Archives for the month of: July, 2013

The New York Times wrote a searing critique of the slash-and-burn policies of North Carolina’s governor and legislature. What was once one of the south’s most forward-looking states is rapidly being decimated into a hard, mean backwater.

As we have learned over recent months, the legislature has imposed deep budget cuts on public schools, is taking away salary raises from teachers who get advanced degrees, has abolished tenure, and is doing whatever it can to advance privatization and demolish teacher professionalism. Of course, while cutting the budget the legislators found $5 million for TFA, and they are hoping to expand charters.

Oh, and wouldn’t you know that a graduate of TFA, Eric Guckian, is advising the governor on his harsh education policy. Remember, these are the people who bring excellence everywhere.

But that’s not all. Since the far right took control of the state, writes the Times,

“… state government has become a demolition derby, tearing down years of progress in public education, tax policy, racial equality in the courtroom and access to the ballot.

“The cruelest decision by lawmakers went into effect last week: ending federal unemployment benefits for 70,000 residents. Another 100,000 will lose their checks in a few months. Those still receiving benefits will find that they have been cut by a third, to a maximum of $350 weekly from $535, and the length of time they can receive benefits has been slashed from 26 weeks to as few as 12 weeks.

“The state has the fifth-highest unemployment rate in the country, and many Republicans insulted workers by blaming their joblessness on generous benefits. In fact, though, North Carolina is the only state that has lost long-term federal benefits, because it did not want to pay back $2.5 billion it owed to Washington for the program. The State Chamber of Commerce argued that cutting weekly benefits would be better than forcing businesses to pay more in taxes to pay off the debt, and lawmakers blindly went along, dropping out of the federal program.”

NC CAN, part of a national organization devoted to privatization and high-stakes testing, has declared this to be the “year of the teacher.” Apparently NC CAN has a sense of humor since the legislature works overtime to beat up on teachers and remove any benefits it can think of. Let’s see if NC CAN campaigns to raise teachers’ salaries or to protect academic freedom.

If only I had known sooner, I would have posted the announcement of today’s symposium.

Yes! There is money to be made by investing in charter schools! It’s all about the children! It’s the civil rights issue of our time! And a great investment too!!

“Bonds and Blackboards: Investing in Charter Schools (New York, NY)
Symposium – July 10, 2013; 9:30 – 6:30 PM

WHAT: A one-day symposium to help Wall Street – especially the tax-exempt bond market – understand the value of investing in charter schools and best practices for assessing their bond credit.

WHEN: Wed., July 10 – 9:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. (Registration and breakfast begin at 8:30 a.m.)

WHERE: The Harvard Club of New York City, 35 West 44th Street, between Fifth and Sixth Avenues.

WHO: Confirmed speakers include Noah Wepman of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation; LISC CEO Michael Rubinger; charter school investors Alliance Bernstein, Hamlin Capital and Nuveen; commercial bankers; bond underwriter RBC Capital Markets; and rating agency Standard & Poor’s. The charter school sector will be represented by SUNY, a charter school authorizer; charter support organizations; and charter school operators.

The keynote speaker is Brett Peiser, CEO of Uncommon Schools, a charter school network of 32 schools in the Northeast that has successfully reversed the achievement gap between low-income students and their higher-income counterparts.

Registration for this event is now closed.
If you are interested in attending, please email effc@lisc.org to see if we can accommodate you.

Location: Harvard Club
35 West 44th Street
City: New York
State: New York”

Robert Shepherd was pleased that Susan Ohanian joined the honor roll of the blog.

He wrote this:

“Susan Ohanian’s website is a garden of many, many delights. I love this bit she posted from Albert Einstein, who was a pretty bright guy (and who had some truly wonderful ideas about education):

“I believe in standardizing automobiles. I do not believe in standardizing human beings. Standardization is a great peril which threatens American culture. . . . Such men [as Henry Ford} do not always realize that the adoration which they receive is not a tribute to their personality but to their power or their pocketbook.

—— Albert Einstein, Saturday Evening Post interview, 10/26/1929”

Michael Gilbert, a school psychologist at Meachem Elementary School in Syracuse, New York, offers words of wisdom to his fellow citizens.

Please read and share them.

He writes:

….Much of what is happening in public education “reform” is not about what is in the best interest of students and schools. It is about politics, power, special interests and money.

All children in public schools are riding in the back of this proverbial bus in some way or another. Parents have a right to be outraged, but I doubt that most of them fully understand the current state of affairs. When it comes to public education, we can no longer assume that our children’s best interests are being served. This will continue to be the case so long as state and federal mandates are issued by individuals lacking basic knowledge of child development and education.

Lately there have been a lot of attacks directed against teachers for the failure of our schools as measured by standardized test scores, and against parents for behavioral issues in their children. While teachers and parents certainly own some of the accountability, these issues are much more complicated than they seem. Due to recent education reform policies, the passion and creativity for teaching is being destroyed, and I fear the best and brightest teachers are either leaving the field or will never enter it in the first place.

There is an over-fixation on testing, the results of which are being used — unfairly, according to researchers at the Economic Policy Institute and National Research Council — to evaluate teachers. While class size continues to increase, there has been a decrease in time allotted for movement (recess, physical education) and for the arts and humanities….

Data clearly show that children in low-achieving districts experience a great deal of stress related to factors such as trauma, poverty and violence. Studies have repeatedly demonstrated how stress interferes with the skills required for school success — for example, with the ability to attend to and concentrate on instruction; with flexibility and perseverance in problem-solving; and with the maintenance of self-control.

Instead of addressing this in a meaningful way, we simply assume that students will be able to leave their struggles at the entrance to the school. To make matters worse, we have increased the level of stress on these children by implementing policies that are getting us nowhere and are leaving a large number of students behind.

Parents and concerned citizens need to lead the charge in taking back the schools which ultimately belong to them.

There are no quick fixes for meaningful education reform and it will require a great deal of hard work and commitment. However, the “reorganization” of “failing” schools is another process void of logic. Why do we wait for schools to consistently not make yearly adequate progress before we decide to do something new and creative? Should all schools not be given this opportunity? Or is this school transformation process really just an illusion of change?

Schools are not a “business” and students are not products to be measured through high-stakes testing. There needs to be a fundamental shift in the underlying framework of public education. Here are a few things that we could perhaps start with.

Teachers need to be truly valued in our communities. Let’s not minimize the dedication and heart teachers put into their profession or the role they play in the development of the whole child.

Teachers also need to be given the opportunity to teach a meaningful and enriched curriculum. There needs to be a return to unstructured play opportunities in kindergarten to cultivate necessary social-emotional skills.

Learning is about quality of instruction, not quantity. It is dependent on teachers and students developing meaningful relationships, not the administration of what State Education has termed “instructional dosages.” Students need to learn how to think, not what to think.

We need to put resources back into classrooms and school buildings, even if that means eliminating staff from central offices. There needs to be a reduction in unnecessary meetings and an elimination of ineffective programs. Otherwise, a great deal of valuable time will continue to be wasted throughout each school year.

Building administrators need to spend more time in their buildings working as instructional leaders to teachers and supports to children. Currently, they have much less time for what really matters, due to all that is required with state-mandated testing and teacher evaluation protocols.

Leaders in education need to inspire and unite – not dictate, demoralize, and divide. It is not about image, photos ops, rhetoric and catch phrases. It is about leading by example, with actions, not just words. With the current mantra of no bullying, why is it OK for our leaders to engage in exactly that type of behavior?

“College and career ready” makes a great sound bite, but in reality the concerns are much more complex and urgent. Can we agree to first make a commitment to equip children with skills for life, such as being responsible, persistent, cooperative, empathic and resourceful? Our children must be, above all else, effective communicators able to manage strong emotions. Once we are successful with that goal, then “college and career ready” will take care of itself.

Districts need a strong and well-informed school board — one that serves the students and families in their community. Many school boards across the state have passed clear resolutions against high-stakes testing and teacher evaluation systems. Unfortunately, a local school board recently passed a resolution that was, while well-intended, weak and off target. They should not only be more aggressively defending the teachers they employ, but also the children that their district serves.

A school board works for the public that elects them. The superintendent works for the board that hires them. Some districts seem to have this hierarchy upside down. Of course, the accountability doesn’t stop here. The commissioner of education, state Education Department, state Legislature, and governor all need to answer to parents specifically and taxpayers in general.

Ultimately, control of public schools should be returned to the local level. But until then we all need to be defending what is right and in the best interest of our children. Parents and concerned citizens need to lead the charge in taking back the schools which ultimately belong to them. A grassroots education revolution may be our only hope.

 
 The article is right on. It would not surprise you that some of the letters that followed attack the writer, question why there is a school psychologist, and raise other attack-dog questions.
Thanks for stating simple truths clearly and succinctly, Michael Gilbert!

Here is an event you won’t want to miss, if you can pay the price of admission.

So many opportunities to cash in on the emerging market of education.

There are, as the ad says, lots of needs to address:

“This is a long-overdue shift the public has been clamoring for — measuring quality by what students are able to master, not by time spent in a classroom — and the private sector is offering numerous opportunities to ride this wave.

“Another example is the push to enhance offerings in the K-12 space, potentially opening up more early childhood and supplemental education.

“And many for-profit providers are finding opportunities in partnerships with hospitals and universities and other large employers, so what was once a demand stemming primarily from affluent parents is now trickling downwards.

“These are just some of the excellent reasons why investors who appreciate expanding opportunities in attractively-priced companies belong at The Capital Roundtable’s ENCORE conference — “Private Equity Investing in For-Profit Education Companies,” being held in New York City on Thursday, July 25th.

“Here are even more reasons that new technologies have created among education companies focused on support services —

“Teacher Evaluations — now being put into the hands of third parties.
Enrollment Specialists — outsourcing this key activity to dedicated firms.
Student Services and Job Placement — increasingly being turned over to middle-market providers.
Admissions and Financial Aid IT — with huge interest in software and SAAS providers.
Massive Open Online Courses — helping institutions deliver large-scale MOOCs that are typically free to take and to serve to build an institution’s brand.
Syndicated Content — helping institutions save on course development and faculty costs with pre-packaged curriculums to be delivered online with the institution’s own brand.
No argument, this is an amazing moment for private equity investors to explore for-profit education opportunities. And this encore conference from The Capital Roundtable is particularly valuable if you are new to the education marketplace and need to understand its particular complexities such as the Higher Education Reauthorization Act implications.

“Just consider —

“The education sector represents the second biggest category of GDP, so there’s a lot of need to address.
63% of the deal value last year in the for-profit education sector represented private equity transactions, up from 51% the year earlier.”

What are you waiting for?

Achievement First prides itself on its high test scores, but recent stories report that these charters are also distinguished for startlingly high suspension rates. Half the 5-year-olds were suspended last year.

Dacia Toll, the Ivy League-educated leader of the charter chain, promised to cut the suspension rate in half. Instead of suspending the kids, apparently they will get even tougher on them in school.

I have always wondered how privileged white college graduates learned to be so hard on impoverished black children. It is highly unlikely that what they do in these boot camps reflects their own home life or schooling.

Here is the drill in the AF charters that gets higher test scores:

“There is an urgency in the tenor of the classrooms at Achievement First schools; a sense that every second must be used for learning. Even on the last day of school at the Hartford middle school, a history teacher has a tightly structured lesson that students are clearly enjoying. She uses a timer to ensure that small tasks — like moving the desks into a U-shape for discussion — don’t take longer then necessary.

“The schools also have a language of their own that expedites communication and students, for the most part, respond like a precision team. A teacher at Bridgeport elementary schools tells her students to: “SLANT, fold your hands and make a bubble.” Translation: Sit up straight, listen, ask and answer questions, nod to signal engagement and track the teacher with your eyes. And the bubble? Purse your lips and fill your cheeks with air — a move that ensures quiet.

“For years, the Achievement First students in Hartford, New Haven and Bridgeport, have outperformed their peers on state tests in almost all grades and subjects. On a recent visit to Achievement First’s middle school in Hartford, a strict disciplinary code was evident.

“In a large lecture hall with stadium seating — the “reflection room” — two or three students who had been removed from class for behavioral reasons sit quietly under the supervision of a staff member.

“At the front of the room, the consequences of breaking the rules and the rewards of not doing so are spelled out on large posters that proclaim, “You’re not a born winner, you’re not a born loser. You’re a born chooser. Make the Right Choice!”

“And in most classrooms, two or three students wear a white shirt over their blue school uniform, signaling that they are in “re-orientation” — a disciplinary measure that permits them to stay in academic classes but forbids interaction with peers and removes them from special classes like music or physical education.”

There is something Orwellian about that “Reflection Room.” I wouldn’t let my children or grandchildren go to such a school. Would you?

A comment posted on the article by Carol Burris, the principal of South Side High School in New York:

“As a public school principal, if I engaged in such practices, I would be fired. No middle class suburban parent would put up with the systematic humiliation of their children. The “culture” is more aligned with a communist nation than our nation.

“As for the “reflection room”–that is in-school suspension and for state accounting purposes, it should be counted as such. These practices may develop compliant children controlled by fear, but they will not develop leaders who have learned self-control.”

Walmart, owned by the fabulously wealthy Walton family of Arkansas, has told the city of Washington, DC, that it will not build stores there if the City Council passes a “living wage” bill. The members of the family are billionaires and at the very least multimillionaires.

Walmart wants to pay only the minimum wage of $7.50 an hour. The City Council wants a “living wage” of $12.50 an hour, reflecting the high cost of living in DC.

Walmart says it will abandon DC if required to pay such “high” wages.

Have you seen the ads that Walmart is running on national television that show how their employees are achieving their dreams because of their beneficent employer? On $7.50 an hour?

The Walton Family Foundation is happy to throw millions of dollars into DC charter schools, but not provide a wage that will allow the parents of the children in those schools to make choices about their lives.

A billionaire family in Idaho has been running ads (“Don’t Fail, Idaho”) disparaging the schools as failures. The Albertson family wants to promote online learning, which will save money but provide worse education. A member of the family invests in K12.

A sad story from an Idaho teacher:

I live in Idaho. I have seen public education dollars drop so low, that we are seeing our largest district in the state, struggling to hold on, using up reserves they once had. The push of charter schools in this state is high.

Idaho has reduced it’s public funding to schools since 2001. The voters of Idaho approved a 1% sales tax increase back in 2006 that was earmarked for education, only for the state to remove other funds that were allocated towards education, to help support a decrease in business property tax. Education lost money in this deal. I know my kids’ school is considered a low performing school, there is high poverty, yet there are great teachers! And, my boys are getting a great education. Charters spread the states’ education dollars further, in an already poorly funded system.

http://www.thenation.com/article/167782/questions-idaho-economist-mike-ferguson#axzz2XvGxwLwm

My boys attend a school that has poor ratings, according to Idaho’s new 5 star rating system. I understand there is high poverty in their school, but there are also great teachers and great learning opportunities. I believe my boys are not only getting an academic education, but an education on how to develop relationships with people from all different backgrounds. This is huge, when being successful in a business/career. Everyone encounters different types of people. A mediocre boss, a great boss, a not so great one, and same with coworkers. It is true in any profession. But, in order to be successful in a company, there must be respect…something that seems to be lacking at times when it comes to teachers. In fact, that’s what got me involved. A parent, who saw the blaming of teachers as the problem with our schools, ludicrous! Something was not right, and boy, did I find out more than I could imagine in this web of destruction of our public schools.

Governor Otter even boasted to a gun company to come and bring their business to Idaho, because we have the most minimum wage workers in the country. Just who is failing Idaho, the people? I think not.

Bottom Rung: Gov. Otter Touts Idaho’s Low Wages To Attract Gun Companies

We had public hearings on education at the state house. There was going to be a public hearing with the Joint Finance and Approppriations Committee, but Governor Otter didn’t feel that was necessary, because we didn’t have a budget issue this year. Oddly enough, the biggest complaint at the education hearings was lack of funding, regardless if you were supporting “traditional” public schools or charters.

http://www.idahostatesman.com/2013/01/19/2417923/legislaturekills-public-hearings.html

So do we have some high poverty schools? Yes, I guess you can say that. And running these ads of “Don’t Fail Idaho,” are hard to swallow when you know the real truth. Cause no, it is not my kids, nor will I let it be!

The world knows Wendy Davis as the state senator in Texas who filibustered for 11 hours straight against an bill that would restrict abortion. Unlike Jimmy Stewart in “Mr. Smith Goes to Washington,” she was not allowed to take a drink of water or go off-topic or even lean on the speaker’s desk.

What you may not know is that this was not her first filibuster. That was in 2011, when she filibustered against the mammoth budget cuts to public education of $5.4 billion, which crippled many schools and turned out to be completely unnecessary ( but the funding was not restored).

For her valiant resistance to the cuts, the Republican leadership kicked her off the education committee, but she continued to sit in on its meetings and even to offer legislation. She joins the honor roll today as a champion of American education and an all-around champion of courage in public life.

She knows more than most people how crucial education is, how it offers a lifeline to those who reach out for it. The following appears in the New York Times:

“My mother only had a sixth-grade education, and it was really a struggle for us,” she said in a 2011 video for Generation TX. She said she fell through the cracks in high school, and shortly after she graduated, she got married and divorced, and was a single mother by age 19.

“I was living in a mobile home in southeast Fort Worth, and I was destined to live the life that I watched my mother live,” she said in the video. A co-worker showed her a brochure for Tarrant County College, and she took classes to become a paralegal, working two jobs at the same time. From there she received a scholarship to attend Texas Christian University in Fort Worth — becoming the first person in her family to earn a bachelor’s degree — and then went on to Harvard. “When I was accepted into Harvard Law School, I remember thinking about who I am, and where I came from, and where I had been only a few years before,” she said.”

Wendy Davis is a true American hero. She has tenacity and guts. She has intelligence and wisdom. That’s a great combination.

She never forgot where she came from or how she got to where she is today.

She doesn’t use her life experience to tell others to pull themselves up by their bootstraps. She uses her elected position to extend a helping hand. She knows what free public education meant to her. She wants to keep the promise alive for the millions of boys and girls in Texas who are counting on her.

She is only 50. What a great future she has before her.

Now that Rick Perry is stepping down, I hope she runs for governor.

I have known Randi Weingarten for about 15 years. When I met her, she was president of the UFT in New York City. Over the years, we have shared many important life events, including birthdays, weddings, and funerals.

Randi and I first wrote an article together in 2004. It was a protest against the autocratic way that Michael Bloomberg was running the NYC public schools. The title of the article in the New York Times was “Public Schools, Minus the Public.”

At that time, Randi took a risk joining with me because I was known as an outspoken conservative. But she recognized that I was undergoing a fundamental rethinking of my views. Because I continued to write op-eds and continued to support teachers against the efforts to destroy their professional status, the UFT honored me in 2005 with its prestigious John Dewey award.

Understand that I was still active at the Hoover Institution and the Thomas B. Fordham Foundation, both leading centers of rightwing thought. I was indeed in transition, in what I eventually understood as a life-changing intellectual crisis. I was trying to define and redefine my perspective on issues I had studied for decades.

Randi must have known I would come through this period of introspection and self-doubt. And I did.

The books I wrote during these years were studiously nonpartisan: “The Language Police,” which criticized censorship of tests and textbooks by both the right and the left (2003); “The English Reader,” an anthology I compiled with my son Michael; “Edspeak,” a glossary of education jargon and buzzwords.

Then in 2010, I published “The Death and Life of the Great American School System: How Testing and Choice Are Undermining Education,” and fully renounced my conservative alliances, beliefs, and allegiances. Randi gave a book party for me at AFT headquarters in D.C.

The next year, when she invited Bill Gates to speak in Seattle, she also invited me, but I had a previous commitment to speak to legislators in Boston.

She invited me to speak at the AFT convention again in 2012, and I did and received a wonderful reception from the delegates in Detroit.

We don’t agree about every issue. We disagree about the Common Core. She thinks it has great potential, and I am skeptical about its consequences and oppose the undemocratic way in which it was stealthily imposed. Friends can disagree and still be friends.

But our agreements are far larger than our disagreements. Randi was the first one to alert me years ago to the total inappropriateness of the business model in education. She is a lawyer, and she is very smart. Randi was first, in my memory, to talk about “reform fatigue.” She is courageous. When the big “Waiting for Superman” propaganda blitz was unleashed in the fall of 2010, Randi was treated as Public Enemy #1 by the privateers, and she slugged it out with them on national television again and again. That took guts.

Recently, we co-authored a letter to Secretary Duncan urging him to intervene to stop the destruction of public education in Philadelphia.

I have read many comments on the blog that are critical of Randi. I let readers have their say, but this I believe. It serves no purpose for those of us opposed to teacher-bashing and corporate reform to fight among ourselves. We must stand together so that we will one day prevail over those who want to destroy public education and the teaching profession. We can’t win if we are divided. I will do nothing to help those who pursue a strategy of divide and conquer. They want us to fight among ourselves. I won’t help them.

Today, American public education faces an existential threat to its very existence. We all need to work together, argue when we must, but maintain our basic unity against the truly radical, truly reactionary threat of privatization. As a nation, as a democracy, we cannot afford to lose this essential democratizing institution.

Let us join forces, stand together, debate strategy and tactics, but remain united. If we are united, we will win. And make no mistake. I am convinced that we will win.