Archives for the month of: March, 2013

This is one of the best newspaper articles I have read about the damaging impact of vouchers and tax credits on small-town and rural America.

The big question is why so many conservatives want to destroy one of our nation’s most enduring and central institutions: our public schools. There is little or no evidence that “school choice” produces better academic results. It does, however, privatize education.

Since when do conservatives go around blowing up traditional institutions?

The tax credit program in Georgia isn’t supposed to help “poor kids in failing schools.” It is designed to provide money for any child in the state to go to private school. In short, it’s a voucher.

The article’s writer, Leon Galis, says:

“Meanwhile, there’s panic in the one- and no-stoplight towns below the gnat line. In Harry Crews country, small, isolated school districts serving only a few hundred students each, with so few teachers that it’s common for one teacher to cover several grades, face the prospect of somehow having to get along with even fewer teachers.

Superintendents in these districts don’t know how they’ll go from absolute bare bones to less than absolute bare bones and still offer anything remotely resembling education.

Another thing I don’t understand is why self-styled conservatives have so little interest in conserving anything. For many of these map-dot communities, the schools and the churches are the center of community life, the glue that holds these hardscrabble places together.

As Beverly Grant, a retired Quitman County teacher, told the Journal-Constitution, the school system is “the foundation of the community. Basically, it’s the only thing the community really has … .”

Anybody who’s ever been to Quitman County will know exactly what she’s talking about. Starve the schools and you fast-track these towns toward extinction. Why don’t conservatives get that?
And why don’t they get this?: If strewing vouchers around to give people more school choices makes any sense at all, it makes sense only in urban and suburban areas, like Cobb County where Ehrhart is from. In places like that, you can throw a rock in any direction and hit a school.
But in the sparsely populated areas of the state where schools are too far apart even to consolidate, the urban and suburban fascination with “school choice” is a cruel joke. For a voucher to be worth anything, people have to have options, which the residents of the “sparsity” grant districts don’t, unless you count moving away.

To a more jaundiced eye, though, maybe this situation isn’t a case of the right hand not knowing what the right hand is doing. Maybe the right hand knows exactly what it’s doing. Because enough people in the “sparsity” districts are reliable Republican voters, the Republicans under the Gold Dome know they can jerk those constituencies around with impunity. And for exactly the same reason, Democrats ignore them. Both parties fish where the votes are. And they’re not in Harry Crews country.

This is all starting to make sense to me now.

Want to know why teachers are demoralized? Read this story from Grand Rapids, Michigan.

Michigan has been a national leader in attacking public education, increasing charters, and diminishing teachers’ pay and benefits. Governor Rick Snyder must take pride in crushing his state’s public school teachers.

Oh, did you know that more than 80% of the charters in Michigan are for-profit?

Public school activists are conducting a sit-in in the office of the mayor of Philadelphia to protest school closings.

This is the announcement I just received:

BREAKING NEWS – March 5, 2013 – Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Hello PCAPS (Philadelphia Coalition Advocating for Public Schools & Moratorium Endorsers,

The fight for education has just reached new levels! Parents, community activists, retired teachers and allies are sitting in the Mayor’s office as we speak and they are refusing to leave until we win a one year moratorium on school closings.

Members like yourself are joined by NAACP President Jerry Mondesire and Philadelphia Federation of Teachers President Jerry Jordan.

This is a historic day for public education in Philadelphia!

The School Reform Commission in Philadelphia will vote on March 7, 2013 for the closing of 29 Public Schools after three days of public testimony calling for a one year moratorium. The plan was revised by Dr. William Hite, Superintendent of the School District of Philadelphia.

PCAPS is a combination of Parents, Parent Groups, Community, Unions, Philadelphia Federation of Teachers, Clergy who have come together to fight for Public Education.

http://politic365.com/2013/03/05/pa-school-closings-addition-of-subtractions-dont-add-up/

http://www.citypaper.net/news/Closing_Arguments.html

http://thenotebook.org/

On other posts, I have told the story of Eastside Memorial High School in Austin, Texas.

The school board and superintendent (Broad-trained) decided to give the school to a charter chain called IDEA. This was not popular with the community. Many families in the neighborhood pulled their children out of the IDEA charter in protest and sent them elsewhere. In the November election, the community elected a school board member opposed to the charter takeover, and the board severed the contract. Now the state is considering shutting down the school, and the parents and students are trying to block the school’s closure. At the Save Our School Rally last weekend in Austin, a large contingent of parents and students from Eastside Memorial High School marched and chanted in unison, raising their “bear paws” to show their support for their school.

Here is a letter from a parent:

 

Dear Diane, Thank you so much for sharing our story! ~~

There are many misconceptions about our school. Some created by self-serving “we can do better” groups. MOST created and broadcast by our own School District! I wish to address Five. ~~

First, “EMHS is always failing”. When EMHS was “born” in August 2008, it was already rated Academically Unacceptable (AU). That is NOT what they promised the neighborhood. It was supposed to be a fresh start. Our students and staff have lived and worked under this AU guillotine from day one. :-( ~~

Second, “EMHS cannot fix itself.” EMHS is no longer AU. The hard-working students and staff turned the school around. Within two years, grades, test scores and graduation rates were WAY UP. And drop-out and discipline reports were way down. ~~ Their reward? Their beloved and successful Principal was replaced. And (10/20/2011) two months into the new school year the district Superintendent announced that IDEA Charter would take over their school in a year!!! ~~

Three, “The Community does not care.” Many emotionally exhausted, heart-broken students and staff left the school. Many more stayed and FOUGHT BACK. Eventually, thousands across Austin wrote, called, and protested FOR the school. As Diane said, it took an election and 14 months to cancel the IDEA plan. Now the Super is telling another story to scare us all. ~~

Four, “The TEA Commissioner will close EMHS”. But, why would he? EMHS is AA! And scores are way up. ~~ And, there is a lot going on right now in Texas education (testing, funding, etc.). He is busy. Why would he bother messing with our school??? Because the pissed off / embarrassed Super went charging over there to tell him that the new Board had messed up and EMHS was now out of compliance! ~~

Finally, Five: “Nothing at EMHS has worked./ We have tried everything.” Nearing 5 years of existence, EMHS has been subjected to 4 MAJOR restructurings by the District. IDEA is number 5. When I think of how wonderful our little campus family is and how well they are performing. I think about how glorious they might already have become. If not for the constant churning actions of their heartless (stupid?) District. ~~

Despite the District’s constant reminders to the world that EMHS is garbage. Our campus family is one of the most loving, compassionate, hard-working, and determined groups that I have ever had the honor of being a part of. ~~ Please pray for us. Thank you.

Signed: Toni Rayner, EMHS mom x2.

Mayor Bloomberg plans to start four charter high schools that will open after his term of office ends.

This constitutes an admission that his own efforts to reform the public schools have failed.

The mayor has had 11 years of total control of the public school system. Every year, he closes more schools. Some of the schools he closes are schools that his own administration opened..

Less than 5% of the city’s 1.1 million students attend charters.

The other 95% have been forgotten, adrift in a system that has been reorganized four times, with all regional and district supervision eliminated, with the loss of large numbers of excellent principals and the hiring of large numbers of ill-prepared principals, left on their own and judged by test scores.

What have the 95% gotten? Tests, pre-tests, test prep. School closings. Overcrowded classes.

The major legacy of the Bloomberg administration is the creation of a test-based accountability system that few believe in, but that has the power to close schools and wreck careers and reputations.

“Tweed,” as the central bureaucracy is called, operates with slavish devotion to “data,” but cold indifference to human beings. The young MBAs at Tweed have spent a decade wiping out institutional memory and attempting to create a bureaucratic, efficient, computer-driven system that churns out higher test scores.

The latest public opinion poll (January) showed that only 18% of the city’s voters want the next mayor to have the control that Bloomberg wielded.

The Bloomberg example reveals the shortcomings of corporate reform. It sets parent against parent in battles for choice and space. It destroys neighborhood schools. It gives preference to schools under private management. It shatters communities so they will be unable to organize and fight back. It lacks any vision of what education is or should be. It has neither reformed the public schools nor provided better education for all students.

Kevin Kosar, who earned his Ph.D. at NYU in a study of federal education policy, researched the use of the term “failing schools.” It was seldom used until 1990. Since then, as you can see when you open the link, it has become a commonplace term.

This is clearly political, since test scores for every group are higher today than they were in 1990, graduation rates are higher, and dropout rates are lower.

“Failing schools” is a term that enables privatizers to take over more public property and to enroll more students when their neighborhood school was closed.

Before the passage of No Child Left Behind, public schools were seldom closed for low test scores. School officials and the public understood that low test scores reflected the social and economic conditions in which students live. It made no sense to punish the school because its students were living in poverty. After NCLB and Race to the Top, more and more urban schools are being closed to punish them for their low test scores.

A reader suggested that we read the following research brief:

“Here is a recent Issue Brief from Research for Action that looks into school closings in Washington DC, Pittsburgh, New York City, Chicago, and Philadelphia. Quick but great read:

http://bit.ly/13CAUuN”

Former Governor Jeb Bush traverses the nation, especially the red states, bringing news of the Florida miracle. After the debacle of the “Texas miracle,” which thrust NCLB on the nation, Mr. Bush would be well-advised to pick another issue.

The Palm Beach Post wrote a scathing editorial taking down the myth of the Florida miracle (which Bush’s former deputy Hannah Skandera is now selling in New Mexico).

The editorial says:

“Former Gov. Jeb Bush has an undeserved reputation as an education reformer. Florida’s recent education progress has come not from implementing Mr. Bush’s policies but from cleaning up after them.

“Mr. Bush has been visiting legislators in Tallahassee to talk about education policy. Get out the mops and buckets. Taxpayers also should reach for their wallets, since the former governor’s new big ideas involve transferring more public dollars to the for-profit companies behind him.”

And the editorial goes into detail on the disaster of Florida’s testing and accountability system.

It concludes:

“Now Mr. Bush heads several foundations pushing for a rapid expansion of charter schools and virtual schools. His Foundation for Excellence in Education accepts donations from private companies that would profit from lax new laws that Florida and other states are rushing to enact. The sort of careless “reform” Jeb Bush advocates will end up with taxpayers fleeced and students and parents cheated. He has a reputation for reform. He has a record of making messes.”

Jersey Jazzman has pulled together an impressive collection of smears, wherein the corporate reformers’ attack machine tried to silence and/ or intimidate their critics.

JJ’s recitation brought to mind some of the many brushes I have had with the smear machine.

The first occurred in 2007, when I realized that someone in the NYC Department of Education was following me to my lectures and taping them. I saw this on four occasions and was curious but shrugged it off.

Then I realized what was going on when I read a sharp attack on me in the Néw York Post, calling me a “hypocritical critic.”

I later learned from journalists that the DOE was taping my lectures so they could compile a dossier called “Diane Ravitch, Then and Now.” They made the shocking discovery that I had changed my mind! First they showed the dossier to reporters, but none thought it was a story.

So someone at the DOE wrote the article, found someone else to sign it (the leader of the NYC Partnership, a business group that backs Bloomberg), sent it to the mayor’s public relations firm, which placed it in the Post. A journalist friend shared the email thread with me.

I promptly responded. The Post graciously gave me the opportunity to do so.

Since then, there have been so many smears and accusations that I have learned to deal with them.

Here are the general rules of engagement:

Assess the situation and do one of two things: Ignore them or refute them.

Either will be very frustrating for the smear machine, because they want to get to you. They want you to get angry; they want you to respond. If you ignore them, it reveals their insignificance and impotence.

However, if the smear machine is spreading outright lies that you must refute, take them on. Never be afraid. Confront them fearlessly. Do not be defensive. Do not be angry. Be civil even if they are not. Don’t raise your voice or lose your cool. The cardinal rule about bullies is that they are cowards.

Make the decision about which strategy to use, depending on the situation.

The Los Angeles Times reports two late donations to the campaign to elect a board that supports privatization.

The California Charter Schools Association put up $300,000.

Rupert Murdoch’s News America Corporation added $250,000.

The charter association anticipates increased numbers of privately managed charters with no supervision.

The Murdoch corporation has financial involvement through its subsidiary run by Joel Klein, who previously gave $25,000.

Los Angeles already has more charters than any other city in the nation. School board member Steve Zimmer had the temerity to propose that the board develop a policy for oversight of charters before creating new ones. Zimmer enraged the charter lobby, which wants no oversight and no moratorium.

Zimmer, who started his career in Teach for America and remained in the public schools as a career teacher, is in his first term. He is known as a moderate who is independent, belonging to no bloc.

The billionaires don’t want independents on the L.A. School board. They want people who will support more charters, more onerous teacher evaluations, more high-stakes testing, more closing of public schools.

With Mayor Bloomberg’s time in office coming to an end, and the possibility that his reforms will be tossed out by the next mayor, the corporate reformers don’t want to risk losing control of Los Angeles.

Crain’s NY ran an unscientific poll asking “which of Mayor Bloomberg’s policies should the next mayor abandon first?” There were five choices. More than 60% of respondents picked “education” as the first Bloomberg policy to be eliminated by the next mayor. Quinniapiac University ran a scientific poll asking New Yorkers what they thought of mayoral control. Only 18% want to see the mayor in charge of the public schools.

So now the next battle to take over the public schools shifts to Los Angeles.