A little while ago, I posted a statement by a mother of a high-functioning autistic child who said she did not want him to be in a cyber charter; she wanted him to be in a school to have contact with other children and to learn social skills.

Bear in mind that cybercharters have a record for getting terrible academic results, in terms of test scores, retention, and graduation rates. The fact that most of them are for-profit makes it even worse because their sponsors are profiting as children don’t learn. This is one of the reforms of our day that is an unalloyed scam.

I mentioned that I have gotten emails from boosters of e-learning who claim that cyber charters are especially valuable for children who are sick or have disabilities. When K12, the behemoth of the for-profit online learning world, was founded, Bill Bennett said it would be especially valuable for children who had been bullied.

Here is another good comment on this topic:

I believe neither sick children nor special education students deserve to be isolated and without a peer group. We put classrooms in hospitals to continue education. We developed Special Education law to stop keeping children with special needs locked out. We worked on mainstreaming and inclusion to have populations diversified. Without a strong public education we have no common education to those who most need to have opportunity opened to them. Without a strong public education we have no way to promote real citizenship nor nationalism. The very rich have great access now and will always have a variety of both public and private schools from which to choose. You are not fooling anyone who is truly an educator. It seems to me that all of this is just a grab for the money.