United Opt Out has consistently spoken against the abuses of testing and high stakes for students and teachers.
Here is a link to their Declaration of Independence and to other important information about them.
And here is their Declaration of Independence from corporate education reform.
United Opt Out National http://unitedoptout.com
IN OPPOSITION, July 4, 2013
The unanimous Declaration of the national United Opt Out,
When in the course of educating a nation, it becomes necessary for its people to restrain the political and private powers which have obfuscated the fundamental mission of a public system of education to, among other points, compensate for the proclivities of the Laws of Nature to separate and exclude swaths of humankind into those that have and those without.
That to secure this broad mission of a public education, Governments are commissioned by its people to serve unequivocally the explicit needs of those to be educated. It is not to relinquish control of the purposes of education to incorporated powers which deign the will of a free People to determine the means and ends of their cultural developments.
Whenever any Government or Agent of the State abrogates the responsibility to defend the general preparations of its future citizens from untoward profit-making, it is the Right of the Educated to alter or to refuse impositions, and to institute a new Education, laying its foundation on principles and powers to most likely effect their Autonomy, Freedom, and Happiness.
Love, indeed, will resolve that a public system of Education long established should not be upended for fickle and makeshift designs, and accordingly all experience has shown, that an aspirational People are disposed to trust, as certain evils are trustworthy, when impossible oaths are expressed as guarantees of accomplishment. That such promises are made by representatives of the Education State, to whom its People have become accustomed, is the most perverse injury of all.
But when a long record of exploitations and failures, in pursuit of objectives that evince a design to reduce the Educated to absolute Quantification, in effect leading to total economic Exploitation, it is their right, it is their obligation, to refuse such Education, and to provide new Custodians for their future achievement. Such has been the persistent sufferance of the Educated, particular to Inhabitants of the most meager of circumstances; and such is now the requisition which prohibits them from amending their rightful System of Education.
The history of the present Secretary of Education, of his maids of State, and sycophants in unelected offices, is a history of recurring ignorance and ineptitude, all having in ultimate purpose the reduction of the Educated to singularly objective values that are inherently valueless. It is with this Ignorance and Ineptitude that the current Government wields an inseparable Autocratic alliance between Incorporated and State interests against the wishes of the People.
To prove this, let United Opt Out submit these Facts to a candid world:
• He has refused to reduce inequality and segregation, the most unwholesome and unnecessary for a public Education.
United Opt Out National http://unitedoptout.com
- He has constrained the role of professional Educators and contributed to their egregious humiliation in the face of unreasonable scrutiny from the State.
- He has ignored significant corrective actions necessary to diminish disparities in opportunities, resources, and human capital in Education as sanctioned by the Fiscal Fairness Act.
- For refusal to recommend other Laws or Regulations for the Rightful accommodation of large groups of students, principally second language, impoverished, and students of color, unless Schools relinquish the autonomy of Educators and control of their Curriculum, needs inestimable to them and formidable to ideologues only.
- He condones through inadequate and narrow investigations a professional culture of Lying, Cheating, and Exploitation within School communities.
- He has endeavored to prevent School populations from selecting refusal of specific Federal impositions that hinder local needs from an erroneous Competition for funds, such that these limited monies could not possibly repair previous and egregious breaches in support, that otherwise bind Schools and Districts to compliance.
- For taking away our traditional public Schools in favor of Charters, altering our most valuable laws to hasten dissolutions, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Local Boards to enact control of Mayors as opposed to the People expressly.
- For Accommodating large bodies of untrained Educators among us:
- For protecting them, by granting certain exceptions, from qualification for any
Educator position which they hold in the most challenging Schools;
- For imposing Subsidies on public School systems to sponsor amateurs;
- For shielding open Educator positions, that should otherwise be available to
qualified candidates, for provisional Recruits.
- For protecting them, by granting certain exceptions, from qualification for any
- He has excited insurrections amongst us, and has endeavored to bring on the
inhabitants of our cities against each other, setting as rivals the poor against the poor, to become executioners of their own friends and Brethren, to fall themselves by their Hands, to enable the affluent in escaping responsibility.
- He has affected to render Corporations independent of and superior to the Civil power.
- He has exacerbated the conditions dissolving elected Boards repeatedly, for opposing with effete vacillation his encroachment on the rights of the people.
- He has denied sufficient protections to confidential information gathered by private entities in the process of public Education; ignored the apprehensions expressed by the caregivers of the students of our public Schools therein; and perseveres in implementation of diffuse collection methods in defiance of personal Privacy.
- For conscripting the publicly Educated into labour on behalf of Private entities to refine the instruments of our own Oppression; not for the re-investment of knowledge and resources acquired, but to enrich the remunerative coffers of speculators.
- He has abdicated Government in the defense of public Education by declaring Accountability greater to Preservation, and waging Wars of Attrition against us.
United Opt Out National http://unitedoptout.com
In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Secretary of Education whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Profiteer, is unfit to be the warden of a Public lavatory let alone a free system of Public Education.
Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our Private brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their Board members to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of our Allegiance to the public in Education. We have appealed to their assumed senses of innate justice and fairness, and we have summoned them by the ties of our common citizenship to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our cooperation and camaraderie. They too have been deaf to the voices of equality and solidarity. We must, therefore, submit to this necessity, which denounces our Disobedience, and hold them, as we hold us all, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.
We, therefore, the Administrators of the national United Opt Out, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the free people of this Nation for the integrity of our intentions, do, in the Name and our Authority, defiantly publish and declare, That our public systems of Education are, and of Right ought to be, Absolved from any and all Obligations, Oppressions, and Exploitations set forth only by Private and Unelected Associations; that we assert the abilities to Choose and Refuse certain Acts and Things that violate the interminable conscientiousness of professional Educators; and that as Discerning and Intellectual personnel, charged with labors few are wont or capable to do, we have full Power to secure our own professional identities, determine to Whom and under what conditions for which we are Accountable, and succeed with significant voice to govern the Laws of our work.
And for support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Good Sense and a Common Destiny, we mutually pledge each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our Sacred Honor.

BRILLIANT!!! thank you U.O.O.
LikeLike
This is a bi-partisan mess . . . supportive of and adding to a failed national education policy, in my opinion! Kudos to United Opt Out for your continued efforts to unveil the truth behind the myth!
LikeLike
Oh… my… God… this is a funny
parody created by some NY parents
opting who are out:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OvKVkitKOgk
LikeLike
The founding members of United Opt Out are dedicated, wise and witty. Every city and state in America should establish a chapter of the Opt Out Movement.
LikeLike
what a delight!
LikeLike
Here is the direct link to all of the information on our website – http://unitedoptout.com/declare-your-independence-opt-out-refuse-corp-ed-reform/ . In that link is a pdf of the declaration, a video of the declaration, and finally….opt out guides for every SINGLE state. We do hope that you will share these opt out/refusal guides as we launch our greatest opt out campaign thus far. Solidarity everyone. Peg, UOO Administrator, http://www.pegwithpen.com
LikeLike
So where does this important declaration go from here? Has it been sent to the President? Arne Duncan? Union leadership? Published in all the national newspapers? Put in public places for the public-at-large to read? Sent to every congressperson? Senator? Are the regional unions around the nation going to be asking for teachers to sign this declaration? Just wondering the plan so that this declaration can have TOOTH!
LikeLike
Artseagal..We are in phase 1 of implementing our plan – more to follow soon I promise! Best, Peg (admin/UOO, http://www.unitedoptout.com, http://www.pegwithpen.com )
LikeLike
“It is not to relinquish control of the purposes of education to incorporated powers which deign the will of a free People to determine the means and ends of their cultural developments.”
This is the heart of the matter for me.
My heartfelt thanks to those at Opt Out for penning this Declaration of Independence from corporate educational reform.
LikeLike
I usually think about a 13 year old being married against her will as being oppressed, but maybe taking too many exams also qualifies.
In any case, isn’t the solution to this oppression much easier than the 13 year olds problem? Win the election and it goes away.
LikeLike
It is time! The revolution must begin for the public good as it did with our forefathers! Great job!
LikeLike
I like the 18th Century capitalization scheme. And the bullet points read like the Nicene Creed.
LikeLike
I believe you guys are again missing the point here. Duncan could not do any of these acts without the knowledge and approval of his boss, President Obama. Replacing Duncan will not stop this thing…Obama must see the errors of his ways.
LikeLike
Please watch/listen to Glenn Beck’s radio program on YouTube where he explains that this is not just a Democrat issue. Many, many Republicans are supporting and pushing the Ed Reform mission of corporate take-over of public education!
LikeLike
I know this is a bigger issue that both Dems and Repubs support the destruction of public education. It started with a Nation At Risk under Reagan in 1983, continued with Clinton, got a dose of irrationality under Bush Jr with NCLB, and now a heaping pile of dung under Obama’s RTTT. The problem is that education is a Trillion dollar industry just waiting to be fully tapped, and the politicians are not working for the common good.
LikeLike
Yes, it seems everyone wants a “piece of the pie”…even many who seem to own many other whole pies! In Indiana, we slowed things down with a grass-roots effort (and success!) to throw Tony Bennett from office. All of us concerned, across the whole country, need to identify those politicians who are being bought by Gates, Koch, ALEC, ad nauseum, and target them for election upsets. To me, this is the ONLY common work that all opposed to “ed reform” can do TOGETHER.
LikeLike
Forgot to add: Go to followthemoney.org and check who gave money to your legislators’ campaigns! Study all of the contributors as you study the candidate.
LikeLike
I have to say I don’t get it. The Secretary of Education is chosen by the President of the United States to carry out his educational policy. This is Obama’s educational policy, not Arne Duncan’s educational policy. People weren’t hesitant to blame George W. Bush for his cabinet’s failings and his vice-president as they were carrying out what people understood as his policy. Why are educational professionals so afraid of holding the president accountable for this? This is Obama’s educational policy. Until educational professionals get over their own fears of a Democratic president catering to the corporate world, there will be no change because they will be trying to find another scapegoat to attack instead.
LikeLike
Please watch/listen to Glenn Beck’s radio show about Common Core and all of Ed Reform on YouTube. This is not a Democrat issue. Many Republicans are pushing all that this document decries.
LikeLike
As we like to say, fatuously, on Facebook, “like.”
LikeLike
Mathbabe, a ‘blog hosted by a statistician and data scientist, has a good review of Measuring Up a recent book explaining high-stakes tests and the issues around high-stakes testing policies:
LikeLike
MnS,
The issues brought up in the article you reference are peripheral to the root/basic and most important problems involved in educational standards, standardized testing and the grading of students. What is discussed in the article are mainly about the mathematical machinations that educational standards and standardized test promoters do in order to “validify” a process that cannot be validated. Noel Wilson has already debunked these machinations and proved the invalidity of these educational malpractices in
Brief outline of Wilson’s “Educational Standards and the Problem of Error” and some comments of mine. (updated 6/24/13 per Wilson email)
1. A quality cannot be quantified. Quantity is a sub-category of quality. It is illogical to judge/assess a whole category by only a part (sub-category) of the whole. The assessment is, by definition, lacking in the sense that “assessments are always of multidimensional qualities. To quantify them as one dimensional quantities (numbers or grades) is to perpetuate a fundamental logical error” (per Wilson). The teaching and learning process falls in the logical realm of aesthetics/qualities of human interactions. In attempting to quantify educational standards and standardized testing we are lacking much information about said interactions.
2. A major epistemological mistake is that we attach, with great importance, the “score” of the student, not only onto the student but also, by extension, the teacher, school and district. Any description of a testing event is only a description of an interaction, that of the student and the testing device at a given time and place. The only correct logical thing that we can attempt to do is to describe that interaction (how accurately or not is a whole other story). That description cannot, by logical thought, be “assigned/attached” to the student as it cannot be a description of the student but the interaction. And this error is probably one of the most egregious “errors” that occur with standardized testing (and even the “grading” of students by a teacher).
3. Wilson identifies four “frames of reference” each with distinct assumptions (epistemological basis) about the assessment process from which the “assessor” views the interactions of the teaching and learning process: the Judge (think college professor who “knows” the students capabilities and grades them accordingly), the General Frame-think standardized testing that claims to have a “scientific” basis, the Specific Frame-think of learning by objective like computer based learning, getting a correct answer before moving on to the next screen, and the Responsive Frame-think of an apprenticeship in a trade or a medical residency program where the learner interacts with the “teacher” with constant feedback. Each category has its own sources of error and more error in the process is caused when the assessor confuses and conflates the categories.
4. Wilson elucidates the notion of “error”: “Error is predicated on a notion of perfection; to allocate error is to imply what is without error; to know error it is necessary to determine what is true. And what is true is determined by what we define as true, theoretically by the assumptions of our epistemology, practically by the events and non-events, the discourses and silences, the world of surfaces and their interactions and interpretations; in short, the practices that permeate the field. . . Error is the uncertainty dimension of the statement; error is the band within which chaos reigns, in which anything can happen. Error comprises all of those eventful circumstances which make the assessment statement less than perfectly precise, the measure less than perfectly accurate, the rank order less than perfectly stable, the standard and its measurement less than absolute, and the communication of its truth less than impeccable.”
In other word all the errors involved in the process render any conclusions invalid.
5. The test makers/psychometricians, through all sorts of mathematical machinations attempt to “prove” that these tests (based on standards) are valid-errorless or supposedly at least with minimal error [they aren’t]. Wilson turns the concept of validity on its head and focuses on just how invalid the machinations and the test and results are. He is an advocate for the test taker not the test maker. In doing so he identifies thirteen sources of “error”, any one of which renders the test making/giving/disseminating of results invalid. As a basic logical premise is that once something is shown to be invalid it is just that, invalid, and no amount of “fudging” by the psychometricians/test makers can alleviate that invalidity.
6. Having shown the invalidity, and therefore the unreliability, of the whole process Wilson concludes, rightly so, that any result/information gleaned from the process is “vain and illusory”. In other words start with an invalidity, end with an invalidity (except by sheer chance every once in a while, like a blind and anosmic squirrel who finds the occasional acorn, a result may be “true”) or to put in more mundane terms shit in-crap out.
7. And so what does this all mean? I’ll let Wilson have the second to last word: “So what does a test measure in our world? It measures what the person with the power to pay for the test says it measures. And the person who sets the test will name the test what the person who pays for the test wants the test to be named.”
In other words it measures “’something’ and we can specify some of the ‘errors’ in that ‘something’ but still don’t know [precisely] what the ‘something’ is.” The whole process harms many students as the social rewards for some are not available to others who “don’t make the grade (sic)” Should American public education have the function of sorting and separating students so that some may receive greater benefits than others, especially considering that the sorting and separating devices, educational standards and standardized testing, are so flawed not only in concept but in execution?
My answer is NO!!!!!
One final note with Wilson channeling Foucault and his concept of subjectivization:
“So the mark [grade/test score] becomes part of the story about yourself and with sufficient repetitions becomes true: true because those who know, those in authority, say it is true; true because the society in which you live legitimates this authority; true because your cultural habitus makes it difficult for you to perceive, conceive and integrate those aspects of your experience that contradict the story; true because in acting out your story, which now includes the mark and its meaning, the social truth that created it is confirmed; true because if your mark is high you are consistently rewarded, so that your voice becomes a voice of authority in the power-knowledge discourses that reproduce the structure that helped to produce you; true because if your mark is low your voice becomes muted and confirms your lower position in the social hierarchy; true finally because that success or failure confirms that mark that implicitly predicted the now self evident consequences. And so the circle is complete.”
In other words students “internalize” what those “marks” (grades/test scores) mean, and since the vast majority of the students have not developed the mental skills to counteract what the “authorities” say, they accept as “natural and normal” that “story/description” of them. Although paradoxical in a sense, the “I’m an “A” student” is almost as harmful as “I’m an ‘F’ student” in hindering students becoming independent, critical and free thinkers. And having independent, critical and free thinkers is a threat to the current socio-economic structure of society.
LikeLike
You people are unhinged. Public “education” is the most oppressive, intolerant, hateful, and feckless system yet devised by communists and teachers unions. Little but indoctrination centers for leftist ideology. Your relativism has made you all into witless automatons spouting Orwellian nonsense. Bottom line is you have failed to inspire achievement, and you don’t want anyone to know. That way you can keep giving yourselves raises without having earned them.
LikeLike
Richard Flaherty,
Please read my book “Reign of Error.”
Diane
LikeLike