This was written by Raniel Guzman, who is a teacher in the School District of Philadelphia and an adjunct professor at Esperanza College of Eastern University:
May 100 % of your students score proficient or above on standardized tests by 2014.
An attributed Chinese proverb is often wished upon one’s enemies by asserting, may you live in interesting times… This understated “curse” levied upon one’s enemies has a restrained Buddhist sensibility even as one wishes ill toward others. Educators today are indeed living in interesting times. Students and parents are certainly living in interesting times as well. However, the curse placed upon us all is not restrained but rather overt.
The curse is well known to educators and asserts the following, may 100 % of your students score proficient or above on standardized tests by 2014. So then, who has placed this “curse” upon us all? I am certain we can think of obvious enemies. Nonetheless, I am not certain many of us are thinking about the less obvious and thus more lethal enemies. They give politically correct speeches, and radiate a fatherly presence. Their threat resides precisely in the proximity to their victims, namely us. We often develop a blind spot for such figures and hope that they will protect us from sorcerers and things that go bump in the night. Unfortunately, simple examination of deeds, rather than speech, proves otherwise.
Their “curse” is characterized by dilution and diminution. Teachers, students, administrators and parents are diluted in endless paper chases disguised as tests, assessments and reports. Conversely, the edification of concepts and individual free will are systematically diminished. The combined effects may elicit the maddening image of a hamster running endlessly in a caged wheel. However, a more accurate image of these effects is more akin to desperate victims racing to the top of an inextinguishable inferno.
May 100 % of your students score proficient or above on standardized tests by 2014 is particularly stressful when father figures emphasize the deadline, by 2014. This has been the curse that has dominated the bulk of my teaching career. A curse so powerful it has decimated all attempts to render it inoperative. This “super curse” has brought forward other conjurers, who with wands in hand have temporarily waved away some provisions yet, have not been able or willing to undo this “super curse”. What would motivate someone to place such a curse? Let’s entertain some thoughts.
Many profess that a goal as noble as ensuring that all students score proficient at the same time and place is beyond reproach. Well, it is simply reprehensible. This cynical goal suffers from a pernicious pathology, which advocates forgive as a delusion for perfection. Shamefully, these apologists hide the correct diagnosis. It is not a delusion of perfection that motivates the jinxers, but rather a pathology of exclusion. We all know the consequences of not scoring proficient and obtaining AYP, -they close your (our) school. However, 2014 can’t seem to arrive soon enough for some hexers. Hence, the rush by officials –this year-, to close as many public schools throughout our country under the convenient excuses of “austerity” and “scores” is well afoot. The unprecedented shuttering of dozens of public schools particularly in largely African American communities, as in Chicago, Philadelphia, Washington D.C. etc. are justified under the rationale of budgetary challenges.
This rationale anchors itself on the operational premise of right sizing. Irrespective of the fact that we are talking about children and their development -this thinking may have legitimate administrative basis in the private sector. However, the current juxtaposition of private sector practices and public sector commitments, such as providing an adequate and free education as stipulated in the constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, have dissimilar agendas and unequal strengths. Why then the rush if the “super curse” will effectively close thousands of public schools all across our country within a year? We will surely have the right size and number of schools soon enough. Could it be that the proponents’ zeal for the “super curse” is waning? Hardly.
In fact the “super curse” is going very well. The political party, pardon, -the political parties, both of them, have put away their “profound pedagogical partitions” to unite in this effort. Likewise, the industrial testing complex continues to redact tests, assessments, practice workbooks, study programs, while hiring consultants, garnering ever greater budget allocations, and accumulating data all aimed to ensure that scores comply with targets of soon to be imposed common core standards. But above all of these machinations, one supersedes them all, the president’s silence on these matters is the best indicator that all is truly going well among the jinxers and hexers. Conversely, hope for a change is sequestered. So again I ask, why the rush? Could it be that the “super curse” itself is waning? Hardly.
In fact, the jinxers are emboldened by their powers and lack of meaningful restraints, -why wait? “Let’s exclude NOW!” they demand. What we have in front of us now is a turn to Kronos, but an inverted Kronos. We have all seen the depictions of Kronos devouring his children. His filicides are motivated out of fear, a fear of competition from his children. Thus, he eats them. In our case, our Kronos is not committing filicide, but rather devouring the children of others. One can imagine a repented titan with a renewed paternal instinct and displaced fear of competition in the presence of other children asking another titan, “How do we devour the potential competitors of our children?” The other titan may respond, “Well, one way is to be proactive. For example, you offer your children greater pedagogical and assertive experiences and opportunities. In addition, you enroll your children in a school that is free of stigma, for example, one that does not administer standardized tests, say a private school or a divinity school. In other words, enroll your child in a school that does not partake in omens or curses.”
Nonetheless, there is still another way, a more reactive way, to devour your children’s potential competitors, -you close their schools and in doing so -eliminate the competition. Once shuttered, you place stigma upon the displaced children and adults. Moreover, you place a scarlet tattoo on both and you never lift the curse. The calculation is the following; the failure of some children will ensure that mine will thrive. This charter is an open collusion devoid of formalities.
I am well aware that we live in highly secular times, which are dominated by facts and figures. But for some of us who recognize the evil that lurk in men’s hearts, we cannot ignore the immutable. Those who conspire against children are devoid of judgment. Consequently, their motivations are drawn from an irredeemable well. They practice technical numerology, model apparitions, and consult conjurers. Some of them believe in curses. Others still are weary of omens. Some even fear children, often their own. I believe in God. Evil may cause great pain and destruction, but evil never prevails. Evil’s harvest never mature and eventually in its rage devours its own seed.

Clearly 100% proficiency on anything like very high standards is absurd.
We have set a standard for driver’s licenses that we expect everyone to meet. But no one believes its a high standard.
Interestingly, Minnesota has just eliminated ALL tests that students must pass in order to graduate. Students will continue to take tests, and results will be shared with families, educators and students, to help students understand where they are relative to expectations from different kinds of colleges/universities/employers, etc.
But they will not be expected to reach a certain level on any of the tests to graduate.
LikeLike
It would be quite interesting to see something like “high” standards. Whatever those might be, they would look nothing, of course, like the amateurish CCSS in ELA.
LikeLike
Bravo…and here Bill admits it’s an experiment, but not on his children.
“It would be great if our education stuff worked, but that we won’t know for probably a decade.”
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/wp/2013/09/27/bill-gates-it-would-be-great-if-our-education-stuff-worked-but/
LikeLike
In 2006, Margaret Spellings said, “I talk about No Child Left Behind like Ivory soap: It’s 99.9 percent pure. There’s not much needed in the way of change.”
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/14589472/ns/us_news-education/t/education-secy-no-child-act-needs-no-changes/#.UkbLBbTF-JU
LikeLike
I always say the year could be 3014 for 100% mastery, and it still couldn’t happen.
LikeLike
So then what? What if students attain the unattainable of 100% mastery? What was the plan after 100% mastery? UHHH, no one heard about what was next because they never expected us to achieve that goal. Don’t we really want to know if our students are critical thinkers, problem solvers, lifelong learners, productive members of society, content citizens? I never evaluated test scores and found the answer to those questions.
LikeLike
” I am not certain many of us are thinking about the less obvious and thus more lethal enemies. They give politically correct speeches, and radiate a fatherly presence. Their threat resides precisely in the proximity to their victims, namely us. We often develop a blind spot for such figures and hope that they will protect us from sorcerers and things that go bump in the night.”
Hanna Arendt’s banality of evil eloquently explained.
LikeLike
I hold to my “babies will not cry” analogy. To say that 100% of people will master a standardized test, and the desire that they do so anyway, is like wishing babies don’t cry.
It is evil to wish that a baby won’t cry, as a rule. It is life to listen to the cries of babies and take cues from their cries and attend to their needs accordingly. So it should be with performance on school work (that is not created by a company with no close connection to the children being tested, or vested interest in what they know other than a high dollar contract).
LikeLike
Florida’s solution: push the date forward to 2023. Yes, folks, instead of all the children in Florida becoming proficient in 2014, we now expect that miracle to occur in 2023. Don’t change the ridiculous goal, just kick the can down the road. That way we can continue our education killing policies.
LikeLike
This author’s quote says a lot, “But above all of these machinations, one supersedes them all, the president’s silence on these matters is the best indicator that all is truly going well among the jinxers and hexers”…”
Obama may be our first black president but this in no way means that MLK would have walked hand and hand with him. I look at a sea of brown faces of young children every day whose lives are being forever changed (negatively) by the national education policies at my title one school as our “father” president smiles upon our nation! They are segregated by their poverty. While students at Sidwell friends are watering plants in a garden or standing in smocks before an easel and painting or eating a fresh salad with avocados and raisins in a clean cheery school .. my students (as well as all other title one students nationally) are sitting in mildewy smelling rooms from rain water leaks, sitting on rugs in uniforms memorizing a specific concept because it is “September 12th” and by god every title one classroom in the nation is following the exact same lesson because it is marked on the unified pacing calendar published by one of the “approved” publishing companies. Teachers must wade through links in all the myriad reams of pages within their “approved publications” to select
their “choices” in how to “individualize” their lessons. The students will eat lunch from microwaved foods in plastic (a sea of processed foods) dumped on styrofoam trays, they will form military lines and walk down hallways to get to science class or media (and this is most of their exercise for the day). The land around the school will remain pretty much manicured and unused because there is very little “recess time”.. 15 minutes for lower grades and if you are a 6th grader, you are “too big” to deserve movement… ughhh! But you are never too big enough to drill and prep for standardized tests and to have your pre test results posted on the walls of the school with racing cars along a racing track or some other county-approved similar directive. Siwell Friends is the color film while title one schools are a gray version! Every time Obama gives the nod to one of Duncan’s hideous policies… he gives a fatherly nod to oppression of our neediest students. MLK would be ashamed of him.
LikeLike
Let’s start a “Sidwell for All” Movement. When the first school in my children’s district when through the whole turnover process–“scoring” a School Improvement Grant, of the 4 turnaround models, none was the Sidwell Model. What an oversight! When the next school in our distressed district went for the federal money, there was still no Sidwell Friends Model. Now the third school is being put through the wringer–Connecticut’s state version of SIG–and we could not choose the clearly successful Sidwell Friends Model for our Middle School! This must stop. We have seen the great results at Sidwell. We have witnessed the successes. We love the school menus. Sidwell includes art, music, physical education, high-quality academics, character education, favorable teacher-to-pupil ratios–and NO STANDARDIZED TESTING! for every child! I demand this winning formula for all children.
Enough floundering around with Race to the Top. Fire Arne Duncan. I have the solution: Sidwell for All is my new motto.
LikeLike
Good one!
LikeLike
Count me in! Even in the Catholic school system in the Archdiocese where I teach testing is too overemphasized. It may not affect some of the wealthier Catholic schools in my city as much, but I teach in an inner city Catholic School and it does affect my students.
LikeLike
I’m on board with the Sidwell for All movement.
Instead of creating public schools like Sidwell, Obama and Duncan are funneling millions in American Recovery & Reinvestment Act funds to Murdoch’s Wireless Generation/Amplify to fund school turnarounds and for other purposes.
http://www.recovery.gov/espsearch/Pages/advanced.aspx?data=recipientAwardsList&AwardType=CGL&RecipName=Wireless%20Generation&PageNumber=2#Results
Total Vendor Award Amount
$22,799,095
Number of Awards
100
School Turnaround Engagement Manager
http://www.dcjobs.com/j/t-School-Improvement–Educational-Leadership-Coach-e-Wireless-Generation-l-Indianapolis,-IN%3B-Fort-Wayne,-IN%3B-Evansville,-IN-jobs-j2719121.html
LikeLike
LLC1923:
I do not see where Amplify is receiving any money’s from the grants you linked to. A quick scan of the top recipients suggests that Apple is receiving the lion’s share of these monies.
LikeLike
There’s lot of money to be made under the guise of reform. See excerpt and full post.
The Gates USDOE is not motivated by improving teaching and learning. I will cut and paste one at a time so I don’t end up in moderation. You can’t deny the obvious much longer:
That’s why we are excited about the Education Data Initiative, an Administration-wide effort to “liberate” government data and voluntarily-contributed non-government data as fuel to spur entrepreneurship, create value, and create jobs while improving educational outcomes for students.
LikeLike
Linda: That may be, but my question was on the details of this particular PO.
LikeLike
It’s spreading. It’s everywhere. Kids are props; kids are data. Data is for sale.
The eduvultures are now very, very, very concerned about $tudent $uce$$.
B e w a r e ! They may eventually want your children, too.
But don’t forget their mantra: it’s all because of the thousands and thousands of BAD teachers.
LikeLike
http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/06/08/power-open-education-data-0
LikeLike
Is there a connection between the Common Core and data privacy violations?
inBloom was sold to states and districts and still is being justified by NY State as helping kids become “college and career ready,” and its interoperable instructional tools were supposed to be be aligned with the Common Core.
It is clear, in any case, that having the same common standards and tests across states would simplify the task of comparing and collecting student data, and that the feds wanted to encourage this data collection and sharing through their revisions of FERPA and via their grants for state longitudinal data systems provided by the fiscal stimulus funds and Race to the Top.
http://nycpublicschoolparents.blogspot.com/2013/10/is-there-connection-between-common-core.html
LikeLike
Art, do you really believe that as of last week “every title one classroom in the nation is following the exact same lesson because it is marked on the unified pacing calendar published by one of the “approved” publishing companies. “? Is this hyperbole or do you really believe this is fact?
LikeLike
“I am well aware that we live in highly secular times, which are dominated by facts and figures.
Were we to be so lucky to live in “highly secular times”. Unfortunately, these times are dominated by ideologies (religious, political or otherwise) lacking in rational logical thought.
LikeLike
Duane Swacker: I agree.
I would argue that the ascendancy of the High Holy Church of Testolatry with its Sacred EduMetrics of Accountability [small print: for OTHER PEOPLE’S CHILDREN] is a sign that we are living in something less than secular times. There is something akin to non-secular fervor in the rabid unthinking use of mathematical intimidation to make the general public believe that “Data Driven Decision Making” boils down to the scores generated by high-stakes standardized testing.
One good sign: the furious push back by the leading charterites/privatizers against Diane Ravitch is a sign that the edufundamentalists are losing.
“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” [Mahatma Gandhi]
We are already well past the first two stages.
🙂
LikeLike
Number of kid attending charters continues to increase.
LikeLike
That can happen when you close their public neighborhood school…it’s called “choice”.
LikeLike
In many places it’s happening without closing neighborhood schools. That’s called expansion of opportunity.
LikeLike
Not here…we all don’t live in your world.
LikeLike
Not in Colorado. Many want the kids to be inBloomed.
Without privacy, there is no democracy.
LikeLike
Joe,
They are making it impossible for reasonable parents to want to keep their children in urban public schools. The conditions and curriculum are purposefully chasing away the people who care about quality education. The morale at my school is so low and my son feels it in all his classes. Teachers are not allowed to teach how they believe is right. Stick to the managed curriculum. Even then the evaluative rubrics find a way to make you want to quit and forget the whole issue. But then they win. You seem to like all this.
LikeLike
Green Party Teacher: thank you for your missive from Planet Reality.
Evidently you are unaffected by the Rheeality Distortion Fields ubiquitous on RheeWorld.
I make no claim to being dispassionate in the ed debates but I think your first sentence is critical: “They are making it impossible for reasonable parents to want to keep their children in urban public schools.” Yes, precisely because the “leaders” of many districts are like coaches of professional sports teams who consciously make “their” districts and “their” schools play in such a way that they lose to the other team. In fact, they try to “manage” in such a way that the leading charteriters/privatizers can run the score way up on them. Then they try to invoke the ‘mercy’ rule: end the suffering, just close public schools and turn them over to those most cagebusting innovators of $tudent $ucce$$.
With all my heart I appeal to the genuine supporters of public education and a “better education for all”: whether the teaching staff, students and parents of a particular school or schools can agree [for now] on, e.g., whether to opt in or opt out of high-stakes standardized testing, keep the lines of communication with each other open. Be firm, take action, but show respect to each other. Time and subsequent events will make clearer which decisions and actions were more effective, or perhaps that a variety of initiatives worked well. Confidence in each other does not automatically equate to agreement. But honest disagreements can test—and hopefully, strengthen—mutual respect and cooperation.
Perhaps we can learn something from the words of a pretty pathetic looking fellow, all skin and bones who wore homespun clothes, who amazingly was instrumental in the defeat of what not too long ago was the ‘greatest empire the world has ever known’:
“Honest disagreement is often a good sign of progress.” [Mahatma Gandhi]
🙂
LikeLike
Well, you are (as most young people) and optimist, as was Ghandi, who proved successful. I (as a retired teacher) am not so sanguine.
Nevertheless, I so wish for the success of rationality. But, remember, the “Dark Ages” lasted for well over a millennium.
LikeLike
Let’s be a little careful about painting our views with such broad strokes as “all” or “never” – it seems dishonest to me. My great hope is that we don’t have to stoop to the tactics of the “other side” to make our voices heard. In my large, urban district children in Title 1 schools are not sitting on moldy carpet and eating processed foods but many (not all) of them ARE fed a diet of “programs” designed to raise a score on a test and “close the gap” (note – meaning the gap in test scores). In my state many (not all) of the people that yield power have been convinced that a test such as DIBELS can be used to decide what reading “deficits” a child has and form there what program the school should buy to fix this deficit. The sellers of the test and the sellers of the programs are getting rich. These tests and programs tend to crowd out the healthy foods those of us commenting here provided our own children or provide children in our classrooms (sometimes on the sly). I feel hopeful when educators with evidence and data that contradict the claims made by those I would disagree with speak out and point out the perils of the path we are on. In the field of literacy Richard Allington has been doing that for a long time.
LikeLike
Krazy TA, as usual, you are too good with your concepts. I love the church idea. Why not? Could make a lot of money. In fact, I would not be surprised if someone did it and was successful.
Any time anyone or any organization of any kind says 100% they are outright liars. There is no perfection and especially with people. There will always be so many serial killers and lovers of violence. This has been and will be the human condition. The societal question is how much do we have. Our present only the tip takes all has put us into a position of increasing that potential rather than reducing that potential of problems in society. As you increase the daily pressure on people to survive personally and even worse with a family the amount of “I don’t care anymore” increases and you have what is starting to happen now, more violence with higher numbers of dead and governments having wars to placate the military industrial complex and their owners like the Bush family. This must end or we will have Krazy TA’s “High Holy Church of the Testolatry.” Is this what we want?
LikeLike
Krazy TA and George,
I am somewhere right in the middle of both of your responses. I don’t want to give up on my beliefs and humanity. But is it fair to my children? Don’t they deserve better? Will I be harming them by keeping them in my urban district which is trying to lead the way on evaluations that make no sense?
LikeLike
Do you remember the point in I, Claudius when Claudius discovers that Caligula is crazy? He says something like “This will never last, he will never continue as emperor, he’s crazy!” Of course, he did, supported by those who used his insanity to forward their own agendas.
Fast forward several thousand years. George W. Bush, who appeared to have difficulty reading a complex sentence was a possible Republican candidate, then THE Republican candidate, then the president of the United States, and finally and most unbelievably a two-term president. The impossible happened.
Back to the beginnings of NCLB. When I heard the provisions which required that all children would be proficient by 2014, I was told the law would never reach that end point since that would mean that in 2014 all schools would be failing. And here we are facing the impossible yet again.
Just as it is possible for a person with major mental problems to be a Roman emperor; just as it is possible for someone of obvious intellectual limitations to be a two-term president; so it is possible for us to be faced with the demand for 100% of our students to be at proficient by 2014. Next year.
LikeLike
Pidge, NCLB was a hoax.
LikeLike
But people in my district, in my union, said it would never reach this point because it was impossible to continue with something so obviously wrong. They were wrong. It was and is possible that we have all been set up to fail. BTW, great job last night!! I was in the audience.
LikeLike
CCSS = Hoax, the sequel
LikeLike
Aspirational goals are, well, aspirational goals.
LikeLike
All endeavors are righteous, except those that lay their foundations on capitalizing on the incredulities of others…those structure in the end prove weak and always fail.
LikeLike