Enthusiasts of online education are forever gushing about the prospects for high-quality, low-cost education, delivered to masses of students sitting at a computer.
In January, San Jose State announced a partnership with a firm called Udacity, and the results to date have been a disappointment. Udacity is funded by equity investors as the next new big thing. Technically, the Udacity program is not a MOOC because it is neither “massive” nor “open,” but it is a trial of the concept of online learning.
“According to the preliminary presentation, 74 percent or more of the students in traditional classes passed, while no more than 51 percent of Udacity students passed any of the three courses….The spring courses – a remedial math course, a college algebra course and an introductory statistics course – were chosen in part because of the wishes of Bill Gates, whose foundation gave the effort a grant,” university officials said.
The university will make improvements in the courses and try again. Udacity is expanding to Georgia, where “the company recently signed a major deal with the Georgia Institute of Technology to eventually offer a low-cost online master’s degree to 10,000 students at once.”
Only brick and mortar schools should offer online degrees and courses. This should not be outsourced. My second masters was from West Texas A & M University. I loved it. It was difficult, but I am the type of person who does well with limited supervision because I’m self motivated.
I can visualize graduation ceremony via Skype:”EVERYONE MOVE YOUR TASSEL, CONGRATULATIONS!”
Entire degrees? I’ll be reviewing more closely my gynecologist’s credentials in the future. Bad News!
Ever hear of Western Governor’s University? It is going on a decade now. http://www.wgu.edu/
I’m concerned by that, and what it may mean for everyone in the future.
I’m pretty sure that’s where my new (this is his first year of admin) supervising principal got his admin masters-it was a total online course of study. He could see by the look in my eyes when he said that that I had to squelch the laughter/hide my contempt.
I have argued for years that online courses have a built in blind spot. Where face-to-face education has clear signs as to whether students are engaged (whether they come to class, can answer questions, turn in assignments, etc) which act as goads to keep students going, online courses and their ilk require a decision to “attend” every time an interaction is to be made. There is no momentum, no regular schedule, no encouragement to participate and students always fall away. This happened with correspondence courses, TV courses, etc. This is nothing new. Maybe if these folks would require all students to log on once a day it might help, but students would still need to decide when to do that task, rather than have the goad of “I have to run to catch my 10 o’clock class.” We are talking about managing human behavior here and too little thought has gone into “classroom management” and too much into delivery system economics.
I actually know a friend who just ‘took’ an online class for another friend. Well at least one of them learned something. Just not the person who will actually be doing the job (that paid for the class originally) and that’s the problem with online education.
Maybe there’s actually some value to students of having a living, breathing person there with them to model thinking (as in doing math problems on the board), answer questions, maybe even inspire.
MAYBE?????????????????
There likely is, but that may not be an option for some students. The choice may be between an online program like the Art of Problem Solving and no course at all.
So 25% more of the students who took a remedial math course failed?
Can they get the time they put in back from Bill Gates, now that they have to re-take the course? They should conduct these experiments, these failed start-ups, on people who can afford it. I would suggest that the family members of the inventors should go first.
Another term for the Reformy-English Dictionary:
“Virtual” = “fake”
I think virtual courses will have a role in education from now on. Probably not a dominant one, but in rural areas they can greatly expand the courses students can take.
I think blended courses, however, are the future of higher education.