Jason Stanford listened to Arne Duncan’s put down of the “armchair pundits” who oppose Duncan’s obviously brilliant plan to reform American education. How can we forget how Duncan saved the Chicago public schools? But I digress.
Stanford, a veteran journalist in Austin, describes himself as an “armchair dad” of children in the public schools of Texas.
He has news for Secretary Duncan. Texans are sick of testing. They do not share the Secretary’s enthusiasm for the super-duper tests that will make all children college-and-career ready and tell us the truth that all the previous tests failed to tell.
Stanford points out that the Texas legislature reduced the number of tests needed for graduation from 15 to 5, in response to massive protests by parents and local school boards. The people of Texas said “enough is enough.”
But that’s not all.
Astonishlngly, the legislators “even made it illegal for testing lobbyists to give them campaign contributions, a rare move in a state notably hostile to limits on lobbying, business or giving them money.”
But that’s not all.
Stanford writes:
“The only thing wrong with these limits on school testing, say Texans in a recent poll, is that they didn’t go far enough. The Texas Lyceum polled 1,000 adults and found only 14% said the legislature should have left the 15 tests in place, and slightly more (17%) liked the changes. The shock of the poll is that 56% of Texans wanted either to get rid of standardized tests entirely because they encourage “teaching to the test” or leave accountability standards up to local school boards.
“That’s a lot of armchair pundits.”
Arne Duncan’s love of high-stakes testing has had real world consequences. It has hurt children. It has labeled them as dumb and caused many to give up. It has caused many youngsters to be denied a high school diploma whose lives will be blighted because they couldn’t pass one of the five mandated tests.
Stanford writes why this matters:
“More than a third of Class of 2015—a group of Texans equal to the population of Abilene—currently won’t graduate because the students have failed at least one state test and two subsequent retests. In elementary school, a quarter of the state’s fifth graders will be held back because they failed the reading test. In the eighth grade, a third of all black and poor students have failed the state’s math test.
“Either those scores are signs that two decades of test-based accountability has utterly failed to improve education for underserved populations, or they are proof that test-based accountability is a faith-based ideology with less credibility than believing that marking your child’s height against a wall causes him to grow. You don’t need to sit in an armchair to think that a system that excludes a third of a state’s population from public education might be a sign that you need to re-examine the basic assumptions underlying education policy.”
Diane, this is from today’s Playbook….
LEHANE WILL LOVE: SHAQ ENDORSES CHRIS CHRISTIE! Ad by Russ Schriefer, with Shaquille O’Neal as the only voice: “I don’t endorse many politicians. But Chris Christie is different. He’s working with me to bring jobs back to our cities, and on a new program to help kids in tough neighborhoods get ahead. Governor Christie’s provided more funding for schools, given parent MORE choices in what schools their kids can go to, and merit pay for good teachers. He’s a good man. Excuse me – he’s a GREAT man. Please join me in supporting Chris Christie – the governor.” See the ad. http://goo.gl/LEsWl9
Oprah loves Christie, too. (And Corey Booker does as well.) Christie is the go-to guy for minorities who have amassed fortunes and become conservative, so that they can be assured of holding onto their hordes. The rest is smoke and mirrors.
CT, I’d be cautious about grouping “minorities who have amassed fortunes and become conservative.” Many who have become successful have spent their lives giving back. This includes the waves of immigrants over the past 150 years. Cory Booker has shown enormous personal courage, even though he might not yet understand the importance of saving public education. In Christie, we have a challenge: how do we turn a very popular (as proved by Tuesday’s election) leader into a listener? It’s an education job and as teachers, we know how challenging it is to educate the unwilling. We are so fortunate that Diane Ravitch has led the movement in changing the public narrative (via Christie-confronter Melissa Tomlison). It seems to be catching on. Thanks so much for your comment CT:)
ER, I have friends who are minorities and decided to turn Republican once they amassed their wealth, which they told me they did precisely so they could hold onto it. That’s not uncommon these days, particularly amongst African Americans, who have long been a progressive stronghold in the Democratic party. Glenn Ford from the Black Agenda Report talks about that. He describes how Cory Booker was bankrolled by the right-wing Bradley foundation, early in his political career, for the purpose of getting black Democrats onboard with corporate education “reform”, back when privatization was just being peddled by the GOP –so Booker knows very well what he is doing. See:
Jason Stanford’s sentence “More than a third of Class of 2015—a group of Texans equal to the population of Abilene—currently won’t graduate because the students have failed at least one state test and two subsequent retests.” brings up the interesting question of what all students awarded a high school diploma should be capable of doing academically.
The tests these kids are failing are not testing regular reading, writing and math skills.
Instead, the tests are tricky, wordy and contain excessively difficult questions.
So, if you want to kick a bunch of kids to the curb and deny them a high school diploma because they haven’t mastered the nuances of college-level math and deep-structure grammar (think Chomsky), then wow. Just wow.
A HS grad should be able to do basic academic work–not college-level work. But if the deformers keep the tests basic, then they can’t call teachers failures and swoop in to steal our tax money.
I think you may be reading more into the posting than is there. You say that a HS grad should be able to do basic academic work, and I agree, but the post does not say which exams the students have failed three times or what standards are used to determine failure.
You claim that mastery of college level math (I wish for mastery of traditional high school level math. A third of the incoming class at my university must take remedial mathematics classes. Some community colleges offer classes in “college arithmetic” and have workshops in fractions) and mastery of deep-structure grammar is required to pass the tests, but there is no evidence, at least in this post, that mastery is what is being required.
Another interesting question is who should decide what all students awarded a high school diploma should be capable of doing academically.
Of course the standard feel good response is to say something vague and democratic-sounding like “parents and educators not corporate billionaires and their for-profit corporate corporations of corporate-ness!!!”, but I’m looking for something more specific.
No surprise. Obama dissed bloggers the other day. He said, “All of us need to stop focusing on the lobbyists and the bloggers and the talking heads on radio and the professional activists who profit from conflict, and focus on what the majority of Americans sent us here to do,”
Most bloggers I know of are just regular people who have to pay out of their own pockets to blog and don’t make any money from doing so, let alone a profit.
So sue him, George. Why have you held onto that for so many years, if you think it could take him down?
I wish Indiana would follow. Am afraid that will not happen.
but
one never knows. We must keep the faith and keep trying.
What out testing, charters, and racing to the top what else is Mr. Duncan going to talk about — he’s knows nothing about curriculum and instruction and has no classroom experience. With his background his nothing more than an armchair manager.
Teaching economist, I suspect you work at a low to mid-tier state school given your students? We don’t live in first world country. You want first world students, a country needs a dynamic, balanced economy with a vibrant, organized labor force. Fat chance of that happening in English-speaking countries.
This is a thrust that public education may need to take to survive: play by the same rule book as the privatizers: cherry pick students. In PISA’s vaunted E. Asia that is the system, kids are streamlined early to different schools out of sight. It’s harsh, but we’re talking about the very survival, and hence the last chance of an educated populace, of public education.
Actually I teach at the state flagship university, a research one school in the old Carnegie classifications. We do have very minimal enterence requirements and that results in an unusually wide distribution of student preperation..