Archives for the month of: June, 2012

I am a historian of education and I should know these things, but I don’t.

Does anyone know when for-profit schools first began operations?

I am guessing it was Educational Alternatives Inc., in Baltimore, in the early 1990s (where Rhee was a teacher), but I am not certain.

EAI pre-dated the arrival of Edison Schools by a few years. Did anyone pre-date EAI?

Perhaps someone reading this blog has the answer at hand, either from research or from practical experience.

I keep thinking how unusual it is to have schools operating for-profit and how easily we now accept such schools as part of the landscape of “innovations.”

Diane

This morning I posted a blog about Governor Kasich appointing a former football star to the Ohio state board of education.

I got this response from a reader in Michigan:

This is part of a trend I’ve seen here in Michigan – celebrity policy-making. It’s an extension of the traveling shows of Michelle Rhee and Jeb Bush. When Rhee talked to the Michigan legislature last year many legislators seemed in awe. The same thing happened when Jalen Rose, a former University of Michigan basketball star, talked to them about education and the need for more charter schools. He was an expert, I guess, being about to open a charter school in Detrot. His qualifications, other than as a basketball star, we’re that he had attended Detroit Public Schools and he had lots of money.Legislators were posing for pictures with him and getting his autograph. Celebrity policy-making in action.

This comment set me to wondering. Our policymakers say we should be competitive with the nation’s highest-scoring nations on international tests. The College Board ran a full-page ad in major newspapers saying that our education system is “crumbling” because we have lower scores on international tests than other nations and they are beating us.

Can you imagine Finland or Japan or any of the other high-scoring nations handing their kids and their taxpayer dollars off to sports stars? There is a football player in Texas who opened a charter school; needless to say, he has no background as an educator. Tennis star Andre Agassiz has started a chain of charter schools, backed by $500 million from investors.

Does anyone seriously believe that this deregulation and deprofessionalization will improve education and allow us to overtake the top nations?

Have we lost our minds?

Diane

I am thrilled when I see that readers are looking at earlier blog posts. I started the blog in late April and have posted about 275 blogs. The earliest ones are as timely as the latest ones, but they get buried by the weight of new blogs.

I heard from a reader just now who came across my blog about a fascinating article in the Teachers College Record comparing U.S. education policy today to Stalin’s education policies: top-down, rigid and unrealistic goals, punishments for those who couldn’t meet the goals, and phony statistics.

The reader commented:

I didn’t know about Stalin’s education policies before I read this but for several years now I’ve been talking about “the Stalinization of education” — making an analogy to the famous five year plans which were imposed from above, set unrealistic goals with penalties attached, and resulted — of course! — in massive falsification of results and cooking of data by people on the ground. My wife and I are educators who work with English language learners and we suspect the real purposes of such goals, now as then, are intimidation, fear, and control. … Before I started talking about “Stalinization,” I was merely calling the situation “Dilbertesque.”

So, please dear readers, go to the archives of this blog and check out earlier postings. I guarantee you will find stuff you like and stuff to make you think, maybe even stuff to disagree with. They are yours to use and distribute at will. No copyright. No advertising.

Diane

The federal government’s heavy-handed, top-down policy of closing schools as a “turnaround” strategy fragments communities, particularly communities of color. Corporate reformers like Arne Duncan and Joel Klein count it as a badge of honor never to listen to the cries of parents and teachers and community leaders when they close schools and replace them with charter schools where students must apply for admission.

Something new has been added: student voice. Students from Chicago and Philadelphia joined to oppose the heedless closing of schools in their community. Remarkably, they recognized “that there is a national agenda to privatize education.”

They are right. The privatization movement targets their schools and their communities.

When students awaken, the national conversation will change. When students start to stand up to the corporate forces that want to test them again and again, then rate them, rank them, label them and close their schools, it is a game-changer.

Diane

 

When I joined a webinar for #soschat recently on Twitter, the main topic of discussion was “what can we do?” How do we resist a well-funded campaign that makes parents, teachers and students feel powerless and helpless? What tools do we have? What is our counter-narrative?

I have thought about that a lot because the same questions arise wherever I go.

One response is that we should not allow anyone to privatize our public schools.

Public education is a cornerstone of our democracy and it must not be handed over to corporations.

But then I received a video of a brilliant campaign to save the public library in Troy, Michigan.

It is riveting.

It saved the library from those who would close it down.

It shows how to reach the public.

It shows how to create a powerful and effective message to counter those who would destroy a community resource.

Learn how they did it.

Diane

PS: Think about how this might apply in education. Imagine a campaign to turn over our public schools to Wall Street to manage like a stock portfolio. That sounds too close to reality!

The Detroit  News reported the latest plans for the beleaguered Detroit Public School district. Under state control for three years, Detroit is now run by an emergency financial manager with dictatorial powers.

First the good news: “Detroit Public Schools’ proposed 2012-13 school year budget supports a system of schools focused on innovation and robust school choices, data-driven programs to enhance teaching and learning, including new Individual Learning Maps for every child, and highly qualified teachers selected after new teacher evaluation and interviewing processes,” Emergency Manager Roy S. Roberts said. Roberts is a former auto industry executive.

Now the bad news: “For the second year in a row, DPS is cutting its budget by nearly a quarter, from $1.03 billion last year to $784 million for the new fiscal year. It cut $231 million from its budget for the 2011-12 year as well as 800 staff positions.” This year, there will be 1,900 layoffs, as 15,000 students are transferred to the new state authority in charge of failing schools. “Class sizes will remain at 25 in grades K-3, and rise by three to 33 for grades 4-5 and 38 for grades 6-12, returning to levels from 2010-11.” Last year, the teachers took a 10% pay cut.

Now the really good news: The district will have a surplus of $11.9 million at the end of the current fiscal year!

Think about it: Some of the poorest and neediest children in one of the most economically depressed cities in America will have some of the most crowded classes in the nation.

The district is on life support. But never fear, there will be “highly qualified teachers,” “innovation,” “robust school choices,” “data-driven programs,” etc. The lyrics are familiar, but there is no music.

Diane

Every once in a while, I read an article that is so packed with insight and new information that I want to share it. In the past, I would use Twitter to send it out. Now that I have this blog, I can not only share it but tell you why I think it is important.

The article tells the story of how Stand for Children came into Massachusetts, did some constructive work in a few communities, then launched its now-typical campaign to reduce teachers’ rights and status. It brought the Massachusetts Teachers Association to its knees by threatening to put a heavily-funded initiative on the ballot that would be far worse than a negotiated agreement. In the present anti-teacher climate, MTA capitulated to Stand’s demands.

What’s new in the article? The revelation of the big money players behind Stand; the Machiavellian techniques that it employed in Massachusetts, echoing its bare-knuckle campaign to crush the Chicago Teachers Union; the bald-faced presumption of an out-of-state organization imposing its will on teachers in the nation’s most educationally outstanding state.

And what’s familiar is the nagging question: Why did Jonah Edelman sell out? Why did the son of iconic figures in the civil rights movement become a pawn for big money and big business? Was it for money? Was it for power? I try not to speculate about people’s motives (usually unknowable) and to judge them by their actions, but this puzzle is just too puzzling and too hard to crack.

Diane

In a demonstration of the importance that he attaches to the weighty work of the Ohio State Board of Education, Governor John Kasich appointed a former quarterback at Ohio State University to a seat on the state board. His choice, Stanley Jackson,plans to open a charter school for African American males. He played for Ohio State in 1996 and 1997. It is said that he shares the governor’s vision for education in Ohio.

In another recent development in Ohio, the state education department was shocked, shocked to discover that a for-profit charter company was making a profit and using the extra money to fund its other operations.

There are two great websites to learn about education in Ohio. One is http://www.plunderbund.com, which casts a properly skeptical eye on the depredations of the state’s education leaders.

The other is http://10thperiod.blogspot.com/. I have been reading this blog since I visited Cleveland in the spring, and it is a deeply knowledgeable discussion of the politics of education in Ohio.

Diane

With all the education reforms taking place in Louisiana, it’s clear that Governor Bobby Jindal wants to be a national leader in what is now called the “education reform” movement. Louisiana is leading the nation in the race to the bottom, having adopted every bad idea in ALEC’s catalogue of ways to tear up your public school system.

The Louisiana law was saluted by Indiana’s state superintendent Tony Bennett, head of a group of ultra-conservative state superintendents called Chiefs for Change, who share Jindal’s desire to get rid of public education if at all possible. Bennett said, “These student-centered reforms will completely transform Louisiana and its students,” by introducing a “marketplace of choices.” Part of that “marketplace of choices,” we now know, is letting students take tax dollars away from their public school and pay it to universities, private businesses, individual teachers, tutoring businesses, online companies, or anyone who sets himself up and says he is selling education.

Now we knew about the voucher program and we knew about the vast expansion of charters and for-profit online corporations. And we knew that teachers will be fired if the scores don’t go up in their classes every year.

But here is a new way to “reform” the schools. The state board of education, in its infinite wisdom, decided that teachers in charter schools don’t need to be certified. Understand that certification in Louisiana is not a real high bar to clear. A teacher need have only a college degree, a grade point average of 2.5 out of 4, and pass a national teachers’ exam.

But not for charter teachers! They don’t need certification. State board member Charles Roemer, a graduate of Harvard College and Harvard Business School, insists that charter schools need to be free to “try new approaches.” One new approach is to have uncertified teachers.

But wait, Roemer has an even better idea! According to an article in the local press:

Roemer said the issue of teacher credentials should be left to individual charter schools.

Some who even lack an undergraduate degree could do a good job in the classroom, he said.

Roemer said charter schools should be given flexibility, then be held accountable for how students fare in the classroom.

Roemer knows a good bit about charter schools. His sister Caroline Roemer Shirley is executive director of the Louisiana Association of Public Charter Schools.

Teachers in charter schools, if Mr. Roemer has his way, won’t even need to be college graduates. Now there is an innovation. Just hire anyone who wants to teach, without regard to qualifications, and see if they can raise test scores. Do they need a high school diploma? Why? Why not go for broke and wipe out all credentialism?

This is indeed new ground in the “education reform” movement.

Diane


I opened up my New York Times and was surprised to find a full-page ad sponsored by the College Board attacking American education.

The ad showed a graphic in which “national security,” “jobs,” “healthcare,” and the “economy” rest upon a base of “education,” but the base is cracking.

The ad says: “Our future depends on the strength of our education system. But that system is crumbling.”

The ad then says “Help make education a higher priority in the presidential campaign. Go to DontForgetEd.org,” a website with very little content.

Why is the College Board spreading lies about our education system?

Who is paying for these ads?

Is the College Board mounting this campaign because David Coleman, the architect of the Common Core standards, is about to become its president?

What is their purpose other than to defame our nation’s hard-working educators?

If any readers can find a way to start a petition campaign to complain to the College Board, let me know.

They stink.

Diane