Kiersten Marek writes in Inside Philanthropy that the Gates Foundation seems to be ramping up its interest in the connection between housing and education. The foundation has made a few small investments in this interaction, and it appears to have realized that homelessness and housing instability has a negative impact on educational achievement. One straw in the wind: “The new CEO of the foundation, Susan Desmond-Hellman, recently wrote on the Impatient Optimists blog that a “stable place to call home” is one of the “few things that every child needs to lead a healthy, productive life.” (Along with good schools and a strong community.)…”
While the Gates Foundation has long noted the obvious linkages between housing, family stability, and student achievement, it hasn’t done much grantmaking to specifically address that nexus. But that’s changing, and [Gates’ program officer Kollin] Min says the foundation is advancing “partnerships between housing authorities and school districts, to look at the connection between housing stability and educational outcomes.”
Min cited McCarver Elementary School in Tacoma, which was recently profiled by the Urban Institute, as an example of the kind of collaboration that the Gates Foundation has created. By enrolling in the McCarver special program, kids and families commit to staying with the same school and receive rental assistance as well as other forms of support. The idea, of course, is that less moving around will allow kids to improve academically—and not only the kids who would otherwise be shuttling around, but also their classmates, who studies show are negatively affected by the disruption of students coming and going.
Min says the foundation has seen “positive results” from the partnership between the Tacoma School District and the Tacoma Housing Authority. But he also says this work is still early in the game. “We are just kind of taking baby steps with thinking about these issues.” On the other hand, as Min describes it, all this is hardly rocket science: “We’ve come to the firm point of view that for many children challenged by housing and mobility issues, it really is important to try to bring systems together, and that’s really the only way that we can improve outcomes.”
Perhaps the Gates Foundation could become a strong voice taking a stand against school closings, which are needlessly disruptive in the lives of children, families, and communities. The recognition that children are negatively affected by disruption is an important insight. We can hope that these are lessons learned that will change future practice.

So, is the Gates Foundation going to do anything to stop the destruction – via denial of resources, financing, and deferred maintenance – of public housing, which often goes hand-in-hand with gentrification?
No, I didn’t think so.
LikeLike
“The idea, of course, is that less moving around will allow kids to improve academically….”
This from the man who’s championed stack-ranking students and teachers, firing the bottom 10% of teachers, closing schools based on test scores….?
I love the smell of hypocrisy in the morning.
LikeLike
Gosh, do you think this might possibly lead them to “discovering” that poverty itself is the fundamental problem fueling all the rest and that full frontal assaults on it on multiple fronts are what’s really needed to position education to properly make it’s own contribution to the effort?? Me neither.
LikeLike
But it would be nice if it did. I am not a fan of the Gates Foundation’s research in education. They seem to find ways to support their preconceived ideas. (Remember how often MET results were delayed?)
But if this worked, and significantly, it could help to provide the point that poverty and instability matter.
The huge downside is that philanthropy can only do so much even if applied to causes that we agree with. This is why charters will eventually be up against it. When they no longer get the philanthropic extras (like KIPP), then what happens?
I’ll at least give the Gates Foundation here though. We have often discussed social services for poorer communities. This is a step in that direction. We’ll see how they use the information they gather and analyze but if people like most on this blog are correct, this will make a difference in educational outcomes for the communities that receive this philanthropy.
LikeLike
“His philanthropy”? I use the borrowed phrase, villainthropy.
The Institute for the Study of Knowledge Management in Education, scary title-yes, is Gates funded. Gates and the Hewlett Foundations gave money to ASG and they, in a surprise finding, reached the conclusion, machine scoring of tests reduces school costs. Guess who benefits? It’s not communities. Gates gave the National Council of Social Studies, $500,000 and now, they brag about a state that mandates testing by computer.
If Gates’ education policies were beneficial, his kids would be enrolled in schools with high stakes electronic testing.
Gates is against raising the minimum wage and he ranted against pensions. The major difference between Gates and the social Darwinism, of the Kochs, IMO is PR.
LikeLike
Common sense is so much more efficient than exercises in comparing data sets on the correlations of school achievement with housing.
LikeLike
Teachers can correct me if I’m wrong, but I wonder why one of the 5000 ed reform orgs don’t focus on attendance at school. Just that. If you ask juvenile judges and social workers here what the common denominator is for kids who don’t do well in school they’d say poor attendance. Judges focus on it. We have one who uses 15 days absent as a kind of marker of chaos in the home which is usually money problems. I guess he could focus on bad teachers or bad schools but it seems logical to focus on “are they even in school?” first.
My son feels nervous and “behind” if he misses one day and he’s a fairly easy-going person. He’d be a wreck if he missed 15.
LikeLike
I’ve wondered too why expanded access to health, dental, and vision care for kids aren’t on any big national philanthropist’s radar. (Think about dental pain: if you know someone who has experienced it, you know it can be very debilitating. Then imagine that you are a child, you can’t get your pain treated, and you have to sit still and be quiet and concentrate on tests your teachers give you.) But then, what would happen to No Excuses, All Children Can Learn, and the national sport of blaming bad teachers for everything?
LikeLike
It’s just so odd that there’s this disconnect. With judges it’s “in school, every day”. It’s incredibly consistent and they’ve been watching this for decades, some of them. It is their single favorite lecture from the bench 🙂
I agree on dental. I think dental problems probably cause more lost work days for working class younger people than any (strictly) “medical” problem. They didn’t get care when they were little so it snowballs and hits them at 30. I had a dentist tell me he can judge the poverty level in a neighborhood by looking at how many over the counter dental remedies are in the drugstore. They treat themselves.
LikeLike
Dental- the 1% were exposed when they used the children of the poor to make profits, from a federal program for dental care. The corporate dental group ground down the kids’ good teeth and put on caps, so they could make more money.
Remote Medical, provides dental care for the poor. It could use some philanthropy. When it comes to a decision between money for astroturfing, by E$E and, Remote Medical, there’s a winner and a loser.
LikeLike
Correction- It’s Remote Area Medical. When the organization went to Seattle, Gates contributed. I’m curious if he and his friends kicked in anything near the estimated $30,000,000 donated to E$E.
LikeLike
In 2014, Small Smiles and Aspen Dental were two, among 5 dental clinics investigated relative to decisions about exclusion from federal programs.
LikeLike
Poor attendance is a red flag for any school. My school had a policy to call home if a parent hadn’t called in an absence, but the school has few resources to do anything more other than sending out the social worker. Poor students are often trapped in a an relentless abyss of poverty and dysfunction. Any shred of stability is a step in the right direction. The last thing these students need is more chaos caused by closing public schools.
LikeLike
We had a superintendent in Buffalo who fired all the attendance officers. Ten years later, the attendance rates are abysmal, even for kindergarteners. And once the precedence is set, it is extremely difficult to change what is now considered the norm.
Yet teachers are expected to teach those empty seats and be rated on the results.
No excuses? Not an excuse, just an explanation of the current situations that teachers face which are beyond their capacity to change.
Ellen T Klock
LikeLike
Koch/Gates/Walton initiatives, in every arena, aim to enrich oligarchs. The DNA of the 0.1%, compels them to control. As they reach age 60 and beyond, they become ever more desperate, trying to compensate for legacies like a kingdom of toilet paper, inert tech products, and hollowed out communities, anchored by a nickel and dime discount store.
In a tangential point, David Axelrod, Obama’s strategist, found a place at the University of Chicago Institute of Politics. David Brooks, who is on the Institute’s Board, wrote in his newspaper column that the ability of both political parties to raise the same amount of money was proof that money doesn’t influence elections. Cozy relationships among oligarchs and politicians, e.g. Gates and Obama, coupled with the media, dominated by plutocrats, effectively grinds down the 99.9%, under the control of the 0.1%
There is no competition for the worst generation that ever lived. It’s the baby boomers, the takeover, occurred under their watch.
LikeLike
“Legacies”
The legacy of Carnegie
Is libraries and books
The legacy of Gates, we see
Is testing, VAM and crooks
LikeLike
Again, well done. SDP, I’m glad you are on the side of the angels.
LikeLike
Well done.
LikeLike
Oh Good, Broading [sic] Schools and Gatesed [sic] Communities …
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dYHmQT_7a2c
LikeLike
Shades of Henry Ford and company towns?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_company_towns_in_the_United_States
LikeLike
“Pay no attention to the man behind the nose”
When master pulls the string
The puppet starts to sing
And public buys
The puppet’s lies
Though nose is quite the thing
LikeLike
I fear private foundations having the power to perform government functions. The Gates Foundation’s involvement in education has been a disaster. Society does not need super wealthy individuals experimenting on “helping” it to improve. What is needed is for the super wealthy to pay their fair share of taxes to enable the government to provide for the needy etc. Let’s not forget that there were two tax cuts while getting involved in two wars resulting in huge deficits and cutbacks in the public sector.
LikeLike
Let’s also not forget that Bill Gates company Microsoft is one of the worst offenders among the supposedly “American” companies (in claim only) who keep billions of dollars “offshore” (nearly a hundred billion in the case of Microsoft) to avoid paying US taxes
Any money Gates spends on “philanthropy” (which can be viewed as little more than rather small “investment” that will yield dividends in Microsoft sales in the future) pales in comparison to what Microsoft’ ‘saves” by avoiding taxes ($30 billion)
Gates has a rather serious credibility problem: he has none.
LikeLike
Agreed. The billionaires keep coming up with schemes to pay less and less so they can keep more and more. Since they own so many politicians, they get to shape policy to suit them. It’s not working out too well for the other 99%, especially when they want to circumvent the democratic process to forward their agenda. That is why we must stand up for public schools, one of the few paths left for people to change their lives.
LikeLike
Yes, Gates is a bigtime hypocrite, but if he has discovered the concept of “Housing First,” it could be a good thing. This is from the “Housing First” page on the National Alliance to End Homelessness website:
“The vast majority of homeless individuals and families fall into homelessness after a housing or personal crisis that led them to seek help from the homeless assistance system. For these families and individuals, the Housing First approach is ideal, as it provides them with assistance to find permanent housing quickly and without conditions. In turn, such clients of the homeless assistance networks need surprisingly little support or assistance to achieve independence, saving the system considerable costs.”
http://www.endhomelessness.org/pages/housing_first
The Gates Foundation has done a lot of harmful tinkering. If they could find a way of supporting needy communities in fundamental ways, without deliberately disrupting and distorting those communities, maybe they could do some good.
Here’s an excerpt from the Housing First Wikipedia article that’s relevant to housing and schooling:
“Housing First approaches are based on the concept that a homeless individual or household’s first and primary need is to obtain stable housing, and that other issues that may affect the household can and should be addressed once housing is obtained. In contrast, many other programs operate from a model of “housing readiness” — that is, that an individual or household must address other issues that may have led to the episode of homelessness prior to entering housing.”
If you provide stable housing first, then you can address truancy, nutrition deficits, and so on. You could even stock the home with books. Whoever is running the housing program could start a book-of-the-month club. Give each kid in the home a new book every month, no strings attached.
If the Gates Foundation were to stop their crazy self-interested education schemes and just hand out books, and maybe offer classes for parents on reading to kids, they’d be doing something for communities. Instead of destroying them by pushing school closings, teacher firings, and other wrongheaded ideas.
LikeLike
If the Gates Foundation were to stop their crazy self-interested education schemes and just hand out books, and maybe offer classes for parents on reading to kids, they’d be doing something for communities.”
That’s a very big if.
I’d say it’s about as likely as that a large asteroid will strike the earth tomorrow.– but I’d be more than happy to be proved wrong.
Unfortunately, there is nothing in Bill Gates past that would indicate he would do such a thing. His history (at Microsoft and with the Gates foundation) is all about control. Indeed, Gates is a control freak. Just watch the interview that Sixty minutes did of his former business partner Paul Allen.
Despite Gates foundation’s statement that all people have equal value, his actions indicate quite clearly that he believes otherwise. He has demonstrated time and again that he has zero respect for democracy by doing an end run around the democratic process here and in other countries in order to quickly ram through his policies.
Here’s an idea: maybe Gates should just butt out of things he knows nothing about or, at the very least, work through the democratic process to try to change things instead of actively looking for ways to subvert it.
LikeLike
SomeDAM Poet:
Yes, that’s a big IF all right. The point of my comment was to help spread the word about the Housing First movement. And the Give-A-Kid-A-Book movement.
Gates’s agenda is less about supporting people than it is about manipulating them. But Gates isn’t gonna live forever, and it’s possible that with enough public outcry his foundation might possibly change its tune . . . sometime in the future.
LikeLike
Prolly when the asteroid hits. 🙂
PS I apologize if my comment detracted from what you were saying about the Housing First and the Give-A-Kid-A-Book movements.
Sometimes I get going on Bill Gates and can’t stop.
LikeLike
“Harmful tinkering”? That’s the understatement of the decade.
LikeLike
Linda, I was going for “understatement of the century,” but I guess I fell a few years short. Gates’s influence has been devastating, but he’s got a lot of company. By a lot, I mean the disproportionate influence of a handful of billionaires and their hirelings. And of course the word “disproportionate” is also an understatement.
LikeLike
This is such an interesting article because I have wondered why Gates with all his money was not really helping the poor with their very real problems that seriously work against them in terms of academic achievement.
LikeLike
When will Gates stop meddling with policy? He really needs to spend more time with his own kids or pick up a hobby. I feel that we, the poor needy public, are his project. If he would give his money to those who have more insight and expertise, there might be less back-peddling when his grand schemes fail.
LikeLike
“When will Gates stop meddling with policy?”
Once past the Gates of Hell
It’s hard for one to meddle
Or even try to sell
A different way to pedal
LikeLike
I like Gates and his attempts to improve the world. I just think to improve the world requires building fair systems and level playing fields. Business seems to thrive by exploiting unfairness to their advantage. So, I don’t think the business model will save the world.
LikeLike
Just a reminder that Cuomo started out doing really good work in the housing field, and look at him now. If Gates gets into housing with as little valid information about that as he has about how kids learn I fear for the results. Nanny state public housing? No choice in where you live? Apartment inspections? The possibilities are endless, and terrifying.
LikeLike
Gates “attempts to improve the world”, make it worse, for the poor and middle classes.
What’s to like?
LikeLike
I teach in Tacoma and the McCarver program is amazing. They work with the Tacoma Housing Authority, a local CBO – Peace Community Center, and the city. The program has been in place for a couple of years now and the staff at McCarver have great things to say about it. If this is the type of program that Gates helps to fund (one with local control responsive to the specific needs of that community), it might be a great thing. I’m not convinced Gates would be able to let local communities run their programs, though. McCarver is located in the Tacoma Hilltop neighborhood. In the 80’s and 90’s it was more than a scary neighborhood. Just driving through when I was in high school, I saw two armed robberies in 6 blocks. The area has cleaned up a lot. This program has helped to add stability for the families that McCarver serves.
LikeLike
Consistency is important. A teacher would rather keep their class intact the entire year, including those students with discipline problems, than change the environment with a never ending rotation of children.
Since those in poverty frequently move (or are evicted) from location to location, there needs to be some stability in their lives. In Buffalo, the students normally stay in the same school with the same teacher for at least the year, regardless of their current address. I know this goes against the neighborhood school concept, but it is one of the positive aspects of busing. And if a charter school doesn’t work out, the parent has the option to return their child to the original school they were attending.
(The grass is always greener or You don’t know how good you had it until you don’t have it anymore).
Ellen T Klock
LikeLike
I am super grateful for the robust conversation here. My feelings about Gates often cover the full range of expressed above, including a very cynical concern that the foundation really does want to destroy public education. However, talking to Kollin Min gave me hope that the foundation could evolve and do more to support the low income families and help rebuild the middle class. If the foundation could support housing and other expensive pieces of the equity puzzle including asset building and health care spending safety nets, it would be more useful than much of their work in education reform.
A little background on me: my two daughters go to public schools and are well and prospering in their education, but we have witnessed a marked impoverishment of our community since the Great Recession, and schools are one place where this poverty is visible. We have lost our music, sports, and gifted education programs in recent years. We dealt with the Achievement First charter schools trying to move in on top of all this, and I was proud to join with many parents in the community to get the plan for charters, and further defunding of our school department one student at a time, thrown out. I hope our schools are coming back now, and that the whole charter movement can back off. It would be great if some of the money for education philanthropy could focus more on meaningful, useful, and practical ways to increase stability for struggling families with children.
LikeLike