This appeared originally in Newsday on Long Island.
Long Island is becoming the epicenter of the Opt Out of Testing movement. Parents who are vocally opposed to standardized testing are running for school boards. Long Island parents are furious at the state’s deluge of tests, especially the most recent Common Core tests, which claimed that most of their children were “failing,” even students who were A students in school. Is everyone lying except the tests? Not likely. How did Commissioner King predict with great accuracy that 70% of the children would fail before they took the test?
Common Core Vs. Common SenseI put a very worried and anxious girl to bed tonight. She’s 7 and in second grade. I am a worrier too, I guess she gets it from me. But in the mid 1980s I was worried about the Barbie outfit I misplaced and whether I’d be able to cartwheel as well as the other girls on the playground at recess. You see, she has her first Common Core math test tomorrow. We have spent the last 2 weeks learning her math work. I say we because I have had to learn it as well. I am a certified NYS teacher and have had to rely on a 7 year old to explain to me how to add 65+7. It’s not as easy as you think.
My heart breaks for her and her fellow students. I have a little girl who loves school. All I want is for her is to go to school happy and come home happy. As far as I am concerned the rest will fall into place. I know what my responsibilities as a parent are in supporting her education. I think if we all reflect back to our elementary school days the best days, and our treasured memories were those days when we did a fun art project on a Friday afternoon, or perhaps we got to play outside for extra recess or maybe we didn’t get to math one day because we were creating costumes for a Thanksgiving play and feast. Are our children going to have positive memories like these to reflect back on?
I feel for all the parents and caregivers who are dealing with tired, frustrated children at the end of a long day, . . . and that’s before homework has even begun. When I was teaching and presented at my Open School nights, I stressed the importance of the home school connection and I have heard the same sentiment from my child’s teachers each year. I want to sit with my child and help her when she needs it. I want her to know I value what she is learning. Now a totally new math curriculum has been thrust upon us. Hey, NYSED, the parents need classes on this stuff too! My daughter continually comes home and tells me “the state” wants the math work done a certain way. Other than naming the state we live in and others that we have visited, I do not think she even understands what “the state” is. She has been told that to do math the way parents have learned is wrong. I tell her that it is not wrong, but is simply a different way of reaching the right answer. I feel hamstringed and trapped, and this is public education! Why are we subjecting our children to this? I guess the next thing we’ll be teaching is a new way to sing the ABC song, starting with the letter m.
I also feel for the teachers who know in their hearts what is developmentally appropriate for a child to be learning. I feel for them because parents are frustrated and taking it out on the teachers. I feel for the principals and administrators who are asking even more from their staff. At my daughter’s open school night I appreciated that her teacher told us what a second grader can handle developmentally. However one week later, out went the math workbook and in came this common core module work using the very concepts the teacher said most second graders couldn’t and wouldn’t understand. Of course these teachers are stressed. I am sure it’s very hard when your job is on the line to not get overwhelmed and frustrated; but the children sense the teacher’s panic. My child doesn’t want to disappoint her teacher, she wants her teacher to be proud of her.
I do not claim to know all about the Common Core, its mission, its purpose or its evolution, but I do know something about common sense and it seems to have been thrust aside. I know that it has made my child doubtful of her abilities. I know it has brought unnecessary stress into her life and I’m mad about that. Does making something harder and more difficult make a child smarter? We want to keep up with the rest of the world but I think 200+ years of American ingenuity and creativity have served to prove that we are quite able to compete in the world around us.
My biggest question is what has changed? Many previous generations have learned without the Common Core. I loved school, and I fear my 3 daughters won’t have those memorable experiences that make school a happy and nurturing place of learning. I taught for over 6 years before staying home with my children. If you asked any of my former students what they came away with from my classroom and teaching, I would hope it is that I made them feel valued, intelligent, and capable. I wanted to instill in them a sense of pride and love of learning, hoping that it would put them on the path to a lifetime journey of learning and personal fulfillment.
Come on parents, we change our shoes if they are uncomfortable. We switch doctors and seek second opinions if we don’t like our course of treatment. Our grocery store loyalty is fickle if we don’t have a positive experience or they ran out of the brand of pasta we like. And here we are sitting back, watching our children suffer.
I prepared questions for this math test tomorrow for my child using the teacher’s study guide. As I sat there with my daughter, who understood the homework each night, I saw fear in her eyes. She blanked. She could not recall how to do any of the math her teacher has spent goodness knows how many hours on these past weeks. My daughter is on overload and her brain cannot filter and process all the information and methods she was inundated with these past few weeks. So, I made a call as a parent, I took the study sheet and questions I had prepared and put it away. She may fail, she may pass. I do not care. She knows her addition facts and we are working on subtraction facts. I am more proud that she thinks of others and is a kind child. And her cartwheels are amazing!!!!

When I was seven (in the 80s), I worried about nuclear war.
While school should yield conscientiousness, it should not create anxiety in children. Yet another reason I am paying close attention before I decide where my youngest will go to school.
Teachers (rolling their eyes) talk about how ridiculous the processes and assessments with CCSS are; but they say they don’t see it changing.
My confidant (my spouse; not a teacher) says that when things are not good, they typically will change. So, I hope he’s right. And I hope parents will keep sharing these stories. Right now, we have leadership trying to convince those who think that what doesn’t seem good, is.
LikeLike
Sadly Joanna…from what I have seen the Private Schools have awesome books and curriculum…small classes and the students learn so very much….
I know a 7th grader that knows more trig than an advanced student in a Public High School..
i know it costs…but to me..it is worth every cent!!
LikeLike
The AIG teacher at the public school where I work yesterday said the same thing. We are exploring all options.
LikeLike
“When I was seven (in the 80s), I worried about nuclear war.”
Joanna, I *almost* made this exact comment in response to the original post. Yes, the fear of global thermonuclear war sort of trumped most other childhood fears in the 80s. I don’t think the older or younger generations can really understand — the older ones think they had the same sword hanging over their heads but my generation had no comforting illusions about the possibility of surviving a full nuclear exchange between the powers. Of course, people born after 1990 have no real concept of the fear we lived under, either.
I sometimes try to explain to my older colleagues how I felt a sense of relief on 9/11, once I realized that it was only some hijacked airplanes crashing into buildings and not what I thought of first when I saw everyone in my building standing frozen and unable to tear their gazes away from the explosions on the televisions.
LikeLike
I remember feeling great elation when the iron curtain fell. And even though the threat of loose nukes can be scary, it was being a child in an era of anxiety where one could imagine the hour long period of knowing an attack had been launched that frightened me. I remember going downstairs late at night crying and my father comforting me by straight talk of the unlikeliness of the dreaded event (kind of like my husband does for me now regarding my anxiety that our son will endure the stress this caring mother has described in her post). For my older two, I shoot straight the way my dad did. I tell the CCSS is a giant experiment and not to worry. And that education is more than school.
We will get through this. Hopefully, we will get beyond it and make the changes parents want. For now I tell my older kids not to worry. If leadership takes us down a bad road, we might have to breathe the dust until they either turn around or get off the road, but we do not have to profess that their road is right just because they want us to.
This is tricky. But smart and compassionate parents like the mom who wrote the post are what will change things!
LikeLike
I love parents like you!!!!
Your comment below
“My daughter continually comes home and tells me “the state” wants the math work done a certain way”
That should never be a part of any math objective.
That is like saying that even if you can figure it out a different way you must use Algebraic Equations.
If this teacher has been told that the state wants it done a certain way this is the most Pathetic approach to teaching math ever used..
You go right ahead and teach your child her math facts and please teach the Multiplication Tables. This method has worked for centuries…but since we already know that it works and have substantial material and methods..it does not bring in the Political Greedy Monsters that have teamed up with the Giant Book Companies to SELL MORE CR*P.
35 teachers told me just last week that they now Hate Teaching!
They hate it..It is no longer any fun for the students or the teachers.
It is Chaotic…It is non creative..It is so poorly written…They raced to get it done and threw it at the teachers…who are supposed to throw it at the students ..who are supposed to absorb the chaos and then pass the most bizarre tests known to man..
LikeLike
From the student’s point of view it really doesn’t matter if it is the state requiring that math be done a “certain way” or the teacher requiring that math be done a “certain way”.
My middle child found our local non-CCSS mathmatics classes extremely frustrating and we moved him out of public school math education as quickly as seemed practical.
LikeLike
As a former math teacher, I am always interested about what is meant when someone says that math must be “done a certain way”. Often I hear that from parents who really mean that their child’s teacher is requiring them to use a method different from the way a parents was taught. A good math teacher will be able to show multiple ways for most every topic (the teacher has to have some way to see that the student-and parent-at least tried the method taught, by showing their work was done “a certain way”), allow students to choose what works best for them (not necessarily the parent), try to move them towards the most efficient method (which may not be the one the parent grew up with,) over time, and accept the right answer however it was arrived at in the end.
LikeLike
Tracy – I cannot speak for others but what I mean is that my child was given a 9-step process for substracting with regrouping. I do not care that borrowing is now called regrouping (that actually makes sense), nor does it bother me that my child is shown other methods. What drives me crazy is that a child is forced to use “number” bonds in a 9-step process when he or she both understands the concept and the computation and has both mastered the number bonds as well as several other more efficient ways of answering the problem. Teach my kid as many ways to subtract as possible, sure…but don’t insist they continue to use convoluted, invented, and arbitrary methods well beyond their usefulness (if they even were ever useful). Showing a child the process of math is one thing…drawing hundreds of “number bonds” is quite another. Most of these processes are foreign to even mathematicians. They may be one way of representing what certain conceptual people are able to do in their head, but the actual steps are invented and exist only in the realm of the curriculum and the test.
LikeLike
I think that a major problem with doing math education is a wide variety of abilities in mathematics, and that can not be eliminated with the elimination of the common core standards.
LikeLike
This is a question that a student brought to me the other day…Alg 2 common core stuff
I only wrote the first part as the rest was too tedious to write.
“Coyote was chasing a road runner, seeing no easy escape, Road Runner jumped off a cliff towering above the roaring river below. Molly Mathematician was observing the chase and obtained a digital picture of this fall.Using her mathematical knowledge, Molly modeled the Road Runner’s fall with the following quadratic functions.”
* This was single spaced and all in the one glob you see above…
And on and on and on…
They had two equations and a bunch of questions
One of the questions is
‘When would the road runner splash into the river?”
Guess this is their real world folks…
LikeLike
This is a perfect example of the convoluted nature of CC math. This is actually a rather simple PHYSICS problem: The square root of (2 x height in meters, divided by 9.8) Time for math teachers to use some science in the classroom.
LikeLike
I guess you’d rather it said something like “an object launched off a cliff, here is a scale drawing of how it fell to the ground below. The following equations apply to this problem, blah blah blah…?
LikeLike
Almost any “problem” has multiple solutions – some better (more efficient; more accurate; more proper; etc.) than others. Would you prefer that a chimpanzee try to perform open heart surgery on you with a fork and butter knife? Just because there are multiple ways to solve a math problem doesn’t mean .it is best practice to teach the inefficent and improper methods. The right tool for the right job, so to speak.
Now instead of the road runner problem I would try it this. I’d show the you tube clip of Felix Baumgartner’s skydive from 24 miles (38.4 km) above the ground on October 14, 2012. Have students select the appropriate formula from the physics reference sheet provided and calculate how long it would take him to hit the ground (assuming he forgot to deploy his parachute. Ouch). My apologies if this
problem makes math interesting to students in a real real world context.
LikeLike
NYS Teacher, my father was a Physics teacher and I am sure he would have approved of the problem you present here. Physics was probably the most fun I ever had with math.
LikeLike
Math being used as a means (in science) instead of an end (math).
Thats why most kids much prefer physics to calculus. CC is littrered with bad examples of mis-applyiing math. A 7th grader asked me for math help – the CC aligned question was requiring a function for detrmining the size of a house addition. Ridiculous. Math educators will lose much of their credibility if they continue to peddle this non-sensical appraoch to their discipline.
LikeLike
I am not sure that you could ever reach a consensus on what might constitute a sensible approach to teaching mathematics. Certainly the approaches used over the last 40 years have all been harshly criticized by different groups.
LikeLike
NYS Teacher…I would definitely want someone like you as the Leader of the Department of Education!!!!!
All of your responses are Brilliant!!!
LikeLike
Thank you. I’m not sure I qualify here in NY – all three of my children attended public schools.
LikeLike
This is unacceptable! The NYDOE and any adult gaga’s (go along to get alongers) should be reported to child protective services for child abuse. I left my job because I refused to be part of this “cult-like” behavior. I’m not asking people to leave their job, but speak up especially for those children that do not have a parent who will or can speak for them. Keep spreading the word and OPT OUT!!
LikeLike
I so agree.
Great idea…report abuse!!
LikeLike
The “Cult-Like Behavior” Jaded mentions here is prevalent across the USA. It is required for the cover-up of routine, acknowledged student abuse, grade and test-score manipulation, permanent record alterations and more…all required in order for NCLB 2014 and Race To The Top scorecard falsification year after year. This is how it is done in order to make the money flow into places where education is no longer the central activity, no matter how the cult characterizes it.
LikeLike
Thanks for posting my piece Diane. Only a short excerpt appeared in Newsday, thanks for sharing the whole piece.
LikeLike
That’s Newsday for you.
Your daughter sounds beautiful. Keep cartwheeling and enjoying her smiles and joy. It’s more important than any tests she’ll ever take.
I always told my students before I was fortunate to retire, “Tests end up in the garbage eventually. Don’t give them too much power. What counts in life is how hard you tried and your character. As a teacher I won’t remember a student’s score in ten years, but I will always remember a good heart, kindness, and what makes the student standing in front of me amazing as an individual.”
LikeLike
Thank you, she is quite a lovely little girl. Great advice, so true. I hope you are enjoying your retirement.
LikeLike
Ellen, Thank you so much for taking the time to express your thoughts and fears and troubling experiences with your daughter. I cannot tell you how I relate to your discouragement. I am a K teacher in Newark. I recently had to implement a paper-based test to my 5 and 6 year olds (I am totally against paper-based tests in K.) Half of the kids were totally confused and frustrated. And I just kept thinking how completely absurd this is! They had to circle the smiley face if the pair of words that I said were rhyming and the frowning face if the words did not rhyme. Sounds so easy, but when those little eyes looked at the two columns of faces, many were confused. The adults who wrote these tests surely were not kindergarten teachers. If so, they would have done away with the paper and “assessed” in another way…if you INSIST on an assessment on rhyming words in October of kindergarten. I hope and pray many more parents will rise up and fight this madness and reclaim childhood for our kids.
LikeLike
The first paragraph (cartwheel part) reminds me of somebody
LikeLike
Here is my idea of how to be heard since the “reform” leaders don’t seem to hear the protests, emails, meetings etc. I call it “The Cupcake Test.” Read below to understand what this test is all about. Perhaps the people in power will start to understand what is important to children, parents, teachers, and schools if they receive cupcakes with a message. For example, a cupcake with “freedom to learn” written upon it. It’s worth a try.
The Cupcake Test
I teach 1st through 6th grade at a private, non-profit Montessori school in Wisconsin. We don’t do any standardized testing of any kind at our school. So let me rephrase my first sentence: I teach all day, every day, for nine months out of the year at a Montessori school.
I love the little bubble that I am so fortunate to go to every day. The children I teach are happy, curious, capable people and I enjoy having conversations, making discoveries, and trying out new things with them. I don’t like to even call them “my students” because so much of what they learn is a result of their own personal quest to know more about the world: past, present, and future. It is a really nice place to work, teach, and learn and I think that they feel the same way.
But I also like to know what is going on beyond this wonderful bubble. Outside of my school bubble, these happy, curious, capable people would be referred to as learners. Outside of the bubble, their knowledge would not be solely for their own personal benefit but used as data. Their experiences would not be unique but standardized, franchised, and homogenized across the county as we, as a nation, collectively run this “Race to the Top.” I wish that every child, teacher, and parent could join me in my bubble. Sorry, everyone else in eduland, you are not invited.
Here is my solution to educational reform that is easy, simple, and cheap. I call it the “Cupcake Test.” How do schools get the things that they really want? Bake sales. If parents, students, and teachers really want something for their school, they hold bake sales. If the cause is really important to them, people will take the time to bring in plates of cupcakes and then other people will buy them. How would the Common Core reform stand up to the cupcake test? Let’s say CCSS vs. fictional books, or CCSS vs. freedom from standardized testing, or CCSS vs. time to get to know each student, CCSS vs. learning just because it is what makes life interesting? Which cause do you think would win?
So here’s my point. Would we as a nation have supported this latest educational reform if it had to be funded by cupcakes or is it being initiated because there is so much corporate funding providing the money? Is it really important to the parents, students, and teachers and did anyone in eduland take a moment to ask them?
LikeLike
I love your analogy! If CC$$ was so good, why did it have to be rammed down our throats?
BTW….I love that you are from a private, non-profit Montessori. Is it associated with a school district, is it a stand alone set up as a non-profit, or is it a publicly funded privately run charter school? Just curious, so many different iterations these days….I sent my children to stand alone non-profit Montessories in 2 states.
LikeLike
We are a stand alone non-profit. We don’t take any federal or state funds or grants of any type. Many years back, there was some pressure for us to become a charter school but our school refused. We enjoy our freedom to teach and are held accountable by our students. They do very well when they leave us.
LikeLike
Just out of curiosity, what is the tuition at your school? The Montessori school in my town charges about $10,000, in line with the other private schools in the area, but I have been told that this is unusually inexpensive.
LikeLike
Our tuition is very low compared to most other Montessori schools (about a third and is listed on our website). Our administrators double as teachers and we utitilize the talents of our staff. I have a degree in music education so I also teach music classes. My assistant teachers have degrees/experience in graphic arts and pe so they double. It is a busy but enjoyable day. We have tried our best to make our school affordable and accessible.
LikeLike
I see it is low at $350 a month (I can’t get to the calendar, but even if it is a twelve month school year that would be less than half the price of my local Montessori school).
I hope it would not be impolite to ask, but what salaries do you offer your teaching staff? I wonder if the other schools pay significantly more for staff with their higher tuition.
LikeLike
The “Cupcake Test” is brilliant! This is an analogy that will strike a cord with all school bakers, past and present.
LikeLike
Just sent your “Cupcake Test” to all our staff.
Will be waiting for the “Duane, do you have a minute?” moment with the principal who will wonder why I’m so negative.
LikeLike
Would you mind, Marianne, if I posted your entire comment as a post on my blog and link back to it here? I like the reference and explanation so much I want it to stand alone. -Brian
LikeLike
Post away!
LikeLike
Love the cup cake test!
Regarding “there is so much corporate funding providing the money”…true. But never all the money. The mandate is always underfunded. The local tax payer will be on the hook for the rest…see under RTT funds.
LikeLike
Brilliant!!!
Those lucky children in the Montessori schools.
I have seen the results of this Real Education!
Teachers will be leaving the Public Schools by the thousands..
Or….some will literally die of the stress of the tests…
LikeLike
“. . . even students who were A students in school.”
Another misuse of “grading”-labelling students with a score or letter grade that they earned on an interaction/producing a product. . A major epistemological mistake is that we attach, with great importance, the “score” of the student, not only onto the student but also, by extension, the teacher, school and district. Any description of a testing event is only a description of an interaction, that of the student and the testing device at a given time and place. The only correct logical thing that we can attempt to do is to describe that interaction (how accurately or not is a whole other story). That description cannot, by logical thought, be “assigned/attached” to the student as it cannot be a description of the student but the interaction. And this error is probably one of the most egregious “errors” that occur with standardized testing (and even the “grading” of students by a teacher).
And: “So the mark [grade/test score] becomes part of the story about yourself and with sufficient repetitions becomes true: true because those who know, those in authority, say it is true; true because the society in which you live legitimates this authority; true because your cultural habitus makes it difficult for you to perceive, conceive and integrate those aspects of your experience that contradict the story; true because in acting out your story, which now includes the mark and its meaning, the social truth that created it is confirmed; true because if your mark is high you are consistently rewarded, so that your voice becomes a voice of authority in the power-knowledge discourses that reproduce the structure that helped to produce you; true because if your mark is low your voice becomes muted and confirms your lower position in the social hierarchy; true finally because that success or failure confirms that mark that implicitly predicted the now self-evident consequences. And so the circle is complete.”
In other words students “internalize” what those “marks” (grades/test scores) mean, and since the vast majority of the students have not developed the mental skills to counteract what the “authorities” say, they accept as “natural and normal” that “story/description” of them. Although paradoxical in a sense, the “I’m an “A” student” is almost as harmful as “I’m an ‘F’ student” in hindering students becoming independent, critical and free thinkers. And having independent, critical and free thinkers is a threat to the current socio-economic structure of society.
LikeLike
Great Thoughts!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
And if a child receives one of these F’s….??
Had one the other day who received an “F”in Academics…
I paid him $8400 for his Construction Company to remodel a part of my house..
None of the PHD’s in my family knew how to do any of that work!
You should have seen the mathematical skills he was using and the invoice he wrote..It was fit for a King..
Smart my a$$…He was smart..
He is not the smart that the ‘One Size Fits All’ Declares but he got the last laugh……….He was laughing at the system….all the way to the bank and to the other jobs he had lined up!!
He told me he will send his kids to a Private School…
LikeLike
I definitely feel for you and your daughter. Here in massachusetts students need to pass their tenth grade MCAS test (ma’s standardized test) in order to graduate high school. Now my daughter who is in sixth grade and will be taking her fourth year in a row of these tests, has suddenly caught on to this requirement. She has spent the past few evenings bringing this up “what if I don’t pass I won’t graduate?”…………*sigh, she’s only in sixth grade!
LikeLike
Please watch this video and share it with your school admins and teachers. It is powerful presentation from a child clinical psychologist about the developmentally inappropriate CCS. She also talks about the math which might help you with your daughter’s teacher.
LikeLike
Erin
I watched this entire video.
Thank You so much for sharing..
Dr Megan Koschnick is brilliant.
She also mentions that how can something be implemented that has not been researched….the children are being used as experimental mice..
I have Said all along these children are being used as guinea pigs..
The parents must be so unaware that their children are being used in an experiment and being exposed to developmentally inappropriate standards…
I hope every teacher and administrator in this country will watch this tape..
I know that Arnie and his Greedy Bunch of Politicians will not give it the time of day!
LikeLike
“Cartwheels? Kindness? When will you humans learn that the ONLY things that matter are test scores, productivity, and being a superior asset to the business community?”
– The NYSED
LikeLike
Indeed: kindness, common sense and playfulness as part of learning don’t “count.”
LikeLike
I guess we can burn the old saying
“All work and no play makes Jack a Dull Boy”
This Over the Top Testing Race will result in the following Jacks..
Dull…Bored..Restless…Unmotivated…Stressed Out…Burned Out…..
which will lead eventually to an adult that is
Insensitive..Hardhearted…Uncaring……
LikeLike
ALL TESTS ARE based on data re percentages of right answers based on pretestin g by item What’s new? Norm referenced tests have been replAced by politicAlly referenced tests
Sent from my iPhone
>
LikeLike
The best line in there was thinking that the kids will learn the ABC song a different way starting with the letter m. Funny thing is, my kindergartner came home the first week of school and explained how they spent time learning the letter t the entire week. That was first. Why?
LikeLike
If they are learning to print, letters such a T, L, H and I are easier. My DD and DS used a book called “Writing w/o Tears” in preschool and they started with T.
LikeLike
And ironically when the kids prepared their Thanksgiving feast and made costumes for their pageant they had not skipped math. The learned math in a way they would be able to remember.
LikeLike
Teaching students math means trying to demonstrate the “why”. Why do we have to do the same thing to both sides? Why do angles all add to 180? Why is multiplication a short cut to addition? Ideally (Gödel’s proofs aside) students will see the axiomatic approach. I will teach how the quadratic formula is derived from completing the square. But I also need to disassemble and reconstitute the lesson for those that don’t see that. Hence, I sing the formula to Pop Goes the Weasel. I give the quadratic formula puzzles.
That is where CCSS undermines the teacher. It dictates how I must teach. And the fatal flaw is not in the standards themselves, but the truth the tests are the real standards. The high stakes tests drive the standards, not the other way around. Teachers are hamstrung – dare try to innovate and you risk professional ruin if your approach conflicts with the assumptions and presentation of math concepts on the PARCC tests. And the added absurdity of it all is that teachers don’t even know what exactly is on the test.
LikeLike
MathVale
You are so correct………………………………..
The teachers have to guess what is on the test.
One standard = 10,000 plus possible questions.
When we take a Driver’s License Test….they give you exactly what you will need to know…
Same with the Real Estate Test….
“The High Stakes Tests drive the Standards”……..Spot on with that comment!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LikeLike
100%. This post reveals the ultimate lie told by CC reformers, “they’re just standards, not a curriculum, just a guidline for teachers, no loss of autonomy” BULLFECES. The test is the curriculum. Ask any HS Regents teacher. Ask any HS AP teacher.
LikeLike
Ironically the new CC exams cannot be taught. They are way too unpredictable, way too convoluted, way too syntax challenged, way too new.
LikeLike
Our current educational system seems to have forgotten one thing. Students no matter what age are individuals. In order to foster a lifelong passion for learning you have to support each individual’s passions. You can’t do that with huge class sizes. You can’t do that when children are pressured to perform tasks that are generally developmentally inappropriate.
Ever heard of Piaget folks? His stages define concrete learning as normal and fundamental from about 4-7. Learning to read so young and do complex math is actually from the symbolic stage which begins as early as 7 but may not begin until 8 years of age. I’ve worked in public schools and in alternative learning environments. I’ve seen homeschoolers that were not pressured to read when they were 5-7 love books and learn to read when they were ready between 8-10. Many European countries don’t even start “formal” education until 7. Rudolf Steiner that developed Waldorf education theorized that children were not ready to read until 7 which had to do with the age at which children are acquiring adult teeth (though some do lose teeth as early as 4).
Why are we in such a rush to deny our children a childhood? The examples the author gave about her education mirror my experience growing up in the 60’s. I don’t remember learning the alphabet, but I do remember playing with blocks, digging in the sandbox, and loving Dr. Seuss books.
I remember how much fun recess was. When I talked to my children when they were in elementary school about their day, what they shared was all the things they did at recess. They didn’t share learning about the sound of m or how to spell long vowel words that have a silent e. These are important skills when you have a reason to read and write. Lets get the kids enjoying books and having a reason to communicate in writing such as writing a thank you note for birthday gifts! The first most fundamental step to developing writing skills is having access to drawing/ painting/ and other mark making materials. Make sure children have lots of access to art materials and open ended exploration. Math is so easy to teach on a concrete level using objects or things like goldfish crackers, graham crackers (basic fractions). And math really is a part of daily life which can easily be incorporated into learning activities such as cooking, sharing a snack, or seeing how many Hot Wheels cars are in the toy bin. Once you’ve counted the the toy vehicles you can sort them, compare them, measure things with them, etc….Making math real would go a longer ways towards mathematical thinking then learning dozens of formulas/algorithms for finding the correct answer.
LikeLike