Charles Parrish of Wayne State University submitted the following proposal:
Surgeons United who Care for America (SUCA*)
This is to announce the establishment of a new approach to surgery in the United States: Surgeons for America (SUCA). Following in the high-heeled footprints of Michelle Rhee and Wendy Kopp, we will employ the model of Teach for America (TFA). That model involves the recruiting bright young graduates of our best colleges and universities, providing them with 5 or 6 weeks of training, and then sending them out to provide high-value surgical operations for patients at low cost. They will replace older surgeons who have become set in their ways and have lost the ignorant, enthusiastic arrogance of youth. We prefer to recruit young people with bachelor degrees in the sciences or business, but we will consider candidates from the humanities on a case-by-case basis. Our particular concern in the selection process for candidates from the humanities is whether they have, or can quickly develop, a callous sense of indifference to patient pain and outcomes.
Part of both our 5 and 6 week courses in surgery, is a one-week course in the finances of Charter Surgery Urgent Care Clinics. All our trainees learn how to do such things as purchase a building through a newly formed for-profit firm and then to lease it back to the Charter Surgery Urgent Care Clinic, which is of course as 501(c) 3 non-profit organization. The SUCA surgeons should be officers of both the for-profit and non-profit organization in order to maximize their income and get the maximum tax advantages. All materials for use by the clinic (furniture, tables, computer, stirrups for gynecological exams, operating instruments, etc.) can be leased or bought outright from the for-profit firm.
As a small concession to experience (of which we are usually contemptuous), there will be a different between the training in the two tracks. Those who enroll in the 5-week program will be only qualified to perform certain simpler operations (vasectomies, D&Cs, appendix, Gall bladder and similar organ removals, skin and other simple cancer operations, penile and breast implants, etc.). Those who go through the 6-week course will be qualified for all operations, from brain cancer to hangnails. Those in the 5-week course will use the textbook Surgery for Dummies. The 6-week course will use Advanced Surgery for Dummies.
After three years as a Surgeon for America, a SUCA graduate will be encouraged to move on into their life career with warm memories of their youthful experience as a surgeon and with a dandy new citation in their curriculum vitae. We do not want these young surgeons to become stale (as so many of the older, experienced surgeons they are replacing are). Many of these young surgeons will go into hedge fund management or other Wall Street professions. Their experience as a surgeon trained to develop moral ambiguity and indifference to the to the pain they inflict through their novice approach to surgical procedures prepares them particularly for such professions.
SUCA was initiated by a grant from the Gates Foundation from funds freed up when Bill finally grew bored with funding charter schools and getting no results and being excoriated by Diane Ravich.
*Pronounced “Suck-A”, as in: “You are a suckaa.”

Sounds like the perfect solution to the health care crisis in poor and minority neighborhoods! What other people need is youthful enthusiasm and some Ivy League “winners” to set high standards for their health.
LikeLike
Don’t ya wish Gates had a life instead of being a bad meddler? Gates is all about CUI BONO? And he benefits while others suffer.
LikeLike
He didn’t get where he is by being wonderful. He got his billions by being a monopolist.
LikeLike
Brilliant! That says it all about corporations.
LikeLike
It’s great, but the health care comparison should scare people. We don’t have a universal public system for health care, like we do for K-12 public schools.
We have a fragmented, public-private payer health care system that leaves 40 million people without any care at all, and of course working class and poor people get the worst care.
I don’t know why anyone would want to turn our universal public education system into a fragmented, public-private payer for-profit system, but that’s where we’re headed with “reform”.
If you’re watching the federal government try to graft universal access and public/private payor onto an existing failing “system” with health care reform, imagine what it’ll be like when the public school system is gone. It’ll be like our current health care system.
The big word in health care is “fragmentation”. That’s what we’re trying to fix. In twenty years it’ll be the big word in education if this continues on its present course.
LikeLike
Chiara Duggan: thank you for bringing up “fragmentation.”
I make no claim to having thought this through, but it has struck me over and over again how the leading rheephormistas advocate for a kind of ‘diffused’ or ‘fragmented’ or ‘unresponsible’ school system. It very much goes along with their caveat emptor defense: if you don’t like their particular charter school or voucher program, they are deaf to your complaints because you were a bad consumer and should have made a better choice. Dissatisfied? Send your “most precious assets” [thank you, Michelle Rhee!] to the Centre of EduExcellence down the street—or across town through gang-infested neighborhoods—if you don’t like their edubrand. Let those kids build character while they’re dodging bullets!
In other words, edupreneurs and educrats and edufrauds are never to blame—it’s students and parents and peons doing the unimportant work in school classrooms and cafeterias and so on that are picking poorly and fouling up and not buckling down.
The leaders? Accountable, yes, responsible, no. The Teflon Defense, aka “kiss up, kick down.” All in the noble service of $tudent $ucce$$. Makes perfect ₵ent₵ to them…
Of course, when it comes to the schools that the rheephormers send THEIR OWN CHILDREN to, it’s a completely different matter.
As Leona Helmsley might have said about OTHER PEOPLE’S CHILDREN suffering the obedience training and practice of low-level skills in the schools suffering under rheephorm,
That’s for the little people. Us.
Funny thing, though… When folks like Michelle Rhee or David Coleman are asked to defend their two-tiered education hypocrisies, they can’t seem to muster up the wherewithal to debate Diane Ravitch. Even with staffs of 120????
Why would that be, I wonder?
😎
LikeLike
“We do not want these young surgeons to become stale (as so many of the older, experienced surgeons they are replacing are).”
That’s also great. To an “outsider” like me (not an educator) I have to say that the language reformers use regarding teachers is almost offensive. Maybe teachers are used to it after a decade of this, but it’s really blatant to me, all this use of “fresh” and “young”. I don’t think a large organization in the for-profit world would get away with it without middle aged and older people objecting, but for some reason ed reform non-profits do.
LikeLike
Chiara, you are so very insightful that I always thought you were an insider. Thank you for your amazing voice in this fight.
LikeLike
“. . . is almost offensive. . .”
NAH, it’s totally offensive.
And I too thought you were an insider by your thoughtful comments! Keep em coming!!
LikeLike
What an in depth analysis of what is going on in education. A high tech comparison. Beautiful.
LikeLike
How about Doctors Without Degrees? (DWDs, pronounced doods)
Or Doctors Without Medical School, pronounced Dooms.
The author forgot to include a necessary enabling step: judge all doctors by how long their patients live, and other such metrics. Since the poor and minorities have worse life outcomes than the white and wealthy, then the doctors who work in inner-city or poor rural clinics or hospitals are clearly to blame and should be fired. Since many cancer patients don’t even survive for five years, even quicker penalties should be levied. But those won’t apply to DWDs or DWMs because they are, by definition, excellent, and only work for 2 years.
LikeLike
I’ve been saying this for years.
LikeLike
Hi Diane,
I love this. Can you give me his email address so I can contact him about sharing it?
Thanks,
Allan
Allan Jones
President, Emaginos Inc.
(703) 357-3055 Cell
(571) 222-7195 Office
(571) 222-7032 Home
ajones@emaginos.com
“The convention opened with a prayer, a very fervent prayer. If the Lord can see His way clear to bless the Republican Party, the way it’s been carrying on, then the rest of us ought to get by without even asking for it.” — Another timeless Will Rogers quote He could as easily have cited the Democrats!
LikeLike
I previously worked in the Texas Medical Center and just wanted to add, there is a TFA equivalent—-first year residents in July. Anyone who goes into a teaching hospital in the summer, should definitely clarify that they don’t want to be treated by an intern, since they just arrived—at the earliest, December, if the procedure isn’t too complicated. They usually turn them loose on indigent and elderly cases—so there is an equivalent patient cohort that goes along with the indigent public school children.
Also, many doctors would say “I trained at MD Anderson Cancer Center”. The running joke with the nurses is that those doctors drove past Anderson one day and waved. It generally means they attended some minor conference there—-so please ask plenty of questions of any doctor!
And hospitals are playing the same game as schools—they are trying to get rid of the most difficult to treat as that boosts their mortality rates—-so healthcare is not so far removed from education issues—-just more a matter or life and death…
LikeLike
http://www.economist.com/news/business/21589866-firms-keep-grading-their-staff-ruthlessly-may-not-get-best-them-ranked-and-yanked
More on the failure of rank and yank, which is another name for stack ranking:
“On November 8th All Things D, a tech-industry website, reported that Yahoo staff are increasingly unhappy about a quarterly performance review introduced last year by the new boss, Marissa Mayer. The grading exercise is said to have cost 600 of them their jobs in recent weeks.
Four days later, Microsoft announced that its own, equally unpopular system was being scrapped. In a memo, Lisa Brummel, Microsoft’s head of human resources, said there would be “no more ratings” and “no more curve”. The firm would implement a “fundamentally new approach”, designed to encourage teamwork and collaboration.”
I’ll make a bold and cage-busing prediction. We are now going to be hearing the words “teamwork and collaboration” from ed reformers, repeated endlessly 🙂
LikeLike
“. . . “teamwork and collaboration” from ed reformers. . .”
Yep, as long as they control the teams and the collaboration.
LikeLike
Would you put your life savings in a bank that advertises itself as a partial service bank? A bank with financial advisers who trained on Monopoly boards? Of course not. so why give your life to a health care system that advertises only partial service provided by partially trained medical personnel?
LikeLike
I’ve been saying it for quite a while. If you wouldn’t take your child to an engineer to have his tonsils removed, why would you send him to a Teach for America to learn to read?
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Naked Teaching.
LikeLike
Can teachers (doctors) or schools/districts (hospitals) be sued for providing inadequate instruction or taken to account for failing to meet a standard of care? No, they can’t.
When they can, all of these half-baked Doctors/Pilots/Other Esteemed Professions analogies will finally make sense.
LikeLike
It seems that doctors and hospitals can be held accountable…through lawsuits. That’s why doctors and hospitals insurance bills are so high.
LikeLike
Oh, Tim. Apparently you do not know the lengths boards and administrations will go to when a teacher “breaches” the almighty standardized test security. So your protests are irrelevant, I’m afraid, but nice try.
LikeLike