Archives for category: Technology

Wired magazine reports that Facebook funded most of the experts who “vetted” Messenger Kids, an app designed for children as young as 6. It did not consult critics or defenders of children’s privacy and their childhood.

One of the “experts” that consulted with Facebook was the National PTA, which received funding from Facebook.

What is it with the National PTA? They were enthusiastic about charters and garnered big donations from Gates, now Zuckerberg gets them on board to put little kids online.

Stephen Dyer writes that ECOT will argue in court tomorrow that it should be paid for kids that were not there. 

 

Led by the privatization-mad Mind Trust, Indianapolis is bringing in Sajan George to take over a low-performing school. Sajan George is not an educator. His schools in Detroit and Newark failed. So of course, Indianapolis must hire this proven failure.

Saman George is a management consultant who had a top job with Alvarez & Marsal as they pillaged their way through New Orleans, St. Louis, and New York City, collecting huge fees ($500 an hour) to introduce business practices into education. In St. Louis, A&M installed the retired CEO of Brooks Brothers clothing store as superintendent. $5 Million later, they left town, and the struggling district lost its accreditation (it just now won it back).

In New York City, Sajan George led the A&M effort to revise the city’s complex bus schedule. The plan was rolled out on the coldest day of the year, and thousands of children were stranded by poor planning. A&M collected $15 million in a no-bid contract from Joel Klein for that failure.

Recently Sajan George has re-emerged as a “turnaround specialist,” although he failed in both Detroit and Newark. Chalkbeat tells the story here. 

“When it comes to turning around troubled schools, Matchbook Learning has a troubled history — two schools it took over were closed soon after. But Sajan George, founder of the management group, thinks Indianapolis is his chance to succeed.

“Indianapolis Public Schools leaders have recommended Matchbook as a partner to restart School 63, a school with chronically low test scores. The nonprofit operator has been through layers of vetting from the district and its partners. But the network’s past troubles raise significant questions about whether it is likely to succeed in Indianapolis and highlight the limited pool of partners with the interest and experience in restarting failing schools.”

Mercedes Schneider carefully examined the dismal record of Sajan George and A&M here:

When It Comes to Employing Services of Sajan George, Indy Is a Sitting Duck.

Reformers are never deterred by failure. If at first you fail, try again. If at second time you fail, try again. Never learn from experience. Failure apparently is just another path to profit.

Indianapolis is off to a bad start in their zeal to wipe out public schools.

 

Some of the early pioneers of the tech industry have banded together to earn about the dangers of tech addiction.

Hopefully, they will warn about the dangers of data mining, invasion of student privacy, and the false promise of replacing skilled teachers with computers.

 

 

 

William Lager, the entrepreneur who invented The Electronic Classroom of Tomorrow, had a brilliant political strategy. He has collected nearly $2 billion since the school opened in 2000, and he gave a few million each year in campaign contributions to politicians. No public school could do that. Top state officials spoke at ECOT’s graduation ceremonies, as did Jeb Bush, who is fanatically devoted to digital learning. ECOT was lucrative but had the highest dropout rate of any high school in the nation.

When the State auditor Dave Yost (a recipient of Lager funding) audited ECOT, he discovered that enrollment was inflated and reached a settlement for the mega-school to repay the state on a monthly basis. Rather than give up money to which it was not entitled, the school closed.

One of the most persistent and well-informed critics of ECOT is Bill Phillis, former Deputy Superintendent of Education for Ohio, now retired.

He asks a question: why not hold Lager personally responsible for the hundreds of millions diverted from real public schools?

He writes:

“State probably won’t be able to recover all of the over-payments to ECOT in face of its closure: but continuation of payments is not the solution

“The chairman of the House Education and Career Readiness Committee is in a tizzy because the ECOT closure stops the clawback of $4 million per month. (The chairman, a leading benefactor of ECOT campaign donations, is a consummate defender.)

“ECOT’s average monthly payment for the students “enrolled” thus far this school year is $7.7 million. $4 million per month is being held back to repay the previous fraudulent claims. Therefore the state is spending $7.7 million to get $4 million back. The $7.7 million monthly payment will stop because ECOT, at least temporarily, is out of business; hence, ECOT allegedly will no money to pay back the ill-gained money. But ECOT and the ECOT Man have assets that should be tapped.

“The two ECOT for-profit companies, the real estate and facilities and the personal real estate holdings and other assets might accrue to the amount ECOT owes. The ECOT Man has accumulated vast holdings with money that should have been spent on educating children.

“All the powers of the state should be unleashed to recover the money ECOT owes. School districts have lost hundreds of millions from ECOT’s claims for students not served. The Governor, Attorney General, Auditor, State Superintendent, State Board of Education and the sponsor should join efforts to develop a strategy for recovering every dime possible.

“The chairman and his legislative colleagues should learn from the ECOT fiasco and either eliminate charters or put the entire charter industry under the sponsorship of elected school district boards of education. The for-profit concept must be eliminated.”

William L. Phillis | Ohio Coalition for Equity & Adequacy of School Funding | 614.228.6540 | ohioeanda@sbcglobal.net| http://www.ohiocoalition.org

PS: When I looked up ECOT in Wikipedia to check the founding date, I note that the only critic quoted works for the pro-choice Thomas B. Fordham Institute, not the knowledgeable Bill Phillis, who has tracked Lager’s misdeeds for years.

The writer of this story Colin Woodard won the George Polk Award for exposing the for-profit scheme that Governor Paul LePage tried to impose on the children of Maine. Jeb Bush pulled the strings.

The surveillance state is a reality. Someone is watching you. They see you on hidden cameras as you move around the city. They see your emails.

When your child goes to school, someone is watching his or her eye movements, measuring their responses.

I have been writing about this for a while (see here and here), prodded on by my friend Leonie Haimson, who was one of the activist parents who brought down inBloom, the data mining business funded by Bill Gates with $100 million.

We must guard our children’s privacy. Someone wants their data. They want it to enable them to design new products to sell to them and their school.

Don’t let them have your child’s data. Resist.

This is one of my favorite news articles.

It answers the question, where do the tech leaders of Silicon Valley send their own children to school?

While they are pushing computers into public schools, they send their own children to a Waldorf School that does not permit any screen time at school and discourages its use at home. Learn why.

Why don’t they want Other People’s Children to have what they know is best?

 

If you are as sick of reading about the brilliance of the young hotshots of Silicon Valley as I am, you will enjoy this article. 

It appeared in “Wired,” the journal of the tech world. Summary: The bloom is off the rose.

“As headlines have exposed the troubling inner workings of company after company, startup culture no longer feels like fodder for gentle parodies about ping pong and hoodies. It feels ugly and rotten. Facebook, the greatest startup success story of this era, isn’t a merry band of hackers building cutesy tools that allow you to digitally Poke your friends. It’s a powerful and potentially sinister collector of personal data, a propaganda partner to government censors, and an enabler of discriminatory advertising…

”When Bodega, a startup making “smart” vending machines, announced its launch in September, it encountered an angry mob on Twitter. Bodega’s co-opted name, along with its founders’ stated plan to make corner stores obsolete, fit perfectly with the stereotype—arrogant, elite tech bros trying to get rich by disrupting a lovable local icon. “Let’s see your shitty glass box make me a bacon, egg and cheese with jalepenos on a roll you sick, capitalist scum,” the rapper El-P tweeted. The company’s founder issued an apology, which was subsequently mocked.

“Bro-dega,” as it’s since been named, was just one catalyst of the anti-tech sentiment rippling beneath our collective surface. After Skedaddle, an “Uber for Buses” startup, was featured on Business Insider, a screenshot of the four young male cofounders, smiling atop an article describing an unsavory-sounding mission, ricocheted across Twitter. “What a nightmare,” the writer Lisa McIntire tweeted, adding, “Silicon Valley is run by complete sociopaths.”

“A trend story about startups riding the trend of “co-living” emerged; Twitter screamed, “YOU INVENTED ROOMMATES!” When Bloomberg revealed that fruit packs made by Juicero, a well-funded startup selling expensive juicing appliances, could be squeezed with bare hands, commentators howled with schadenfreude. Juicero wasn’t just a preposterous company: It was “a symbol of the Silicon Valley class designing for its own, insular problems,” and “an absurd avatar of Silicon Valley hubris.” When a study showed that a “brain-hacking” supplement created by a venture-backed startup called HVMN was no more effective than a cup of coffee, mockery ensued.

“This week, when Netflix tweeted a joke about some of its customers’ viewing choices—a marketing ploy that, just a few years ago, would have felt like a clever insight gleaned from the wonders of big data—the press and tweeting masses immediately attacked it as creepy and a violation of privacy. These rifts have solidified the feeling that techies and their moneymen are painfully out of touch…

”In 2008, it was Wall Street bankers. In 2017, tech workers are the world’s villain. “It’s the exact same story of too many people with too much money. That breeds arrogance, bad behavior, and jealousy, and society just loves to take it down,” the investor said. As a result, investors are avoiding anything that feels risky. Hunter Walk, a partner with venture capital firm Homebrew, which invested in Bodega, attributes the backlash to a broader response to power. Tech is now a powerful institution, he says. “We no longer get the benefit of the doubt 100 percent of the time, and that’s okay.”

But is it okay to let these spoiled, arrogant brats take control of our lives and disrupt the institutions that meet other people’s needs? I think not.

 

A former Facebook executive has taken the extraordinary step of apologizing for the damage the social media giant has done to society.

A former Facebook executive is making waves after he spoke out about his “tremendous guilt” over growing the social network, which he feels has eroded “the core foundations of how people behave by and between each other.”

Chamath Palihapitiya began working for Facebook in 2007 and left in 2011 as its vice president for user growth. When he started, he said, there was not much thought given to the long-term negative consequences of developing such a platform.

“I think in the back, deep, deep recesses of our minds, we kind of knew something bad could happen,” said Palihapitiya, 41. “But I think the way we defined it was not like this.”

That changed as Facebook’s popularity exploded, he said. To date, the social network has more than 2 billion monthly users around the world and continues to grow.

But the ability to connect and share information so quickly — as well as the instant gratification people give and receive over their posts — has resulted in some negative consequences, according to Palihapitiya.

“It literally is a point now where I think we have created tools that are ripping apart the social fabric of how society works. That is truly where we are,” he said. “The short-term, dopamine-driven feedback loops that we have created are destroying how society works: no civil discourse, no cooperation, misinformation, mistruth. And it’s not an American problem. This is not about Russian ads. This is a global problem.”