Archives for the month of: September, 2013

We all have heard or read or seen the stories in the mass media about the “miracle” in New Orleans. Hurricane Katrina, which Secretary of Education Arne Duncan called the best thing that ever happened to education in that city, wiped out public education and the teachers’ union. Now New Orleans is the only city where more than 75 % of students are in charter schools with minimal government regulation.

Experienced journalist and scholar Andrea Gabor here goes behind the curtain and takes a closer look than Oprah or the other high-profile celebrants of the “miracle.” Her article appeared in Newsweek-The Daily Beast. (I link to another site here because I had trouble opening the Daily Beast site.)

In a tour de force of investigative journalism, she takes a close look at what is happening in the best charters (typified by a degree of regimentation that most parents would abhor), and what happens to the thousands of kids who disappear and are not included in the statistics.

She concludes:

“In New Orleans, critics argue that the pressure to show high test scores and get kids into college, combined with the broad leeway given to charter schools to suspend and expel students, means the “difficult to teach” kids have been effectively abandoned. New ideas on how to teach disruptive and unmotivated students have not emerged from charter schools,” charges Barbara Ferguson, a former superintendent of public schools in New Orleans and a founder of Research on Reforms. “Whether the difficult-to-teach high school students are expelled by charter schools or whether they attended schools closed by the RSD, they are an outcast group, thrown into an abyss … Neither the RSD nor the state Department of Education tracks these students to determine if they ever enter another high school.”

“But even for students who don’t fall through the cracks or get expelled, it bears asking: have the pressures and incentive systems surrounding charter schools taken public education in the direction we want it to go? Anthony Recasner, a partner in founding New Orleans Charter Middle School and FirstLine, is visibly torn between his hopes for the New Orleans charter experiment and his disappointment in the distance that remains between today’s no-excuses charter-school culture and the movement’s progressive roots. “Education should be a higher-order exploration,” says Recasner, a child psychologist who left FirstLine in 2011 to become CEO of Agenda for Children, a children’s advocacy organization. The typical charter school in New Orleans “is not sustainable for the adults, not fun for kids,” says Recasner, who is one of the few African-American charter leaders in New Orleans; his own experience as a poor child raised by a single parent mirrors that of most students in the charter schools. “Is that really,” he asks, “what we want for the nation’s poor children?”

Heather Vogell, a reporter for the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, has spent a year studying the testing industry.

The series she is writing about testing for the Atlanta Journal-Constitution should receive a Pulitzer Prize. See here and here.

What she has uncovered is that the tests are flawed, that errors are common, and that students are denied a high school diploma because of errors made by the testing companies.

When I read about students who dropped out of school because they failed a test–because the test answers were wrong or mis-scored–it makes me feel that the testing companies should be subject to criminal prosecution.

Those students will not have a diploma, they will not be able to go to college, they will not be able to get a good job to support themselves and their family, because of a bad standardized test.

Let me repeat: Testing companies that inflict real harm on real people should be subject not just to fines, but to criminal prosecution.

The testing industry is ruining the lives of other people’s children while they rake in profits.

And they suffer no consequences. Only the students do.

Let’s face it, folks.

Our nation is overdosing on standardized tests.

Why?

Because the people in charge–in Washington, D.C. and in the state capitols–don’t trust teachers.

They don’t trust teachers to make their own tests, as teachers did for generations, and as teachers in other nations still do.

This has to stop.

Start planning now for the spring testing season.

Opt out.

Do not let your child take the state tests.

Do not administer the tests.

Encourage your school to opt out.

Encourage your entire district to opt out.

Stop the machine.

Stop the destruction of the lives of children and  young people.

Take control away from the technocrats and demand a real education, not a system whose only purpose is to rank and rate students based on flawed instruments.

As readers know, John Merrow decided yesterday to post a blog in which he gratuitously insulted me by comparing me to a politician on the far right and implied we represented extremes and neither of us was a hero. This came out of the blue. I used to think of John as a friend, but friends don’t insult friends. He also insulted readers of my blog, suggesting that like Senator Ted Cruz’s followers, they are all closed minded. We are, he says, on “the left,” while Cruz is at the other extreme. He much prefers Dave Levin, one of the founders of KIPP, whom he holds up as an exemplar of “the messy middle.”

The insults came so thick and fast that it was hard to sort them out. My readers are not leftists. They are teachers, parents, students, administrators, and ordinary people who don’t like to see their local public schools closed down or taken over by a private charter corporation like KIPP.

I am a scholar and a historian. I don’t like the status quo of the past dozen years. I think our policymakers are doing serious harm to children, teachers, schools, and communities. It is outrageous that they call these policies “reform,” when it would be more accurate to call them “destruction.” They are destroying childhood. They are destroying creativity. They are destroying love of learning. They are maligning public education. They are demoralizing teachers and principals and destroying the education profession.

Through my blog and my books, I have tried to present evidence and research, not just opinion. When I express opinion, it is based on evidence. Dispute the evidence, if you will, but don’t resort to ad hominem attacks.

I invite my readers to read the comments following John’s post. Not many agree with what he wrote.

“Reign of Error,” released September 17, debuts at #10 on New York Times’ bestseller list!

Thanks to all the fabulous education bloggers who spread the word.

Since I started this blog, I have periodically named people as heroes of American education because they have been courageous in standing up for the rights of children, for good education, and against powerful and misguided policies that do harm to children and public education. Some have risked their careers and liivelihoods. They deserve recognition.

Now along comes John Merrow, whose work I have often praised, comparing me on his blog to the Tea Party extremist on the right Ted Cruz.

Merrow also takes a gratuitous slap at people who support my views, calling us leftists. That’s wrong. I speak up on behalf of educators And parents, not the left or the right or any political faction.

I was stunned. I sent him the following response.

“John

I was hurt by your comparing me to Ted Cruz

Very offensive

I have no staff, no funding. I take insults and abuse on a daily basis. I am 75 years old and doing what I think is right.

I don’t claim to be a hero

I haven’t taken a bullet like the staff at Sandy Hook

I regularly name hero superintendents and parents and teachers who have the courage to speak up for what’s right

I was about to write a column naming you a hero for your pursuit of the truth about DC and the obloquy you took

No point to that now

I just don’t understand your sly putdown of me

Diane”

A reader writes:

 

In my daughter’s Kindergarten class here in Palm Beach County, Florida, she just had her first test–in Kindergarten!!! Each student was separated by a cardboard wall of blinders around them and they were given a five page test on numbers one through five. They had to write the number, the word for the number and draw how many dots represented the number. At a local union meeting, I asked a Kindergarten teacher from another school if she did that in her classroom–surround each student by blinders. She nodded in affirmation. We’re told “They have to be prepared to be tested in first grade.” I remember when I went to Kindergarten in the sixties. Kindergaraten was a half a day. We played with blocks, wooden choo choo trains, had snack and naptime. The teacher tried to teach us how to tell time, but I couldn’t make heads or tails of it. I never went to preschool. About midway through first grade, my learning clicked and I took off and I haven’t stopped learning ever since. What’s the rush? Why can’t the kids have a chance to be kids? We’re told they have to be prepared for 21st century jobs, for a global workforce? You mean, the global workforce that ships American jobs over seas for dirt cheap wages? You mean the global workforce that hides their money overseas in various tax shelter schemes to avoid paying taxes to help the American people (or people in any country!). You mean the global workforce that exploits people rather than serves them? You mean the global workforce, led by bankers, that created a casino economy, wrecked the entire global economy and received a bailout at public expense while people who purchased homes were left with underwater mortgages? Is that the global workforce we’re preparing our kids for? No thanks. I want my daughter to develop a kind heart, to think of others and to make the world a better place for all, not to be a pawn for profit-making schemes of education testing vultures.

A reader sent the following comment, which includes a very disturbing document. The founder of the Pennsylvania Cyber Charter School in Midland, Pennsylvania, was indicted and accused of siphoning some $8 million from the school’s accounts. The school has (still has) over 10,000 students and an annual income of $100 million. Bear in mind that virtual charters do not have the expenses of brick-and-mortar public schools: no library or librarians; no school nurse or guidance counselors; no custodians; no heating bills; no fields to maintain; etc. Yet they collect the same state tuition as if they had all the same expenses.

Here is the reader’s comment:

Speaking of cybercharters, the affidavit in the PA fed case was unsealed. It’s a good read. Trombetta boasts that he is moving into Florida. It appears to me that they intended to shut down the PA and OH operations and move to a state where there was less, ahem, HEAT.
You’ll come away wondering why it took a decade to conduct even a cursory review of the financial transactions, or why there was no action by the state of PA.
They wiretapped phones, so there’s a lot of dialogue.
My favorite part is where the digital learning pioneer tells one of his criminal associates he can no longer accept bags of cash in the Pizza Hut parking lot.

http://ae3b703522cf9ac6c40a-32964bea949fe02d45161cf7095bfea9.r89.cf2.rackcdn.com/2013/261/187/affidavit-unsealed-in-the-nick-trombetta-criminal-investigation.pdf

Yes, there are charter schools that serve all kids. Yes, there are good charter schools that are not trying to drive the public schools out of existence.

But then there are the profiteers, who have spotted the charter industry as a chance to make money.

Surprise of surprises, this critical review of the profiteers appears in Forbes magazine. Fat City, indeed!

Regular readers of this blog know some of these stories. They know about green cards for foreign nationals who invest in charter schools. They know about the New Market Tax Credits. They know that sports figures without any educational qualifications are opening charter schools instead of summer camps. They know that the online corporation K12 pays its CEO$5 million, but did you know his pay is tied to recruitment, not to academic performance?

A few more new items:

“Charter schools are frequently a way for politicians to reward their cronies. In Ohio, two firms operate 9% of the state’s charter schools and are collecting 38% of the state’s charter school funding increase this year. The operators of both firms donate generously to elected Republicans.”

And:

“The history of publicly traded charter school firms is limited and ugly. Edison Schools traded publicly from 1999-2003. During that period, it reported one profitable quarter. Shares reached nearly $40 in early 2001… only to crash to 14 cents.”

And this:

“For now, the big money in charter schools is confined to those on the inside. In late 2010, Goldman Sachs announced it would lend $25 million to develop 16 charter schools in New York and New Jersey. The news release said the loans would be “credit-enhanced by funds awarded by the U.S. Department of Education.” Of course.”

And this:

“In Florida, the for-profit school industry flooded legislative candidates with $1.8 million in donations last year. “Most of the money,” reports The Miami Herald, “went to Republicans, whose support of charter schools, vouchers, online education and private colleges has put public education dollars in private-sector pockets.”

But, as the article says, both Democrats and Republicans have joined the game.

Howard Blume reports that students in many districts quickly cracked the security code on their shiny new iPads. Now they are using them for Facebook, music, gaming, whatever.

Thanks, citizens of Los Angeles!

Too bad the district can’t afford to repair its buildings or reduce class size or hire arts teachers.

Have fun, kids. Just make sure you don’t lose your new toy.

At the 2012 Democratic national convention, the governor of
Massachusetts raved about the success of a school called Olive
Gardens, where the 80% of the staff was fired, and many
inexperienced TFA were brought in. EduShyster points out that
the
Charlotte M. Murkland Elementary School is even more
successful, yet there were no shoutouts at the Convention, no trips
to the White House, no national press coverage. I wrote a post about
the Murkland school based on a story in the Lowell newspaper.
EduShyster has visited the school many times. In her post linked
here, she explains the ten ingredients that created a dramatic and
genuine success story. Here is ingredient number 10: “10. Speaking
of Time, this Miracle Didn’t Happen Overnight The Murkland’s
turnaround began in 2009 and the school has showed steady and
impressive growth each year since then. Which means that the
school’s success isn’t short term or illusory. And that may be the
very best part of this story.” Read her post to learn about the
other 9 crucial elements of sustained and sustainable
change.