When Mayor Bloomberg was elected in 2001, his first priority was to gain control of the schools. At the time, the schools had a central board with seven members, two appointed by the mayor. Now the mayor appoints a majority and they serve at his pleasure.
In the last decade, the city’s schools have Ben subject to four major reorganizations and three chancellors. One of them lasted only 90 days, a record of sorts.
Now, voters and NYC public school parents oppose mayoral control. In a new poll, only 18% want the mayor to control them.
This is what the Quinnipiac poll showed:
“New York City’s next mayor should share control of the public schools, 63 percent of voters say, with 18 percent who want the mayor to keep control and 13 percent say the mayor should give up all control. Parents of children in public schools share those opinions. In fact, no group supports continuing mayoral control of the schools.
By a 53 – 35 percent margin, voter trust the teachers’ union more than Bloomberg to protect the interests of public school students.
Voters approve 45 – 34 percent of the job Schools Chancellor Dennis Walcott is doing, his highest approval rating so far. Parents of public school children approve 51 – 34 percent.
“New Yorkers don’t like Bloomberg’s take-over of the schools. Most favor shared control,” Carroll said. “And never forget: it’s a labor town. Despite all the outcry against the teachers union, New Yorkers believe the union would do a better job protecting kids than Bloomberg.”

Very few NYC parents have any idea how the panel for education policy works (i.e., that the mayor appoints 8 out of 13 members and that the 8 NEED to agree with him). People are shocked when I share that info with them. I think if more people knew this knowledge, the outrage would be even greater.
LikeLike
I haven’t seen much if any real discussion about ending mayoral control among the 2013 mayoral candidates, so this is probably academic. But if NYC ever does eliminate mayoral control, I would pray that it does so very carefully to avoid the problems that plagued the system in the old days of local school boards. I didn’t have children at the time, but I haven’t forgotten the news coverage.
LikeLike
I’ll take my chances with a democratically elected school board over a dictator any day.
And you’re right, none of the candidates are in favor of ending mayoral control. DeBlasio actually said he wasn’t.
LikeLike
It troubles me that Mr. deBlasio is a proponent of mayoral control of the schools. As a teacher in the NYC schools, I’ve worked under the dictatorial regime of Mayor Bloomberg for my entire teaching career.
How WOULD Mr. deBlasio be different? It’s not a question that he has answered in great detail, only in generalities.
I am very much against ANY Mayor having control of the public schools. unless that Mayor has had actual experience as an educator and the necessary credentials in education to make informed and crucial decisions that affect so many NYC students.
Why are the mayoral candidates so enamored with the concept of having personal control of the PUBLIC schools? Bring back the local school boards, and let the mayoral control law sunset.
LikeLike
Did you see this yet? Over a half a million spent by corporate “education reformers” to persuade voters to support mayoral control in Bridgeport, CT.
They lost but what a waste of money and they say it is all for the kids.
Imagine how many books could be added to the libraries? More social workers? Smaller class sizes? What a waste of money!
The final reports from Bridgeport’s November 2012 education reform referendum are in and it turns out that the corporate education reform industry and its supporters spent at least $562,955.16 in their effort to pass Bridgeport Mayor Bill Finch’s anti-democracy initiative, a proposal that would have eliminated the City’s democratically elected board of education and replaced it with one appointed by the mayor.
So many wealthy people and corporations so very concerned about the children in Bridgeport, really?
http://jonathanpelto.com/2013/01/17/news-flash-corporate-education-reformers-spend-563000-and-counting-in-bridgeport-loss/
LikeLike
Good question, Linda.
Why are those wealthy people and corporations apparently so concerned about the public school children in Bridgeport?
Is it motivated by some sense of social justice ( cough-cough), or other reasons?
I’d love to hear the honest answers instead of the smokescreen answer always given by these people:”It’s for the kids”. Well, I’m off to buy a bridge in Brooklyn now…..
LikeLike
Most elected local school boards do quite well, thank you. Bloomberg has been a disaster! Good Bye and Good Riddance!
LikeLike
Title of post says it all.
Sounds like a good idea to me.
LikeLike
We need to get away from this narrative of “mayoral control” and speak instead of ‘school governance’ envisioning effective democratic structures to put in place in a new public education system after this dictatorial monster leaves office.
LikeLike
Hello, to Mr. Bloomberg I donot like how you handle the system in the Department of Education. Thanks to you< we all been layoff in 2011. i work for the Department almost 20 years . I need my job back.
LikeLike