The Wall Street Journal, owned by Rupert Murdoch, is known for its admiration for Donald Trump and its commitment to the best interests of big business and capitalism. On Friday, it published this editorial about Trump’s determination to impose tariffs on our trading partners. This action, said the editorial, is just plain dumb.
The editorial said:
President Trump will fire his first tariff salvo on Saturday against those notorious American adversaries . . . Mexico and Canada. They’ll get hit with a 25% border tax, while China, a real adversary, will endure 10%. This reminds us of the old Bernard Lewis joke that it’s risky to be America’s enemy but it can be fatal to be its friend.
Leaving China aside, Mr. Trump’s justification for this economic assault on the neighbors makes no sense. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt says they’ve “enabled illegal drugs to pour into America.” But drugs have flowed into the U.S. for decades, and will continue to do so as long as Americans keep using them. Neither country can stop it.
Drugs may be an excuse since Mr. Trump has made clear he likes tariffs for their own sake. “We don’t need the products that they have,” Mr. Trump said on Thursday. “We have all the oil you need. We have all the trees you need, meaning the lumber.”
Mr. Trump sometimes sounds as if the U.S. shouldn’t import anything at all, that America can be a perfectly closed economy making everything at home. This is called autarky, and it isn’t the world we live in, or one that we should want to live in, as Mr. Trump may soon find out.
Take the U.S. auto industry, which is really a North American industry because supply chains in the three countries are highly integrated. In 2024 Canada supplied almost 13% of U.S. imports of auto parts and Mexico nearly 42%. Industry experts say a vehicle made on the continent goes back and forth across borders a half dozen times or more, as companies source components and add value in the most cost-effective ways.
And everyone benefits. The office of the U.S. Trade Representative says that in 2023 the industry added more than $809 billion to the U.S. economy, or about 11.2% of total U.S. manufacturing output, supporting “9.7 million direct and indirect U.S. jobs.” In 2022 the U.S. exported $75.4 billion in vehicles and parts to Canada and Mexico. That number jumped 14% in 2023 to $86.2 billion, according to the American Automotive Policy Council.
American car makers would be much less competitive without this trade. Regional integration is now an industry-wide manufacturing strategy—also employed in Japan, Korea and Europe—aimed at using a variety of high-skilled and low-cost labor markets to source components, software and assembly.
The result has been that U.S. industrial capacity in autos has grown alongside an increase in imported motor vehicles, engines and parts. From 1995-2019, imports of autos, engines and parts rose 169% while U.S. industrial capacity in autos, engines and parts rose 71%.
As the Cato Institute’s Scott Lincicome puts it, the data show that “as imports go up, U.S. production goes up.” Thousands of good-paying auto jobs in Texas, Ohio, Illinois and Michigan owe their competitiveness to this ecosystem, relying heavily on suppliers in Mexico and Canada.
Tariffs will also cause mayhem in the cross-border trade in farm goods. In fiscal 2024, Mexican food exports made up about 23% of total U.S. agricultural imports while Canada supplied some 20%. Many top U.S. growers have moved to Mexico because limits on legal immigration have made it hard to find workers in the U.S. Mexico now supplies 90% of avocados sold in the U.S. Is Mr. Trump now an avocado nationalist?
Then there’s the prospect of retaliation, which Canada and Mexico have shown they know how to do for maximum political impact. In 2009 the Obama Administration and Congressional Democrats ended a pilot program that allowed Mexican long-haul truckers into the U.S. as stipulated in Nafta. Mexico responded with targeted retaliation on 90 U.S. goods to pressure industries in key Congressional districts.
These included California grapes and wine, Oregon Christmas trees and cherries, jams and jellies from Ohio and North Dakota soy. When Mr. Trump imposed steel and aluminum tariffs in 2018, Mexico got results using the same tactic, putting tariffs on steel, pork products, fresh cheese and bourbon.
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has promised to respond to U.S. tariffs on a dollar-for-dollar basis. Canada could suffer a larger GDP hit since its economy is so much smaller, but American consumers will feel the bite of higher costs for some goods.
None of this is supposed to happen under the U.S.-Mexico-Canada trade agreement that Mr. Trump negotiated and signed in his first term. The U.S. willingness to ignore its treaty obligations, even with friends, won’t make other countries eager to do deals. Maybe Mr. Trump will claim victory and pull back if he wins some token concessions. But if a North American trade war persists, it will qualify as one of the dumbest in history.

maybe Trump will see his shadow and go back to sleep for six years.
LikeLike
Our dimwitted president has failed to learn from history. Enacting Prohibition to prevent people from drinking booze only helped create & enrich the Mafia, who provided the illicit alcohol that the masses wanted despite the law of the land. Same for drug use nowadays. You can go after the providers all you want, but if there is still excessive demand for drugs, the Cartels will provide them. There’s no perfect solution for stemming drug usage, but this action by our Moron-in-Chief is ridiculous.
LikeLike
Trump is obsessed with McKinley who was big on tariffs. Both Trump and his secretary of commerce said that they prefer raising revenue through tariffs, rather than income taxes. The “drugs flowing through the border” claim is just a way of justifying the whole tariff scheme. Forbes said that only 1 percent of fentanyl smuggling comes from Canada, so a trade war with Canada makes no sense at all whatsoever.
LikeLike
Curious why he’s started a trade war with our neighbors and closest allies.
LikeLike
This, from the Wall Street Journal? Is Murdock asleep? And where is Trump-the-Sharpie when you need him? CBK
LikeLiked by 1 person
What’s even more horrifying than this article is the comments from many of the WSJ readers. They’re buying the war on fentanyl justification for the trade war.
LikeLike
Once a CONVICTED EFFIN FELON cultista always a CONVICTED EFFIN FELON cultista, eh!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Timothy Snyder: The Logic Of Destruction
If you voted Republican, and you care about your country, please act rather than rationalize…make it known to your elected officials that you wanted something else. And get ready to protest with people with whom you otherwise disagree.
Individual Democrats in the Senate and House have legal and institutional tools to slow down the attempted oligarchical takeover. There should also be legislation. It might take a moment, but even Republican leaders might recognize that the Senate and House will no longer matter in a post-American oligarchy without citizens.
Trump should obviously be impeached…Those considering impeachment should also include Vance.
Democrats who serve in state office as governors have a chance to profile themselves, or more importantly to profile an America that still works.
Attorneys general in states have a chance to enforce state laws, which will no doubt have been broken.
The Democratic Party has a talented new chair. Democrats will need instruments of active opposition, such as a People’s Cabinet, in which prominent Democrats take responsibility for following government departments. It would be really helpful to have someone who can report to the press and the people what is happening inside Justice, Defense, Transportation, and the Treasury, and all the others, starting this week.
Federal workers should stay in office, if they can, for as long as they can. This is not political, but existential, for them and for all of us. They will have a better chance of getting jobs afterwards if they are fired.
And companies? As every CEO knows, the workings of markets depend upon the government creating a fair playing field. The ongoing takeover will make life impossible for all but a few companies.
Commentators should please stop using words such as “digital” and “progress” and “efficiency” and “vision” when describing this coup attempt…The plotting oligarchs…are offering no future beyond acting out their midlife crises on the rest of us. It is demeaning to pretend that they represent something besides a logic of destruction.
As for the rest of us: Make sure you are talking to people and doing something. The logic of “move fast and break things,” like the logic of all coups, is to gain quick dramatic successes that deter and demoralize and create the impression of inevitability. Nothing is inevitable. Do not be alone and do not be dismayed. Find someone who is doing something you admire and join them.
https://snyder.substack.com/p/the-logic-of-destruction?r=p3e2a&utm_medium=ios&triedRedirect=true
LikeLike
Thank you, Kathy.
LikeLike
That link doesn’t work on my computer.
LikeLike
“The Wall Street Journal, owned by Rupert Murdoch, is known for its admiration for Donald Trump….”
I have read the WSJ for many years, since long before Trump went into politics. The editorial page is conservative, but they have published many hundreds of editorials and op-eds critical of Trump since 2015. Trump worshipers frequently lambaste the WSJ and National Review for disagreeing with Trump’s official actions, public language, and personal conduct.
LikeLike
Jeff,
I read the WSJ and it’s true that its editorials occasionally criticize Trump. But I think it’s fair to characterize the WSJ as pro-Trump despite occasional deviations.
I think I could fairly say that the WSJ is rabidly pro-voucher.
It’s also pro-free trade so it is not surprising that it condemned Trump’s stupid tariffs.
LikeLike
We often see and hear of those puzzled by rural Americans who vote against their own interests. I think this can be said of the business community as well. For those who pride themselves for analytical decision making they obviously pay little attention to the data regarding our economic performance with Democratic administrations vs. Republicans. The results are not even close. Growth during the Clinton Administration far outperformed Reagan’s who tripled the national debt while Clinton got us to a balanced budget. Bushes tax cuts and deregulation brought us 2008. After pulling us out of the Great Recession, Obama’s last three years outperformed Trump’s first three before the pandemic. Biden’s statistical performance in new jobs (around 14 million), Stock markets, and manufacturing significantly outperformed all Republicans since Nixon. Billionaires increased their net worth almost exponentially. Yet, WSJ, The Chamber of Commerce, and most business organizations enthusiastically supported the candidate who had the first negative employment result since Hoover. I don’t get it.
LikeLike
It is a conservative article of faith that only Republicans understand economics. Normal people can see that the economy thrives under Democrats and are a clusterf**k under Republicans. But Republicans have been pushing the lie for decades, and conservatives are constitutionally incapable of giving progressives/liberals credit for a damned thing.
LikeLike
I’m starting to believe that Republican oligarchs like it when others struggle.
LikeLike
Noblesse oblige. /s/
LikeLike
Quelle surprise.
LikeLike
Canadians booed the American national athem at the Ottawa NHL game. Canadian David Doel of the rational national commented “You have to really screw up to get Canadians to boo a national anthem”
LikeLike
It would be easier to read this article if the post provided a working link.
LikeLike
The Rational National is a youtube show. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJ5gYDKYdQA
LikeLike
Thanks.
LikeLike
David Pearce: Wow. I hadn’t heard that. Goes to show that one’s reputation is priceless. CBK
LikeLike
The operative word is “one’s”.
LikeLike
If the WSJ criticizes something the CONVICTED EFFIN FELON does you know it has to be bad.
The CONVICTED EFFIN FELON’S cultistas that I interact with tell me to “give it six months and we’ll see.” Hell, there won’t be anything left to see.
LikeLike
‘It is really awful!’: Rep. Crockett explains terrifying reality if Musk has federal funds access | Watch
LikeLike