The Washington Post has a good article about the aggressive way that the Obama administration has imposed its education agenda in the past three+ years.
The article notes, almost in passing, that there is no evidence for the success of any part of this agenda. No one will know for many years whether the Obama program of testing, accountability, and choice will improve education.
When reading the article, it is easy to forget that the U.S. Department of Education was not created to impose any “reforms” on the nation’s schools. It was created to send federal aid to hard-pressed districts that enrolled many poor children.
When the Department was created in 1980, there were vigorous debates about whether there might one day be federal control of the schools. The proponents of the idea argued that this would never happen. It has not happened until now because Democrats and Republicans agreed that they didn’t want the other party to control the nation’s schools.
But now that the Obama administration has embraced the traditional Republican ideas of competition, choice, testing and accountability, there is no more arguing about federal control. Republicans are quite willing to allow a Democratic administration to push the states to allow more privately managed schools, to impose additional testing, and to crush teachers’ unions.
Republicans would never have gotten away with this agenda at any time in the past three decades. The Democrats who controlled Congress would never have allowed it to happen.
Who would have imagined that it would take a Democratic President to promote privatization, for-profit schools, evaluating teachers by student test scores, and a host of other ideas (like rolling back the hard-won rights of teachers) that used to be only on the GOP wish-list?

Thank you for saying it so clearly. What would we call the new party created by educators to return the Democratic party to a more original and pure purpose (much like the Republican “Tea Party”)? We are not being well represented or well served by current policy agendas.
LikeLike
Diane – just read the Post article on
my way to work this morning. I agree thR article was the best yet published by the Post on this topic, but some vital info was omitted. will be sending a letter to the editor but where to start….the article should have included: 1/ a graph & explanation showing the PISA scores of low poverty level US schools as compared to high performing countries to demonstrate that we don’t have a teacher problem but a poverty problem; 2/ connections of Duncan & some DOE officials to billionaires boy club & privatization agenda; 3/ outsize influence of billionaire’s boys club on edu policy.
Would you consider writing a letter to the editor too or ask for an op ed opportunity?
This article is a good start for Post (& contradicts the position of its editorial board) but more quality articles need to be written & soon. Thanks!
LikeLike
I don’t write letters to the editor. I write articles, books, and blog posts.
LikeLike
I respectfully disagree with Concerned Mom of Two. As usual, Diane Ravitch has produced a superb analysis, and has many other publications on related topics. OUR JOB is (1) to share articles like this with others – VERY IMPORTANT: I will tweet this one to several thousand people. (2) contribute our own op-eds/letters to the editor, etc.
LikeLike
So given what a disaster Obama has been for public education, why did AFT President Randi Weingarten join Arne Duncan on his “Education Drives America” national bus tour Thursday to promote Race to the Top?
“Secretary Duncan will visit Mount View High School in McDowell County for a panel discussion with community members and stakeholders. He will be joined by Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers. Participants will discuss how to build public-private partnerships to support educational improvement as the path to a brighter economic future. Mount View is one of 20 schools in West Virginia that has received a part of $28.5 million in School Improvement Grants (SIG) awarded to the state by the Education Department during the past three years to turn around schools and improve student achievement. A press availability will follow the event.
http://www2.ed.gov/news/events/calendars/secschedule.html”
Secretary of Education visits McDowell County
from the McDowell County Register Herald
“Former West Virginia first lady Gayle Manchin, chair of the Reconnecting McDowell governance board, and Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers, got the audience — numbering about 200 — into the excitement of the moment by recapping the day’s highlights. However, the people were obviously there to hear what Duncan had to say.”
http://www.register-herald.com/todaysfrontpage/x1241954830/Secretary-of-Education-visits-McDowell-County
LikeLike
It’s interesting how Republicans have been complicit in this. When tax-cutting conservatives took control of state houses across the country and started gutting public education budgets, it made schools even more dependent on federal money, which gave Duncan & Co. stronger leverage to coerce school systems into adopting this “dreadful agenda.” Now Republicans rail against “too much federal intrusion” when they themselves are also to blame for handing the feds that power to intrude.
LikeLike
Oh come on. Obama and the Democrats couldn’t wait to get their hands on these schools.
LikeLike
Of course. But cost-cutting Republicans helped enable them. This works both ways, mind you. Now that Democrats are lining up for school choice as a solution to inequality, Republicans will take that as leverage for transferring more public edu-dollars to religious schools. Hence, Jindal plan. No one in charge seems to be able to think systemically about policy. They play checkers rather than chess.
LikeLike
Yes, of course. Obama’s support for choice undercut Democrats’ opposition to privatization and set the table for vouchers.
Did you hear Obama denounce the Jindal voucher plan? the Indiana voucher plan? or any other voucher plan?
Of course, he is against vouchers. But softly, softly.
Once you support privatization, it’s hard to draw the line. And the Republicans are running with it.
LikeLike
yep. Republicans could have stopped Race to the Top and the waivers, which are an outrageous extension of federal control, but they stood by passively as Arne Duncan became the nation’s superintendent of schools.
LikeLike
I hope you will take the time to read this on the psychology in the assessments. Another reason I’d never allow my kids to take these standardized assessments and why I continue to oppose tying a teacher’s evaluation to the assessment.
http://www.educationnews.org/education-policy-and-politics/the-secret-document-that-drives-standardized-testing/
This isn’t about academic knowledge…it’s social engineering!!
LikeLike
“The proponents of the idea argued that this would never happen.” That flies in the face of everything we know about human nature. Once a threshold has been passed, a new threshold is established. Then the newer threshold is passed, ad nauseum. It was naive to think today would never come. It’s here and it’s not good.
LikeLike
The solution is overlooked. If our citizens would insist their elected officials either follow the US Constitution they swore to uphold -( see 9th & 10th Amendments ) or RESIGN , simultaneously forfeiting their government pensions I think we’d witness some really positive actions. CITIZEN ACTION IS NEEDED To remind everyone that EDUCATION IS NOT AN ENUMERATED POWER !
LikeLike
It is amazing how teachers are to blame for failing schools, but never principals. Recently, our school gained a new principals after the long time principal retired. This is happening a lot in Chicago. Nearly 3 quarters of the district principals and teachers retired this past year. The new principal entered with a confrontational tone telling teachers how to dress, demanding that they perform various volunteer task, and shuffled many positions. Many of the teachers and staff left the school and some parents are angry because they have lost teachers who had taught many of their children. And they rightfully don’t have confidence in the newer teachers. These newer teachers are a core of teachers that he brought in having no academic credentials. It is so sad that this is a low performing school and he would bring in low quality individuals to work with struggling students. But this is common in many poverty stricken community as there are efforts to cause schools to fail and convert them to charter. I wish there could be a focus on this.
Also, I talk regularly to former students who go to charter high schools and are getting A’s but feel that they are not challenged and that the schools want their teachers to get good rating by students, therefore, insure that they obtain good grades.
Donn
LikeLike