George Wood is superintendent of Federal Hocking School District and an articulate supporter of public education in a state where public education is under siege by the governor and legislature. How can schools function in an atmosphere of constant turmoil and interference by politicians? Here are his thoughts about the state’s new report card for schools:
A perspective on the State’s new report card by Dr. George Wood, Executive Director of The Forum for Education and Democracy
Below is a statement regarding the State’s new report card released by Dr. George Wood. Dr. Wood is the Superintendent of Federal Hocking School District and the Executive Director of The Forum for Education and Democracy. His perspective is worth a read.
Ohio E & A
Response to New State Report Card
George Wood, Superintendent, Federal Hocking Local Schools
August 23, 2013
With the release of the new state school report cards we are again being led down a dead-end road. There is no evidence that the way the state reports on student achievement, or school performance, primarily by using standardized test scores, helps children learn or our teachers teach. The ‘new’ report card simply continues this attempt to grade our schools with tools that are not up to the job.
In the Federal Hocking District we are pleased that our schools received an “A” on the one measure that really matters-graduation rate. Our schools have one of the highest graduation rates in Ohio, and we have some of the highest standards for graduation in the state (including requiring that graduates earn more credits than the state minimum, pass all state tests, and produce a senior project and a graduation portfolio). It should also be noted that among those students that graduated in 2013, and were FHHS students for four years, 87% of them are going on to higher education having been admitted to Ohio University, Marietta College, Middlebury College, New York University, and Ohio State.
Unfortunately, most of the new state report card is based upon the standardized tests students take. These tests have never been shown to have a positive effect on students after they leave school; be it in college, the workplace, or the military. While they are one measure that helps us identify some strengths and weaknesses in our program, they should not be the sole measure of the success of our children.
Further, the new report card continues a history of Ohio constantly changing the rules and standards for schools without sound reason or research to make such changes. Over the past two decades we have had a myriad of state programs and mandates on testing, teacher evaluation, and curriculum. In fact, by my count, in the past eighteen years Ohio has instituted, dropped, changed, and added over three dozen mandated standardized tests at virtually all grade levels. As the new report card is issued schools are grappling with a new mandated curriculum (known as The Common Core), a new teacher evaluation system (the Ohio Teacher Evaluation System), soon to be released new high school end-of-course tests, the Third Grade Reading Guarantee, and new health and safety regulations.
The constant changing of the rules almost seems to be designed to make our schools look bad. All over Ohio schools that have had positive report cards in the past saw their scores tumble. One of our schools went from being rated “Effective” by the state last year to having an “F” grade in achievement-how is that possible?
It should also be noted that these new programs are more of the ‘unfunded mandates’ for which the State is so well known. There are no additional dollars directly provided to districts to implement these mandates (you can apply for grants, but even if you do not get one you still have to carry out the work). For most districts, such as ours, the current state budget has continued the trend of reduced or flat funding. We have now seen in the past two decades more than half a dozen school funding plans and have yet to see any of them carry out the Ohio State Supreme Court’s order to fix school funding.
Yet while state funding goes down or is static, their attempt at controlling our schools goes on. At Federal Hocking the state provides around 52% of our budget, but through the new state reporting system and the new state mandates they are attempting to control 100% of our agenda.
While we will use the new state report card as one measure of our work, we will not rely upon it as a sole or even the best measure of what we are doing. In fact, it would be short sighted for us to focus solely on test preparation, as it would have a negative effect upon our children limiting the range of educational experiences we offer them in our schools.
Our agenda will be driven by a set of progressive operating principles put together by our staff and approved by our school board in the true spirit of local control. Experience tells us that the state will, in the blink of an eye, change the rules we face again and again. (In fact, as I write this the rules for the testing of high school students for graduation are so unclear they are not even posted on the Ohio Department of Education web site.) In order not to keep trying to dance to the tune played in Columbus we will focus on what is best for our kids. We may not get the best grades on the state report card, and we may be singled out for additional scrutiny by the state. But we will continue to keep our focus on the most important standard of all, providing our families with the schools and classrooms that move our children on to graduation and a productive life after school.

Indiana is changing its school grading system for the 3rd time in 5 years (counting the manipulation of the system as a change). The best comment I read about a Indiana’s system is that it is like ” shooting arrows into a wall then someone paints the target”. I would apply that to any state’s school grading system, it is simply a political tool to create winners and losers.
LikeLike
The rules do not matter to them.
What matters is constantly asserting their power to make up the rules.
LikeLike
What an excellent, accurate, positive letter. I wish ALL superintendents would stand up to this malarkey. I couldn’t believe that our district, despite the teachers voting “no”, decided to jump on board of the RttT and CC just to receive the paltry $125,000 it got for so doing. The professional development we got was a hodge-podge of tech courses, including several sessions where the computers weren’t working correctly. The result was that in order to “digest” all this new tech, we had to TEACH OURSELVES on our time, which cuts into the time to actually DO OUR JOBS. I guess our jobs now include giving even more of our personal time to ever-changing mandates and courses … which will continue to change. The “funny” thing is … since tech changes weekly … we will NEVER “catch up” and there is an endless cycle of spending on computers, doc cams, smart boards, iPads, etc. which conveniently have ever-new programs designed to cost the district even more money. And, in order to pay for this, we cut or freeze teacher salaries and increase classroom sizes.
My husband was on the local school board from 1995 – 2007. We are very aware of Bill Phillis’ sincere attempts to get Ohio to fund schools equitably. It sure isn’t going to happen with THIS legislature, but it didn’t happen with the previous governors either.
LikeLike
Two Gold stars for George. It takes courage and determination to defy the establishment. Many issues do not merit the effort. However, there is no more important issue to defend and protect than our children and pubic education is key. Before I retired last year in Georgia we were in all kinds of confusion and disarray in the school system. But on reflecting back, the truth is that for the past 20 years our central office and the state Board had been doing exactly the same type of “flavor of the month” changes to education: to the curriculum, evaluation, testing, pay for performance schemes, and other distractions. That kind of churning is terrible for principals, teachers, and students. And of course, to make matters worse, there was never enough funding to cover it, although a number of the changes were actually in pursuit of more dollars.
LikeLike
Hurray for being truthful!! Too many superintendents in Ohio are following the legislature, and are blaming their teachers. They are taking these false reports as pure truth. They are not about the children; they are about themselves and about how their district’s report card makes them look. There is one small city in northwest Ohio, where the superintendent claimed not to believe in retire-rehire two years ago, but himself retired this past spring, and has been rehired for this school year. Why is so much based on lies?
Perhaps the answer is to revolt. It’s nice what the governor and the ODE believe. What they need to realize is that we, the citizens of Ohio, do not agree with them. We have the evidence that when teachers are allowed to make decisions about what and how they teach, that the students succeed.
My concern with the state report cards is that we are comparing school districts. Our local newspaper reported that district A had these grades, but district B had these grades. If you go to the ODE website, you will see that we are not comparing apples to apples. In my county, I looked at all the state report cards. While some schools get a grade in every category, some are getting NR for not rated. These NRs bring their district scores up. Case in point: two schools made the headline for having the best scores in the county. Both of these districts had multiple NRs in more than one of their schools. What would their overall scores have been if they had been rated in all areas? The areas not rated deal with students of poverty and special needs students, and yes, both of these districts have students in these categories. So why weren’t their scores reported? Can anyone explain to me why we aren’t grading everyone in every area? Some say it depends on whether they are RttT schools or not. Why should that matter?
To clear things up, my first choice would be no tests, but if we’re going to do it, lest’s do it equally.
People should be standing up and saying- “Keep your darn nose out of OUR school!!!!!” It is time to revolt. “Our teachers are good. Our families are supportive. Our children are learning. YOUR tests and evaluations are wrong, and do not meet our standards for our community and our children’s futures.”
What if we took the money wasted on test administration and reporting, and used it to train the families that don’t know how to support their children in their school work? Has anyone ever asked how much money is spent on test administration and data collection? Perhaps it is time.
Once again, thank you for caring for Ohio’s children.
LikeLike
Hi Diane, Regarding the Times article on TFA and their brief turnover times for teachers and the brief few weeks of teacher “education,” here is Malcolm Gladwell’s article on how long it takes to accomplish complex tasks: http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/sportingscene/2013/08/psychology-ten-thousand-hour-rule-complexity.html
Also, the Times letters today reacting to the article are in interesting read:
Love your blog.
G. Michael Abbott
LikeLike