Archives for the year of: 2013

I often get comments by teachers that move me close to tears. This is one of them. In the best of times, what the writer says would not be remarkable. In these times, these words remind us how education can be powerful and why these days it is not, it is just filling in the blanks.

I thought that several years ago the NCTE had come out with a position or paper arguing that rubrics were not appropriate for several reasons. I tried rubrics for several years and found them to be limiting and the products that I received in Social Studies, English and Humanities courses to be less than what I knew the kids could do. It’s a natural human thing to want to please and then focus on doing what is defined in front of you ala a rubric and stop. “Little Boxes” rings in my ears.

I adopted Leonardo DaVinci 7 Principles as a guide and was especially attracted to Sfumato usually translated as “Up in Smoke” meaning to embrace ambiguity, paradox and uncertainty. Great things are produced and discovered when you open the door to possibilities and leave some things undefined. When I did that, there was difficulty adjusting as kids had been trained to give the right answers. My response was there may be none and that I was more interested in originality, creativity and being able to explain and defend one’s thinking. En Garde!

However, once kids realized that they were full partners in their learning and that most anything was possible, they brought me to tears with their work. I have been lucky to work with teams of colleagues that shared this philosophy in public and private settings here in Houston and around the world. We shared a belief also that rich, engaging teaching and learning was the best way to inspire kids and the test scores took care of themselves. All test prep and no play makes Johnnies and Janes dull kids.

Two days ago, the New York Daily News published a beautiful tribute to the heroes of Sandy Hook, both the dead and the living. The newspaper called them its Heroes of the Year. The editorial was written with such eloquence and feeling that it brought me to tears.

I admit I was surprised by this editorial because the Daily News is known for its stridently anti-teacher, anti-union editorializing. (On the other hand, its reporters are unfailingly fair, and the newspaper publishes the amazing Juan Gonzalez, whose column has exposed numerous scandals.)

Today, the New York Daily News resumes its regular flaying of teachers and their union with one of the world’s dumbest opinion pieces. This one was written by a teacher who belongs to Educators4Excellence. She says she moved from Denver, where test scores count for 50% of educators’ evaluations, to NYC because of the Big Apple’s reputation for innovation. The Colorado law was written by a young state senator who is an alumnus of Teach for America.

Based on this teacher’s opinion piece, we may safely assume that Denver was not innovative enough to keep her there nor was the lure of its fabulous teacher evaluation program.

She says that she really, really wants to be a better teacher but she can’t be unless she is evaluated by her students’ test scores. Does she not know her students’ test scores now? This is puzzling indeed.

Please, someone, send this young woman the report by the National Academy of Education and the American Educational Research Association on the inaccuracy of value-added assessment. Or the statement by leading researchers published by the Economic Policy Institute.

For the uninformed, here are a few details about Educators4Excellence. The organization is two years old. In its first year, it had grants and contributions of $339,031.00. That’s pretty amazing for a start-up.

Even more amazing, E4E had receipts last year of $1,926,028. About one-quarter of the total came from the Gates Foundation.

I wish E4E would share its secrets about how a small group of teachers raised nearly $2.4 million in only two years. Inquiring minds want to know. Think what we could do to support public education if we had their fundraising secrets.

Its mission seems to be to demonstrate–in testimony before legislative bodies, advertisements, and opinion pieces like this one–that teachers want to be evaluated by test scores, and they don’t want tenure. And above all, don’t pay any attention to experienced teachers. Listen to the kids who have taught for a few months or a few years. They know best.

Here is a website in Australia that keeps watch on the damage done to Australian education by bad ideas imported from the USA.

The question is why Australia–which ranks above the US on those international tests–should be copying the methods of the US.

The Treehorn Express
Treehorn is the hero of an easy-to-read, sad children’s book, “The Shrinking of Treehorn” by Florence Heidi Parry. She cleverly exposes adults’ couldn’t-care-less attitude towards the needs of children, even when the circumstances of mal-treatment of children are patently obvious…vomiting, sleeplessness, crying etc. Treehorn found that parents, teachers and principals only pretend to care. What do you think? Were his experiences typical of our attitude to children?
naplanhasfailednaplanhasfailednaplanhasfailednaplanhasfailednaplanhasfailednaplanhasfailed
NASA called a meeting at Cape Canaveral of plumbers, footballers, band leaders and lawyers, as you do when you want advice on the best way to send a rocket to Mars. At the same time, a meeting of measurers, IT experts, testucators and politicians met in Canberra on the best way to get better scores on NAPLAN tests.
naplaniscruelnaplaniscruelnaplaniscruelnaplaniscruelnaplaniscruelnaplaniscruelnaplaniscruelnaplaniscruelnaplaniscruel
The Methodology of Mediocrity
In the sequacious pursuit of fear-based kleinism and zombic functionalism, there is a quixotic determination amongst Australian politicians, measurers and testucators to establish and maintain a test-based school culture at any cost. It’s so true. These discrete, identifiable groups seem to believe that the more you test children and frighten them with the consequences of failure, the more that school children will want to learn …. better and harder. These control freaks spend millions to make sure that the stakeholders in learning – teachers, pupils and parents in particular – will do as they are told. They take advantage of the present era of a fading democracy, of the support and controlled silence of the brotherhood of media interests and of the ease with which good people can be ‘milgramed’ to perform deeds that are quite contrary to their basic beliefs and ethics. At this point in time, these ‘buz baz’ showmen are confident that they have manufactured sufficient consent for their mission to succeed, so they are prepared to spend an enormous amount of tax-payers’ dollars to stream-line the process on-line.
The ultimate mission is to make sure that measurers, on behalf of the test publishing industry, eventually flood schools with test-coping equipment, ipads and high-tech test-preparation programs as well as test-oriented curriculum programs. There is no sincere learning base to the mission. There is no compassion for the feelings of children nor any effort to encourage and extend the basic love of learning.
These Australian schadenfreudes gathered in early December, 2012 to ignore serious research, to flee from the advice from international authorities where achievement is enjoyed, celebrated and applauded, as they continue their cruel assault on the enjoyment of learning. They support the maintenance of mediocrity because they don’t know any better; and they prefer not to deal with issues of LEARNING. Measurement pundits’ backgrounds are so limited that they advocate that fundamentals of literacy and numeracy have to be parroted and practised before any form of learnacy can be undertaken.
They know, all too well, that most school children suffer from some forms of High-stakes Naplan Testing Disorder [HSNTD]. Manifest in every home of a Year 3,5,7,9 pupil and in every school during the April-May period each year, the condition is widely known and is deliberately Treehorned by these test-freaks. They just don’t care. One has to wonder about them.
Let’s take a few examples of how public ignorance is maintained and how they control proffered cognitive, expert teacher advice in their pursuit of mediocrity’s one-size-fits-all credo…..
1. The impact of NAPLAN on the well–being of students and their families was researched by the University of Melbourne and published by the Whitlam Institute at the University of Western Sydney http://www.whitlam.org/the_program/high_stakes_testing in November, 2012.
8353 teacher stake-holders who operate at the sharp end of the testing program reveal that NAPLAN testing has resulted in [1] a narrowing of teaching strategies; [2] a narrowing of the curriculum; [3] damage to children’s health and well-being; [4] negative impact on staff morale and school reputations. In an open democracy, that’s sufficient evidence for a halt to be called. But…
On 30-11-12, a debate was conducted on Melbourne Radio about the limits of NAPLAN testing, during which the CEO of ACARA [Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority], expert measurer, Robert Randall was asked: “This study finds that children are sick, stressed and sleepless because of the tests. How concerned are you by that finding.”
Mr. Randall responded : “One answer I’m going to say, you know, we’re concerned about it. We welcome this report and others for us to have a look at, to get information so we take that information on in order to improve our program.
But equally we will challenge, if you like, the methodology and some of the information. [We know more than they do] ….it’s some students and in some circumstances and we need to work those things through, but we need to be careful that this is not a claim about the whole populous, the participation.”
MoM:- The floggings will continue until teacher morale improves. We testucators don’t like the way that teachers volunteer their observations.
2. Following an intensive survey of international research into high-stakes testing, Greg Thompson of Murdoch University obtained responses from 961 teachers from WA and SA. about their expert opinion of the effects of NAPLAN. It was published in October, 2012. http://effectsofnaplan.edu.au/wp-contents/uploads . The findings were “consistent with international research about the effects of high-stakes testing.”
The overwhelming concerns were obvious: [1] “High-stakes testing creates incentives for teachers to narrow the curriculum, adopt teacher-centred pedagogies and teach to the test. These strategies are detrimental to literacy and numeracy learning.” [2] “The majority of teachers do not see NAPLAN as improving literacy and numeracy.” [3] “Stress makes learning more difficuIt, not more likely. Trying to improve education outcomes through NAPLAN at the same time as it increases the stress of those involved, would appear to be a self-defeating strategy.” [4] “Only a minority of teachers perceive NAPLAN has had some positives.”
MoM:- Make sure that the word does not get out. Constituents might become alarmed about the effects. Make sure the press does not mention it. It didn’t say a word. The tactic worked.
3 There has been a “Big Increase in Students Withdrawn from NAPLAN Tests” according to Trevor Cobbold. His Research Paper of November, 2012 http://saveourschools.com.au demonstrates that “there has been a four-to-five-fold increase across Australia since 2008 in the percentage of children withdrawn from the numeracy tests.” “Certainly more and more parents are becoming aware that NAPLAN is not compulsory despite the efforts of education authorities to suggest they are mandatory.” and “…the rapid growth poses a threat to the reliability of NAPLAN results for inter-school comparisons, inter-jurisdictional comparison and trends of student achievement.”
MoM:- Again: “not a word to Bessie”. The press managed to protect its readership from information of this kind as it has done on other important issues during the year.
naplancausesstressnaplancausesstressnaplancausesstressnaplancausesstress
Remember? http:ed/treehornexpress.wordpress.com/2012/11/ of 3 Nov. lists in “The Zone of Silence” other instances such as the comments of especially important educator visitors to Australia like Jounni Vakijarvi and Pasi Sahlberg of Finland education; Professor Robin Alexander, chairman of most comprehensive report on primary education [6 years of collective integrated study] ever compiled – The Cambridge Report; Yong Zhao ex-China now U. of Oregon; Andy Hargreaves of Boston; Kishore Mahbubani of Singapore . None rated a mention. Not a single solitary word in the more prestigious media outlets.
Nor did the deliberations of the APPA-NZPF Conference on ‘Leading Learning’ get a mention. Nor did the announcement on 11 September that there would be a Senate Inquiry. Nor did….who knows?
The maintenance of high-stakes testing is deceitful. Until our undemocratic, testucating leaders concentrate on child learning – the loving [YES – LOVING] development of each child and its learning talents, no matter what they are – we are stuck forever on mediocrity. Present processes guarantee it.
There is little doubt that NAPLANISM just gets stupider and stupider. ACARA measurers, their political buddies and all those testucators, who are victims of the Milgram hypothesis, just have to ‘think children’, admit to a billion dollar mistake, and find ways to lead learning the proper way. ‘THINKING CHILDREN’ [not testing] is critical.
testucatororeducatortestucatororeducatortestucatproreducatortestucatororeducation
“It is now to the point where I think the EQ ship is way off course and too close to the rocks. It’s full of people who don’t know that they don’t know, and there are too many in leadership roles that simply don’t want to know. Sadly their eyes seem to be fixed on the next rung of the ladder.The premature roll-out of the Australian Curriculum which saw pedagogically questionable materials full of grammar and spelling errors unleashed on an unsuspecting student population,has been a debacle and totally compromising for any of us who were directed to implement it. No wonder our kids are falling behind.We are SO MUCH BETTER than this. Teachers are a fine bunch and it takes a lot for them to stay the course. We just need good and smart leaders – scholars not managers. And it would be heartening if our school leaders had at least a Master of Education degree. Like Finland??” On my frequent trips to international educational conferences in Asia, the stiff competition we face in this region is evident. But without pedagogy drawn from evidence-based research and without strong leadership to see it through, I fear we’re sunk. Perhaps our mantra should be UP WITH WHICH WE WILL NOT PUT! Time to get EQ and the Australian education system ship=shape again.”
A SCHOOL TEACHER
top5by25top5by25top5by25top5by25top5by25top5by25to5by25top5by25top5by25top5by25top5by25top5by25top5by25top5by25top5by2
LINKS :-
Phil Cullen AM FACE FACEL FQIEL
Gold Medal : ACEL
Life Member : CCEAM, QSPPA, QSPSSA
Classroom Teacher : 17 years
Primary Principal : 22 years
State Administrator: 19 years
Author
Grandfather
41 Cominan Avenue
Banora Point 2486
07 5524 6443

Categories Education Reform, International

Jersey Jazzman Deconstructs Joel Klein’s Record

Joel Klein served as Chancellor of the New York City public schools for eight years. He had no previous experience as an educator. But he came to the job with a determination to reinvent the system and wipe out whatever he found. He has often boasted of the dramatic gains that occurred under his leadership, at the same time that he claims that public education is in terrible shape due to teachers’ unions and tenure laws that protect incompetent teachers.

Here Jersey Jazzman begins a multi-part dissection of Klein’s record as leader in New York City.

Categories Corporate Reformers, Klein, Joel, New York City

A Personal Invitation to Join a Protest in DC

Should I go?

This video was made by Peggy Robertson, who is a leader in the National Opt Out movement.

What a fabulous invitation to join the Opt-Out protest on April 4-7 on the steps of the US Department of Education!

Who could resist Sam and Luke?

I will be there on April 4 at 3 pm.

Thanks, Sam and Luke.

To all the readers of this blog: Join me.

Read this link to learn about Occupy the DOE.

Categories Education Reform

Teachers in Hawai’i Speak Up

A reader responded to my roundup of the good news of 2012 and chided me for not mentioning the courage of teachers in Hawai’i, who have stood up and spoken up for their profession. And then I received this comment from a teacher in Hawai’i:

Aloha! Hau’oli Makahiki Hou — 2013! Thanks for a terrific blog, Diane! As well as being an Inspiration! Remember… you’re always welcome to come visit, speak, stay with us in Hawai’i ! What started out as a one-school grass-roots Hawaii-Teachers-Work-To-The-Rules Protest in mid-November grew to a every-Thursday Statewide-effort involving nearly 100 schools by mid-December… and though we resisted the (tremendous!) temptation to rally/protest/bring-national-attention-to-our-woes during President Obama’s Christmastime-visit (out of repect for his precious Family’s privacy), the movement is already gearing up again in earnest! Keep your eyes peeled for news of the enormous Statewide Rally for Teachers (and their myriad Supporters!) planned for Thursday, January 17th at the Hawai’i State Legislature…. or…. hmmm… better yet? Come Join Us!https://www.facebook.com/CampbellWorkTheRulesProtest

How I wish I could join them!

Categories Unions

My News for 2013

Faithful readers of the blog may recall that I started a new book last June.

I am pleased to announce that it will be published next fall by Knopf, the finest publishing house in the United States.

The title is under wraps for now.

If you have been reading the blog, you know what it’s about.

Categories Ravitch, Diane

EduShyster’s Predictions for 2013

EduShyster, that merry prankster of edu-reform offers her predictions for the New Year.

She says 2013 will be the year of the edupreneur.
This is a new genus americanus, the ultimate result of turning the public education system into an emerging market.

Categories Education Industry, Education Reform, For-Profit, Humor, Privatization

The Best of 2012

2012 was a year in which supporters of public education–parents, educators and concerned citizens–won some huge victories against the privatization movement.

Let’s begin with the elections of 2012.

Reform idol Tony Bennett was booted out by the voters of Indiana, who elected veteran educator Glenda Ritz as State Superintendent of Education.

Idaho was a great victory for supporters of public education. Idaho voters decisively repealed the Luna laws, which would have committed the state to spend $180 million for laptops while imposing merit pay, crushing the unions and tying every educators’ evaluation to test scores.

Voters in Florida rejected an effort to amend the state constitution to permit vouchers.

Voters in Bridgeport, Connecticut, voted against the mayor’s effort to take control of their public schools by eliminating the elected board of education.

Voters in Santa Clara County, California, re-elected Anna Song, whose opponent outspent her by about 25-1. She was targeted for defeat by the California charter school lobby after she opposed a bid by Rocketship to open 20 new charters. Rocketship will get the charters but Anna Song proved that big money was not enough to beat a supporter of public education.

The big push for “parent trigger” laws ran into two stumbling blocks:

In Florida, Jeb Bush and Michelle Rhee put on a full-court press to persuade the state legislature to pass a law allowing parents to vote to hand their public school over to a charter operator. But they overlooked the parents of Florida! Every Florida parent group turned out in Tallahassee to oppose the “Parent Empowerment” bill. In reformese, when they talk “parent empowerment,” that means parents are about to lose their voice and their local neighborhood school. Florida PTAs, Fund Florida Now, Testing Is Not Teaching, 50th No More, and every other grassroots group spoke out against the “parent trigger.” A bloc of Republican state senators turned against the bill, and the bill died in the state senate on a tie vote of 20-20. It will be back this year, but so will Florida’s parents.

The billionaire libertarian Philip Anschutz, in league with billionaire media mogul Rupert Murdoch, released a film called “Won’t Back Down,” that was intended to teach the American public that the only way to save their children was to hand their public school over to a charter operator. The film was heavily promoted at NBC’s “Education Nation,” on the Ellen show, and at a “Teachers Rock” concert sponsored by CBS. Michelle Rhee sponsored free showings at both national political conventions, so that every Democrat and Republican could have a chance to see how important it is to turn public schools over to private management, whether for-profit or non-profit. But then Parents Across America sprung into action. They put out a fact sheet about who and what was behind the movie. A few of them actually demonstrated at the Democratic National Convention. When the film was released in late September, it was pegged as anti-teacher and anti-public education and anti-union. It got terrible reviews. It didn’t sell many tickets. It flopped. Within a month after its grand premiere, it had disappeared. The free market is not kind to idlers, even when the guy who produced the movie is one of the biggest theater owners in the nation.

The movement against high-stakes testing roared into high gear:

More than 80% of the local school boards in Texas passed resolutions opposing high-stakes testing. Prominent Texans like state board member Tom Ratliff spoke out against the misuse of tests.

Superintendent Joshua Starr of Montgomery County, Maryland, called for a three-year moratorium on high-stakes testing. He said that the schools were inundated with too many changes at the same time.

Superintendent Heath Morrison of Charlotte-Mecklenburg, North Carolina, said that the national obsession with high-stakes testing had to stop. He said, “we can teach to the top, but we can’t test to the top.” Last spring, Morrison was chosen as Superintendent of the Year by the American Association of School Administrators.

Superintendent John Kuhn of the Perrin-Whitt Independent School District in Texas continues to be an eloquent spokesman for children.

The voucher program in Louisiana became an international embarrassment and its funding was declared unconstitutional:

Earlier this year, Governor Bobby Jindal pushed through sweeping voucher legislation for Louisiana that would give vouchers for more than half the children in the state to attend private and religious schools with money taken from the public school budget. Because several of the voucher schools are religious schools that teach creationism, the Louisiana plan was mocked by media around the world, who laughed at the idea that children would be taught that men and dinosaurs co-existed and that the Loch Ness monster is real, and other nonsense. Just weeks ago, a Louisiana judge struck down the funding of the vouchers, because the state constitution says the money is dedicated to elementary and secondary public schools. The language is clear. The state may not raid the public school’s minimum foundation budget to pay for vouchers.

Oh, and the anti-voucher vote in Florida continued a longstanding tradition: No state has ever voted to approve vouchers.

Local school boards continue to support their public schools with vigilance:

In addition to the many local school boards in Texas and elsewhere that have passed high-stakes testing resolutions, school boards have fought off other intrusions.

In North Carolina, the school boards won a battle to keep the for-profit virtual charter corporation K12 Inc. out of their state.

The Austin Independent School Board, after an election that brought in new members representing the community, severed its contract with the IDEA charter chain.

In Nashville, the Metro Nashville school board turned down Great Hearts Academy four times because Great Hearts wanted to locate their charter in a mainly white neighborhood and had inadequate plans for diversity. The board stood firm despite the fulminations of the governor, the legislature, and the state commissioner of education, who are so determined to open the way for Great Hearts that 1) Commissioner Kevin Huffman withheld $3.4 million of public funds from the children of Nashville to punish the school board for its refusal to follow his orders; and 2) the legislature plans to authorize a state commission to override the local school boards’ wishes. This accords with ALEC legislation.

Bad news for ALEC:

For years, ALEC has been under the radar. The shooting of Trayvon Martin in Florida made the public aware of ALEC’s “Stand Your Ground” legislation, invoked by the man who killed the teen. Then the media starting paying attention to ALEC and discovered its agenda of privatization (see ALEC Exposed) and learned about the model laws written by ALEC for charter schools, vouchers, online charter schools, union-busting, uncertified teachers, and an array of other corporate-friendly legislation.

The Chicago Teachers Union went on strike and said, “Enough is enough!”

Teachers have watched in dismay as state after state has whittled away or hacked away their right to bargain collectively, their tenure rights, their academic freedom, and their pensions. They have seen state after state pass legislation requiring merit pay (even though it has never worked anywhere) and tying their evaluations and their careers to student test scores (even though research says that value-added assessment is inaccurate and unstable and punishes teachers who teach children with high needs).

Teachers and principals alike have watched in dismay as rightwing legislatures and governors have slashed spending for public schools while paying more for testing.

Educators have been appalled by cuts in basic services to students.

And the CTU said, “No more.”

CTU was not allowed to strike about anything that mattered, but they made clear in their words and deeds that they were striking for their students. They were striking to protest the lack of teachers of the arts, of librarians and social workers, and of basic resources for students. They were protesting overcrowded classes. They were protesting school closings.

CTU had the support of parents of Chicago’s students. They had the support of police and firefighters.

The national media never understood what was at stake, but almost every educator in America did.

And to educators, CTU were heroes. Every educator wished they too had one of those cool red CTU tee-shirts.

2012 was the beginning.

Teachers, principals, superintendents, local and state school boards are speaking up.

Parents and students are speaking up.

The friends of public education dominate social media.

We dominate Twitter and Facebook because we have millions of supporters.

The corporate reformers have millions to buy TV ads and to buy media outlets.

But they don’t own us.

And they are failing. Everything they advocate is failing.

That is why we are winning.

2012 is the beginning.

We will take back public education for the public, not for profit, not for private interests.

For the public.

Pro publica.

Categories Charter Schools, Education Reform, Parent trigger, Privatization, Supporting public schools, Unions, US Education, Vouchers

The Worst of 2012

December 14, 2012, will be engraved in our hearts and memories forever as a dark and terrible day in our national history.

It was a day when the unthinkable, the unimaginable, happened in Newtown, Connecticut.

It was a day when every parent’s worst nightmare became a reality.

It was a day when educators heroically defended their children, making the ultimate sacrifice.

It was a day we will never forget.

It was the worst day of 2012.

Categories Connecticut