The Journal News of the Lower Hudson Valley wrote an editorial explaining the genesis of the testing madness that has gripped the nation for at least 15 years.
First came No Child Left Behind, then Race to the Top, destroying education by a mammoth obsession with test scores.
Andrew Cuomo used federal policy to lash out at teachers’ unions. Of Congress passes s new law, reducing federal punishments, what will the states do with their new flexibility?
The editorial sees some positive sights:
“Newly arrived state Education Commissioner MaryEllen Elia has said she will appoint task forces to review the Common Core standards, New York’s 3-to-8 tests that are now tied to Common Core, and how test results are used to evaluate teachers. Elia has a track record of supporting the standards-testing-evaluations approach to improving education, but seems keenly aware that many New Yorkers have little faith in our testing obsession. She’ll soon realize that a whole new group of parents are now irritated because of the recent Regents exam in algebra, which left even top students scratching their heads.”
Giving the boot to Pearson sent a good signal.
But now there is “the Cuomo problem.”
“Then there’s the Cuomo problem. Our governor is the driving force behind New York’s brutish teacher-evaluation system, which will increasingly rely on test scores to label teachers (even though we won’t use the same scores to evaluate students because the tests are unproven). Many classroom teachers and the parents who appreciate them will remain peeved until the system is changed. Elia will have to confront this problem pronto and figure out a way to circumvent Cuomo’s stubbornness, driven largely by his animus for teachers unions.
We hope that Congress will let states decide how to use test data for their own purposes. But it would be up to New York’s leaders to recognize what even those in Washington see: testing should not drive education policy. Many teachers will spend too much time next year trying to protect their jobs by preparing students for tests. This must not continue.”

God forbid……any of the media…….upset Queen Hillary Clinton…….by asking her anything at all about her support for people like Cuomo, and other teacher bashing testing industry privatization idiots.
LikeLike
Don’t have any faith in Mary Ellen. She recently met with the Buffalo School Board and told them in no uncertain words that unless those five identified failing schools “improved” over the next year, she would be taking them over. Next is the other twenty five questionable schools on the list. Buffalo would then be left with the fifteen schools which are doing well. Basically two districts (or more) of the haves and have nots.
Elia has a no excuses policy.
Unfortunately, the state ed department hasn’t indicated what improvements will equal success or how those improvements will be measured. A kind of “we’ll know it when we see it” policy.
Syracuse has it worse – they have fifteen schools on the chopping block.
LikeLike
Sorry, it’s five that have one year and twenty that have two years, with fifteen safe.
LikeLike
The era of churn is in full force.
LikeLike
She got along very well with the state DOE here in Florida. That should tell you lots. Well, that and her partnership with Gates.
LikeLike
She started her career at the same school my mom taught at in a blue collar/middle class neighborhood bordering Buffalo. So, she should know better.
LikeLike
Oh, and if you are talking carrots – that district has the highest pay scale, but are rated middle of the pack.
LikeLike
I am wondering the same about John Kasich. He did get rid of PARCC, but everyone has said AIR is awful too. I do know it will not be hard for teachers to receive “ineffective” on the evaluation system. There are Ohio teachers who are outstanding working long hours having to wear a label of “developing.” What a messed up system to make teachers feel awful about themselves……😫😫😫
LikeLike
Getting rid of PARCC didn’t do anything for students. They’ll now spend next year preparing for a different Common Core test. It’s 100% downside for them.
The adults should probably stop following whatever fad comes down the pike and experimenting on them. It’s obvious our lawmakers didn’t even glance at the PARCC test prior to putting it in since they were all surprised to find out how long it was.
Asking 3rd graders for “rigor!” and “hard work!” when the adults on the policy side aren’t even doing the bare minimum takes a lot of nerve.
LikeLike
In every state this willbe a telling time of whether or not elected leadership truly has compassion and hope for those working in and attending public schools or whether they have a personal objective to undermine public schools. But thank goodness it can be handled state by state.
LikeLike
Ed reform is taking a real beating in Ohio media again this week with the manipulation of charter ranking schemes and the abrupt resignation of the “choice” director.
Campbell Brown’s marketing outfit better do some more damage control. Not looking good here, “on the ground”.
http://www.10thperiod.com/2015/07/ohio-charter-school-sheriff-all-white.html
LikeLike
Yes, Chiara, you are so right. It is tough being an Ohio teacher. AIR will be no improvement. Didn’t I read in Diane’s blog that due to all of the charters in Ohio, Ohio now has this huge achievement gap they have to report?
LikeLike
I think they had an achievement gap and it is going up not down.
I don’t know if it’s “due” to charters, though. I can’t figure out how they measure it. Charters aren’t helping or it would be narrowing, but I don’t know how big an effect they have.
LikeLike
Well of course he will. He’s certainly been well-compensated for it. A fundamental problem with people who have no core principles is they tend to support whatever pulls in the largest number of cash-filled suitcases.
LikeLike
BINGO!
LikeLike
Cuomo’s political opposition is weaker than I’ve ever seen in my lifetime and very corrupt.
With both the House and Senate speakers overthrown in recent months, opposition is especially weak in NYS now. Corrupt goes without saying.
LikeLike
Cuomo has taken too much money from reformers to back off now on state testing. As his mouthpiece, Elia will be trying to head off the opt-out movement by blaming it all on Pearson. Look for expensive PR/advertising campaigns next spring about how the new, improved state tests will help ensure our children are college/career ready. They will soft-pedal the connection with teacher evaluations for the time being. I wonder if Flanagan will try to push something through the legislature that will make opt-out illegal. I will say that the reformers’ achilles heel is their utter contempt for parents. They are so sure, every single time, that they are right that they are flabbergasted, every single time, when parents disagree with them!
LikeLike
I fear Cuomo owes his corporate handlers too much to actually look out for the well being of public education. He will probably continue on the wrong path unless he gets so much backlash from outraged from parents that he can no longer ignore them.
LikeLike
More gross corruption in for-profit higher ed:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/davidhalperin/debt-collection-agency-ru_b_7820326.html
How are they planning on regulating thousands of charter schools from DC when they can’t even regulate for-profit colleges?
LikeLike
Really good point.
LikeLike
Cross posted at http://www.opednews.com/Quicklink/Will-Cuomo-Preserve-Testin-in-Best_Web_OpEds-Diane-Ravitch_Education_Madness_Obsession-150720-557.html#comment555641
with a link to a previous essay in my comment:
Gerri K. Songer Explains Why Common Core Tests Are Actually Harmful to Students
by dianeravitch
Gerri K. Songer, a literacy specialist in Illinois, here explains what is wrong with the Common Core tests: “In terms of text complexity, ACT, SAT, and PARCC all use excessively high level text. PARCC is by far the worst assessment for many reasons, some of them including the use of multiple passages between which comparisons and contrasts are made; finite detail-oriented questions; and multi-step cognitive analysis. Yet, the ACT disseminated last March resembled PARCC in reading and mathematics, with the exception of multiple passage comparison/contrast. If the agenda of both ACT and SAT is to become more like PARCC, then one, in essence, wouldn’t be any better than another.
LikeLike
When I posted this at OEN, it got this very interesting comment from Bill Johnson, who is a former educator and technical director of a public high school, presently working in the trade show industry in marketing for numerous corporations.
He says:
Today, most humans do not know the history of testing students.
If you look back in time and dig up the National Defense Education Act of 1958, and then research Project Talent run by Dr. Flanagan what you will find is that testing students served a purpose clearly focused on national defense.
The tests were designed to separate out the smartest and brightest students from the average or less than average students who were basically abandoned to the liberal controlled public school system.
The tests were designed to find the smartest and brightest students and then focus on those students to be channeled into STEM education for science research and development to put America in the lead in science and technology which was paramount back in the 1950’s and 1960’s during the cold war.
If you will recall, when Hitler and his nazi regime fell, Russia took roughly half of Hitler’s scientists and America took the rest through Operation Paperclip.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Paperclip
Some of you might recall it was a nazi rocket scientist named Wernher Von Braun America captured who put America on the moon.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wernher_von_Braun
You have to understand that our survival and national defense was directly tied to the development of brain power through specialized education which did not exist back then and so America developed a separate and NOT equal system of education.
Our federal government and military industrial complex wanted only the smartest students for their purposes while completely abandoning those deemed not worthy into junk schools or public education.
I learned of this because I was a STEM student who attended a U.S. Army private school creation. It was done undercover to keep people in the dark as to what was really going on back then.
You can read about this situation in the archives of President Dwight Eisenhower- a U.S. Army general turned president. Some of the details have only recently been declassified. But in cabinet meetings minutes you can read how Eisenhower and his science team put it all together covertly through universities and secondary schools.
Testing was their way to secretly cull the smartest students who were never to go to public schools- only the dummies. It was done for no other reason.
Today STEM education is common and available to any qualified students. STEM education is today out of the closet.
Anyone who wants to do away with testing is basically saying all students are equal so the smart ones are forced to be equal to the dummies and experience the same substandard education. In other words, hold back the smart ones along with the dummies while dumbing down education for the dummies to look smarter than they really are.
Good education should allow each student to advance at their own pace, not a failed system of everyone is equal so stay in your place until allowed to advance.
Submitted on Tuesday, Jul 21, 2015 at 10:13:05 AM
LikeLike