Stuart Egan, National Board Certified Teacher in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, learned that he was entitled to a bonus of $2,000 for the students in his AP classes who passed their exams. He doesn’t want the money. He needs the money, but he won’t take it. After taxes, he will donate it to his school, which is under-resourced, like many in the state. In this post, he explains why.
Behind the bonus, he writes, is a lack of respect for all public school teachers.
Here are three good reasons he doesn’t want the bonus:
1. I do not need a carrot stick. If getting a bonus to get students to perform better really works, then this should have been done a long time ago. But it does not. I do not perform better because of a bonus. I am not selling anything. I would like my students and parents to think that I work just as hard for all of my students in all of my classes because I am a teacher.
2. This creates an atmosphere of competition. I did not get into teaching so that I could compete with my fellow teachers and see who makes more money, but rather collaborate with them. Giving some teachers a chance to make bonuses and not others is a dangerous precedent.
3. I did not take those tests. The students took the tests. Sometimes I wish that I could take the tests for them, but if you are paying me more money to have students become more motivated, then that is just misplaced priorities. These students are young adults. Some vote; most drive; many have jobs; many pay taxes. They need to be able to harness their own motivation, and hopefully I can couple it with my motivation.
Stuart’s response reminds me of something Albert Shanker once said about merit pay: “You mean that students will work harder if teachers are offered an incentive? How does that work?”

Standing ovation.
LikeLiked by 1 person
To paraphrase … that oft-repeated movie line:
“We don’t need no stinkin’ BONUS!”
LikeLiked by 1 person
All Title 1 teachers with 3+ years in the same school should work tax free! Wouldn’t cost districts one penny; lost revenue gets skimmed from bloated defense budget. Leave the school, lose your tax free job. This plan just might provide enough incentive to attract and keep HQTs.
LikeLike
Now that’s a suggestion I’d not heard before. I like it!
Republics could like it because it lowers taxes, at least on those teachers willing to take the deal.
Democrats could like it because, reasons.
It’s logical, it’s workable…it’ll probably never happen.
LikeLike
Thanks RH. I have been trying to promote this idea for a while. There is no reason that it couldn’t work. Significantly increases teacher pay without harming district taxpayers. My only concern is that Title 1 districts might start to use it as a way of lowing salary schedules.
LikeLike
Unless your district refuses to apply for Title I for your school. We have a high enough poverty rate at my school to qualify for Title I, but the district won’t apply for the funds.
LikeLike
You could use F&RL.
LikeLike
The teacher’s position is admirable and I get the desire to give back to his underfunded school. If he wants to make the most impact, however, the money should be given to a pro-education PAC. Use the legislature’s bad program against them.
LikeLike
Mike,
The Network for Public Education has received gifts from teachers that were bonuses they rejected.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nice to know!
LikeLike
Now there’s a teacher for your honor roll, Diane!
LikeLike
Well done Stuart and as a middle school teacher in NC, thank you!
LikeLike
Instead of test-based “bonuses,” how about fully funding our schools. We are motivated by excited learners who are happy young people. Of course, we want reasonable compensation commensurate with our advanced education, commitment, etc. — after all, we do have families to support and student loans to pay off. However, offering a couple thousand to try to get us to focus on testing is an insult. We are there to focus on students and their futures.
LikeLike
His action makes me think of something I experienced early in my teaching career. In the fall of 1965 I was teaching a high school calculus class at Morningside High School in Inglewood, CA. That summer we had experienced the Watts riots and the spill over in racial tensions created a reshuffling of our course offerings. As a result, my calculus class (being a group of only 13) was cancelled. I would not stand for this (I was dept. chair with some power in the system) and held the class at 7 a.m., more that an hour before the normal school start time. For the first three months, there was no salary for this “extra” class, but that was irrelevant to the professional obligation to continue the math program for these 13 kids. I was not and am not hero for doing this, I was simply a professional attempting to provide the best program for my students. Having said this, I must admit that I received a giant reward with the continued friendship of these students with whom I shared this special time. I will gather with several of them for their 50th high school reunion in October. Who said you can’t get rich in teaching?
LikeLike
Larry: 🙂 Thank you.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on caffeinated rage and commented:
Thanks to Dr. Ravitch and EdNC.org.
LikeLike