Archives for the month of: September, 2012

Testing children in kindergarten is becoming common practice. Oregon will begin testing all 5-year-olds next fall to assess their “readiness” for kindergarten. It is never too soon to test children, and some states have drafted standards for pre-schoolers.

How did this happen? An article by Stephanie Simon in Reuters explains it all.

“Testing young children is not a new concept. In the 1980s, many states assessed children to determine whether they were ready to enter kindergarten or first grade. Experts in child development denounced the practice as unfair and unreliable and it faded out.

In recent years, however, the federal law known as No Child Left Behind has put pressure on schools to raise scores on the standardized reading and math tests given to students starting around age 8. Schools that post poor scores are labeled failing; principals and teachers can lose their jobs.

With the stakes so high, many administrators have decided to start testing in the earlier grades, to give kids practice and to identify students who need help.

The Obama administration accelerated the trend in 2011 with a $500 million competitive grant to bolster early childhood education. States that pledged to assess all kindergarteners earned extra points on their applications.”

So now state after state is falling into line, testing the littlest students to find out what they know and what they don’t know. The experts are strangely silent about whether this is developmentally appropriate. It is never too soon to start compiling data, it seems.

A group of concerned parents, retired teachers, and friends of public education in Indiana created a website, which is here.

They are the Northeast Indiana Friends of Public Education.

To lend a hand, read their materials and join them in the battle to stop privatization of public education and demolition of the teaching profession in the Hoosier State.

If you are not in Indiana, read their website to get good ideas for your own site.

Here is their list of myths about public education in Indiana:


Myths About Public Education in Indiana
MYTH: Public Schools are Failing our children.
FACTS:
National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP) test scores are the highest in the history of the Federal tests. On basic NAEP scores, Indiana has outperformed the nation on all 41 NAEP assessments since 1990.
Indiana Graduation Rates are the highest in history. 85.7% graduated in four years or less in the Class of 2012, up from 84.1%, 81.5%, 77.8%, 76.4%, and 76.1% in the last five graduating classes.
http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/
http://icpe2011.com/Good_News_about_Schools.html
~~~
MYTH: Charter Schools provide a better education.
FACTS:
Public schools outperformed charter schools on 2012 ISTEP tests.
IREAD-3 results for 2012 show 85% of public schools passing but only 70% of charter schools passing.
Public schools can and do offer creative and successful programs; for example, Montessori, International Baccalaureate, Advanced Placement, New Tech, Language immersion, and dual credit courses.
Public schools serve ALL students.
http://www.jgdata.net/istep
http://www.doe.in.gov/achievement/assessment/istep-results
http://icpe2011.com/Good_News_about_Schools.html/
http://www.fortwayneschools.org/
~~~
MYTH: Poverty does not affect a child’s educational performance.
FACTS:
Family income is the single most reliable predictor of student test scores.
The correlation of poverty and academic achievement is one of the most consistent findings in educational research.
ISTEP scores confirm that poverty negatively impacts student achievement and performance.
http://doe.in.gov/achievement/assessment/istep-results
http://parentsacrossamerica.org/2012/02/diane-ravitch-do-politicians-know-anything-about-education/
~~~
MYTH: Teachers’ unions use tenure to protect poorly performing teachers from dismissal.
FACTS:
Teacher in K-12 do not have tenure. They have never had a guaranteed “job for life”.
Teachers remain subject to the same disciplinary actions as employees in other fields.
Teachers did have the right to due process under state law which goverened the dismissal provess; however, the legislature changed the law and eliminated due process.
Termination of ineffective teachers was and is the responsibility of the school administration.

Click to access 2011-07-27-InfoMeeting-Handout.pdf

http://www.doe.in.gov/sites/default/files/legal/sea-575.pdf

Stephanie Rivera is preparing to be a teacher at Rutgers University, where she is a junior. Stephanie has her own blog. But what’s special about Stephanie is that she has strong values, she has guts, and she is articulate. As an activist devoted to educational equity, she rightly is suspicious of faux reforms sponsored by billionaires and corporations.

Stephanie attended Education Nation. This is her report on te various panels and town halls. It is well worth reading because Stephanie brings a fresh perspective to the issues and personalities.

I sent out a post with language garbled by my iPad.

Delete it and read the update.

How could the director of this film not know that he was promoting an idea dear to the agendas of rightwing think tanks and ALEC?

Juan Gonzalez of the New York Daily News is appalled at the steadily shrinking proportion of black and Hispanic students in the city’s elite exam high schools:

He writes:

In 1999, three years before Michael Bloomberg became mayor, black students comprised 24% of the student body at Brooklyn Tech. This year, the percentage of black students has plummeted to 10%.

Stuyvesant’s student body was nearly 13% black in 1979; it then dropped to 4.8% by 1994; this year it’s an atrocious 1.2%.

Only 1.4% of students offered admission to Stuyvesant this year (13 of 937) were Latino, even though Latinos comprise 40% of all public school eighth-graders and were 21% of students who took the specialized high school test.

Our mayor, Michael Bloomberg, who so often boasts of reducing the racial achievement gap in education, sees absolutely nothing wrong with this picture.

His first schools chancellor, Joel Klein, actually extended the same test to determine admission to five more top city high schools, with similar results.

“Stuyvesant and these other schools are as fair as fair can be,” Bloomberg said. “You pass the test, you get the highest score, you get into the school no matter what your ethnicity, no matter what your economic background is.”

The mayor would have you believe it is all about merit, which even my 13-year-old knows is nonsense.

He acts as if the giant test prep industry isn’t raking in billions of dollars precisely to offer anyone with enough cash a leg up on the rest of the city’s children.

……Asked about this, Bloomberg reacted with his typical rich man’s arrogance.

“Life isn’t always fair,” he told a City Hall reporter. “I don’t know how you would take away the right to get tutoring.”

….It’s time our school system stop glorifying the best-trained test takers and start nurturing great students.dmitted to the city’s elite examination high schools.

Mike Feinberg is visiting New Zealand to talk about KIPP, and some of the New Zealanders are none too happy about it.

From the attached article, it is clear that they are not thrilled with the “no excuses” doctrine. As one writer says, “If you wouldn’t do this to your own child, why would you do it to other people’s children.”

Admission to New York City’s elite high schools is determined by one test and one test only. As a result of this policy, few black or Hispanic students are admitted to these schools. Diversity has dropped sharply in the past several years.

Civil rights groups are suing the city.

Consider these startling facts:

“Although 70 percent of the city’s public school students are black and Hispanic, a far smaller percentage have scored high enough to receive offers from one of the schools. According to the complaint, 733 of the 12,525 black and Hispanic students who took the exam were offered seats this year. For whites, 1,253 of the 4,101 test takers were offered seats. Of 7,119 Asian students who took the test, 2,490 were offered seats. At Stuyvesant High School, the most sought-after school, 19 blacks were offered seats in a freshman class of 967.”

Imagine that: Only 19 black students in a class of 967.

At a news conference, Mayor Bloomberg said that the exam schools are “designed for the best and the brightest” and he saw no reason to change the policy or state law that permits it.

We have often heard of the Florida miracle, as recounted by former Governor Jeb Bush.

Remember the Tezas miracle?

I know there was no Texas miracle.

This reader says there was no Florida miracle.

The Los Angeles Times published a review–maybe it is an article, not a review, it is hard to tell–of the anti-union, anti-public education film “Won’t Back Down.” The article reaches no judgments about anything, other than the opening box office, which does not look good.

It says that critics claim the film is anti-union, but its director and writer don’t agree. Critics say that the producer is a rightwing zealot, but the director and writer say it doesn’t matter. Presumably the conservative billionaire Philip Anschutz, who also underwrote “Waiting for Superman,” just wanted an inspiring parent-teacher story. An uplifting story about how parents and teachers together can take over their public school and give it to a private corporation and live happily ever happy.

Anyone who knows anything about education issues knows that the point of the story is to promote the “parent trigger” law, which has converted no school anywhere as yet. The “parent trigger” law was first passed in California, and is now model legislation heavily supported by the far-right group ALEC and the equally far-right group Heartland Institute. But ALEC and Heartland and Anschutz don’t have a political agenda.

But here is the good news:

Opening weekend expectations for “Won’t Back Down” remain soft, with the $19-million movie on track to pull in less than $5 million when it opens against the sci-fi time travel film “Looper” and the animated comedy “Hotel Transylvania.”