With each new expansion of charters, the public is assured that “charters are public schools,” and “competition will be good for everyone,” and “everyone should have choice.”
But as this article explains, there is another agenda at work.
The author, a former executive director of the Georgia Republican Party, explains the agenda. The current public school system will turn into the equivalent of “public welfare” schools, akin to public housing or public transit, the schools of last resort for those who are can’t find an alternative. The new schools–the charters, for example–are what he calls “neo-radical” schools, the schools that welcome the strong and willing.
The author makes clear that “reform” movement is not for “reform” of existing schools but for privatization to the maximum extent possible with government money.
The new schools will be privately managed and publicly funded with minimal government oversight.
The schools that are left behind as “public schools” will be dumping ground for the children who are most difficult or most expensive to educate.
With this transformation, the privatizers will recreate a dual school system, based not on lines of race, as in the past, but on lines of class.
This is the goal–intended in some cases, unintended in others–of the current privatization movement: A dual school system: one system for the good kids, the other for those who were rejected or unwanted by the other system. The latter system, now known as “public schools,” will house disproportionate numbers of students who are learning English, students with disabilities, students with behavior problems, and students who can’t get higher scores every year.
And thus dies the common school idea.

It astounds me how this message is lost on seemingly the majority of the public. When the message comes from public school educators, it is deemed “political” and, therefore, without merit. Although we should never stop working to get this word out to the public, we need more voices like this from outside of the public school profession to speak out.
LikeLike
See Valerie Strauss’ column from Friday, on the same theme:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/wp/2012/12/07/americas-next-education-crisis-and-who-benefits/
LikeLike
With this analysis I essentially agree, but do not deplore because it will bring a net gain of ‘freedom’ and not drag down the ‘willing’ by the ineducable to the higher learning, but not untrainable for useful, self-sustaining, productive lives. The ideal of the “common school” was never the case, anyway. The non-college-bound dropped out after 8th grade and went to work (like my grandfather). My father and mother were first generation college, and I am only second generation (my wife still first generation).
LikeLike
I find your endorsement of this awful idea to be elitist and quite awful. I hope that you are not a teacher.
LikeLike
We have to acknowledge that the goal of providing each student with an education that allows them to achieve their highest potential and the goal of social integration of each individual in society are often in conflict.
LikeLike
THE MASTER PLAN
(based on Bain Capital strategies)
My charter “IT’S ALL ABOUT THE CHILDREN” now controls 25% of the schools in urban area X. The Publics have been closed and the remaining are at full capacity. Time to move:
Dear Governor,
It has come to our attention that “IT’S ALL ABOUT THE CHILDREN” has fallen on tough times! We may go bankrupt and have to close our schools in X. We are seeking an additional $40 million this year to stay solvent. This should be sufficient to get us through the year and continue our great education for the children of X.
We realize that this is difficult for you to budget for $40 million extra for our schools, but actually we will save you over $60 million this year if we were to default. That is, it would cost you over $100 million to re-open and staff Public Schools sufficient to house our students which would be your Constitutional duty.
“IT’S ALL ABOUT THE CHILDREN” CFO looks forward to receiving your check this week.
Thank you, in advance, for your quick response and I will be addressing you again next year!
CEO: Iam Nota Crook
“IT’S ALL ABOUT THE CHILDREN” Academy
X town
Your State
LikeLike
I knew there had to be a catch.
LikeLike
Yes…. Simply stated and directly to the point….that is the purpose of
their movement.
Give me your high achievers, your good test takers, your children of obedient parents, your docile, your compliant, those willing to walk in straight lines, slant, chant and follow orders. I will take
your cash and grant your “choice”. Now be gone and don’t ask us any questions.
LikeLike
“Give me your high achievers……………..”
wonderfully phrased Linda! should be inscribed at the base of statues in front of every charter!
Emma L. would be proud (LOL)
LikeLike
We need to revitalize public education, so that it is the preferred alternative.
LikeLike
What would Horace Mann do?
LikeLike
That would be nearly impossible while they destroy the profession and rob all the money, which is their intention. They are too blinded by their greed and group think to realize their product will be no better and most likely worse. A nation of over tested worker bees will not solve our problems, but only exacerbate them.
LikeLike
that would be a great plan if it were true We don’t need to revitalize, reform or anything else. We work hard and we teach kids. We do a great job and we need to start saying that. Reformers have had their say, now it is our turn to talk back….tell our truth and show them for the liars and scammers that they are!
LikeLike
Let’s start with behavior. An inner city school with large numbers of disruptive students is not a “common school”, it is a dumping ground that committed parents will rightly avoid in order to protect their children. If we want to avoid seeing all but our wealthiest public schools become schools of last resort, we have to turn the tables on the reform movement. Bloomberg and the rest would have a much harder time destroying public schools and turning them over to charter operators if public school policy for long term suspension and expulsion was automatic transfer into online schooling. Students who wished to could apply to return to the regular school setting and be given counseling and support so as to make it possible for them to return. Or they could continue to pursue their education online. But, in the meantime, with a no dumping ground policy in place, there would be a better climate for everyone who could manage a regular classroom setting.
LikeLike
This is the goal–intended in some cases, unintended in others…
Diane,
Is your rhetoric harming the cause of the constitutional common school?
Through the first few paragraphs, my reaction was, “good, a resource I can take to policy makers.” Once I get to the “unintended” “goal” part, I’m nauseous.
Goals are always intentional. Consequences are sometimes unintended.
Here’s a deal: For practice, you sit for a mock deposition. Then we take the complimentary set of questions to Arne Duncan, Bill Gates, and Michelle Rhee. If they (Duncan in particular) decline, we suggest the Senate stop confirmation of all US Ed nominees. We ask Congress to consider impeachment if the President uses recess appointments to avoid transparency and integrity in US Ed.
In the meantime, thanks for the link. I’ll look to see if it helps move the public education doomsday clock further from midnight.
Warmest regards,
Eric
PS: If the fate of American public education is in our hands, America is worse off than anyone could imagine.
LikeLike
Eric,
Our hands are small and poor but we have many clean hands!
LikeLike
I love the sentiment, but would clean hands pay Bob Chanin’s salary?
LikeLike
Link: http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/gaynor/110316
LikeLike
Everyone has the right to state their opinion.
Why does NY have so many lawyers and NJ so many toxic dumps?
NJ had first choice!
LikeLike
… Arne Duncan, Bill Gates, and Michelle Rhee ….
And Finn. Would he have been the first of the group to give up on public education? And once, having decided, be unable to reconsider? His admission of poor charters only confirms his desire for a better weapon against public schools. He appears to be a smart guy happy to have gullible allies.
LikeLike
The public doesn’t realize that charters are funded with public school money. Not only will public schools have needier kids – they’ll do so with less money. THEY’LL be hamstrung by the tests, while the charters can be “free” to be creative or rote, at their own will!
LikeLike
You are completely correct, but it is present tense. The public schools HAVE needier kids. They do so with less money. They ARE hamstrung by the tests. The charter schools ARE free to be creative or rote at their own will.
LikeLike
Right. I don’t think the “common man” knows this. Charters will bankrupt the public schools. I wonder how this can be publicized.
Beth
LikeLike
… all of the proposals, taken as a whole, could lead to the creation of a new public welfare program called “public schools.
Unionized educators seem unprepared to reciprocate. At least Georgia educators have advanced this important conversation–moving the public education doomsday clock further back from midnight. Their vehicle is the Professional Association of Georgia Educators:
“PAGE seeks to build bridges of cooperation and support for one of the highest callings in our nation–that of being an ‘educator.’
“Many educators throughout Georgia were uncomfortable with the concept of forced “unified dues” and were opposed to the militancy of teacher unions nationwide. They were equally uncomfortable with the NEA’s aggressive political partisanship and the organization’s wide-ranging social agenda on issues unrelated to education. Georgia educators joined PAGE as an alternative to teacher unionism. … PAGE’s philosophy puts the educational interests of students first and foremost. Members work every day to make Georgia a better place for students to learn and for teachers to teach. That simple, affirmative message has not only led to the phenomenal growth of PAGE, it has also brought the support of the business community and governmental leaders. PAGE is held in high esteem by both groups who share our positive message of ‘putting kids first.'”
So why aren’t unionized educators across the nation working to enhance public respect for their profession? Sound guidance (though long-ignored) comes from former HEW Secretary David Mathews, Is There a Public for Public Schools, and Reclaiming Public Education By Reclaiming Our Democracy.
LikeLike
Eric: Do you feel that you are representing all unionized educators with veracity? Earlier you asked about Diane’s “rhetoric,” but you ironically fail to see your own.
“So why aren’t unionized educators across the nation working to enhance public respect for their profession?” Who said they are not? Your statement appears to be a generalization based on a very narrow view. To quote the character Montgomery Scott from the iconic television series, Star Trek, “Laddie, don’t you think you should rephrase that?”
In my state, one of our unions has a public advocacy program in place:
Also, this very same state union offers professional educator training in support of our students in varying cognitive and social education areas. Just peruse the website to see how active the union is in making a positive contribution to our schools.
I find it terribly difficult to sit idly by while someone paints every unionized teacher with the same brush. I sincerely hope you do not do the same in regard to every student, especially since I have three little family members who are public school students in the state of Georgia. I know their parents would appreciate knowing that their children are being taught by educators with a penchant for divergent thinking and the integrity to research a topic before making blanket statements.
LikeLike
Hi LG,
Thank you for your comment. I regret not replying in a timely manner.
I’ll review the site–thanks for the link. Moving the public education doomsday clock further from midnight is a tall order, though.
My reason for highlighting David Mathews’ work is it provides a foundation for the promises made by NEA President Bob Chase during the “new unionism” (pre-NCLB) era. Post NCLB NEA has engaged in a series of partnerships (ACORN, MoveOn.org, etc) that seem to put politics ahead of schoolchildren.
So I see a track record of broken promises and bad faith on the part of union officials.
I especially appreciate the measured tone of your response. Indeed, I could have dialed down the provocation without producing pabulum. (Although I am pleased to have elicited such an informative and constructive response from a careful reader.)
LikeLike
Of course that is the agenda, and the push for computer delivered instruction is part of the plan. In the public schools bleary eyed children will be drilled by computers in rooms with an aide looking on. We are back to the turn of the 20th century when new immigrants were called “the great army of incapables” that had entered the schools. They were shifted into vocational programs so that the children of wealthier Americans could have college prep.
All of this is grounded in the belief that some children must be regimentized and drilled (the liberal view of charter schooling) or, that they are really not worth teaching at all. (conservative view).
LikeLike
If you know teachers who have developed curricula that honors the promise of the common school, perhaps they could copyright their work. That would protect it from ed-entrepreneurs. The teachers could then license their curricula to schools that honor the professionalism of teachers.
LikeLike
And there is actually discussion of whether teachers should do this, whether they have the “right” to monetize the fruits of their labor. Personally, if I were actually compensated at market rates for what I ‘produce’ in terms of curriculum products, I’d have to be paid 2-3 times what my contract states. And therein lies the problem. Once the teachers find out what their work is REALLY worth, why would they want to stay in the classroom instead of marketing their curriculum products? And then who the hell will we sucker into teachng the kids for this lousy salary and horrendous conditions with crazy parents and crazier administrators?
LikeLike
History may be more nuanced:
http://www.nytimes.com/books/first/r/ravitch-back.html
Nonetheless, it’s good to see your current reality permits time for reading and replying. Would Dr. Ravitch post a recovery update on your behalf?
LikeLike
“The author, a former executive director of the Georgia Republican Party, explains the agenda. The current public school system will turn into the equivalent of ‘public welfare’ schools, akin to public housing or public transit, the schools of last resort for those who are can’t find an alternative.”
Sorry, but with only limited exceptions, this is already the case in NYC, and has been for my entire life (about 40 years).
LikeLike
We’ve privatized prisons and trash collection in many cities and towns. Several cities and towns have also outsourced their local libraries to private management companies. We outsourced fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan to Blackwater and its various incarnations.
Schools would be the crown jewel and the death of a common democracy and community. And it’s only a matter of time before it’s the local police and fire departments.
This needs to stop and it begins with you and each one of us. Do what you can: call, email, write, testify, etc. I don’t want to someday sit around and wax about the good old days when things were truly public.
I also hope to some day see the fallout when people realize that they’ve been duped by the likes of Michelle Rhee, Joel Klein, Mike Bloomberg, “Dr.” Steve Perry and the whole cast of reformers.I dying to see the reaction. So many are complicit in this fraud. I truly can’t wait.
LikeLike
Has there been a problem with trash pickup? Are the libraries providing poor services to the communities?
LikeLike
Picking up trash was once the crown jewel of our society!
LikeLike
In many states charters are serving mainly low income, minority students. I’m amazed how easily it has been to open charters in urban areas and yet provide a school that is not better and provides a narrow curriculum. Obama has done a diservice to minorities by promoting these schools. Why the desire to promote this crazy right-wing agenda? The people promoting this stuff are obviously super far to the right like the loon mentioned in the article. This movement is a disgrace.
LikeLike
“will house disproportionate numbers of students who are learning English, students with disabilities, students with behavior problems, and students who can’t get higher scores every year.”
Why do you label these children? This is quite an offensive post.
Aren’t these students precious? The worth of souls is great in the sight of God. Why do you judge these children harshly? Don’t you want them? Actually, charter schools take these precious children who are learning English, have disabilities, etc.
LikeLike
It’s sad that you believe everything you read and promote it as “fact” to your readership. This blogger resides in Georgia and knows full well what the political landscape looks like here. You are spreading some major misinformation to your followers. Georgia has an opportunity to bring some of the most innovative school designs to the state, to improve an education system that is woefully inadequate – a 67% high school graduation rate!
Each issue will be looked at on its merits, and don’t for one second believe that Georgia will immediately go to private vouchers. That was not the intent of the public charter amendment which passed with nearly 60% of the vote! The status quo won’t work in Georgia, but the main problem is the state constitution, which states “all citizens shall have access to an adequate education.” That’s right, Diane – ADEQUATE. Truly sad that mediocrity is ok here. That’s why the status quo is unacceptable.
But please, don’t spread one person’s opinion who is completely disengaged from the current politics in Georgia. He is factually incorrect on nearly every point.
LikeLike
I teach there. Georgia has SOLD OUT. No question.
LikeLike
So, voters have decided that the best people to decide
whether a charter school should be approved are sitting in nice
offices in Atlanta, not at the local Board of Education in the
community the charter would ostensibly serve. Great, parents will
possibly have more choices available to them. But, what if those
new choices are no better than the existing ones? How will anyone
know? And, if the AZ example of exempting charters from state
accountability requirements is followed, we’ll NEVER find out.
We’ve already seen how AZ leads the nation, or at least the
southeast, in wrongheaded policy decisions.
http://blogs.ajc.com/get-schooled-blog/2012/11/21/georgia-putting-all-our-eggs-and-hopes-in-charter-school-basket/
By the way, I remember the moral of the fable: Don’t put all your
eggs in one basket!
http://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=13243440#editor/target=post;postID=8822746603668322483
LikeLike
I lied earlier. Diane, you’re right. I can’t believe you’ve uncovered Georgia’s evil plot to destroy public education and leave millions of children without a quality education. You should be commended for unveiling our secret plan to privatize education since folks in Georgia are getting such a quality education today. Did I mention we have plans to take private money from anyone who’ll give it to us? Did I also mention that these state commissioners are going to approve every charter application that comes across their desk and not do any due diligence or discuss its merits with the local communities who supported the application?
I know – it’s an evil plot to destroy the status quo. No one’s apologizing. And the democrats in Georgia look like the party of “no” instead of the party of education reform.
Thanks for unveiling this evil plot to your constituents.
LikeLike
Thanks for the candid admission.
LikeLike
1 member of our state’s board of education homeschools his kids and 3 members of the board send their kids to charter schools. Good signs. I know of many university professors in my state and in neighboring state who homeschool their kids. They know what’s what.
All I see on this site are angry teachers who gang up on and bully anyone who disagrees with them. I certainly wouldn’t want my kids, or any child to have to spend the day with them.
LikeLike
Being angry at adults for bad behavior is any person’s prerogative.. including teachers. Do you feel bullied by that?
LikeLike
“All I see on this site are angry teachers who gang up on and bully anyone who disagrees with them. I certainly wouldn’t want my kids, or any child to have to spend the day with them.”
You obviously haven’t read very much here. Let me fill you in…there are teachers posting here who are dedicated, highly experienced professionals but who are tired of the rhetoric that says they are failing at their jobs. If you want to play here, at least play fairly.
LikeLike
Let me remind you what happens when you let an uninformed, uneducated local school board be the ONLY ones who could approve charters if the amendment didn’t pass in Georgia. Our favorite protector of the status quo, Maureen Downey, just gave the perfect example why we need a state charter commission whose job is to act as an appellate process for public charter schools. The URL is below. Ms. Downey just made the case for the proponents of the amendment!
http://blogs.ajc.com/get-schooled-blog/2012/12/12/aps-watchdog-delves-into-charter-school-chain-with-history-of-problems-yet-aps-board-considers-renewal/?cxntfid=blogs_get_schooled_blog
LikeLike
Let me remind you what happens when you let an uninformed, uneducated local school board be the ONLY ones who could approve charters if the amendment didn’t pass in Georgia. Our favorite protector of the status quo, Maureen Downey, just gave the perfect example why we need a state charter commission whose job is to act as an appellate process for public charter schools. The URL is below. Ms. Downey just made the case for the proponents of the amendment!
http://blogs.ajc.com/get-schooled-blog/2012/12/12/aps-watchdog-delves-into-charter-school-chain-with-history-of-problems-yet-aps-board-considers-renewal/?cxntfid=blogs_get_schooled_blog
LikeLike
Dr. Ravitch: “A dual school system: one system for the good kids, the other for those who were rejected or unwanted by the other system. … And thus dies the common school idea.”
LG: “there are teachers posting here who are dedicated, highly experienced professionals but who are tired of the rhetoric that says they are failing at their jobs.”
To ensure credit where credit is due, we should acknowledge the contribution of ed policy, state and local boards, central offices, and building leadership in cheating schoolchildren. I’ve not seen (even after exploring the suggested link, above) an actionable plan supported by a proper bibliography for picking up the slack created by those most responsible.
Has anyone consolidated the lessons learned from all the court cases in all the states and scouted a path forward? Massachusetts has good standards, New Jersey has a state association of school business officials responsive to its funding litigation, districts in North Carolina and Maryland have received Presidential recognition. But how do we bring this all together to serve children and end scapegoating of teachers?
Oh, I just realized that my honor roll has only Montgomery County MD in common with Dr. Ravitch;’s honor roll.
BTW, my honor roll is designed to stand up in court and move the public education doomsday clock further back from midnight.
LikeLike
“I’ve not seen (even after exploring the suggested link, above) an actionable plan supported by a proper bibliography for picking up the slack created by those most responsible.”
An actionable plan was not offered–only evidence against your statement: “So why aren’t unionized educators across the nation working to enhance public respect for their profession?”
The PRIDE initiative outlined on said site is designed with flexibility so that local associations can tailor their community advocacy projects to their constituency. Not all advocacy requires a bibliography.
LikeLike
local associations can tailor their community advocacy projects to their constituency. Not all advocacy requires a bibliography.
Doesn’t that become a chicken-and-egg problem? When would “their constituency” demand advocacy suitable for inclusion in a table of authorities for an amicus brief? Do those communities with higher standards for advocacy get better schools than other communities with less knowledge of constitutional mandates and lower expectations?
LikeLike
What criteria do you use to define “higher standards?” Is your definition of “higher standards” with merit? Is mine? “Higher standards” is a term worthy of true “wonkery” unless it can be supported with thorough explanation and dependent context. We can argue philosophy all day–we can even split hairs as to the definition of the word “the,” but the bottom line is your statements about what unions do or do not do are far too general and highly misleading.
Advocacy for public schools may not be the sole responsibility of public schools, but professional groups (such as teachers unions) garnering support through positive partnerships with communities is often a happy by-product of such partnerships. Unions such as the one I mentioned above are actively pursuing community outreach through projects that are funded through their organizations’ resources.
It is not a union’s place to set education policy nor is any union in a position to invite community members to the legislative table in order to influence mandates short of throwing support toward specific policies. In a representative government, community members and unions alike have the power to educate themselves on the issues and to make their voices heard to those whose jobs are to propose and enact legislative mandates. It appears that you wish for unions to craft and enact policy–neither of which are powers that anyone unelected by the public should ever be allowed to do. Making suggestions or submitting proposals that can improve legislation are both very different from being “included at the table of authorities.”
LikeLike
Hi LG,
Thank you for the constructive comments. My reply follows below.
LikeLike
What criteria do you use to define “higher standards?”
In general, meeting goals set by courts.
Is your definition of “higher standards” with merit?
Since they aren’t “my” goals but the goals of courts, yes.
supported with thorough explanation and dependent context
Court opinions vary for just that reason. Plaintiffs sometimes seek closing the gap in reading and math. Affirmative action cases involve qualification for admission to highly selective universities.
your statements about what unions do or do not do are far too general and highly misleading.
An thorough and fair assessment would take a book. For now, I would be delighted to read a case study of a teachers’ union helping meet the goals adopted in settlement of an education lawsuit. Or meeting national education goals.
Unions such as the one I mentioned above are actively pursuing community outreach through projects that are funded through their organizations’ resources.
Has this resulted in achieving goals commonly shared with other education groups (principals, superintendents, treasurers, boards, parents, etc.) or funding adequacy or educational opportunity lawsuits?
In a representative government, community members and unions alike have the power to educate themselves on the issues and to make their voices heard to those whose jobs are to propose and enact legislative mandates.
A reading list or bibliography might be a good start. Credible model legislation would be even better. How might legislators educate themselves to craft legislation that addresses governmental goals articulated in court decisions?
Making suggestions or submitting proposals that can improve legislation are both very different from being “included at the table of authorities.”
My thought was suggestions and proposals would be supported with evidence acceptable to a court. One source would be the table of authorities found in amicus briefs. For example, if the NEA and AFT file an amicus, and list credible research in the brief’s table of authorities, then that same research might be used when crafting model legislation or making suggestions and supporting proposals.
LikeLike
Allowing criteria to only be set by courts is not always the most prudent measure. What do judges and lawyers know about teaching and learning?
“For now, I would be delighted to read a case study of a teachers’ union helping meet the goals adopted in settlement of an education lawsuit. Or meeting national education goals.” Again, you are operating under the premise that the court system is an authority on teaching and learning. If you referencing hiring and firing practices, we are not necessarily talking directly about the very same types of advocacy programs. Obviously, if public school employees feel they are being treated unfairly they will not stay in the profession which in turn will negatively affect the education of the public, but the advocacy to which I refer has more to do with letting the public know how important it is to get involved in ALL matters pertaining to the success of public schools.
“Has this [union’s community outreach] resulted in achieving goals commonly shared with other education groups (principals, superintendents, treasurers, boards, parents, etc.) or funding adequacy or educational opportunity lawsuits?” It is nearly impossible to trace an increase of funding from one source of influence. I do not see the merit in this argument.
“A reading list or bibliography might be a good start. Credible model legislation would be even better. How might legislators educate themselves to craft legislation that addresses governmental goals articulated in court decisions?” I agree. If you peruse the website, you may find countless resources for further reading. As well, there is plenty of testimony both in the statehouse and through contact with legislators brought forth by representatives of this union.
“My thought was suggestions and proposals would be supported with evidence acceptable to a court. One source would be the table of authorities found in amicus briefs. For example, if the NEA and AFT file an amicus, and list credible research in the brief’s table of authorities, then that same research might be used when crafting model legislation or making suggestions and supporting proposals.” Interesting point-of-view, and thank you for the input. I feel that the best place for those in-the-know to dialogue with the powers-that-be is in public discourse and legislative hearings. Courts interpret laws, but the legislatures have the power to propose and pass them. The public has a right to know the facts, but the bottom line is that the average citizen will not have the time nor the experiential information in order to influence the policy-makers without some sort of education on these matters. Unions like the one I referenced are working hard to both inform the public and the legislators alike of the impending impact of many of the legislative education proposals that have swept the country and in turn, their particular state. I fail to see how anyone can say that unions are not part of the solution knowing what I know about the union I referenced.
Thank you for the dialogue.
LikeLike
Hi,
Thanks for the response. I should clarify I believe communities should have schools they are proud of. That takes levels and branches of government working together. The courts weigh in with decisions about the purposes of schools and the adequacy of funding. Such litigation can last a decade or more–I don’t recommend that course.
But once that course is pursued, other branches and levels of government ought to attend to the fact-finding and conclusions of law from court decisions.
Between the AFT and NEA, the NEA appears (to me) to have a much more difficult time with internal coordination. Perhaps the greater longevity of AFT leaders promotes greater consistency throughout the organization.
Perhaps the ultimate challenge for teachers is convincing their communities that they have indeed stepped up to the task of ensuring their schools are everything their respective state constitutions expect. That requires a lot of local work. It also requires meeting expectations set by the courts.
LikeLike
I do agree that teachers unions definitely should engage the public–citizen and public servant alike–in conversations about how to support and maintain quality public education. I cannot speak for the NEA as a whole, despite my state union’s affiliation with it. However, I do not agree that all NEA-affiliated unions, whether on the state or local level, have been remiss in communicating with the public in this regard, as you earlier suggested.
LikeLike