T.C. Weber, a parent in Tennessee, has a hilarious post on his blog (“Dad Gone Wild”) about the end days of corporate-style reform, of which there has been a surfeit in his state. Humor, as we have often seen, can be an effective vehicle for serious social criticism. Reformers, he says, are like little children who refuse to go to bed and keep making excuses about why they should have just a few minutes more. Please, Daddy?
He writes:
I love my children dearly but I am no fan of bedtime. Things at your house may be a little different, but at my house, it’s like standing behind a jet plane. The kids are going a million miles a minute. Questions are flying. Toys are sprawled everywhere. The noise is deafening. I’m alternately crying, begging, and yes, yelling, “Brush your teeth,” “Put your pajama’s on,” and “Get over here and listen to this book.”
All the while the kids are working off a different agenda. They realize that the day is coming to an end, and they’re not ready to let it go. It’s been a good day, and they want to milk it for everything they can. So they are fighting and talking and trying to create enough energy to delay the inevitable. Finally, though, the kids are settled into bed and the day comes to an end, and preparations begin for tomorrow. It was always a forgone conclusion that they would end up asleep at some point and the day would finally come to an end and that their protestations were pointless.
In my mind, that’s where we are with the reform movement in education right now. The day is coming to an end, and like my children, reformsters are kicking and screaming and making as much noise as they can to try and delay the inevitable. We have reached a point, that the reform movement was once engaged in battle against the status quo has become the status quo. As Nietzsche said, “Battle not with monsters lest ye become a monster; and if you gaze into the abyss the abyss gazes into you.” I certainly don’t consider myself and other like-minded individuals monsters, but man have we been demonized by the reform movement, and now the abyss is gazing right back at them.
The reform movement has been in action long enough that we have a body of evidence to examine. It’s a body of evidence spanning some twenty-plus years, and it looks a whole lot like the status quo. Teach For America has been around since 1991, but as Gary Rubenstein points out, it has become this big blob with no real sense of direction or ability to evolve. A recent in-depth study on charters illustrates, that they have more in common with traditional schools than they’d like to admit. A look at voucher data debunks their value pretty, quickly and don’t get me started on achievement districts as blogger Crazy Crawfish points out, they are their own monstrosity.
When confronted with all this evidence, you would think reformers would start looking forward for new solutions and cast off the ones that have been proven ineffective. That would be the wrong assumption. In fact, it’s just the opposite: they double down in defense of the status quo. They accuse education experts of not believing in children of color. They beg for more time. They create focus groups to study things we already know. They pretty much do everything that they’ve accused public education advocates of doing for years. Hello, kettle? This is pot, and guess what, you are black…..
How many studies to we have to present or debunk in order to show the unsustainable practices of charter schools before it sinks in that they are not the panacea they’re made out to be? How many times must we slap the hands of a Achievement District for jockeying numbers before they accept the truth that it’s just not working? How many times and in how many ways must it be shown that charter schools do not perform better than public schools? None of these are isolated events. They are repeated over and over and over and still the reformers fight to maintain the status quo processes. Just like my kids asking for five more minutes – please.
I’ll be honest. I’m a little bit weary of these conversations. There are few things I enjoy more than a good philosophical discussion, but when the other party continues to ignore empirical evidence, it just becomes tiresome and makes it hard to take them serious. I long to move on to something a bit more meaningful. Truth is, I long for the day when I no longer feel compelled to write this blog because we are actually employing research backed best practices.
Reformers tend to further mimic my children in their desire to constantly be doing something, seldom pausing to consider overall implications. It makes me think about what fellow blogger Rob Miller recently wrote, “The tendency to take action often leads to action without reason or research, which has the potential to cause more problems than it fixes.” Miller makes a compelling argument about slowing things down transferring our focus from the individual and onto the whole.
There is more. And it is all right to the point. There are links to the evidence. Read it and enjoy a good analysis. A good laugh, about things that are not very funny. There are good-hearted people–and some not so good-hearted–who are tearing up American public education and demonizing hard-working teachers. Doing the same things over and over again, doubling down when they fail. Never giving up even after they have become the new and dysfunctional status quo. And as they keep on failing, the reformers refuse to recognize that they are not actually “reforming” education but creating chaos and new problems.
Dad’s advice: All the protestations and whining isn’t going to change the fact that the day is coming to an end.

Excellent. A wonderfully appropriate parallel has been drawn here. I suspect that, like the children, they will go down fighting and refuse to admit that the day has met its end. The sun will come out tomorrow.
I suspect that they will just shift focus to another related field the way the discredited for profit universities have. People have realized that these institutions are 87% funded by the public yet they spend only 17% of that money on education and many are unaccredited.. Students are voting with their feet and the edupreneurs have targeted another field.
http://billmoyers.com/2015/03/03/four-reasons-young-americans-burn-student-loan-papers/
So where have for profit adult education institutions shifted their focus to? Charter schools. ITT Tech has opened public charters as they have glimpsed the caboose of their gravy train. With their college level enrollment down, they have “diversified”.
http://www.npr.org/blogs/ed/2014/12/14/369925385/a-for-profit-college-tries-the-charter-school-market
LikeLike
Dad Gone Wild is rapidly becoming one of my must-read blogs.
But as far as this post, two differences:
1. I guarantee your kids are cuter than the reformsters.
2. Your kids will grow up some day.
LikeLike
#1’s a given.
#2 just blew a hole through me. so sad.
LikeLike
Yes, it is sad. But they’ll grow up to be good people and do good things.
LikeLike
#2 they grow up and you miss them, but then they have their own kids, and you get to spoil them and then send them home. 🙂
LikeLike
Dienne, that brought a huge smile to my face.
LikeLike
I feel this Dad does not realize the reason most charters exist: to separate out the children who are not socialized for a school setting. Parents want their children away from some very disturbed, asocial kids. The courts insist public schools hang on to them. Districts cannot place them in alternative schools fast enough to salvage the classrooms and campuses that have discipline issues because of them. As a teacher, I have had to push administrators to find placements for criminals. Who wants to send a child to a school where manipulation by gang-mentality children and juvenile offenders routinely bully their child? Charters may have been conceived of as a place to try out novel ways to educate children of need. They serve now as a segregation of behavior types. Fortunately, my friend follows the original principle as principal of a charter, and she has had to “separate” nearly 30 students this year, some of whom were placed in special schools for behavior and mental issues at a cost of 80,000 dollars. At this charter, teachers threatened to leave over two of these students. Without job protection, what have the teachers to lose? It works both ways. Quick to fire, and quick to leave.
LikeLike
Actually, the reason charters are *supposed* to exist is to take exactly the kind of student you are talking about. Because they were supposed to be free of bureaucracy and state mandates, they were supposed to innovate and find ways to help the most challenging students. Amazing how far they’ve turned away from that vision, isn’t it? Now “innovate” seems to mean “get rid of *those* kids”.
LikeLike
The word of the day is “Teleology”.
“Reformers tend to further mimic my children in their desire to constantly be doing something, seldom pausing to consider overall implications.”
LikeLike
And. . . why “teleology?
LikeLike
Yes, I’m confused too. A little explanation is in order.
LikeLike