Archives for category: Texas

This is the resolution adopted by the Perrin-Whitt school district in Texas, where John Kuhn is superintendent. John is a fighter for children and a member of our honor roll as a champion of public education. He earns his spurs very day as he continues to inspire us.

WHEREAS, the State of Texas has established a system that funds public schools at levels that differ greatly from school district to school district, and

WHEREAS, the State holds all schools—whether high-funded or low-funded—to the exact same academic standards in its academic accountability system, and

WHEREAS, the State has chosen to let citizens mistakenly believe its accountability system compares apples to apples, and

WHEREAS, the State’s accountability system fails to forthrightly acknowledge the funding differences that exist between the school systems it purports to compare, and

WHEREAS, the Texas school accountability system effectively implies that certain schools are inferior academic institutions, and that this is due solely to the inferior practices of educators and not in any way related to state-created funding disadvantages, and

WHEREAS, lower-funded schools are forced by scarcity to invest less than their peers in student supports, teacher salaries, class size reduction, instructional materials, extracurricular programs, maintenance of facilities, and other investments that positively impact student learning, and

WHEREAS, ancient wisdom holds that “to whom much has been given, much should be required,” and

WHEREAS, schools which are higher-funded in Texas tend to achieve, on average, better passing rates on the State’s academic tests and higher state-assigned performance ratings than lower-funded schools, and

WHEREAS, students who reside in one school district are of no less value to their parents or their Maker than students who reside in another school district, and are no less deserving of nor less in need of a quality education, and

WHEREAS, as a direct consequence of its rigid academic accountability for local teachers and its lax accountability for state leaders when it comes to funding efficacy, the government of Texas has evaded true accountability for adequately and uniformly supporting the children of Texas who learn in diverse parts of this land, and

WHEREAS, Texas citizens deserve not only an honest accounting of schools’ performance but also an honest accounting of the Legislature’s fiscal support of schools as they strive toward the state’s own goals; therefore be it

RESOLVED that the ___________________ Board of Trustees calls on the Texas Legislature to tie the school funding system in Texas directly and transparently to the school accountability system in Texas; and, in so doing, to develop a shared accountability system that holds funders no less accountable for their actions than it holds teachers and students for theirs; and which does not unreasonably demand that schools with scarcer resources achieve identical levels of academic performance as schools blessed by this state with disproportionate funding.

PASSED AND APPROVED on this _____ day of _____________________, 2013.

By: ____________________ ​​By: _____________________
Name: ​​​​​Name:
Title: ​​​​​Title:

By: ____________________ ​​By: _____________________
Name:​​​​​Name:
Title: ​​​​​Title:

By: ____________________ ​​By: _____________________
Name: ​​​​​Name:
Title: ​​​​​Title:

By: ____________________
Name:
Title:

News from the Equity Center of Texas about the state’s unjust accountability system:

The EC Xpress

January 22, 2013 • An Equity Center Publication • Volume 4, Number 3

Take Two Kids…

Take two children. Dress one in street clothes and work boots. Dress the other child in competition track gear with the finest track shoes; give him starting blocks, more coaching; put him on a fast all- weather lane to run his race. Give the first child a lane that is uneven and difficult to navigate; then move him 10 yards behind the starting line. Start the race with a gunshot, photograph the finish, and publish the photo in the newspaper for everyone to see.

This is exactly what our state accountability system has always done and continues to do today. Grades are being assigned to school districts all across the state and anti-public school people are pointing to the child with all of the disadvantages and saying, “See, our public schools are failing.”

The truth is no race can be competitively run, nor accurately called, when the race is not fair to begin with. We would never tolerate such things at a district track meet, yet we do tolerate it when it comes to the most important thing schools do. And it is time for it to stop.

Legislators must either level the playing field with the same revenue at the same tax rates so all children have an equal chance to rise to their fullest academic potential—or change the accountability system to account for the disparity in funding.

We learned last week that one school district has set out to make a change. John Kuhn, Superintendent Perrin-Whitt CISD, shared a resolution that was recently adopted by his Board. The resolution points out that no matter if a school is high-funded or low-funded, they are all held to the same academic standards in the accountability system and the system fails to acknowledge the funding differences that exist among the school systems.

It also states, “Texas citizens deserve not only an honest accounting of schools’ performance but also an honest accounting of the Legislature’s fiscal support of schools as schools strive toward the state’s own goals.”

The resolutions calls on the Legislature to “tie the school funding system in Texas directly and transparently to the school accountability system in Texas, in order to develop a shared accountability system that holds funders no less accountable for their actions than it holds teachers and students for theirs. It also resolves that schools with scarcer resources achieve identical levels of academic performance as schools blessed by the state with disproportionate funding.

We are reminded of Margaret Mead, who once said, “A small group of thoughtful people could change the world. Indeed, it’s the only thing that ever has.” We could not agree more. We want to encourage all of you to be a part of the change movement and take a moment to view the sample resolution (based on PWCISD’s) that we have attached to the original email. This is yet another step in a very long process, but it is certainly a step in the right direction.

I will speak at the Save Texas Schools rally on February 23 in Austin.

Help stop budget cuts and vouchers.

Join me in Austin.

Fight for the future of public education in Texas!

SAVE TEXAS SCHOOLS RALLY

February 23, 2013

Dear Save Texas Schools Supporter,

As you know, our public schools are under attack now more than ever. With continuing brutal budget cuts to education, a broken testing system, and proposed private school vouchers that would further drain resources from public schools, it’s time to STAND UP for Texas kids and schools.

Here’s how to make your voice heard during the 2013 legislative session.

1. Be part of our “Fight for the Future” campaign, launching in early January. Every Texas legislator needs to hear repeatedly from you about key issues affecting our schoolchildren. We’ll tell you how with a different idea each week.

2. Join thousands of fellow Texans on Saturday, February 23, 2013 at the Texas Capitol.
RALLY UPDATE

11 am march on Congress Ave., noon to 1:30 pm rally at the Capitol.
Expected Attendance: HUGE! Let’s top 2011’s record of 13,000.
Confirmed Speakers: Supt. John Kuhn, Diane Ravitch. More soon!
Transportation: We can help you with buses from your area this year. Visit savetxschools.org for information.

Become a Local Rally Organizer! See our website to sign-up!

What’s Wrong With Vouchers?

We need to let Sen. Patrick (Senate Education Chair) and other legislators know that vouchers are a BAD idea, because:

1. Vouchers would drain another $2 billion from public education on top of other cuts.

2. Taxpayer money should not be used to fund private and religious schools.

3. Vouchers have been tried in other states and abandoned after failing to improve educational outcomes.

Learn more .
. .
Texas is at a crossroads. The decisions made in the next six months will determine our children’s educational opportunities and our state’s economic prospects for decades to come. The fight for our future is now- please join us in standing up for Texas kids!

Sincerely,

Save Texas Schools

Julian Vasquez Heilg has started a series that follows the money.

Previous entries looked at Sandy Kress, the advocate for high-stakes testing and lobbyist for Pearson, and Teach for America.

In this entry, he takes KIPP to task for understating what it spends per pupil. He relies on public data. He calls on KIPP to be a “little more honest.”

Our compatriots in Australia are watching the growing rebellion against high-stakes testing with interest and hope.

They are impressed by the courage and unity of teachers at Garfield High School. They are also encouraged by the Republican opposition to testing in Texas.

They are watching events here closely.

They know what happens here, for good or ill, will affect their schools.

The world is watching and hoping for better ideas to come from our shores.

Pearson has a contract with the state of Texas for five years that is worth close to $500 million.

That ought to bring gold-plated service and products to the children of Texas, right?

Wrong.

Pearson is advertising for test graders in Texas on craigslist!

The graders need only a bachelor’s degree, and they will be paid $12 an hour.

They will be “trained,” of course, but think of it. Their snap decisions will decide the fate of students, teachers, and schools. If they aren’t that good at what they do, children will fail, teachers will be fired, and schools will be closed. Because of decisions made by a temp worker.

Shocking as this is, it is nothing new. Todd Farley wrote a book called Making the Grades: My Misadventures in the Standardized Testing Industry, in which he described his many years inside the testing industry.

For a quick read right now, be sure to open this article, Dan Dimaggio’s horrifying account of his experiences as a test grader.

Here is a sample:

“Test-scoring companies make their money by hiring a temporary workforce each spring, people willing to work for low wages (generally $11 to $13 an hour), no benefits, and no hope of long-term employment—not exactly the most attractive conditions for trained and licensed educators. So all it takes to become a test scorer is a bachelor’s degree, a lack of a steady job, and a willingness to throw independent thinking out the window and follow the absurd and ever-changing guidelines set by the test-scoring companies. Some of us scorers are retired teachers, but most are former office workers, former security guards, or former holders of any of the diverse array of jobs previously done by the currently unemployed. When I began working in test scoring three years ago, my first “team leader” was qualified to supervise, not because of his credentials in the field of education, but because he had been a low-level manager at a local Target.”

So Texas spends nearly $500 million to hire an army of low-wage temps to make fateful decisions about the future of students, teachers, and schools. And of course it is not just Texas. It is every other state in the nation.

Why trust the judgment of a fallible teacher or principal, when you can rely on the judgment of a $12 an hour temp, supervised by a Target manager?

This is crazy.

The new leadership of the Texas legislature has a plan. State Senator Dan Patrick, the new chair of the Senate Education Committee, wants vouchers, more charters, and a fast track for closing down public schools. He and Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst want to shorten the time that schools have to improve or close–from five years to only two. That should clear the way for lots of vouchers and charters!

Allen Weeks, who heads the Save Texas Schools coalition in the state, wrote an article about the privatization agenda.

He wrote:

“How many schools would close under their two-year axe? Based on 2010-11 ratings, 40 Texas schools — including six charters — would shut down immediately. Dallas would lose seven campuses overnight, including five high schools. Fort Worth would lose two high schools and a middle school. Lights would go out in rural schools like Albany Junior-Senior High School and Hearne High School, triggering long expensive commutes for students to neighboring districts. Another 490 schools, already with one year of academically unacceptable ratings, would likely panic. A second miss by as little as a single student, and that’s it. No school in your community, no football team, no jobs connected to the school — and no guarantee kids will better off academically. Once scores from the new widely-panned STAAR/EOC tests are factored in, the number of “failing” schools may easily skyrocket into the thousands.”

Folks, these gentlemen are not conservative. They are radicals. Why would any sane Texan want to destroy the public schools when there is a boatload of evidence that charters and vouchers don’t do any better?

Allen Weeks is organizing a big rally to support public education in Austin on February 23. I will be there.

Abby Rappaport is one of our best education journalists, and she is mostly covering Texas politics these days.

In this article, she explains the escalating revolt against testing in Texas, where it all started.

The bottom line: Texas has been obsessed with testing for the past two decades, and people are just plain sick of it. The last legislature cut $5.4 billion from the schools’ budget, but managed to find $500 million for Pearson. Abby estimates that in the next few years, Pearson will collect over $1 billion from Texas taxpayers.

That’s a lot of money by anyone’s reckoning.

The school boards are sick of it. More than 80% have passed resolutions against high-stakes testing.

Parents are sick of it. Legislatures are getting complaints in the grocery store and wherever they run into parents in their district.

Happily, Texas Republicans are sick of all the testing. Many come from small towns and rural areas and their constituents are button-holing them. They don’t want to tear up their local public school and close it down because of test scores.

Last September 30, I spoke to a joint meeting of the Texas Association of School Administrators and the Texas School Boards Association. I got a wonderful, wild, Texas-size reception. They don’t like what’s going on. They talk to their legislators. Nobody had a good word for the reign of Pearson.

So, please, all eyes on Texas. Let’s all cheer for the testing revolt that’s growing there by the hour.

 

 

 

 

 

Jason Stanford lives in Austin, Texas, where he writes frequently about school issues. Here he gives us the latest in the school choice saga in Texas.

Texas is crazy for school choice. The state legislature is about to take up the question of vouchers, and the state board of education has approved many charters. The new state commissioner of education Michael Williams previously ran the State Railroad Commission, which regulates the energy industry (lightly), and he is a fan of school choice.

Now the state board has approved a charter called Great Hearts Academies for an affluent white neighborhood in San Antonio. Now there will be a charter for white kids, and other charters for black and brown kids. That is the new world of school choice.

There is a charter school for rich white kids in Los Altos (the Bullis Charter School), the Metro Nashville school board has been trying to stop the Great Hearts Academy of Arizona from opening a charter in an affluent white neighborhood, Eva Moskowitz has opened charters in affluent NYC communities on the Upper West Side of Manhattan and in Cobble Hill in Brooklyn (maybe that’s why she changed the name of her chain from “Harlem Success Academy” to “Success Academy”). New Jersey parents in middle-class towns have thus far repelled them.

The wave of the future, it seems, is that charters will expand into mostly affluent white districts. The kids are less challenging. Instead of “saving poor children from their failing public schools,” they will go where the pickings are easy.

Julian Vasquez Heilig of the University of Texas is devoted to equity for students of color.

This has made him a critic of corporate reform.

And it may account for the name of his blog, which is “Cloaking Inequity.”

You should browse his blog archives. He writes with verve and humor, which we know is rare indeed among the professoriate.

His latest piece reveals the interconnections among the reformers associated with the IDEA charter chain, Teach for America, and the U.S. Department of Education.

IDEA claims that all its graduates enter a four-year college, but as Bruce Fuller recently explained, almost half are failing in college. They were not well prepared. Nonetheless, the U.S. Department of Education recently plopped $29 million into the IDEA coffers.

In the latest wrinkle of an ongoing reform saga, the Austin Independent School Board held its regular election and got some new members. They severed AISD]s connection with IDEA.