I have a visceral distaste for the very idea of measuring the arts with a standardized multiple-choice test.
This strikes me the sort of technocratic thinking that is driving creativity and ingenuity underground and crushing it whenever it dares to appear in a schoolroom.
We know that the only reason this idea is being considered is in order to generate enough data to evaluate teachers of the arts.
Imagine: Asking students in the band to answer bubble questions about composers or music.
Or asking students in a sculpture class to name this artist.
What’s the point? We want students to have cultural literacy but these kinds of learnings belong in the study of history and culture, not in an arts class.
Unless I’m wrong, arts classes are places to do the arts, places for creating them, acting them out, feeling the joy of expression.
And good grief, why can’t we trust teachers to know how there students are doing?
Oh, wait, I forgot. The tests are not being built to measure the students, but to measure their teachers. And we know that when their teachers are measured with these bubble tests, they will feel compelled to focus on what can be memorized, not what can be performed.
Another sign of the coldness that has infested the sensibilities of our policymakers.
I liked this teacher’s good idea about what to do with the bubble tests:
| I am a teacher and an artist. I don’t know which came first, but I do know they work hand in hand together. I work in a high poverty school in an inclusion kindergarten. I did my student teaching in a full inclusion school with two “Emotional Behavior Disorder” programs of children included in the general population of “typical” children.In both instances, the ONLY time I have absolutely ZERO behavior challenges crop up, is when I am teaching an art lesson that allows children to be creative.
My principal has come in to observe this magic phenomena, as have other teachers, only to see troubled children smiling, engaged, cooperative, collaborating, and learning without resistance. Pre-schoolers through adults have learned ALL subjects through integrated art lessons, sometimes including music, and movement. They have learned with joy vs drudgery. And yes, they have DISCUSSED their learning, but it has also become part of their “muscle memory”. I recently posted on Twitter about beautiful crocheted coral reefs and the art of adult women who learned a way to discover a hyperbolic math formula that was yet to be able to be worked out by the best mathematicians. I am hoping this link embeds the Ted-Talk, but if not, you can access it here:http://www.ted.com/talks/margaret_wertheim_crochets_the_coral_reef.html Christine Wertheim and Margaret Wertheim of the Institute For Figuring have started this ongoing project. This integration of feminine art form, higher geometry, environmentalism, and science is found around the world now, but what I loved most besides its beauty was Margaret’s suggestion in the end of her Ted-Talk: She suggested that we create “Play Tanks” instead of “Think Tanks” for real reform. The integration of learning is lost when we compartmentalize and narrow curriculum. Children and adults learn best when we DO. Yes, critical thinking, reading, writing, science, and math are all important. But when integrated with the arts through play, the learning is not only effortless — like play —- but becomes a muscle memory and one that does not have to be forced. We are automatically drawn to the learning and engagement. As for bubble tests: I have a suggestion. Let’s create a bubble test art installation in every school. These bubble test forms need to become a piece of history, a thing of the past. These forms can be used creatively by artists, children and adults alike to create collage, sculpture, furniture, multi-media art forms, wall hangings, paper cutting, — watercolor, acrylic, oil paintings, sumi-e painting — music – though the notes are limited by A,B,C,D – perhaps someone can get creative – dance costumes, drama costumes, and anything else you can think of! Join me in creating art out of bubble tests! That is the ONLY good purpose for bubble tests! Where shall we begin installing them? Perhaps in every Department of Education as protest art! Opt Out and Create Opt Out Art! |

Great post!! Speaking of art inspired by and in reaction to bubble tests, I created this work: http://frambesart.weebly.com/uploads/6/6/5/9/6659233/7058512_orig.jpg as a submission for the 2012 Artistic Rebuttal Book Project: http://www.artisticrebuttal.com/
I really like the idea of creating an installation piece in schools and involving students. 🙂
LikeLike
Love your bubble art. A real beauty. Saved it for future sharing. If ever a message like that was needed, it is NOW!
LikeLike
Finally found a useful idea for bubble tests! I fear that arts will fail prey to bubble mania for the sake of survival. They may need to “prove their worth” in this quantitative way rather than be valued qualitatively as they should be. i have been more concerned about the arts and PE with the rising popularity of STEM. Why are the arts marginalized (or in this case, absent) from current trends? The bias towards the quantitative, the measurable is reductionistic. It leaves out the complexity and humanity of our “subjects.” How very disrespectful of children.
LikeLike
Great engineers and scientists usually have a foot strongly in the arts somewhere. This is critically important and distinctly underthought.
The art teacher at the local high school has a “Trash Fashion” project and show every year. It’s creative, but it’s also engineering, because whatever they make has to stand up to being worn long enough to be modeled. It’s not a trivial concern at all.
Ceramics is a brilliant fusion of chemistry, engineering, and art. You need all three elements to be successful. There is a lot of design in even a simple coffee cup for it to hold up to the firing and to provide a pleasing utility and aesthetic. The glaze and its reaction to the clay is all chemistry and materials science – you can’t just pop a wash of something that looks yellow on it and call it done (I can almost guarantee the end product won’t be yellow). And serious sculptures are significant engineering challenges, building something that will stand, have proper balance, can be moved, will survive the fire… and in the end, look as the artist intended. The consequences of failure are less than that of a suspension bridge, but learning to do one informs the other.
Richard Feynman was famous for playing the bongos … in addition to being a brilliant and Nobel-prize winning theoretical physicist. His FBI file was recently released, and one letter shows a colleague felt that the bongos lessened Feynman’s credibility as a serious researcher. I think instead the evidence shows that his curiosity and his interest in music and art exactly complemented his physics and helped him develop the creativity to work out QED.
LikeLike
I think it’s obvious how to make bubble test sheets into an art test. 🙂 The problem is, there are an infinite number of correct answers, making it hard to score by machine.
By the way, when looking for a picture to illustrate my point (What, no scantron sheets turned into cat pictures on the internet?), I found this little tidbit:
http://www.geekosystem.com/tag/scantron/
Apparently the stroke pattern we each use to fill in a bubble is as unique as our handwriting, and can be used to catch counterfeits. Who knew?
LikeLike
Great idea! Love it! Or it can become TP.
LikeLike
Thank you for sharing your art and ideas! Let’s begin this important work! Find your bubble sheets and transform them , from the BEAST —- into beauty! Or into a form demonstrating the ugliness of this tool of oppression. It is your art! You decide!
Send your Bubble Test Protest Art to Twitter using 3 hashtags: #SOSAction #optoutart #optout
Thank you!
LikeLike
Diane,
I’m in agreement with you that the testing going on now is pure madness. It infuriates me. However, I do think it has helped accountability for special education students, before the pendulum swung as far as it has. I’ve seen evidence of that in my state. Of course, I still see and hear other teachers say that their students can’t learn xyz because of their disability, or that they’re not teaching them certain standards because they can’t learn them. I had a teacher once tell me that her (severe-profound) students couldn’t learn even extended grade level standards because they were so very “retarded”, but in the same conversation tell me that she was shocked to see her students could learn some basic things once they found a communication system. This would not have happened if not for high standards and our alternate assessment. This mindset infuriates me as well.
With that in mind, what are your thoughts on how accountability should be measured? I know i personally want the emphasis on testing and testing based accountability to go away, but for the population of students I’ve taught, I know there needs to be accountability for the reasons I mention above, or else a large population of students will not be pushed to higher expectations.
Conversations with a colleague have brought up the idea of accountability based on instruction–on the front end, if you will. But how could this be measured? Could it be left up to principals, team leaders? Is their a problem with school leadership in that teachers who are bad teachers based on what they do in the classroom, NOT on test scores, are left in the classroom with no regards to providing the PD to help them improve or getting rid of them if they don’t improve?
I’m interested to read your thoughts.
LikeLike
I work as a substitute art teacher in the New York City Schools. One day last year I was working as a day sub in a stressed school in Upper Manhattan. A very self possessed 6th grade student in an ESL class chose to practice her best english with me. What a wonderful young woman. She was actively trying to improve her language skills in a way that was so self generated. She pointed out that ESL students have less art because they are doing double duty in languages. I could feel the sense of relief in in the classroom when these kids were presented with my project which was purely visual. They were able to spend 45 minutes doing something that was NOT language oriented. Try saying that to any reformer, I think kids need to do something that is not language based. It is a heresy to say such a thing these days, but the kids need it. They need it to be able to compete with the more privileged kids in our society who are going to schools where creativity is very highly prized . We are sending these kids into a world that is very fluid, very visual and musical, very creative, very changeable. Denying them the chance to spend a small part of their school week exercising and developing their creative and instinctual skills is nothing less than keeping them down.
LikeLike