Archives for category: Privacy and Privacy Rights

Edward Snowden, as everyone knows by now, is the 29-year-old man who leaked secrets about our government’s surveillance of phone calls and emails. I don’t know if he is a traitor or hero or something else, but I do think that his revelations raise concerns for all of us.

As we realize by now, government and private-sector activities are dedicated to the amassing of Big Data that includes everything we do. Government is doing this, its defenders say, to protect us against terrorism. Business is mining Big Data to sell things to us. The more they know about us, the better they can develop and market their products to us.

All of this becomes relevant to educators and parents because efforts are underway to assemble a national database called inBloom. It was funded by the Gates Foundation to the tune of $100 million and developed by Rupert Murdoch’s Wireless Generation. Should strangers have access to the confidential information of children and teachers? I don’t think so. The time to stop it is now.

As I read about the events in the New York Times on Monday, certain facts and statements were especially salient.

Think of it. Edward Snowden was a high school dropout who was hired as a security guard but soon rose to become an IT consultant for Booz Allen and Hamilton, a mammoth company that collected over $1 billion for intelligence work in the past year. The New York Times writes: “As evidence of the company’s close relationship with government, the Obama administration’s chief intelligence official, James R. Clapper, Jr., is a former Booz executive. The official who held that post in the Bush administration, John M. McConnell, now works for Booz.”

The story goes on to say, “The national security apparatus has been more and more privatized and turned over to contractors,” said Danielle Brian, the executive director of the Project on Government Oversight, a nonprofit group that studies government contracting. “This is something the public is largely unaware of, how more than a million private contractors are cleared to handle highly sensitive matters.”

In another article in the business section, spokesmen for the high-tech industry in Silicon Valley insisted that they had to be free of any government regulation, because it would “snuff out innovation..Bureaucrats should keep their hands off things they do not understand, which is just about everything we do out here.”

“So the first mystifying thing for some here is how the leading companies–including Microsoft, Google, Yahoo, Apple, and Facebook–apparently made it easier for the National Security Agency to gain access. Only Twitter seems to have declined.”

The government data mining program is called Prism. It collects emails, video, voice and stored data on the Internet.

And one more chilling thought: “In 1999, Scott McNealy, the chief executive of Sun Microsystems, summed up the valley’s attitude toward personal data in what became a defining comment of the dot-com boom, “You have zero privacy,” he said, “get used to it.”

Columnist David Safier of Tucson keeps close watch on the corporatization of education in Arizona.

He recently reported that the Tucson school district is outsourcing student data to a Murdoch owned site called mCLASS. This is different from the Murdoch data storage program called inBloom.

Safier is concerned about the security of student data, as we should all be. Why can’t schools respect student privacy?

There is good reason to be worried about the effort by the federal Department of Education to create a massive database. Doing so is part of Race to the Top.

There is reason to be concerned about inBloom, the project funded by Gates and managed by Rupert Murdoch.

In this review of a new book about Google, the writer says:

“The advance of information technology epitomized by Google heralds the death of privacy for most people and shifts the world toward authoritarianism.”

These trends are not inevitable. The time to stop them is now. Join with others and let your elected officials know that you will not abandon your privacy or your children ‘s.

As everyone’s personal, confidential information joins that big data warehouse in the Cloud, what are the gains? What are the losses?

A reader sends this comment:

**********************************

According to professor Jason Frand of UCLA Anderson School of Management:

http://www.anderson.ucla.edu/faculty/jason.frand/teacher/technologies/palace/datamining.htm

“Data mining consists of five major elements:

Extract, transform, and load transaction data onto the data warehouse system.

Store and manage the data in a multidimensional database system.

Provide data access to business analysts and information technology professionals.

Analyze the data by application software.

Present the data in a useful format, such as a graph or table.”

From inBloom’s FAQ page:

https://www.inbloom.org/faq

“With inBloom, school districts can bring results back from each of these systems and build solutions that allow teachers to have one system to sign into rather than 30—so all the information they need to help their students will be available in one place. This makes it simpler for teachers to see a more complete picture of student learning and find learning materials that match each student’s learning needs and spark student engagement. It also makes it easier for schools to offer parent dashboards so parents can more easily see what their children are studying and how they’re doing in school.

The way that inBloom is achieving this vision is by building the technology “plumbing” to connect the different tools and systems in use in schools today and enable those products to work better together.”

And finally, from inBloom’s Privacy Commitment:

https://www.inbloom.org/privacy-commitment

“Vendors have no access to student records through inBloom unless authorized by a state or district with legal authority over those student records.”

It is disingenuous, at best, to defend inBloom from allowing vendors access to student databases simply because they themselves do not grant that access. If anyone thinks for one New York minute that the purpose of creating this database is simply for the good of teachers and students then that person is credulous in the extreme.

And how quickly will it unfold that districts with Broad, Bush, and TFA-trained superintendents and school boards with corporate-sponsored members whose budgets have been severely cut by state legislatures and whose coffers are continuously depleted by federal mandates and school “choice” legislation will begin to sell access to “select” vendors to pay for utility bills, teacher salaries, and building maintenance?

The tech marketers who came together to create inBloom are not innocent philanthropists who have no profit-stake in the end product and to claim so is ridiculous.

From inBloom About: History:

https://www.inbloom.org/about-inbloom

“The SLC custom-built all the inBloom software components and has worked with education technology companies and developers to encourage the development of inBloom-compatible applications.”

Those “educational technology companies and developers” have lots of expensive products to sell and it is not a coincidence that this software debuts at the same time that ALEC, the Business Roundtable, the Chamber of Commerce, and the reform foundations are simultaneously pushing very hard to pass laws in all 50 states requiring state departments of education to mandate online learning, online virtual schools, online testing, and adoption of the CCSS which magically requires (see the Special Education Appendix to the CCSS) software that these miraculously philanthropic companies happen to manufacture and sell at great profit margins to the very school districts whom they are promoting the adoption of inBloom. Now that’s a lucky occurrence, isn’t it? Just like the New York State Dept. of Education/Pearson alliance, maybe?

I see that some commenters are accepting that this is a done deal and are saying that we might as well accept it and try to make the best of it. I say nonsense! I echo Linda in saying that we have no valid reason to acquiesce to the data monster at all without a fight. I have yet to see a compelling reason, backed up with real, peer-reviewed research, that proves beyond doubt that this technology and obsession with data and its collection does anything meaningful to help students learn. It is circular logic always: data collection informs teaching, which adapts to teach to the data-collection tests, which reveal which students do well on data-collection tests, which proves that data collection is necessary.

After following this pied piper for over a dozen years we are no better off than we were before. No miraculous changes have taken place. Poverty has increased exponentially rather than been eradicated by all the magical learning that supposedly lifts students out of their generational poverty and our country and its citizens are worse off by any imagined measure than we were before the reform miracles were mandated upon us. How far does this experiment need to go before people begin to realize that we have little more than a naked emperor?

Carol Burris of South Side High School in Rockville Center, New York, sent out the following notice:

Thank you again for signing the petition against high stakes testing. It will be delivered on June 8 at the Rally for Public Education in Albany.

The purpose of the rally (12:00-3:00) is to express opposition to high stakes testing and support educational funding. Although it is sponsored by NYSUT, other groups are marching as well, including parents and principals.

Fellow principals and I will march behind a banner that says

http://www.newyorkprincipals.org

Our kids and teachers are more than a number .

We are assembling at the bottom of the egg, so if you are coming alone, feel free to join us or come by and say “hello”.

Parking is available under the egg. You can park for free in the two lots
on Madison Ave. I hope to see you there.

http://www.theegg.org/about/directions

*Field Testing*

This is a link to a site that gives parents information about field testing
http://www.scribd.com/doc/141872303/say-yes-to-learning-and-no-to-field-testing-what-nyc-parents-need-to-know

Although it was designed for New York City parents, it is relevant to all New York State parents.

inBloom and your children’s data

Please urge your legislators to support the bill A.6059/S.4284, to block the state’s plan to share private student and teacher information with inBloom Inc. and for-profit vendors, which has 59 co-sponsors in the Assembly and 20 in the Senate. It’s especially important to call Sen. Flanagan at 631-361-2154 and Sen. Skelos at (516) 766-8383 and ask them to support the bill and hold hearings on it now.

More about VAM and APPR

Whether you are a parent, principal or teacher, I think you will find this article on VAM of importance.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/wp/2013/05/20/principal-why-our-new-educator-evaluation-system-is-unethical/

Here is the bottom line: No measure of teacher or principal performance should put the best interests of students in conflict with the best interests of the adults who serve them.

Leonie Haimson is Néw York City’s one-person Truth Squad.

While Schools Chancellor Dennis Walcott was telling anyone who would listen about the stellar education record of the Bloomberg years, Haimson marshaled data to demonstrate that New York City made less academic progress on the federal tests than any city other than Cleveland.

She lacerated the administration for its indifference to class size, now at its highest point in 14 years.

And she shocked her Bronx audience by explaining that the city was releasing confidential student data without parental consent to inBloom, to be mined by vendors.

Haimson is the leader of Class Size Matters and a co-founder of Parents Across America. She is also a director of the Network for Public Education.

In this new world of high technology, will there be any private space for anyone?

Bloomberg made his billions by leasing high-tech terminals that contain up-to-the-minute financial news from all over the world.

Now the story emerges that Bloomberg reporters were spying on Bloomberg’s clients.

This notice just in:

“Parents, do you know your child’s confidential, personal school records are going to be shared with a corporation called inBloom Inc?

This highly sensitive information will be stored on a data cloud and disclosed to for-profit corporations to help them develop and market their “learning products”

The data will include your child’s names, address, photo, email, test scores, grades, economic and racial status, and detailed disciplinary, health and special education records.

Find out more about this plan from advocates and state and city education officials.

What: Town Hall meeting at Brooklyn Borough Hall, 209 Joralemon Street
(take the #4 or #5 train to Boro Hall; #2, #3 or R to Court St., or A,C,F to Jay Street/Boro Hall)
When: Monday, April 29 at 6 PM

Invited guests include representatives from the NYS Education Department, the NYC Department of Education, the Gates Foundation, inBloom Inc., and the NYS Board of Regents.

Co-sponsored by the Brooklyn Parent Academy, Assemblymembers Danny O’Donnell, James Brennan, William Colton; NYS Senators Liz Krueger and Martin Golden; NYC Public Advocate Bill de Blasio, NYC Council Education Chair Robert Jackson, Council Members Gale Brewer and Leticia James; Class Size Matters, the Learning Disabilities Association of NY, Community Education Councils of Districts 1, 3, 13, 14, 15, 20, 21, 22 and the Citywide Council for Special Education, Alliance for Quality Education, Coalition for Educational Justice, and Urban Youth Collaborative.

The event will be livestreamed at http://www.stopmotionsolo.tv or http://www.ustream.tv/stopmotionsolo (either one is okay)

Mercedes Schneider provides an update on the evolving drama in Louisiana: Did John White pull Louisiana data out of the Gates-funded, Murdoch-created project called inBloom?

Did the state board of education approve the agreement?

How many other data-sharing agreements did John White enter into?

Did the state board know where he was sending the children’s data?

Mercedes Schneider tries to figure out what John White did or did not do in relation to Louisiana’s agreement to share confidential student data with the Gates-Murdoch inBloom project. It appears that the state board of education never knew about this arrangement and that it was a secret deal made by John White.

Is there some kind of secret government-corporate group that makes these deals about students without bothering to inform democratically elected officials?