Archives for category: Trump

It is Fox News vs. Fox News!

 

Bill O’Reilly thinks that Judge Curial is a fine judge but says he should recuse himself from judging Trump. Remove any hint of “bias.”

 

Megyn Kelly, once a lawyer, says “nonsense!” That’s not the way the law works. Defendants don’t get to pick their judges.

 

If Trump wins his fight to force the judge out (which he won’t), he won’t accept a Muslim judge. Probably he won’t accept a woman judge. Defendants don’t get to pick their judges, even when the defendant is very very rich.

 

 

Ken Betnstein, NBCT high school teacher and blogger, asks whether Americans would elect a racist.

http://m.dailykos.com/story/2016/6/7/1535415/-But-will-it-matter

Ken looks at two columns today. Both say Trump has demonstrated his racism.

“I find myself asking that question after glancing at two very pointed columns in today’s Washington Post. One, by Dana Milbank and titled Republicans finally discover that Trump is an actual racist, goes through all the elements of Trum’s’ expressions that support that assertion, but quite possibly could be summarized in one sentence partway through the column:

‘You know you’re in trouble when you’re being lectured on sensitivity by Newt Gingrich.’

“The other is by the inimitable Eugene Robinson and titled Endorsing Trump will leave a mark, begins with a similar assertion:

‘Bluffing is Donald Trump’s one great talent, and he brazenly bluffed his way to the Republican nomination. Now he is showing his cards, however, and they are utter garbage: racism, ignorance, capriciousness, egomania and general unfitness for office. That should be — it must be — a losing hand.

“The question of course is on whom will that mark really fall.

“Yes the press is now willing to challenge Trump. As Milbank phrases it

‘A confluence of three factors has caused a sudden and sharp change in Trump’s fortunes. The media scrutiny has increased significantly since he secured the nomination, and journalists, rather than chasing his outrage du jour, are digging in to report more on Trump University, Trump’s stiffing of charities, his lies and his racism. Hillary Clinton has, finally, made the shift to attacking Trump vigorously over his instability. And Republicans are, belatedly, discovering that their presidential candidate wasn’t putting on a show during the GOP primaries: He’s an actual racist.'”

Ken Bernstein reflects on the anti-Semitism of Trump’s followers, after reading an article by Jonathan Weisman of the New York Times. After the journalist tweeted the article by Robert Kagan about Trump and the rise of fascism, he began receiving a steady barrage of anti-Semitic tweets. These were not from Trump but from his followers.

 

Throughout the campaign, Trump has been slow to disassociate himself from the hate groups who admire him, not only the anti-Semites, but the white nationalists. The extremists who linger in the shadows feel encouraged by Trump’s war against “political correctness.” Most of the time, what he calls political correctness is simply treating people who are different from you with courtesy and civility.

 

 

Elizabeth Warren has emerged as the fiercest critic of Donald Trump, totally unafraid of his derision, his sarcasm, and his Twitter attacks.

 

In a speech to the Center for Popular Democracy, Warren tore into Trump as a selfish, narcissistic, insincere, insecure, “money-grubber” who cares not a bit for the travails of ordinary working people.

 

If you read nothing else today, read Marty Rudoy’s brilliantly illustrated version of Warren’s speech, which appeared on Huffington Post.

 

Both articles linked here contain a link to the 10-minute video of the speech in which she dismantles The Donald and as Rudoy says, singes off his hair with her fiery rhetoric.

 

Rudoy concludes:

 

Senator Warren would make an excellent vice presidential candidate in 2016. But she’d be an even better President. That won’t happen in 2016, but life is long, and she has the brains, the passion and the ability to communicate that the progressive-liberal base salivates over.

 

 

Ben Stein is a sane conservative and a professional humorist. In this article, he explains why Donald Trump’s economic ideas are a threat to the stability of the global economy. Trump recently said he could save billions by making a deal with the nation’s creditors and not paying back 100 cents on the dollar on bonds–in other words, abandoning the “full faith and credit” that maintains the trustworthiness of the American dollar. Stein explains why this is a terrible idea that shows that one can’t import the finagling of the businessman into world economics. His view: Trump was not a good businessman, and he needs to find some experienced advisors fast and listen to them.

 

 

What has this to do with education? This too is a realm where non-educators have imposed ideas that  come from the business world. Our children are not “products,” test scores are not profits or losses, and education leaders are not CEOs.