I received an email from a Montessori teacher in Wisconsin. She asked me to publish this so that Dr. John King, State Commissioner of Education in New York, understands that the Montessori school to which he sends his own children does not have a philosophy aligned with what he proposes for Other People’s Children.
Dear Diane,
John King keeps on saying that Common Core is a lot like Montessori education. I am an upper-level teacher (1st-6th grade) at a private Montessori school in Kenosha, Wisconsin. I have read the CC standards and researched it. Many of our parents are teachers in the public school district and I discuss CC with them. I am reading your book and I can tell you that Common Core is nothing like the Montessori method. There are many differences, but I’ve limited my explanation to how we view homework and assessment in the Montessori classroom. This is also how I explain the differences to parents.
One of the current trends in education, to increase “academic rigor,” has resulted in elementary students receiving more homework on a daily basis. So why do Montessori students receive very little homework? While many schools and teachers feel pressure to assign daily homework, research shows this is actually causing children more harm than good. The harm includes loss of family time, limiting time for unstructured play and exercise, restricting the time that children have to pursue their own interests and self-learning, and most importantly, it kills off a love of learning. Children need to go outside and play. So what is our goal in Montessori schools? It is to help the parents raise a well-rounded, happy person with a healthy dose of curiosity and an everlasting interest in our world.How do we assess the students in the elementary classroom if we don’t give tests? First, let me clarify a common misconception about tests. In a conventional classroom, many of the assessments that students take are standardized tests. The results of these tests are received months after the test is given and are not used by the teacher to determine lesson planning for each student. Teacher-made-tests provide immediate results that are used for grades, but the results usually do not influence the lesson plans for each individual child. In the upper-level classroom, we continually evaluate the progress of each child through observation and discussion: observation of the written portion of the assignment, observation of the student at work, and discussion of the work with each student. We record the progress of each student, with the goal that the student is working at his or her best potential and has mastered the concepts. In order to achieve that goal, we often need to review, re-explain, alter assignments, or choose a material that will show the concept from a different perspective based on the needs of each individual student.
Maria Montessori said that “Before elaborating any system of education, we must therefore create a favorable environment that will encourage the flowering of a child’s natural gifts. All that is needed is to remove the obstacles.” There are many obstacles which may cause a student to struggle but the most common causes are fear and maturity, two factors that greatly determine a person’s ability or inability to learn but are rarely ever considered as relevant to education. In a Montessori classroom, we try to create an atmosphere where it is safe to make a mistake and trial and error is the norm, thus reducing the amount of fear and anxiety. The varied rates of maturity are reflected in the three year time spans of 3-6, 6-9, and 9-12. Montessori teachers evaluate the work habits that enable lifelong learning, independence, responsibility, and kindness.
On my evaluation form, I also include if the student is working for his or her own enjoyment. I must say that my students love coming to school everyday and it is hard for me to get them to leave at the end of the day. Parents have told me that their first graders are sad when it is the weekend because they can’t go to school. Montessori classrooms create a setting for children that is very natural to them and encourages learning, discovery, and creativity. It highly respects and values each child. That is the education that John King’s children are receiving.
Marianne Giannis
Like this:
Like Loading...
Maria Montessori was one of the original and most learned school reformers and her focus was always on the needs of the child and what’s best for children — never on how to make a profit or prove a political ideology correct.
Thank you for this letter, Ms. Giannis. After 20+ years of public school teaching I am working towards Montessori certification and I cannot wait to get into a classroom where I can help children love learning and explore the world again instead of focusing on “data” and “rigor” and test taking.
Reading the works of Maria Montessori has changed my life and renewed my love and excitement for teaching and learning.
Here’s NY Education Commissioner
John King behind-the scenes reacting
to people who attempt to opt out from
testing, or who complain about
Common Core:
Here’s a little history lesson regarding Maria Montessori (from Wikipedia): In 1927 Mussolini established a Montessori teacher training college, and by 1929 the Italian government supported a wide range of Montessori institutions.[66] However, from 1930 on, Montessori and the Italian government came into conflict over financial support and ideological issues, especially after Montessori’s lectures on Peace and Education.[67] In 1932 she and her son Mario were placed under political surveillance.[68] Finally, in 1933, she resigned from the Opera Montessori, and in 1934 she left Italy. The Italian government ended Montessori activities in the country in 1936.[69]
This is what John King really
thinks of parents who “opt out”,
or even complain
about his “education reform.”
http://www.southbronxschool.com/2013/10/fine-dining-with-new-york-state.html
King draws an asinine analogy
between parents bitching about
Common Core, or excessive or
inappropriate-for-grade-level
testing or whatever…
to…
the lack of restraint to a customer
would show at a restaurant when
that customer has a problem with
the wine or food served to him:
http://www.southbronxschool.com/2013/10/fine-dining-with-new-york-state.html
He puts himself in a higher order
of class than those belly-aching
parents because when a waiter
brings him substandard food or
wine… well… in such a situation,
he doesn’t complain, or send it
back. He sits there and eats it
whether he likes it or not…
(*** actual quote… no joke***)
JOHN KING: “When I’m in a
restaurant, and the waiter opens
the bottle of wine for me to taste,
I never say ‘No,’ send it back,
even if it’s horrible. The same
with my meal; if I don’t like it I’ll
eat it anyway.”
AND DAMN IT!!! THAT’S WHAT
THE PARENTS AND STUDENTS
IN NEW YORK STATE SHOULD
DO AS WELL!!!
Then it just proves the fact that this man is a complete fool. You eat and drink something substandard & then actually pay for it. It must be nice to have that amount of money to waste.
Thank you for that letter informing
us about the Montessori approach
“in general”.
I was hoping that someone had
actual information about the Montessori
school where King sends his kids.
So far, I’ve yet to find out exactly
what occurs during a typical
school day at that specific Montessori
school—schedule, curriculum,
activities, subjects taught, etc.
Thankfully, both Montessori’s
official site and its Wikipedia
page details what happens at
almost all Montessori
schools—i.e. the ones that are
functioning in a way consistent
with the Montessori educational
philosophy and methods. If
the Montessori to which King
sends his children does not
operate this way, they are an
exception, and not a true
Montessori school—sort of like
a restaurant purporting be a
McDonald’s and uses the name
McDonald’s, but instead that
sells hot dogs instead of
hamburgers.
However, I was able to discover
a blog post from Carol Burris
who DOES have information about
the Montessori school to which
King sends his kids. It’s at the
top of the COMMENTS section:
http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/finding_common_ground/2013/06/when_the_ny_state_education_dept_complained_about_this_blog.html
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
CAROL BURRIS (regarding the
Montessori school where King
sends his kids):
“A friend whose employee attends
the Montessori School (and
therefore knows that the children
attend it) informed me that the
school does not give all of the
tests at all of the grade levels.
“Teachers are not evaluated by
the scores, nor is the school
evaluated by the scores.
“That has been confirmed.”
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
In the video, King described
his children’s Montessori school
being part of NY state’s
“community of schools”.
Apparently, not all of NYS’s
educational institutions
are in sync with the policies that
King demands that the public
schools follow—i.e. the
non-public school where he
sends his own children.
The article that this COMMENT
is responding to is pretty
incendiary as well. It’s from
the “FINDING COMMON
GROUND” blog written by
elementary school principal
Peter DeWitt.
According to the webpage,
DeWitt “writes about students’
social and emotional health,
and how educators can help
young people find common
ground. He was selected as
the 2013 New York State
Outstanding Educator of the
Year by the School
Administrators Association
of New York State.”
The story is about how
officials from the N.Y. State
Education Dept. harassed
him at his school office in
response to comments he
wrote about… you guessed it…
the subject of King’s sending
his children to a Montessori
school.
The attempts to intimidate,
censor, and implicitly threaten
DeWitt are as creepy as
anything to do with the recent
Town Hall fiasco.
For example, Tom Dunn,
King’s Director of Communications,
volunteered to DeWitt…
“It’s not like I’m going to call your
superintendent … ”
… to complain about DeWitt,
should DeWitt refuse to cooperate
and do what he says—i.e. edit out
the stuff about King’s kids
attending a Montessori school.
That remark has a very mafioso-ish
type ring to it—along the lines of…
“It’s not like we’re going to
and harm your wife and kids if
you don’t play ball with us. We
wouldn’t want anything to happen
to them, now. Would we?”
If you’re not going to do
something, and you’re not
actually threatening to do so,
then why even bring it up?
These are the final paragraphs
of DeWitt’s article in their entirety:
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
PETER DEWITT:
“(Ed. Commissioner King’s)
communications director should
spend less time trying to coerce
and intimidate educational
bloggers who are trying to get
out the truth, and spend more
time listening to the voices of
teachers, parents, students and
principals.
“Collectively, there were thousands
of them who converged on Albany,
NY yesterday for the June 8th Rally.
I hope some leaders from State
Ed were in the crowd because
one thing is for sure…our voices
won’t be stifled. ”
“My concern over the phone call
is ‘what’s next?’ One phone call
for an error. A second one
because I used strong language
or criticized the commissioner?
“What will be the next thing I
write that State Ed does not like?
If there is something untrue about
my blog, post a comment at the
end or send an e-mail like everyone
else.
“My secretary is too busy to take
calls about my blog, nor should
she have to. I don’t post blogs at
school, and my students and staff
are my first priority. We are trying
to meet the deadline of getting
through our End of the Year SLO’s.
“Unfortunately, Mr. Dunn’s phone
call seemed less about correcting
an error (which may or may not be
true) and more about flexing his
NY State Education muscles. We
have about as much time for State
Ed phone calls as they do for
ours.”
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
Again, you can read the whole
thing at:
http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/finding_common_ground/2013/06/when_the_ny_state_education_dept_complained_about_this_blog.html
WHAT HAVE I BEEN DOING???!!!
I’ve been posting the John-King-as-
Hitler video.
As funny and as relevant as the Hitler
video was and is, THESE these are
the videos should have been posting
and that everyone needs to read:
(get a cup of coffee, settle in,
and watch… OVER AND OVER
AND OVER… and take notes)
Here are the links to Parts
2 and 4, which did not get
posted:
These videos definitely have a Southern, conservative focus. It highlights the realization that people are opposing the common core for many reasons and have different rationales for their positions. I can see why Billy and his boys were in such a rush to take the whole process out of the hands of “the people.” If they had to depend on the democratic process, common core wouldn’t exist. While I agreed with much of what was presented, there were many occasions where my New England and Midwest urban/suburban background was not melding with the Georgia narrative. Our founding fathers were very smart to honor a federalist formula.
Maria Montessori said that “Before elaborating any system of education, we must therefore create a favorable environment that will encourage the flowering of a child’s natural gifts. All that is needed is to remove the obstacles.”
Maria has said all that needs to be said…….Amen
Thank you for this explanation of the Montessori philosophy. What parent would not want this for their child? The sad fact is that Commissioner King knows all this, yet continues his attempt to provide ‘other’ children with a package of sad and tired pedagogy that is tied to corporate profit. But I am sure that Dr. King will be recompensed nicely when it is time for him to leave his office. He will walk right into a highly paid job working for one of the profiteers that he has so willingly helped.
The Buffalo Public Schools has a public Montessori, but the ridiculous increase in testing over the past five years or so has pretty much decimated the Montessori components. Do John King’s kids have to Dibel and prepare for state assessments based on CCLS? I think not. This amount of testing does not jibe with Maria Montessori’s philosophy. It runs totally contrary to her method.
Are the public Montessori schools traditional zoned schools where all and only students in the catchment area attend the program or are they magnet programs where families can choose to have their students attend?
Families choose to send their kids there. It is a lottery.
A frequent poster LG has commented that allowing some students to apply and be admitted to schools based on lottery systems creates a group of “have” students and “have not” students. Do you find this to be a problem ?
It is a HUGE problem that there are lotteries in any of the public schools and does create a system of the “haves” and “have nots.” I think that this is a failure on the part of the Montessori community to not speak up against this process. Good education, whether it is Montessori or not, needs to stop being viewed as a finite commodity that we are all fighting over. Gold is a finite element, good public education is in reality, infinite.
What solution would you suggest when the number of students desiring a place in a school exceeds the capacity of the building? The traditional way to fix this would be to redraw the catchment lines, but that also creates “haves” and “have nots”.
Why do there have to be catchment lines and separate charter schools? All you have to do is survey the parents and create the number of classrooms to fit the demand. Yes, it takes time to train the teachers and get all of the materials but the great thing is that once it is in place, there aren’t a lot of additional expenses. Many of the materials can be hand-made in order to make cut back on expenses. The school I work at rents rooms from a Catholic high school; the building is classic 50’s industrial style and works just fine for us. This whole system of charter schools, catchment lines, and lotteries is all fabricated nonsense.
What if there are only ten parents in each elementary school catchment are that wish a Montessori education? What if there are thirty?
I would certainly be content with allowing students to cross catchment lines in order to attend schools that offer approaches that speak to their individual goals and desires, but this is often criticized on this blog as destroying neighborhoods and disadvantaging the students who remain in the neighborhood schools.
Thank you for your eloquent description. Maria Montessori worked hard to understand children. She respected childhood. That couldn’t be more antithetical to the CC standards, implementation, and assessment that is underway.
What a lovely post. If what’s described here, is not happening in all of our schools then this is one good blueprint for how to proceed once we’ve given The Bum’s Rush to the bums.
If John King wants the best for ALL children, he should adopt this system.
EXACTLY Who cancelled the
October parent town hall meetings
sponsored by the New York
State PTA featuring New
York State Commissioner
John King?
King or the PTA leaders? Gates?
If it’s a PTA event, can’t they carry
on without King participating?
Everything’s booked and paid for,
and people have set aside time
to attend.
Since the PTA took a boatload
of Gates money, does the
cancellation of the town halls mean
the PTA is not an independent voice
and representative of the parents, and
instead just puppets of Gates? Or
King? Or whomever?
King’s latest statement is that the
truth is the opposite of this. No,
his latest claim is that those
loudmouth parents who spoke out
at the town hall (in the video) were
phony agents of “special interests”
out to disrupt the event, and deny
“the real parents” an opportunity to
learn and dialogue about Common
Core and school reform. (Is King’s
thought process here the kind of
critical thinking he wants taught in
Common Core?)
A MESSAGE TO ANY OF THOSE
WHO SPOKE ON CAMERA:
Were any of you actual parents?
OR
Were you just pretending to be
parents so you could then disrupt
the town hall event on orders from
your “special interest” masters?
OR
Were you perhaps actual parents
as well as “special interest”
provocateurs out to sabotage
the event, and thus deny
the non-special interest parents
the benefits of the town hall?
Inquiring minds want to know.
And to Commissioner King…
exactly WHO are these nefarious
“special interest” puppeteers who
masterminded the destruction
of the Common Core town hall
event?
Whoever they are, they need
to be rooted out at once, and
exposed for these destructive
forces—the enemies of true
school reform—that they are!
Tell the world!
Let’s study the video once again,
so we can start the process
of identifying and exposing them:
Once those speaking on the
video are subjected to a thorough
interrogation, we can get them all
to “flip”—as they say on THE
WIRE—and give up the names of
those “special interest” bastards who
put them up behave and say what
they did at the town hall!
King’s comments show that he understands neither Montessori nor the Common Core.
It’s breathtaking that we have so many of these entirely clueless people in positions of power and authority in education in the United States, noneducators like Arne Duncan and Michelle Rhee , people have no clue how one creates learners, who seem to think that learning is medicine, that you have to coerce kids to do it–that the primary means at the teacher’s disposal for ensuring learning are surveillance and sanctions. There are many, many of these clueless authoritarian types among the educrats. I suppose, that authoritarian types are, ipso facto, the ones who seek positions of power in our educational systems. Perhaps that’s why one encounters so many such as one moves up the chain of command.
The first schoolbook ever published in the United States contained this line in its alphabet:
“Tell B for the Beast at the end of the wood. He ate all the children when they wouldn’t be good.”
Well, the authoritarians have created unleashed the beast. And the beast is eating our children. It’s time to stop feeding our kids to the maw of the standardized test.
Real learning is not something that is DONE TO YOU, something that you undergo. It is something that you do, something that you undertake, because it’s fascinating and fulfilling. With every lesson, we teach one or the other. Mostly, under NCLB and Common Core, we have taught the former. We have made learning into something that people undergo, under threat. There are many courageous teachers who have continued to teach well DESPITE the standards, DESPITE the tests, DESPITE the goons in their classrooms with their egregious checklists. Blessed are the students of those teachers.
Given the universal praise for the Montessori system here, one has to ask why traditional zoned schools are not Momtessori schools and those that want a Montessori education must go to private, magnet, or charter schools in order to get this education for their students.
That’s a very good question, TE!
I think there are a couple of reasons that the public schools haven’t adopted the Montessori method. The method relies on consistency and sticking to the method, materials, and procedures. The public Montessori teachers are often very frustrated because their administrators aren’t Montessori trained/experienced and the teachers must meet all of the requirements of the public school system, including Common Core and all of the standardized testing while trying to maintain a Montessori classroom. One of the main reasons I left teaching at our public school district is because of the frequent changes that were made without the input from the teachers as well as the yearly staff changes. I felt that I could not progress as a teacher within that system.
The other reason is that the Montessori method is often seen as an education for the elite which ironically, is not why Maria Montessori created it. She developed her method while working with the poor and disadvantaged children of Italy. Perhaps the leaders and heads-of-schools of the American Montessori Society will discuss this on their weekend retreat at the Larimar Resort in the Dominican Republic in January. I don’t know if they will because I work at a small, non-profit school and our administrator doubles as a teacher. Anyway, I will probably be busy shoveling out my driveway that weekend and preparing my lesson plans for the upcoming week. 🙂
The thing is, Buffalo Public Schools was way ahead of the curve decades ago when they created Bennett Park Montessori, a PUBLIC school using Maria Montessori’s methods that was FREE and open to the public’s children. Students received a top-notch education there. However, with RTTT the Montessori method has been watered down to the point that one can barely see Ms. Montessori’s methods through the morass that was created by RTTT. The program will be further decimated with common core and the rest of the ed deform crap that is being pushed down our throats.
MichaelOlaf.net describes Montessori thusly (I like his succinct definition):
“At the under age six level, Montessori emphasizes learning through all five senses, not just through listening, watching, or reading. Children in Montessori classes learn at their own, individual pace and according to their own choice of activities from hundreds of possibilities. The are not required to sit and listen to a teacher talk to them as a group, but are engaged in individual or group activities of their own, with materials that have been introduced to them 1:1 by the teacher who knows what each child is ready to do. Learning is an exciting process of discovery, leading to concentration, motivation, self-discipline, and a love of learning.
Above age 6 children learn to do independent research, arrange field trips to gather information, interview specialists, create group presentation, dramas, art exhibits, musical productions, science projects, and so forth. There is no limit to what they created in this kind of intelligently guided freedom. There no text books or adult-directed group lessons and daily schedule. There is great respect for the choices of the children, but they easily keep up with or surpass what they would be doing in a more traditional setting. There is no wasted time and children enjoy their work and study. The children ask each other for lessons and much of the learning comes from sharing and inspiring each other instead of competing with each other.
Montessori classes place children in three-year-or-more age groups (3-6, 2.5-6, 6-12, and so on), forming communities in which the older children spontaneously share their knowledge with the younger ones. Montessori represents an entirely different approach to education.”
I don’t think it is difficult to see why this system was tried and ultimately rejected by the public education establishment, which instead chose to follow the Austrian industrial model instead. There is no need for a huge, ever-growing bureaucracy to “oversee” and control Montessori schools. Graduates of Montessori schools do not make good drones and worker bees: they question, research, and work independently and that is the exact opposite of what the proponents of the industrialized model of education had in mind: they wanted minimally trained workers who would follow orders without question (John King, anyone?) and who would be able to function in their role of making profits for their “betters” with loyalty to them and the state. That is why Montessori was not universally embraced.
Some of the most successful business and political leaders of our time were educated in Montessori schools including Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos, Google founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin, Julia Child, Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales, Princes William and Harry, and Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis.
According to inlyschools.org, Alexander Graham Bell founded two of the first Montessori schools in the U.S. and Canada.
Thomas Edison founded a Montessori school in the U.S.
Jean Piaget, noted psychologist, was head of the Swiss Montessori Society. Woodrow Wilson created a Montessori classroom in the basement of the White House for his daughter.
Why Montessori in the USA evolved into a private school system for the wealthy elite is the story of what has happened socially and economically in the United States of America since the early 20th century; they want the best for their children but the minimum industrialized model is good enough for everyone else’s children. That’s what the reform movement is all about today. Nothing has changed.
What has prevented a local school district or even a state from adopting the Montessori approach (or Waldorf or progressive) for all public schools?
On a humorous note, I just found
this over at STUDENTS LAST:
————————————————
THE KING’S DICTIONARY:
New York – The reigning Commissioner of Education for the State of New York, John King, has released the following dictionary of terms that he would like distributed at any other town hall meetings he deigns to attend.
accountability — fireability, what the King is above
child — learning unit available for sale to corporations (notable exceptions include: King’s child(ren))
critical voices — that to which the King is deaf
democracy — a form of government in which people choose their leaders and their leaders choose not to listen to them because it is time-consuming and inconvenient
dissent — that to which the King is impervious
education — marketplace
educators — pawns
experience — overblown requirement for teaching
evidence — that which does not exist to support the use of Common Core Standards
knowledge — facts, information and skills not necessarily required before implementing state-wide learning standards
money — short cut around democratic process
parent — easily manipulated adult unit in charge of child (see above)
Ravitch — she who must not be named
respect — what silent acquiescence shows
rigor — developmentally inappropriate
schooled — what the King got on October 10, 2013 in Poughkeepsie, NY
special interests — those who disagree with the King’s policies
Town Hall meeting — gathering at which the King speaks and you listen
——————————————–
This is at:
http://studentslast.blogspot.com/2013/10/the-kings-dictionary.html
There were several town halls
scheduled to sell Common Core to
the parents of New York state
schoolchildren. N.Y. State Education
Commissioner was the presenter,
with the events organized and
presented by the N.Y. State PTA.
However, after yesterday’s first
suchtown hall, N.Y. State
Education Commissioner King
strong-armed the N.Y, State PTA
into cancelling the remaining town
halls with the following statement:
https://www.facebook.com/nyspta
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
“While our goal was to provide
an opportunity to learn and share,
based on review of the initial
October 10 meeting, the
Commissioner concluded the
outcome was not constructive
for those taking the time to
attend.
“Please know that NYS PTA
will continue to work with all
education and child advocacy
partners to keep our members
updated andinformed on
education, health, safety and
welfare issues affecting children
and families.
“We apologize for any
inconvenience this may cause
and express our sincere
appreciation to those who have
given their time to assist with
organizing this initiative.”
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
Well, you can “review” for yourself
the crucial final 20 minutes of
yesterday’s town hall here—
the colorfully titled YouTube video
“Commissioner King Gets Spanked”:
This meeting was a Rhee-like
farce where King spoke for 2
hours straight, and was scheduled
to to be followed by 1 hour of
public comments and questions.
Note that… ***was scheduled to
be followed…***
The best laid plans…
Indeed, 20 minutes in, neither
King nor the NYS PTA
moderator “could stand the
heat, so they got outta the kitchen.”
They were totally unprepared by
how well-informed and
onfrontational these parents were.
At about the 10 minute mark, one
parent brought up the fact that King
sends his own kids to a Montessori
School which has a curriculum that
is the antithesis of Common Core
as a Montessori school is…
(to quote its wikipedia entry)
– – – – – – – – – – – – –
“… characterized by an emphasis on
independence, freedom within limits,
and respect for a child’s natural
psychological, physical, and social
development….
“… and has these elements
as essential:[1][2]
” — Mixed age classrooms, with
classrooms for children aged
2½ or 3 to 6 years old by far the
most common
“— Student choice of activity
from within a prescribed range of
options
“— Uninterrupted blocks of work
time, ideally three hours
“— A Constructivist or ‘discovery’
model, where students learn
concepts from working with
materials, rather than by direct
instruction.
“Specialized educational materials
developed by Montessori and her
collaborators
“— Freedom of movement within
the classroom
” — A trained Montessori teacher
“In addition, many Montessori
schools design their programs
with reference to Montessori’s
model of human development
from her published works, and
use pedagogy, lessons, and
materials introduced in teacher
training derived from courses
presented by Montessori
during her lifetime… ”
– – – – – – – – – – – –
This disclosure and implied attack
on King pretty much ended things.
King made the dubious claim that
his Montessori school scrupulously
follows “Common Core”
“This totally enraged the audience
of parents as it was and is a
ludicrous and demonstrably false
claim that was rightly met with
skepticism and loud booing,
enraging the crowd… if for
no other reason that folks
don’t like to be lied to or have
their intelligences insulted.
The flustered moderator then
quickly wrapped it up, “We’re going
to allow two more people to speak.”
At which point people began
screaming even louder:
“WHAT HAPPENED TO ‘ONE
HOUR’ ?!!!”
This is absolutely riveting video.
Again, you can see that crucial
final 20 minutes at:
from:
http://perdidostreetschool.blogspot.com/2013/10/commissioner-john-king-throws-gasoline.html
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
Saturday, October 12, 2013
Commissioner John King Throws Gasoline Onto The Common Core/inBloom/Endless Testing Bonfire
The only thing worse that NYSED Commissioner John King could have done after his meltdown in Poughkeepsie the other night, where he threatened to take his microphone and lectern and go on home if the audience didn’t sit quietly and let him pontificate about the wonders of Common Core, Endless Testing and the inBloom data base, was to cancel the remaining meetings with parents across the state.
One major criticism King and NYSED, along with Merryl Tisch and the Board of Regents, have been taking over their education reform agenda is how they have rammed it down the throats of students, parents and teachers in the state without taking into consideration any of the cares or concerns of the other stakeholders.
By canceling the remaining PTA-sponsored town hall meetings with the public, King reinforces the meme that SED officials are out of touch and do not care one whit what anyone outside of their own offices or the Gates Foundation thinks about their education policies.
The smart move would have been to take the verbal beating in Poughkeepsie, take the verbal beatings elsewhere, acknowledge some of the concerns and say “Oh, we’ll conduct a study over that…” or something to that effect and just keep on keeping on like they’ve been doing.
But Commissioner King is not a smart man, certainly not politically at any rate, because he did the absolute worst thing possible in these circumstances – he took his microphone and lectern and went back to Albany in a huff, canceling the rest of the town hall meetings and underscoring in one feckless act how little he cares about what the public thinks and how little he can handle criticism or challenge.
As Leonie Haimson put it in this post:
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
“These cancellations have provoked even more anger and resentment, with parents saying that while King won’t allow their schools or children to opt out of the Common Core, standardized testing or data sharing with vendors, he is opting out of an important dialogue with parents.
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
Leonie says there is one meeting that was not sponsored by the PTA that King is still slated to attend – October 15 in Oyster Bay, co-sponsored by Senator Marcellino.
If King was a smart man, an astute politician, he would attend that meeting and make believe he actually cared what the attendees were telling him there rather than act as he did in Poughkeepsie and get all defensive and snooty about things.
He can take some of the fuel off the Common Core/inBloom/Endless Testing Bonfire by acting like most politicians and making believe he cares what people think and feel about these issues rather than showing how little cares about what the public thinks or feels about them.
In other words, he would fake it.
Not that faking that he cares when he really doesn’t would put an end to the criticism and the fight SED and the Regents are going to takeover their education reform agenda.
It won’t – not with parents in the affluent suburbs up in arms over the agenda.
But it certainly would put a little bit of a damper on the tumult and fury King set off with his imperious act in Poughkeepsie the other night.
We’ll see if he even shows up to October 15 meeting and then, if he does, how he handles criticism.
As of now, King is making things worse for himself and his compatriots in reform at SED and the Board of Regents.
King = FARCE!
Why does this organization say that the Montessori method in public schools CLEARLY supports the Common Core? I find this very unsettling that these two can be validated as being in alignment…more PR to counter any objection to this ed reform movement.
http://www.public-montessori.org/resources/common-core-state-standards
This website also lists an article about the accomplishments of Recovery School Districts in Tennessee. I questioned the director, Keith Whitescarver, why they are supporting this but my comments were never posted. He responded to me via email and said that the article is not necessarily an endorsement by AMS. I am not sure what purpose this foundation serves. I also questioned the American Montessori Society why they were posting Common Core webinars on their website and offering professional development hours to AMS members for attending these webinars.
The so-called “Achievement School Districts” in Tennessee are too new to have any accomplishments. Don’t believe the hype.
I read the documents and from their explanation I gleaned this:
“Challenges with Correlation
Demonstrating how the Montessori Approach meets and exceeds the Common Core Standards was a challenge on several fronts. This educational approach or curriculum as we have referred to it in this document does not come in a clear-cut, pre-packed format with lists of activities and lessons. Trained Montessori teachers however, create curriculum albums for the age-ranges they are being trained in: 0-3, 3-6, 6-9, 9-12 and Adolescence. Each album covers a certain subject area and is filled with lesson information on every material and skill concept, along with extensions to these materials and concepts, direct and indirect aims of the materials and sequence to which they are to be shown to the children. This makes lesson referencing difficult in this correlation as lessons have specific names that are sometimes only recognizable by trained teachers and children in Montessori classrooms.
The presentation of the Montessori curriculum within the classroom setting is also different from other educational models. While teachers are acutely aware of each child’s place in their educational journey, they do not create lesson plans that are applicable to the entire class. Each child is learning at his or her own pace. Children are more self-directed and allowed to choose works within the age- appropriate classroom structure. This promotes much independence, self-worth and recognition of skill development; all named outcomes of the Common Core Standards.”
It is sad that these Illinois Montessori schools feel the pressure of the Gates/Broad driven reforms so acutely that they were forced to create this document to “prove” that public and charter Montessori schools meet the unproven, unscientific, and untested CCSS.
I hope that these people, whose intentions seem to be sincere and honest, realize that the reform borg will not be satisfied with their production of this document and they will eventually be forced to abandon all semblance of Montessori methods in favor of Gates-funded “best practices”. They have, perhaps unwittingly, sold their souls to the devil as have all the Gates-controlled professional organizations from the AFT and NEA to the NCTE and NTCM and ASCD. I hope the rest of the Montessori community stays far, far away from the poison of CCSS and reform to preserve the purity of Dr. Montessori’s brilliant program.
True Montessori schools should never feel the need to PROVE how they relate to CC$$. Either you agree with their child-centered, individualized method or you don’t. To work along side CC$$ is to totally reject what Montessori has to offer…it just isn’t Montessori at that point.