:

CHICAGO, IL

7:30 pm

Women & Children First at First Free Church

5255 N. Ashland Ave., Chicago, IL 60640

Thursday, November 14:

Edgewood College

Madison, Wisconsin

7 pm.

This letter comes in response to a post by TeacherBiz, aka
Ani McHugh.

Dr. Ravitch, I worked for 29 years for NJEA and six for PSEA. I worked with local teacher associations in some
of the poorest cities in both those states (NJ and PA), including
Chester-Upland.

What is happening in CU is nothing short of a criminal assault on the poorest of the poor, led by politicians who have allowed the state to have a funding formula which penalizes
poor districts and then criticizes them for “failing.”

Corbett, a
former prosecutor, should himself be prosecuted for failing to
enforce the state constitution, which calls for a “thorough and
efficient” system of public schools. By contrast, New Jersey’s
Supreme Court forced the cowards in the legislature to fund poor
districts at the same level as the wealthy districts, with some
impressive results.

I love your work. And oh,
by the way, Ani McHugh is my daughter, of whom I am inordinately
proud.
Robert P. Broderick
Beverly, NJ

The most amazing thing is happening. The Common Core tests were made so “rigorous” that most students were expected to fail, and they did. Less than a third across the state “passed” the tests because the passing mark was set very high and the content of the test was so challenging that many students couldn’t finish the test.

But parents didn’t get angry at their children’s school or their children’s teachers. They got angry at the New York State Education Department, which set the cut scores or passing marks. They got angry at Pearson, which constructed the tests.

And as a result, the opt out movement is growing by leaps and bounds. Parents are outraged, especially in the suburbs, where the local schools are an integral part of the community. Suburban parents know that their children are not “failures,” and they reject the labels that the state put on them.

And the movement to boycott the tests next spring is growing.

Even in Buffalo, not a leafy suburb by any means, the local community is furious. A few days ago, an amazing 2,500 people turned out to protest the tests. The audience included parents, teachers, administrators, and scholars from local universities. It was not just parents from Buffalo, but also suburban parents. They joined in common cause.

Here is a quote from the article about the event:

Reform of high-stakes testing for schoolchildren, a groundswell movement of lawn signs and small-scale protests, became an earthquake Wednesdayevening.

The Summit for Smarter Schools, organized by a group called the Partnership for Smarter Schools and hosted by State Sen. Tim Kennedy, D-Buffalo; Assemblyman Sean Ryan, D-Buffalo; and State Sen. George Maziarz, R-Newfane, filled Kleinhans Music Hall with more than 2,500 parents, teachers and school administrators.

Cheers erupted as Kennedy and Ryan called out the names of districts represented in the audience. It sounded like a school closing list in the middle of a blizzard, encompassing schools from Barker to Allegany-Limestone, with a couple from the Rochester area thrown in for good measure.

“We’ve had a lot of quote-unquote educational reform in the past decades aimed at poor schools in the cities,” Ryan said before the session started, “but now all schools are feeling the pain, regardless of their previous performance. This is why you see a lot of suburban parents here tonight. They’re all being treated poorly. They’re mad about these tests.”

The stage, decorated with a banner that read, “Get Testing Right,” looked like a Western New York State Legislature roll call. In addition to the hosts, there were Assembly Members Ray Walter, R-East Amherst; John Ceretto, R-Lewiston; Michael Kearns, D-Buffalo; and Jane Corwin, R-Clarence. State Sen. Mark Grisanti, R-Buffalo, was in the front row of the audience.

After the introduction by Kennedy, Ryan and Amherst principal Mike Cornell, a succession of speakers laid out the case against standardized testing in a series of 12-minute speeches that were followed by standing ovations.

West Seneca School Superintendent Mark Crawford charged that the tests fail to provide a diagnosis of student strengths and weaknesses.

“They only create a lot of anxiety for students and parents and teachers,” he said. “Why do we want to bunch children into groups of 1, 2, 3 or 4?”

Tonawanda Principal John McKenna argued that testing doesn’t take into account differences among students and communities, a point illustrated by Naomi Cerre, principal of Buffalo’s Lafayette High School, who talked about the difficulties of getting resources to work with and test students from 30 nations who speak 45 different languages.

Jaekyung Lee, dean of the University at Buffalo Graduate School of Education, gave a PowerPoint outline that showed how high-stakes testing does little to improve student performances and how high-achieving nations like Japan and Korea are de-emphasizing testing and encouraging creative thinking.

Maybe I am overly optimistic, but I feel the ground shifting. I feel the tide turning. I feel the beginning of a grassroots rebellion that will sweep away the bad ideas that are ruining the lives of children, teachers, principals, and communities.

Get ready, friends. The Common Core testing may be the death knell for corporate reform.

Joanne Barkan has an excellent essay in Dissent magazine that explains how foundations founded by plutocrats use their wealth and political power to damage democracy.

She uses the example of public education to demonstrate how a small number of large foundations have captured control of public policy, taking it out of the hands of voters and parents to impose their will and get what they want.

She offers the examples of the AstroTurf groups created by the Gates Foundation; these are groups that pretend to represent local, grassroots groups but in fact carry out the wishes of the plutocrats.

Then there is the example of grants offered to districts that are contingent on certain officials remaining in office.

Then there is the example of the “parent trigger,” which manipulates parents to hand over their public school to a private corporation.

And another example is the practice of the Broad Foundation, which underwrites the salary of certain public officials to ensure that it gets its way.

She asks a good question: why are these plutocrats allowed to get tax breaks as they impose their control over and subvert a democratic institution?

This is a subject that deserves a book-length treatment. With her meticulous research skills and her understanding of the political dynamics involved, Joanne Barkan is just the one to do it.