June 3, 2013 12:40 pm
Just in from a teacher:
I teach in Albany, New York, and the State Education Department is crazy.
I just completed 1 month of testing. and no real teaching.
We are giving more tests than I ever dreamed possible.
Not only the state exams, but now local measures to help teachers with low testing students.
These new evaluations have spurred the worst frenzy I have ever seen.
It has been brought on by the Race to The Top money.
What a terrible idea no distict should have accepted the money.
There should have been mass protests about the strings attached, and it should be given back.
Posted by dianeravitch
Categories: Accountability, Race to the Top, Testing
Tags:
Mobile Site | Full Site
Get a free blog at WordPress.com Theme: WordPress Mobile Edition by Alex King.
We are “beholden to” the people we accept money from.
I agree. Give the money back. It is more trouble than it’s worth.
Then we won’t “have to” swallow Common Core, either.
As a traditional, community public school teacher, I’m tired of being told by those in power to just “suck it up” and acccept that RTTT and CCSS are “a given.”
Let’s give back the “given.”
LikeLike
By M. Schneider on June 3, 2013 at 12:46 pm
AMEN!
LikeLike
By Beth Bingham on June 3, 2013 at 12:53 pm
Mass protest
June 8
Albany NY
LikeLike
By Concerned Educator on June 3, 2013 at 1:00 pm
(as I previously commented on this)
“There should have been mass protests”
This is something that many will be saying after Public Education is completely destroyed. We should-DA!
LikeLike
By Tim on June 3, 2013 at 1:09 pm
I so agree
Wish Diane could get the protest started..
Anyone have a name for the Protest
TRILLION TESTERS MARCH MAYBE???
LikeLike
By neanderthal100 on June 3, 2013 at 5:24 pm
Too many states forgot: TANSTAAFL.
Here’s the root of the problem, though — we have a situation in which states apparently CANNOT fund their schools without extra money from the Federal government. That seems to indicate that the Federal government is taking too much in taxes and the states aren’t taking enough.
Once states started NEEDING Federal money in order to run their schools, this became inevitable, no?
LikeLike
By Ron Poirier on June 3, 2013 at 1:12 pm
By “this” I mean effective Federal control of local education systems.
LikeLike
By Ron Poirier on June 3, 2013 at 1:13 pm
It’s not just taxes. Very few administrators are held accountable for transparency in finances. Why is it that a homeschooling family can educate their child for a couple hundred dollars a year, or even for free, and often get results on par or better than a public school spending upwards of $12,000 a year per student? If the administrators were held accountable, and wasteful spending was eliminated, I believe we would find that the schools do not need more money. Our local superintendent makes more than the mayor of our state. It’s absurd.
LikeLike
By Anne on June 3, 2013 at 7:24 pm
I meant to say the governor, not the mayor. 🙂
LikeLike
By Anne on June 3, 2013 at 7:52 pm
This is a tactic that was perfected in the 3rd world. Tie IMF or World Bank loans to policy changes. Things like cutting the public sector, privatizing water supplies, etc. It is called neoliberalism. The chickens are coming home to roost.
LikeLike
By GARRET VIRCHICK on June 3, 2013 at 1:18 pm
Everybody should read The Shock Doctrine by Naomi Klein.
LikeLike
By Susan on June 3, 2013 at 2:28 pm
Agree.
For a quick introduction to her thesis:
series of 7 video clips from a talk she gave in ’07.
LikeLike
By Ang on June 3, 2013 at 5:11 pm
Not to be pedantic, but the IMF’s policies of enforced privatization, deregulation, destruction of labor rights, elimination of subsidies for social needs and downsizing of the public sector in emerging economies was called Structural Adjustment, a tactic of the neoliberal model.
Today, Structural Adjustment, although the term is not used as often, is being applied to European countries and the US in the form of austerity-driven fiscal policies, attacks on public workers, proposed cutbacks to Social Security and Medicare (by both political parties) and privatization of schools and infrastructure.
And, as you correctly state, as the global prominence of the US has waned, imperialism has come home to roost.
Many years ago, during an inspiring (though unsuccessful) strike of Hormel packinghouse workers, I went to a demonstration in solidarity. One of the speakers was Baldemar Velazquez, the head of the Farm Workers Organizing Committee. His first words to the audience were, “Welcome to the bottom.”
Teachers should keep those words in mind as attacks on us proliferate and intensify. If we want to avoid having Bill Gates’ and Eli Broad’s boots on our throats, it’s time to resist and fight back.
LikeLike
By Michael Fiorillo on June 3, 2013 at 2:44 pm
I have long held a prayer that NC would send that money back too. In fact I’ve tried to think of who I know who might be wealthy enough to help cover it (surely there are a few people in this state who could write that check and get us out of this!!)
I pray for it every day.
LikeLike
By Joanna Best on June 3, 2013 at 2:37 pm
With you
LikeLike
By neanderthal100 on June 3, 2013 at 5:25 pm
John King should resign immediately. Gov. Cuomo, Arne Duncan, and President Obama’s bribe has failed miserably.
LikeLike
By tuppercooks on June 3, 2013 at 6:58 pm
Consider this… Florida has been a proponent of everything NCLB and RTTT for 15+ years and this testing craze has resulted in exactly what you descrbed. In St Lucie County, we spend at least 8 weeks of the school year doing testing, resulting in minimal teaching–for some (like Reading), the testing is at least 3 times that. I’m not sure what learning the powers-that-be think is going on–but, hey, “they” get their stats with which to wow the public, the press, and each other.
Lots of money resulting in nothing useful to the student!
Is this what the business community wants?
On that last topic… St. Lucie County (actually, the whole of Florida) is about to add a massive number of families (especially children) to Medicaid. Talk about a tax liability. School Districts are no longer insuring the families of employees. The option presented is to pay approximately $17,000 for insurance or apply for Medicaid. The first option is not reasonable on a net salary of $27,000.
It is only what can be described as a phenomenon: spending goes up, results and salaries go down.
Business community, is this what you call a more efficient government?
LikeLike
By Gregg on June 3, 2013 at 9:22 pm
It’s what they call CHA-CHING!!!
LikeLike
By Ron Poirier on June 4, 2013 at 12:10 am
Speaking of returns, let’s returnn Arne Duncan to his posts prior to Secretary of Education.
LikeLike
By Robert Rendo on June 5, 2013 at 6:35 am