Mercedes Schneider, who teaches in Louisiana and holds a doctorate in statistics and research methods, continues her analysis of NCTQ, its letter grade reports, and its ties to the reform movement.
I would love to see a some sort of a diagram of all the players, superintendents, CEO’s and lines to all the organizations, companies, school districts, charter schools or DOE’s they are connected to. I swear the conflict of interst seems to get deeper and deeper.
Snicker, after I finish with NCTQ, I plan to move on to other boards. It may be a while, but somewhere down the road, I will try to diagram all of the overlapping connections.
A review of the NCTQ players also demonstrates connections to for-profit colleges with teacher ed programs. Duncan cites NCTQ, as if they have some legitimacy. I was on the ed.gov website the other day and saw a link to one of the NCTQ reports. A subsequent search of the site revealed that many of their reports are on there. What happened to scientifically-based research in education?
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:
You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Google+ account. ( Log Out / Change )
Connecting to %s
Notify me of follow-up comments via email.
Notify me of new posts via email.
Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.
Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.
Join 105,887 other followers