A new paper by scholars Helen F. Ladd, Charles T. Clotfelder, and John B. Holbein analyzes the charter school sector in North Carolina. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2593657
The group give a brief history of charter schools in the state, which were capped at 100 until Race to the Top encouraged the Legislature to remove the cap altogether. As they show, the original charter schools enrolled mainly black students. As the sector grew, however, especially in the recent period, the charter sector has been increasingly segregated by race. It now enrolls more white students than black students. The test scores of entering students are higher than in the past.
As the authors summarize:
Taken together, our findings imply that the charter schools in North Carolina are increasingly serving the interests of relatively able white students in racially imbalanced schools.
It is indeed an irony that a policy fostered by the Obama administration (Race to the Top) has encouraged the growth of segregation, which appears to be a predictable result of market-based education. The policies of Race to the Top in this respect reinforce the preferences of the far-right political forces that gained control of the North Carolina legislature and governorship in 2010.
Even more troublesome is the effect of charters on the public school systems of the state, which continue to enroll the overwhelming majority of students.
As of 2014, charter school students accounted for 3.6 percent of all public schools students in the state, with the percentage of K-8 students (4.2%) being twice that of 9th to 12th grade students (2.1%). Although the overall percentages are low, they are far higher in some of the urban districts—currently, charter school students account for 15.1% of all students in Durham, 4.7% in Winston-Salem, 6.1% in Charlotte-Mecklenburg, and 4.9% in Wake County Schools.
The authors write:
In this paper, we have said nothing about how the growth of charters in particular districts is likely to affect the ability of those districts to provide quality schooling to the children in the traditional public schools. That issue is currently an urgent concern in Durham County, for example, where the rapid growth of charters has not only increased racial segregation, but also has imposed significant financial burdens on the school district. One recent study found that the net cost to the Durham Public Schools could be as high as $2,000 per student enrolled in a charter school, although the precise amount differs based on the assumptions (Troutman, 2014). Major contributors to this burden are the fact that the charter schools serve far lower proportions of expensive-to-educate children than the traditional public schools and that the district cannot reduce its spending in line with the loss of students because of its fixed costs. In ongoing research we plan to investigate further the evolving financial and other implications of charter schools on districts’ traditional public schools.

In Durham County the schools have such a bad reputation that most wealthy families send their children to private schools. With the explosion of charters, the second tier wealthy families (the ones who can’t quite afford private schools) have an opportunity to get their children out of what is perceived as a bad situation. When they get into the charters, not only does the base school loose that funding from the state but any support money or time they would have given through fundraisers etc. The cost of the charters is immeasurable.
LikeLike
“In this paper, we have said nothing about how the growth of charters in particular districts is likely to affect the ability of those districts to provide quality schooling to the children in the traditional public schools.”
I think we’re making progress because they’re starting to ask the question. I’m not a researcher but it seems like a huge oversight to me- analyzing what is a system without looking at the effects of one piece on the system as a whole. I do not understand how that happened, and it did happen. It’s as if the public system had no value at all, so didn’t even need to be considered in any cost/benefit analysis, assuming someone somewhere was even contemplating cost/benefit. There’s no evidence anyone was in my state, since we’re not making feeble attempts to repair damage that was done.
LikeLike
This morning’s Answer Sheet has a piece touting a movie about another miracle charter school -Mission Hill- this one was started by Deborah Meier in 1997. Interestingly, Meirr is no longer a charter school proponent:
Speaking of the capitalists who saw this movement as a cash cowW
“…They did this with language resonating with the valiant words of “borrowed” from the civil rights movement. Except they seemed to have left out terms like “equal funding” or “integration.” They did it despite the cost in jobs to teachers of color, as the lowest performing schools were closed (where teachers of color tend to work), despite the cost to public unions which Martin Luther King Jr. died defending. And on and on. They did this by adopting noble words (mea culpa) like choice and autonomy and self-governance and small scale and on and on. They did this by playing with data to confuse our judgment.
Shame on us for being duped…”
http://deborahmeier.com/tag/charter-schools/
LikeLike
I could be wrong, but I don’t believe Mission Hill is a charter school. It’s a “pilot” school under the public system. There is a charter school in the Uncommon group called Roxbury Prep Mission Hill Campus, but I’m pretty sure that’s not connected with Deb Meier’s school.
LikeLike
You are right Dienne, mission hills is called a ‘pilot sclhool.’ However, the author of the piece is one Emily Gasoi who is employed by the Gates funded “‘Center for Inspired Reaching,’ which raises some question:
Pilot schools have some of the independence of charter schools but are in the Boston Public School district and are covered by some collective bargaining provisions.
http://seii.mit.edu/research/study/how-effective-are-boston-charter-and-pilot-schools/
Center for Inspired Teaching – Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
2010: Amount: $1,293,000
http://www.gatesfoundation.org/How-We-Work/Quick-Links/Grants-Database/Grants/2010/07/OPP1021453
webapps.foundationcenter.org/rc/grants_ltr/?resultpage=246&
2013: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Awards a $957,875 Grant to Center for Inspired Teaching.
LikeLike
Pilot schools are really charters too.
“Boston Pilot Schools were opened in 1995 to promote increased choice options within the school district, largely in response to 1994 state legislation creating first-time charter schools…”
http://www.ccebos.org/pilotschools/pilot_qa.doc
LikeLike
My son is finishing his first year in a charter school in the Charlotte area. While it is definitely not perfect, it is MUCH better than the public school he attended from K-5. My son is advanced in math and he is finally able to have a group of peers to interact with during school. The public schools in our region do not challenge kids that have capacity to do more than the program.
It does seem that NC needs to ensure appropriate rigor is used in allowing charter schools to open as there have been some recent disasters, but overall I am a big fan of allowing charters to continue to operate.
LikeLike