Archives for the month of: December, 2013

The New York Board of Regents is determined to pour unprecedented sums into more standards, more tests, and more tests and more standards.

Two Regents have opposed this determined focus on standards and testing: Regent Betty Rosa of the Bronx and Regent Kathleen Cashin of Brooklyn. Interestingly, these are two of the few experienced educators on the state board.

In this article, Regent Rosa blasts the board’s agenda.

“In fact, she thinks the Common Core program is based on incomplete, manipulated data.

“They are using false information to create a crisis, to take the state test and turn it on its head to make sure the suburbs experience what the urban centers experience: failure,” said Rosa, a former teacher, principal and superintendent from the Bronx.

When even members of the Regents recognize that state policy has generated a “manufactured crisis,” wouldn’t you think that other members of the board might stop and think?

Time for the Regents to step back and ask whether higher standards and harder tests are the best way to improve academic performance.

If students can’t jump over a four-foot bar, will they do better if the bar is raised to six feet?

Why not use those billions to provide the support that students and teachers need–like smaller classes, universal pre-K, and after-school programs– instead of pouring it into more measurement?

 

New York established a privately funded “Research Fellow” group to implement the Race to the Top agenda of Common Core implementation and testing. This group was funded by the Gates Foundation, the Carnegie Corporation, and the chair of the Regents, Merryl Tisch.

“Two of the charities bankrolling a controversial $18 million education fellowship program also gave millions to a data company to which the state Education Department plans to send personal student information, despite parents’ objections.

The charitable foundations, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Carnegie Corporation of New York, are major contributors to inBloom, Inc., the data company. The two charities and other entities underwriting the fellowships support rigorous standardized testing for the purpose of assessing teachers, the Common Core curriculum, and student-data collection.

Referring to the privately funded state-education research program, which oversees the work of 23 fellows, New York State United Teachers president Richard Iannuzzi told Capital, “In many ways, it goes back to the very fundamental question about the role of government in a democracy and the need for a system of checks and balances. … All of that is effectively circumvented when private structures are used to significantly influence public policy, and that’s what’s happening here.”

One might well wonder, if these foundations and donors wanted New York to have a research capacity, why didn’t they make a contribution to the state so that these employees are public employees, not a privatized group?

Critics are angry about the ties between the Gates-funded group and inBloom, the massive data collection project funded by Gates and Carnegie. The spin on inBloom is that schools and states “need to know” everything about every student, and that private and confidential information about every student should be put into a data “cloud.” At the moment, the data project is free, but it will not be free in the future. Critics say that the cost to the state in the future will run into the millions. Another concern is that the student data may be hacked or made available to vendors who market their products directly to children. At present, the only two states that have agreed to place student data into inBloom’s possession are New York and Illinois.

The New York Times just concluded a five-part series of articles about a beautiful 11-year-old girl named Dasani.

It is called “Invisible Child.”

The series was written by investigative journalist Andrea Elliott.

She deserves a Pulitzer Prize for illuminating the life of this child and her family.

Here is part 1.

Dasani is homeless. She is one of eight children, who lives with her parents in a homeless shelter in New York City.

She is a bright, energetic child growing up in appalling circumstances.

Here is where she lives:

Dasani’s own neighborhood, Fort Greene, is now one of gentrification’s gems. Her family lives in the Auburn Family Residence, a decrepit city-run shelter for the homeless. It is a place where mold creeps up walls and roaches swarm, where feces and vomit plug communal toilets, where sexual predators have roamed and small children stand guard for their single mothers outside filthy showers.

It is no place for children. Yet Dasani is among 280 children at the shelter. Beyond its walls, she belongs to a vast and invisible tribe of more than 22,000 homeless children in New York, the highest number since the Great Depression, in the most unequal metropolis in America.

Dasani grows up in a city of stark contrasts: One city for the rich, another for people like her.

In the short span of Dasani’s life, her city has been reborn. The skyline soars with luxury towers, beacons of a new gilded age. More than 200 miles of fresh bike lanes connect commuters to high-tech jobs, passing through upgraded parks and avant-garde projects like the High Line and Jane’s Carousel. Posh retail has spread from its Manhattan roots to the city’s other boroughs. These are the crown jewels of Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg’s long reign, which began just seven months after Dasani was born.

In the shadows of this renewal, it is Dasani’s population who have been left behind. The ranks of the poor have risen, with almost half of New Yorkers living near or below the poverty line. Their traditional anchors — affordable housing and jobs that pay a living wage — have weakened as the city reorders itself around the whims of the wealthy.

Some would blame Dasani’s parents for her circumstances. They are unemployed and battle drug addiction. The New York Post wrote an editorial scoffing at this entire series and treating Dasani’s family as leeches on the public welfare system. Andrea Elliott recognizes that Dasani’s parents are dysfunctional. But that leaves the question of how a decent society lifts up people whose lives are in such desperate shape. Or whether we leave them to make their way through an opaque and bureaucratic system:

Dasani’s circumstances are largely the outcome of parental dysfunction. While nearly one-third of New York’s homeless children are supported by a working adult, her mother and father are unemployed, have a history of arrests and are battling drug addiction.

Yet Dasani’s trials are not solely of her parents’ making. They are also the result of decisions made a world away, in the marble confines of City Hall. With the economy growing in 2004, the Bloomberg administration adopted sweeping new policies intended to push the homeless to become more self-reliant. They would no longer get priority access to public housing and other programs, but would receive short-term help with rent. Poor people would be empowered, the mayor argued, and homelessness would decline.

But the opposite happened. As rents steadily rose and low-income wages stagnated, chronically poor families like Dasani’s found themselves stuck in a shelter system with fewer exits. Families are now languishing there longer than ever — a development that Mr. Bloomberg explained by saying shelters offered “a much more pleasurable experience than they ever had before.”

There is one center of stability in Dasani’s life: her public school, the Susan S. McKinney Secondary School of the Arts.

Housed in a faded brick building two blocks from Auburn, McKinney is a poor-kids’ version of LaGuardia Arts, the elite Manhattan public school that inspired the television series “Fame.” Threadbare curtains adorn its theater. Stage props are salvaged from a nearby trash bin. Dance class is so crowded that students practice in intervals.

An air of possibility permeates the school, named after the first African-American woman to become a physician in New York State.

There is Officer Jamion Andrews, the security guard who moonlights as a rap lyricist, and Zakiya Harris, the dance teacher who runs a studio on the side. And there is Faith Hester, the comedic, eyelash-batting humanities teacher who wrote a self-help book titled “Create a Life You Love Living” and fancies her own reality show.

The children also strive. Among them is a voice that periodically lifts the school with a “Madama Butterfly” aria. When the students hear it, they know that Jasmine, a sublimely gifted junior, is singing in the office of the principal, Paula Holmes.

The school matriarch closes her eyes as she listens. It may be her only tranquil moment.

Miss Holmes is a towering woman, by turns steely and soft. She wears a Bluetooth like a permanent earring and tends toward power suits. She has been at McKinney’s helm for 15 years and runs the school like a naval ship, peering down its gleaming hallways as if searching the seas for enemy vessels.

But like Dasani’s family, the school is facing an uncertain future:

For all of McKinney’s pluck, its burdens are great. In the last six years, the city has cut the school’s budget by a quarter as its population declined. Fewer teachers share a greater load. After-school resources have thinned, but not the needs of students whose families are torn apart by gun violence and drug use. McKinney’s staff psychologist shuttles between three schools like a firefighter.

And now, a charter school is angling to move in. If successful, it will eventually claim McKinney’s treasured top floor, home to its theater class, dance studio and art lab. Teachers and parents are bracing for battle, announced by fliers warning against the “apartheid” effects of a charter co-location.

Dasani knows about charter schools. Her former school, P.S. 67, shared space with one. She never spoke to those children, whose classrooms were stocked with new computers. Dasani’s own school was failing by the time she left.

Her teachers and her principal see something special in Dasani. They believe in her. What she loves best about school is the dance classes. That is where she feels freest and happiest. Sadly, the dance studio will be lost when the charter school moves in.

Part 2 of the series begins with a startling contrast between the millions lavished on the renovation of Gracie Mansion, the mayor’s residence where no one lives, and the squalid circumstances in which Dasani and thousands of other children live.

Dasani was still an infant when Mr. Bloomberg took office in 2002. Declaring Gracie Mansion “the people’s house,” he gathered $7 million in private donations — much of it his own money — to rehabilitate the pale yellow 18th-century home, which overlooks the East River. In came new plumbing, floors, lighting and ventilation, along with exquisite touches like an 1820s chandelier and a four-poster mahogany bed.

Facing that same river, six miles away on the opposite side, is the Auburn Family Residence, the squalid city-run homeless shelter where Dasani has lived for more than two years.

Her school is her anchor, but it has suffered too:

The Susan S. McKinney Secondary School of the Arts has suffered its own troubles under the Bloomberg administration: a shrinking budget and fewer teachers.

Dasani’s public school–her watchful teachers and principal– is her salvation in a life of uncertainty and horrific living conditions:

For Dasani, school is everything — the provider of meals, on-the-spot nursing care, security and substitute parenting. On the Gracie trip [the trip to the mayor’s empty mansion], Dasani wears the Nautica coat donated by a school security guard and matching white gloves bestowed to her that morning by the principal.

A school like McKinney can also provide a bridge to the wider world.

It does not matter that Dasani’s entire sixth grade must walk a mile to the subway in icy winds, take two trains, then walk another 10 minutes before arriving. This round-trip journey, which occupies much of the day, is a welcome escape.

The Auburn Shelter, where Dasani and her family live, is regularly inspected, but no one seems to act on violations and complaints:

Over the last decade, city and state inspectors have cited Auburn for more than 400 violations — many of them repeated — including for inadequate child care, faulty fire protection, insufficient heat, spoiled food, broken elevators, nonfunctioning bathrooms and the presence of mice, roaches, mold, bedbugs, lead and asbestos.

Dasani can pick out the inspectors by their clipboards and focused expressions. They work for the State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance, which supervises homeless housing around the state. Given that Auburn is partly funded by the state, these inspectors should presumably hold sway.

Year after year, their reports read like a series of unheeded alarms. Responses by the city’s Department of Homeless Services attribute Auburn’s violations to a lack of money. To the state’s complaint, in 2003, that only one staff member is tending to 177 school-age children in the shelter’s recreation room, the agency responds: “We lack resources for teenagers!”

Residents complain about sexual abuse by staff, but typically their complaints are ignored.

The teachers at Dasani’s school are caring, nurturing, and kind. She makes the honor roll but she has too many absences.

What does school choice mean to a child like Dasani? Only twelve blocks from the shelter is Packer Collegiate Institute, where tuition is over $35,000. But Dasani’s parents know nothing of such schools.

She is not the kind of child to land a coveted scholarship to private school, which would require a parent with the wherewithal to seek out such opportunities and see them through. For the same reason, Dasani does not belong to New York’s fast-growing population of charter school students.

In fact, the reverse is happening: a charter school is coming to McKinney. Approved last December by the Education Department, Success Academy Fort Greene will soon claim half of McKinney’s third floor. This kind of co-location arrangement has played out in schools across the city, stoking deep resentments in poor communities.

The guiding ethos of the charter school movement has been “choice” — the power to choose a school rather than capitulate to a flawed education system and a muscular teachers’ union. But in communities like McKinney’s, the experience can feel like a lack of choice.

Dasani watched, wide-eyed, during a protest last December as McKinney’s parents and teachers held up signs comparing the co-location to apartheid. Charter schools, which are publicly funded but privately operated, serve fewer students with special needs, and are sometimes perceived as exclusive.

A web posting for Success Academy Fort Greene does little to counter that notion. Parents, it says, “shouldn’t have to trek to other Brooklyn neighborhoods or spend $30,000+ on a private school in order to find excellence and rigor.”

In part 3 of the series, Elliott describes the gentrification of Fort Greene, the neighborhood where the shelter is located. And she tells the story of Dasani’s parents, the lives that brought them to a homeless shelter.

Part 4 of the series shows that children are the hidden homeless. When people think of the homeless, they think of vagrants and bag ladies.

Like other homeless children, Dasani did not create the circumstances in which she lives, yet she suffers because of them:

Their numbers have risen above anything in the city’s modern history, to a staggering 22,091 this month. If all of the city’s homeless children were to file into Madison Square Garden for a hockey game, more than 4,800 would not have a seat.

Yet it is the adult population that drives debates on poverty and homelessness, with city officials and others citing “personal responsibility” as the central culprit. Children are bystanders in this discourse, no more to blame for their homelessness than for their existence.

Dasani works to keep her homelessness hidden. She has spent years of her childhood in the punishing confines of the Auburn shelter in Brooklyn, where to be homeless is to be powerless. She and her seven siblings are at the mercy of forces beyond their control: parents who cannot provide, agencies that fall short, a metropolis rived by inequality and indifference.

The experience has left Dasani internally adrift, for the losses of the homeless child only begin with the home itself. She has had to part with privacy and space — the kind of quiet that nurtures the mind. She has lost the dignity that comes with living free of vermin and chronic illness. She has fallen behind in school, despite her crackling intelligence.

The children stick together, but even their solidarity is not enough to overcome the negative experiences, the lack of almost everything that makes for security and the most elemental level of comfort in life.

In part 5, as the series concludes, Dasani finds reasons to dream, reasons to hope, as she gets a chance to join a gymnastics team in Harlem, where she can earn some money and self-respect.

What is the takeaway from the series?

The public school is the anchor of Dasani’s hard and mean existence, the place where she finds care and discipline. The adults in the school know her, and many have shared her own experiences, having grown up in housing projects, with nothing but ambition.

Nearly half the population of New York City is poor or near poor, according to Mark K. Levitan, the Bloomberg administration’s director of poverty research.

This is a higher figure than reported by the Census, which pegged the city’s poverty rate at 21.2% in 2012. 

Nearly a third of the children 17 and under in New York City are living in poverty, according to the Census Bureau (surely much higher using the Levitan numbers).

Whichever the number, the reality is that the gap between Dasani and her counterparts in other parts of the city is huge.

Income inequality is also huge:

A yawning income gap seemed to show a city that has become stratified with wealth concentrated in a small percentage of the population.

Citywide, the mean income of the lowest fifth was $8,993, while the highest fifth made $222,871 and the top 5 percent made $436,931 — about 49 times as much as those with the lowest income.

Manhattan retained the dubious distinction of having the biggest income gap of any big county in the country. The mean income of the lowest fifth was $9,635, compared with $389,007 for the top fifth and $799,969 for the top 5 percent — more than an eightyfold difference between bottom and top.

The takeaways:

How can one of the richest nations in the world tolerate such degrading circumstances for any of its children and families? Blame the parents if you choose, but even they are victims of their circumstances. Surely, we can and should do more than expand the number of shelters for the homeless.

Here is hoping the New York Times’ editorial board reads the series and thinks about the editorials it writes touting high-stakes testing and privately managed charters.

Thank goodness for investigative reporters. Thank goodness for Andrea Elliott’s powerful prose.

I hope she wins a Pulitzer Prize for this important series that tells a story that too many of the elites would prefer to ignore.

 

 

 

EduShyster notes the convergence of three happenings:

1. The New York Daily News breaks the story of KIPP’s “padded cell” for disruptive children. KIPP officials declare they will continue using the padded cell–actually, a closet with a window–as a “calming” space.

2. Simultaneously, the New York Times writes an editorial praising KIPP for its successful methods in educating black and Hispanic children.

3. A new study from researchers at MIT and other universities concludes that higher scores on standardized tests do not predict the development of “fluid” intelligence, the higher-order thinking needed for the thinkers and innovators of the future.

This is one of EduShyster’s most powerful posts. Humorous, of course, but containing valuable information.

Lindsay Wagner of NC Policy Watch reports that North Carolina law may permit home schools to qualify for public funding.

Nonpublic schools in North Carolina will have little or no supervision over their standards or academic performance.

Wagner writes:

“The school voucher program is intended for use at private schools only. But thanks to weak laws and a lack of capacity to ensure compliance, anyone who opens a school in their home may be able to get public money—and face little in the way of accountability.

“No academic standards required in NC voucher program

“Families in North Carolina will be able to participate in the Opportunity Scholarships program beginning with the 2014-15 academic school year.

“The new school voucher system that the General Assembly passed into law last July will provide low-income students currently enrolled in public schools with up to $4,200 annually to use at state-recognized private schools (the list of endorsed schools is viewable here).

“Lawmakers pushed for school vouchers, arguing that North Carolina’s public schools are failing its low-income and minority students and that families should have the choice—at the expense of taxpayers— to send their students to private schools as an alternative. The voucher program will siphon $10 million dollars away from the public school system in its first year, and is expected to expand in the future.

“School voucher programs have been on the rise since Milwaukee implemented them in 1990, with 13 states and the District of Columbia implementing their own voucher programs since that time.

“Private schools that receive school vouchers are typically subject to few regulatory requirements and are free to create their own standards. While some private schools hold themselves to high quality standards for their teachers and curricula, they are often not legally required to do so.

“Milwaukee has become known for rampant fraud and abuse of its voucher program —and its poor educational outcomes. The founder and principal of Milwaukee’s Mandella School of Science and Math used taxpayer funds to purchase his own Mercedes, and a recent study concluded that Milwaukee students participating in the voucher program performed significantly worse in both reading and math than students in the Milwaukee public school system.

“North Carolina law requires nothing in the way of academic standards, curricula or accountability measures for its non-public schools.”

– See more at: http://www.ncpolicywatch.com/2013/12/12/taxpayer-funds-may-be-funneled-to-home-schools-through-school-vouchers/#sthash.uiR3M0rJ.dpuf

Abraham Lincoln:

“If there is anything that a man can do well, I say let him do it. Give him a chance.”

Martin Luther King, Jr.:

“The function of education is to teach one to think intensively and to think critically. Intelligence plus character–that is the goal of true education.”

My thought:

Do we have the courage, the intelligence, the integrity, and the fortitude to change our vision for education?

Or must we remain mired forever to the petty goals of those who think that the only thing that matters is what can be measured? To the small-minded functionaries who discount imagination, creativity, and wit because they can’t put a number on it?

In Kentucky and New York, the Common Core tests caused test scores to tumble by 30 points or more.

State officials assume–with no evidence–that the scores will go up every year. What if they don’t? What if they go up only by a small increment? What if 50-60% of students don’t pass?

In New York, the “passing” rate on the Common Core tests was 30% statewide. Only 3% of English learners passed, and only 5% of students with disabilities. The pass rate for African American and Hispanic students was 15-18%.

If the state continues to insist upon a wildly unrealistic passing mark, the percentage of students who do not graduate will soar.

If Pearson aligns the GED with the Common Core, a startling number of students will never have high school diplomas of any kind. They won’t even qualify for the military. Will they be doomed to a life of poverty, of working in fast-food shops at minimum wage?

It is time to think of multiple ways to earn a diploma. It is time to think about career and technical education for students who want and deserve a chance to have a fruitful life. It is time to re-think what schools should do in addition to preparing students for college.

School should be a place for opportunity, not a single program–not one-size-fits-all, where the losers end up on the streets with no diploma and no hope.

What exactly is the point of making tests so “hard” that only 30% or 40% or maybe 50% can pass them? What will happen to those who never get a diploma? Do we really want to manufacture failure, knowing that those who fail will be those who already have the fewest advantages in life? As we follow this path, what kind of a society will we be 10 years from now?

This is a very funny
spoof of federal
education policy. Imagine Arne Duncan
and Roger Goodell, the president of the NFL, calling a joint press
conference to announce a new program called Race to the End Zone.
Imagine an agreement that all teams will use the same plays. Now
the NFL will have no failing teams! “We in the NFL love the Common
Core Curriculum that Mr. Duncan is pushing on schools here in D. C.
and in forty-five states,” Goodell continued. “Just as he believes
Common Core Curriculum can save the schools, we believe a Common
Core Playbook will save our struggling teams. Beginning with the
2013 season every coach and every team will use the same playbook.”
The press corps grumbles: “An MSNBC reporter shouted from the fifth
row: “Do you truly believe if all teams run the same plays they’ll
all have the same success?” “Of course,” Mr. Duncan interjected.
“It’s going to work in education, too. I promise. And I went to
Harvard. So you have to listen to me.”

Remember the D.C. Whistleblower? Adell Cothorne was the new principal at a highly-touted elementary school where test scores had gone up and off, off the charts. She said she walked in on a grade-erasure session, where staff members were changing student answers from wrong to right. When she blew the whistle on what she learned, she became a pariah and nearly lost her career. For a time, she ran a cupcake bakery. She appeared on John Merrow’s PBS program about the legacy of Michelle Rhee, telling her story.
Now she is back as an educator.

In this post, Cothorne tells us about her early years as a worker for McDonald’s. she reminds us why thousands of fast-food workers are demanding a living wage of $15 an hour. Employers say the rise in costs would be prohibitive for consumers. But would it? She says no.

Another side to this story, which Cothorne does not explore, is the millions of dollars that the heads of these corporations are paid. When you read about the corporate head of a fast-food chain who is paid $10 million a year while paying workers $7-9 an hour, you have to wonder if they have a conscience.

In 2011, Rocky Killion, the superintendent of schools in West Lafayette, Indiana, had an idea: What if we made our own documentary about the schools? What if we became our own production crew? What if we traveled the country and interviewed experts with our questions?

They did it, and the film premiered in Lafayette to an enthusiastic audience of 1,000 people.

The tile of the film is “Rise Above the Mark.” It was directed by Purdue University student Jack Klink, with author Angie Klink, Jack Klink’s mother was scriptwriter. Political analyst Steve Klink, Angie Klink’s husband, was an executive producer. Emmy Award-winning actor Peter Coyote narrates.

The article says:

“The film was funded completely by donations made to the West Lafayette Schools Education Foundation; no tax dollars were used.

“That’s what the film is about: Let’s have a conversation,” Killion said. “Are we on the right track? If we want to become world class and have the world’s best competitive system, why wouldn’t we look at the best education systems and learn from them?”

“The film opens on an emotional Diana Rathert, a fifth-grade teacher who retired early from WLCSC after 38 years. As Rathert speaks about why she retired, she breaks down into tears.

“I still love what I do and I loved it up until the end,” she said. “But I feel like the legislators have beaten us down, and I hope some way we find a way to fight our way back up to the top.”

“It’s a scene that sets the tone for the 65-minute film, which aspires to shift the national discussion surrounding the education reform movement and speaks out against “corporate reform,” including the increase in public charter schools and an increasing reliance on standardized testing.

“Through stories of those like Rathert’s, the film’s creative team hopes to put a face to those teachers directly affected by reform movements that champion private school vouchers, charter schools and other measures that they say put more restrictions on teachers.”

I was interviewed and I can’t wait to see “Rise Above the Mark.”