Archives for the year of: 2013

Come to PS 29 in NYC to hear the mayoral candidates:

Want to know where the Democratic primary candidates stand on education? Ask!

mayoral_postcardlittle

A forum on the future of public education
in NYC

with Democratic primary mayoral
candidates

Moderated by
Diane Ravitch

Thursday May 2nd
5:30-7:00 pm
PS 29 (425 Henry Street, Brooklyn)

What do 800,000+ New Yorkers have in common?

We are NYC public school parents.

And Parents Ask Questions.

Ask Your Question*

*Submit your question to
questions@parentvoicesny.org.

This event is being organized by ParentVoicesNY

Because we are the parents voting for our
kids’ future.

NYC Mayor Bloomberg just dropped $350,000 into the campaign to beat Monica Ratliff in a runoff for the LA school board.

A few weeks ago, Bloomberg gave $1million to the coalition of billionaires, who assembled a $4 million war chest, mostly to defeat Steve Zimmer.

Bloomberg’s million was enhanced by fat gifts from Rupert Murdoch, Michelle Rhee, Eli Broad, and the Hollywood elite.

And they lost!

Steve Zimmer won by a proportion of 52-48. He beat the billionaires and moguls!

Can Monica Ratliff beat the billionaires?

Can Michael Bloomberg buy a seat on the LA school board?

He already owns the NYC board. Why does he want to own one 3,000 miles away?

Stay tuned.

Veteran teacher John Thompson says that it is time for the billionaires to step back and recognize the damage that they are doing to American education. They assume that because they are so successful, they know it all.

Shocked to discover that poverty actually exists, they decided that the best way to save poor kids was to destroy the school system.

___________________

In this thoughtful and provocative essay, Thompson writes:

“So, with the best of intentions, these novices assumed the mantle of “accountability.” Market-driven “reformers” set out to destroy education schools, teachers’ due process, and local systems of governance. These accountability hawks had great political success, but educationally they failed. Corporate “reformers” never understood why it is easier to kick down a barn than to build one. So, tens of billions of dollars has been wasted on their data-driven theories. And since so much had been invested in the macho theme of “accountability,” someone has to pay.”……,,,

Being true believers in data, “reformers” had always loved testing. As test-driven accountability backfired, however, standardized testing became a method of stomping down teachers, our unions, and our professional values. They even adopted a system, known as “value-added,” that could not conceivably be a tool for building better schools. It began as a kick upside the head to get our attention, so that educators would comply with top-down mandates. But now, the purpose of these statistical models is shaming and destroying individual schools and educators.

Then, the data-driven crowd tripped over students. Since these ideologues were in the dark and blissfully unaware of teaching and learning, they were not intentionally kicking kids as they struck out at their adult enemies. Having stumbled into a world they did not understand, “reformers” did not necessarily know that the system would respond to their mandates with nonstop test prep and narrowing the curriculum. But, now, high-stakes testing has even been pushed down into primary grades and into art classes……

“Sarah Carr, in Hope Against Hope, describes New Orleans as an example of school “reform.” Hurricane Katrina did the dirty work of wiping the old system. This created a “technocrat’s dream.” They were free to build the system they visualized, “run by graduates of the nation’s most elite institutions, steeped in data, always seeking precision, divorced from the messiness — and the checks and balances — of democracy.”

“In Chicago, Philadelphia, Detroit, Washington D.C., N.Y.C, and elsewhere, “reformers” have adopted the Katrina method and doubled down on their gamble to destroy the status quo. Once, they might have thought that closing schools might save money or even be a step towards improving educational outcomes. By now, however, we have too much evidence to the contrary. The purpose of school closures, it is now clear, is kicking out veteran educators who have not seen the beauty of their theories of Big Data unleashing creative destruction.

“So, corporate “reformers” are now stumbling over the families of the children who they had wanted to lift up. As Chicago Teachers Union President Karen Lewis explains, parents understand that “reformers” benefit from “one set of schools for children being taught to rule the world.” Whether they understand it or not, the elites’ testing regimes are producing another “set of schools for children being taught to be [Wal-Mart] greeters.”

“It is only a matter of time before urban parents join their children and educators, and become the next dog to be kicked in anger. After all, parents (like the teachers and employees of targeted schools) are workers too. And, the unions that “reformers” are kicking have long been essential to political coalitions working for children and families.

“But, we can’t expect “reformers” to stumble over that realization. They are too busy kicking schools and educators who they blame for the failure of their once-beautiful dream.”

This is crazy, or is it?

We learned the other day that Texas Instruments is a big promoter of Algebra 2 as a graduation requirement in Texas. Why? Civic spirit, love of education, or the fact that TI supplies most of the graphing calculators needed for Algebra 2?

Now we learn from this report that a company selling cursive writing materials is a major proponent of a law requiring same in North Carolina.

Please do not misunderstand the issue here.

I believe that everyone should learn cursive writing, both to do it and to read it.

But I don’t believe that state legislatures should dictate how teachers teach or what methods are best.

I also am a firm believer in the value of knowing the multiplication table by heart, but I don’t think that lawmakers should mandate it.

I love memorizing poetry but that should not be subject to legislation either.

States like North Carolina should have high standards for teachers. They should have at least a year of study and practice before entering the classroom. They should pass tests in the subject they plan to teach. They should have support and mentors.

If they are truly professionals, let them teach.

If you want to know how No Child Left Behind has injured our society’s most vulnerable children, read this heart-breaking story about the sanctions imposed on the Rhode Island School for the Deaf.

Written by a recently retired teacher at the school, it describes how the standardized testing regime struck the children and the school like a sledgehammer, causing it to be labeled Persistently Low Performing.

The story begins:

“I recently participated in the inspiring and informative webinar “How to Organize a Grassroots Group” put on by the Network for Public Education and the Northeast Indiana Friends of Public Education. I am a retired teacher of the deaf, having retired from the Rhode Island School for the Deaf in the fall of 2011 profoundly dismayed by the unreasonable sanctions placed on the school by the Rhode Island Department of Education (RIDE), headed by Deborah Gist (Broad Superintendents Academy 2008).”

Read this post and ask yourself how anyone associated with the punishments inflicted on this important school can sleep at night or look themselves in the mirror every morning without grimacing.

And the next time you hear a pundit or think tank jockey praise NCLB, tell them about the Rhode Island School for the Deaf.

Even though Michelle Rhee suffered multiple embarrassments in the past few weeks–with John Merrow reporting her refusal to investigate the cheating scandal that occurred on her watch and the Broader Bolder Approach reporting the failure of her “reforms”—her organization continues to push her failed “reforms” on states across the nation.

StudentsFirst pumped over $317,000 into legislative races in Iowa to ensure that legislators would listen to its radical, anti-public education message. It was the single biggest contributor to state races in 2012.

Now it is filling the airwaves with ads urging the legislature to adopt changes that will advance Rhee’s personal vendetta against teachers and public education.

She demands that teacher evaluations be tied to test scores, even though research and experience have shown that this strategy consistently fails, as it failed in DC. She wants a parent trigger law, so that parents can be duped into privatizing their community public school and turning it over to one of the corporate charter chains.

Iowans should demand that StudentsFirst fully disclose the source of its funding so they can find out who is behind this campaign, other than the former leader of one of the nation’s lowest-performing districts. And Iowans should remember John Merrow’s conclusion that DC is worse off after five years of the Rhee-Henderson leadership by almost every measure: test scores, graduation rates, truancy, teacher turnover, enrollments, etc.

Paul E. Barton, an experienced education researcher and author of the book National Standards: Getting Beneath the Surface, is concerned that the implementation of the Common Core standards is happening too quickly. He wrote this post for this blog:

A Critical Stage for the Common Core

The much-anticipated Common Core Standards have been rolled out—and widely praised—and tests based on the standards are being created. Now is a really critical stage when teachers must be trained and a curriculum created, and states and schools seem to be on their own. The standards have been described as very rigorous and challenging, requiring teachers to learn new pedagogies. These tasks will be both time consuming and expensive.

The early returns publicly available are worrisome. A recent Education Week story bore the headline, “Teachers Feel Unprepared for the Common Standards.” The story was based on a survey of 600 subscribing teachers who formed “quite a diverse sample.” The survey found that nearly three in ten teachers have had no training at all on the standards. Of the 70 percent who had training, 41 percent had four days or less, and three in ten had one day or less. Although job-embedded training is considered the most effective kind, only three in ten of those who received training say they received it in that way.

The respondents said that more than two-thirds of their schools were not prepared, and 27 percent said their districts were not up to the task.

In addition to teacher training, a curriculum needs to be developed and teachers need to be provided the materials they need. The standards are about what students must know, not how they will be taught. If English teachers must include more non-fiction reading, non-fiction books must be made available.

What is needed is common readiness standards. Although implementation is up to the states, it would be comforting to know that the principal actors who have gotten the standards movement this far would find a way to help guide it, check on all the stages of implementation, provide needed information about progress, and give some assistance or cautions to the states if implementation gets off track.

The new tests should not be given until implementation of the Common Core Standards is complete. It is the responsibility of the states to fully prepare teachers, develop a curriculum based on the standards, and provide teachers with the materials they need to teach to the standards. If not, students will suffer the consequences and teachers will likely be blamed.

Woodrow Wilson High School in Washington, DC, warned students that anyone who did not take the DC tests would not be allowed to play in any athletic activities next year.

In addition, the school posted a table of prizes and raffle tickets that students could win every day they took the tests.

Says the school: “DCCAS Testing Schedule – We will be administering the DCCAS April 23-25, 2013 to all scholars that have been identified to take one or more of the assessments. Scholars who do not show for a required assessment will be pulled from their classes on April 26 and April 29-May 2, 2013. Any scholar who is required to take one or more of the DCCAS assessments and does not complete the assessment will NOT be eligible to participate on any athletic team next year.”

Please don’t miss the list of prizes that every student may win by taking the tests.

Do you think the school is worried about a massive boycott? Why else would they bring out the carrots and sticks? And who pays for all those mini iPads and gift cards?

Paul Barton, an experienced analyst of trends in American education, has written this piece to emphasize the importance of appropriate implementation of the Common Core standards. He warns that testing should not begin until teachers are prepared, a curriculum is in place and has been taught, and teachers have the materials they need.

A Critical Stage for the Common Core

​The much-anticipated Common Core Standards have been rolled out and tests based on the standards are being created. Now is a really critical stage when teachers must be trained and a curriculum created, and states and schools seem to be on their own. The standards have been described as very rigorous and challenging, requiring teachers to learn new pedagogies. These tasks will be both time consuming and expensive.

​The early returns publically available are worrisome. A recent Education Week story bore the headline, “Teachers Feel Unprepared for the Common Standards.” The story was based on a survey of 600 subscribing teachers who formed “quite a diverse sample.” The survey found that nearly three in ten teachers have had no training at all on the standards. Of the 70 percent who had training, 41 percent had four days or less, and three in ten had one day or less. Although job-embedded training is considered the most effective kind, only three in ten of those who received training say they received it in that way.

The respondents said that more than two-thirds of their schools were not prepared, and 27 percent said their districts were not up to the task.

​In addition to teacher training, a curriculum needs to be developed and teachers need to be provided the materials they need. The standards are about what students must know, not how they will be taught. If English teachers must include more non-fiction reading, non-fiction materials must be made available.

​According to the Wall Street Journal (4-15-2013), New York City “slowly started preparing schools for the new standards three years ago.” The New York City Schools Chancellor said that all NYC schools were expected this year to teach to the Common Core mold, but the city never provided schools with a full curriculum or curriculum materials to plan lessons.

​What is needed is common readiness standards. Although implementation is up to the states, it would be comforting to know that the principal actors who have gotten the standards movement this far would find a way to help guide it, check on all the stages of implementation, provide needed information about progress, and give some assistance or cautions to the states if implementation gets off track.

​The new tests should not be given until implementation of the Common Core Standards is complete. It is the responsibility of the states to fully prepare teachers, develop a curriculum based on the standards, and provide teachers with the materials they need to teach to the standards. If not, students will suffer the consequences and teachers will likely be blamed.
______________________
Paul E. Barton is author of National Standards, Getting Beneath the Surface.

Jersey Jazzman deconstructs John Merrow’s post “Who Created Michelle Rhee?”

If you recall, Merrow spread the blame for her undeserved celebrity among four suspects:

1. Rhee herself, by inflating her resume

2. The media, including himself, for featuring her 12 times on PBS

3. Rightwing funders

4. The unions because of their intransigence.

JJ pins the blame for Rhee on…..read it yourself.