Thousands of supporters of public education rallied across the nation on behalf of full funding of their schools. The walk-ins are taking place in more than 30 cities to protest school closings, budget cuts, high-stakes testing, and privatization.
The movement is being organized by the Alliance to Reclaim Our Schools, a coalition that includes the American Federation of Teachers, the Journey for Justice Alliance, and the Center for Popular Democracy, among other organizations and unions.
“The future of public education in the United States stands at a critical crossroad,” a statement from the Alliance reads. “Over the past two decades, a web of billionaire advocates, national foundations, policy institutes, and local and federal decision-makers have worked to dismantle public education and promote a top-down, market-based approach to school reform. Under the guise of civil rights advocacy, this approach has targeted low-income, urban African-American, Latino and immigrant communities, while excluding them from the reform process.”
“These attacks are racist and must be stopped,” the statement continues.
The movement is demanding:
Full, fair funding for neighborhood-based community schools that provide students with quality in-school supports and wraparound services
Charter accountability and transparency and an end to state takeovers of low-performing schools and districts
Positive discipline policies and an end to zero-tolerance
Full and equitable funding for all public schools
Racial justice and equity in our schools and communities.

Here’s more of the sign on letter from Alliance to Reclaim Our Schools that Diane quotes from: bit.ly/reclaimourschools Check it out and sign on!
And the AROS website: http://www.reclaimourschools.org
AROS includes the NEA, Alliance for Educational Justice, Opportunity to Learn campaign, SEIU and Gamaliel, as well as the AFT, Journey for Justice Alliance and Center for Popular Democracy.
LikeLike
Whoops, here’s the link to the AROS (Alliance to Reclaim Our Schools) sign on letter: https://actionnetwork.org/forms/stand-with-alliance-to-reclaim-our-schools
or go the AROS website: http://www.reclaimourschools.org/updates
LikeLike
Oh, God. These people:
“Baker’s aides suggested the demonstrators write the governor a letter to file a formal request to meet.”
He can’t even spare 5 minutes for public schools.
http://www.boston.com/news/education/2016/02/17/boston-public-school-parents-teachers-protest-budget-cuts/zvQ06uY1SFc01I8STeQ70M/story.html?s_campaign=bcom%3Asocialflow%3Atwitter
LikeLike
An article in the LATIMES, posted just an hour ago—
Link: http://www.latimes.com/local/education/lausd/la-edu-lausd-walk-in-20160217-story.html
An excerpt highlighting well-known participants:
[start]
L.A. Unified Supt. Michelle King joined union organizers and school board members for the demonstration at Hamilton High, where she was once principal. The partnership between the school district and the union on this event was emblematic of how those who are part of the traditional education system have put aside differences to rally together against what they perceive as a common threat.
In other cities, the mood was less cooperative: Chicago teachers targeted district officials for more funding and a fairer contract.
But Karen Lewis, president of the Chicago teachers union, attended a walk-in at Dorsey High School in Baldwin Hills. She was there and not in Chicago because of this week’s American Federation of Teachers executive council meeting. Dorsey was assigned to her, and she wore a sign saying, “Eli Broad, leave our public school alone,” followed by the hashtag “#studentsdeserve.”
On hand at Hamilton was Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers.
“Clearly the fight in L.A. is against billionaires trying to destabilize a public school system,” Weingarten said. “This is a fight about whether we provide real opportunities for all kids or whether the privatizers and billionaires get to decide which kids get opportunities and which kids don’t.”
[end]
😎
LikeLike
New law in Utah being proposed that would essentially gut truancy laws. The proponent states: “Education is not a Constitutional right, but being able to raise your kids as you see fit is a Constitutional right.” He also stated that it’s not the responsibility of the parents to get their kids to school, but that schools need to “entice” kids to come to school. Crazy. http://www.sltrib.com/news/3544453-155/citing-parents-constitutional-rights-utah-lawmaker
LikeLike
Amazing. And sponsored by a Republican. No surprise. Does the GOP just want to encourage ignorance or wallow in it?
LikeLike
I have to say — I am of two minds on this one. On the one hand, I am no fan of cookie cutter truancy laws that do not provide the flexibility to deal with illness, kids who are ballet dancers, kids who act in movies, etc.
But the legislators in the article make no sense (surprise!). The one claiming that schools need to “entice” kids received several truancy notices with respect to his son who is a nationally ranked basketball player who will attend (or is attending) Duke. No doubt, he was gone on college recruiting trips (which are not excused absences). On the one hand, I am not worried about whether his kid will get a decent education. But on the other hand, “enticing schools” had absolutely zero to do with his truancy problems. His other “evidence” is parents who don’t bother to bring their kids — or who show up late, in pajama bottoms. This too has nothing to do with whether schools are sufficiently “enticing.” This is a parent issue — not a bored kid issue. It has to do with a small subclass of irresponsible or incapacitated parents who either cannot hold up, or are not holding up, their end of the bargain (the parent part — that happens at home). I won’t lose a lot of sleep over decriminalizing truancy, but see nothing in the article except more mindless “blame the schools” for every thing arguments — that bear no connection to reality.
LikeLike
JEM: I agree that severely criminalizing truancy is to be avoided, but, as you say, there’s a LOT of problems with the comments this legislator made. And I don’t like laws made because of a few people’s personal experiences, which this seems to be.
LikeLike
Newark, NJ got rid of truancy officers – and a h.s. student went missing, and the school didn’t notice she was missing, and she wound up dead, found not from from her h.s., and meanwhile Scami Anderson was having her schools report 100% attendance. This same 100% attendance was also reported during a student’s death from meningitis and Scami blamed everyone but herself for not knowing when the kid who died was in or not, and who else was in or not, etc. Real nightmare, that.
LikeLike
I dunno. For younger kids, yes, they need significant adult help to get to school and perhaps there needs to be some mechanism to hold parents accountable for that. And, yes, I think about people like the FLDS people who try to keep their kids from being exposed to the outside world at all while abusing them within the cult (but those kids go to their own cult schools anyway, so truancy laws don’t really affect them).
But at some point school really should be something that kids choose to go to. We do need to rely less on power and control and more on making school relevant and worthwhile for all kids. There is no other situation in life in which you are forced to go somewhere for that many hours a day with so little choice unless you commit a crime and you are justly sentenced to prison. People cannot – and should not – be forced against their will. At least not without harmful consequences. If we really believe in democracy and being a free country, then all human beings, including the young ones, need to be respected as autonomous agents.
As an example (and, yes, I know one example doesn’t really prove much), I have a friend who went through a nasty divorce a few years ago from her abusive husband. Her 14 year old son suffered a lot from the trauma of the situation. He was never very good at or fond of school to begin with, but during this situation he just collapsed. There were bullies at school who picked up on his misery and decided to make it worse. The school did nothing to support or protect him. He wasn’t the least bit interested in anything he was learning, the teachers didn’t seem to care, he didn’t feel safe and school wasn’t in any way meeting his needs, so he stopped going. What was his mother supposed to do about it? He was bigger than she is so physical force wasn’t going to work. She tried every sort of bribe and punishment she could think of – nothing was worth it for him. Meanwhile, she’s getting nasty letters and court orders and threats of him being taken out of her custody. How in the world do we think that power and control, threats and punishments (of either the kid or the parent) in a situation like this are going to make it any better? Either make school a place that meets his needs or stop forcing him to go where he’s miserable.
Peter Greene has an interesting piece today about a professor who asked his students if they could get an A with no strings attached – no assignments, no tests, etc. – other than that they keep the deal secret, would they take the deal? Most of them said yes. The point being that school has become (or has always been) a place to get good grades to get into a good college and/or get a good job (for those who can and will jump through the hoops). It’s not about learning or meeting students’ needs – it’s just credentialing. If we ever get through rephorm to the point that the people actually have control of their schools again, I really would like to see some major re-thinking of what school is for and how best to implement it. We’ve too long been stuck in the compulsory model of schooling as a way to turn out productive adults. It’s time to think about making school meet the needs of kids (which it does more for affluent kids) rather than the other way around.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Education.
LikeLike