Wayne Gersen has been working in several districts in Vermont. He is impressed by Vermont’s determination not to allow testing to be the be-all and end-all of education. The state is determined not to let NCLB wreck its schools and not to ask for a waiver that would allow Duncan to impose high-stakes testing. If only Obama did what Vermont does!
Very glad Vermont is moving away from Carnegie (rigid) approach to graduation, toward student demonstration of skills. St. Paul Open School developed a series of proficiencies more than 30 years ago, Mn New Country has done the same.
Carnegie units way too rigid – students should be expected to demonstrate a variety of skills before graduation, only some of which can be measured by a standardized test.
“. . . only some of which can be measured by a standardized test.”
NO, no standardized test measures anything other than the ability to take a standardized test. The teaching and learning process cannot be measured. To insist otherwise is to promote a false/invalid view of the teaching and learning process.
Duane, do you agree we should be moving away from Carnegie units to determine whether a person is ready to graduate from college?
Re use of standardized tests to help measure part of what a student knows…As an example, the American College Testing service says scoring at or above a certain point on their test predicts whether a student will earn a B or higher as a Freshman in college.
I don’t think that colleges should only use ACT as a way to determine whether to admit a person. But have you, or anyone else you respect, looked at their assessments and determine that their research is flawed?
Yes, I have read the 1990 study that you have posted.
Joe
“the American College Testing service says scoring at or above a certain point on their test predicts whether a student will earn a B or higher as a Freshman in college.”
Maybe so, but as I recall the test does not predict success in college beyond the freshman year.
Alan, unfortunately many students drop out of college in their freshman year. Some because they have failed too many courses, some because they don’t have the money to continue. Some for a combination of reasons.
So a test that helps predict which students will succeed in the first year seems to be a valid part (only part) of determining who should be admitted when a college has more applicants that it does spots.
This is for higher ed – I don’t believe in using such tests in k-12 because k-12, as others have noted, as a mission of educating all kinds of youngsters.