Archives for the month of: July, 2013

Jeff Bryant of the Education Opportunity Network congratulates Arne Duncan for saying that there was “no excuse” for states that fail to fund their schools.

Jeff was quick to point out that the “no excuse” mantra is customarily used by Duncan and other corporate reformers to blame teachers for low test scores.

It is refreshing to hear the same rhetoric directed at governors and legislatures that abandon their responsibility to fund public schools.

Bryant writes:

“In his statement to the Pennsylvania officials overseeing the Philadelphia mess, Duncan urged, “We must invest in public education, not abandon it.”

“So yes, “No excuse.”

“When valued neighborhood schools are shuttered with no more justification than a press release, there’s no excuse.

“When public school administrators are forced to cut learning opportunities that keep students safe, healthy, engaged, and supported. No excuse.

“When teachers and parents have to speak out to prevent larger and larger class sizes…

“When students walk out of school because their favorite subjects and teachers are cut…

“When whole communities have to turn out into the streets to protest the plundering of the common good…

“No excuse. No excuse. No excuse!”

The holy grail for corporate reformers is cost-cutting that produces profits. Their hope is that if schools replace teachers with technology, the districts save money, and the tech companies strike it rich.

As David Sirota writes, districts (especially those with Broad-trained superintendents) are pouring millions into iPads, tablets, etc., in hope that students will learn online and be tested online. at the same time, class sizes will get larger as the teacher becomes a monitor, supervising rather than teaching. Even districts that have suffered budget cuts and lost essential services will somehow find the money to invest in technology.

Win-win-lose.

Win for those who sell technology.

Win for those who want larger classes taught online.

Loss for the kids, who need a human teacher to help them and explain.

New York City parent activist Natalie Green Giles saw an uncanny resemblance between the Hunger Games and the city’s education policies.

She writes:

The Hunger Games in the NYC Public Schools

June 2013

By Natalie Green Giles

We have just finished the annual rite of our Hunger Games here in our New York City public schools. Our games go on for six days, not counting the weeks (in some cases months) of prep to get ready for them. The reaping, as always, selected all of our third through eighth grade public school students, from our 32 districts, some as young as seven years old. We parents hope it doesn’t get younger, but the ominous signs are starting to point that way.

Families know the drill at this point, but it has been getting worse. The Capitol–City Hall and the DOE in coercion with the Albany education leaders and lawmakers–must have felt rumbles of rebellion and decided that it wasn’t enough to just use our children as pawns in the political game of legacy-making and privatization: this year they went and up’ed the challenge and made the games harder, knowing that the tributes and their coaches (teachers) wouldn’t have enough time or the right tools to train, and that some kids would have a much harder time surviving in this arena. They, of course, had to make sure that the whole world could see the Capitol’s power, authority, and ability to control and humiliate, so they still made sure they could fire the teachers based on the scores of the tributes (even though by now we all know the metrics are based on a terribly flawed methodology). They try to make these scores public so that we can cheer for the top performers and deride the low scorers. The Capitol also makes sure we know that they will come and shut down a schools if not enough of its kids survive the arena with a passing score. It’s a way of keeping us standardized and conformist. It’s an easy way for them to keep track of us, just giving everyone a number. We wouldn’t want society to start nurturing creative and independent thinkers who might cause a rebellion in the future.

Once again, the careers from District 2 showed off their lifelong training; we heard recently how the majority of rising kindergartners getting the gifted and talented seats came from that esteemed district. We already knew that the fourth graders and seventh graders from the wealthier district often had a lot of private coaching, but many families now spoke of hiring tutors and sending their four-year-olds to test prep programs, just to be sure their kids were armed as best as they could be. You can’t blame them. The competition is fierce in the arena, and we know not everyone can win. There are just so many seats available in the good schools, especially in the good middle and high schools.

Then there are the gamesmakers. They go by the name of Pearson. Beware of them. They are being paid tens of millions of dollars alone this year from the testing contracts they have signed with the Capitol, and they are ready to put in whatever obstacles are necessary if it looks like the children are getting too comfortable. Starting fires, creating fierce mutant animals, or turning down the temperature to freezing in the arena? That’s nothing. Now they have ramped up what was a 180-minute test to 270 minutes—three straight days of 90 concentrated minutes (bathroom breaks are discouraged), reading passage after passage after passage, sometimes throwing in crazy stories about pineapples and hares. It could drive a tribute to the point of madness. Or worse—it could make them hate reading and writing with all those boring passages that don’t reflect life in their own district and with everything out of context. And to really trip us up, they make mistakes in their scoring. They sometimes tell kids who performed well that they didn’t make the cut. Who knows what last minute perils those gamesmakers at Pearson will throw in for the upcoming tests? Who knows what dangers await our children? Not even the Capitol, it seems.

And yes, all of Panem watches and reads about the games, but we are not actually allowed to ever see the tests or know what the correct answers are (or know what our children got wrong). But the games nonetheless are a political spectator sport, and media companies benefit mightily, as newspapers and other media outlets cover the drama of the arena and everything leading up to it. And when the final scores come out? That’s the real feeding frenzy. But no one media company benefits as much as Rupert Murdoch’s. He has a subsidiary called Wireless Generation. Check them out.

We parents want to rebel but we don’t know how. We suffer every year along with our chosen children, but go along with it because we are forced into believing that the Capitol knows what’s best—more so than even parents and educators. So we acquiesce and let our children go without real learning for weeks and months while they get prepped for battle. We let our children endure the days of testing, with all the stress and pressure and anxiety it causes. And then we watch as our children lose even more instructional time after it’s all over, because their teachers are then taken away to grade the tests for days at a time. (Oh—and by the way– the schools now have to pay the bill for the coverage while their teachers are away.) A few families were brave enough to “opt out” of testing this year—keeping their kids out of the arena or telling them not to fight when they got there (i.e., leave the test blank)—but we’ve heard that there will be severe consequences for those kids and their schools. But maybe it’s time for us to be brave. Maybe it’s time to fight against what we know is just plain wrong. Before it gets even worse. Before the games are scheduled for more than six days a year.

Think about it–when the stakes are so high and so misguided that our children’s educational reality begins to mirror a dystopian fantasy, what do we really have to lose?

Responding to another reader, Robert Shepherd challenges the claim that reformers want a free market in schooling:

“We are NOT seeing the emergence of free market alternatives to public schools. We are seeing is crony capitalist alternatives dependent upon federal and state regulation and the public dole that could not possibly survive in truly free markets. It doesn’t matter whether it originates on the right or the left or what rhetoric it uses, tyranny is tyranny. It’s a NewSpeak version of the language of classical liberalism that is being used to defend what is actually happening. It’s incredibly naive to buy into the rhetoric in the face of the realities. Let’s see: Pass a federal law that ensures that almost all public schools will fail. Require states to provide alternatives. Have the Secretary of Education, now a private citizen, found an online virtual school to provide those alternatives, one that depends upon the same taxpayer dollars but siphons off a lot of those into private profits. There are eight million stories in the Naked City, and this has been one of them. The others have much the same general form.

“If that’s what you think of as the creation of free market alternatives, then you have started mainlining the Soma.”

Robert Mann, a professor of communications at Louisiana State University, tries to imagine how Bobby Jindal and John White would react if they heard that Headstart centers kept sloppy records and couldn’t pass an audit.

He writes:

“Imagine if almost every one of those schools could not produce any records to prove that their expenditures did not constitute “gross irresponsibility or gross individual enrichment.”

“What do you think would be the reaction of Louisiana Republican leaders?

“What if the audits of these Head Start schools were littered with the following statements: ”We were unable to perform the [investigative] procedures because the school did not have a separate checking account or other procedures to account for [government related] expenditures separate from other expenditures.”

“Can you imagine the outrage we’d hear from Gov. Bobby Jindal and state Education Superintendent John White?

“Well, what if similar audits turned up showing the same kind of sloppy record keeping at almost every private voucher school in Louisiana? What do you imagine the reaction would be to that?

“Well, we don’t have to imagine.”

It is okay by them if voucher schools keep bad records. It doesn’t matter at all.

No problem. Just throwing taxpayer dollars out the window with no accountability at all.

But when most voucher schools could not produce the records needed to be audited, John White shrugged it off.

John White wrote a letter to the editor to defend his record and praise the sweeping, bold, innovative reforms that he has led.

Mercedes Schneider subjected White’s letter to a severe fact check and found it deficient, especially in relation to basic accuracy.

She cuffs him about the head and says:

“Reformers like White thrive on promoting the false dichotomy that “disagreeing with me” equals “a return to the old days.” Another reformer false idea is that everything about the past ways of functioning is “bad” and the “bold, new, sweeping reforms” are automatically “good.” Not so. Critically-thinking individuals consider what works, whether from past or present. It is a shame that I find myself having to defend such a basic idea.

“You are the one playing the game, John White. You write a letter thinking that people will divorce your words from your previous deceptive behavior. You think that the public does not read the other pages in the newspaper, including the pages on your voucher program failure and fraud. You fail to realize that your distorted words only provide fodder for more blog postings for the likes of me. Rest assured, people will read this and share it in other social media settings. They will see you once again as the deceiver that you are. They will once again see through the emptiness of your words.”

A new survey shows that Philadelphia has the highest poverty rate of any of the nation’s 10 largest cities.

28% of the city’s people are poor, as are 39% of its children. The national child poverty rate is 23%.

Now we know from reformers that poverty is no “excuse” for low test scores, but we also know from the reality-based world that low income is highly correlated with low test scores. If you want to learn more, read Richard Rothstein’s “Class and Schools,” or google Helen Ladd’s “Education and Poverty: Confronting the Evidence.”

Thus, it makes no sense to strip the city’s schools of the arts, physical education, librarians, guidance counselors, social workers, and every other support personnel. These children desperately need a good education.

The state of Pennsylvania has a constitutional obligation to educate its children.

And the state thus far has cynically told Philadelphia to extract more taxes from its impoverished population. That is worse than no answer. That is negligence of a high order.

When the next election comes round, the people of Pennsylvania should hold accountable those who inflicted harm on the state’s most vulnerable children.

Hugh Bailey argues that fighting democracy is a losing battle.

He refers to the struggle over the future of the public schools of Bridgeport, Connecticut, which has involved an ongoing battle by the mayor to gain control of the schools (he lost a referendum when the public said no) and now involves a court battle to keep Paul Vallas as superintendent. He was hired, Bailey says, by an illegitimate board and given a contract to lock him into place. Now a court has ruled that he is not legally qualified to serve under state law.

Bailey points out:

“Like it or not, our system of laws is the one we have, and making exceptions for celebrity superintendents or anyone else is only going to bring trouble.

Speaking of Vallas, he needs to go. He’s leaving anyway. He’s had one foot out the door from the day he arrived. The notion that he — that anyone — can swoop in, make some changes, lock them into place and get out of town is farcical.

One judge has ruled against him already, and the state Supreme Court has proven it doesn’t look kindly on the whole “the rules don’t apply to us” routine when it comes to Bridgeport education.

That’s the peril of this strategy. The mayor of Bridgeport might believe democracy doesn’t work. He might even convince the governor. Clearly the state education commissioner is on board.

But those judges — they’re tougher to bring around. And without them on your side, all that hard work that went into enacting anti-democratic reforms takes you right back where you started.”

Public education is part of the fabric of democracy. It cannot be reformed by undemocratic means. When elites believe that they know best, and that their ideas are so good that they need not consult parents and teachers, they are doomed from the start.

In an earlier post, Karen Francisco (editorial page editor of the Fort Wayne Journal Gazette) lamented that failing charters escape accountability by turning into voucher schools or shopping for an authorizer with low standards. When challenged by a reader, Francisco explained what happened in Fort Wayne.

She wrote:

“In fact, the two failed Imagine Inc. charter schools in Fort Wayne are being converted to voucher schools. The local charter board has been dismissed, loans forgiven and Indiana taxpayers will continue to pay Bakke’s company to operate two underperforming schools. In addition, an out-of-state real estate investment trust — EPT Properties — will continue to collect about $1 million a year for the charter school lease. Instead of through the charter board, the tax dollars now will be funneled through low- and middle-income families to a religious organization and, in turn, to the REIT.”

Malala Yousafzai, the teenager who was shot in the head by Taliban thugs who don’t want girls to be educated, spoke at the United Nations and was amazingly eloquent in calling for free, compulsory education for every child.

What an incredible and heroic young woman.

Some heard her and got goosebumps.

The attempt to murder her made her more courageous.

““Let us pick up our books and our pens,” Ms. Yousafzai told young leaders from 100 countries at the United Nations Youth Assembly in New York. “They are our most powerful weapons. One child, one teacher, one book, and one pen can change the world. Education is the only solution.”

The NY Times reports:

“Ms. Yousafzai, noting that she was proud to be wearing a shawl that had once belonged to Benazir Bhutto, spoke in a calm, self-assured voice as she delivered her first major speech since she was shot on the left side of her head Oct. 9 on her way home from school in Pakistan’s Swat Valley.

“In her speech, she recalled how the attackers had also shot her friends. “They thought that the bullets would silence us,” she said, “but they failed.”

She said:

“And then, out of that silence came thousands of voices. The terrorists thought that they would change our aims and stop our ambitions but nothing changed in my life except this: Weakness, fear and hopelessness died. Strength, power and courage was born. I am the same Malala. My ambitions are the same. My hopes are the same. My dreams are the same.”