Archives for category: Philadelphia

Jersey Jazzman, aka teacher Mark Weber, reviews the blossoming of choice-choice-choice this summer.

Behind it, he says, is a failure of honesty and will.

In recent weeks, we have been besieged with testimonials and heartening stories about choice.

“The clever thing about this construction is that anyone who challenges the narrative is immediately put on the defensive: Why are you against helping people get a better education? Why don’t you care about these children? It must be that you care about your own interests more than theirs…

“There is little evidence that the fraction of “choice” schools that appear to get better results do so because they are “innovative” in their educational practices. But the “choice” schools that do get gains all seem to have structural advantages, starting with resource advantages — gained through a variety of strategies — that allow them to offer things like longer days, longer years, smaller student:staff ratios, and extended educational programming.

“By all appearances, we seem to be able to adequately fund our schools in the affluent, leafy ‘burbs, even as we shrug our shoulders at the prospect of doing the same for urban centers enrolling many students who are in economic disadvantage. Millburn has what it needs; Newark does not. Gross Point has plenty; Detroit doesn’t. New Trier is fine; Chicago is not. Lower Merion thrives; Philadelphia withers.

“It’s a story that plays out across the nation. Somehow these affluent communities manage to scrape together enough to provide adequate educations for their children, even when burdened with unionized teachers and step contracts and democratically elected school boards. Somehow they manage to get their schools what they need without giving up transparency and governmental accountability and agency for all of their citizens through the democratic process.

School “choice” is the result of a failure of honesty and will.

“The failure of honesty comes from failing to fully acknowledge that structural inequities — inequality, chronic poverty, racism, inadequate school funding — lead to unequal educational outcomes. It also comes from failing to acknowledge that the advantages a select few “choice” schools have accrued to themselves are directly responsible for their outcome gains.

“The failure of will results from a failure to act collectively in ways that would move adequate resources to all schools where they are lacking, without giving up democratic governmental control.

“Neither Kristof nor Lemmon nor Hardy nor anyone else has given us any reason to believe that the only way to get more resources into schools that need them is to abandon governmental control. There is, however, plenty of reason to believe shifting school control to private entities will reduce transparency, student and family rights, and efficiency — both here and abroad.

“When children live lives free of want and attend well-resourced, government-controlled schools they do very well. Certainly, there are problems and room for improvement. But communities don’t need to give up control of their schools if the pre-conditions for success are in place.

“Instead of upending the entire system, why don’t we try that?”

Despite lackluster results at some of its Philadelphia schools, KIPP plans to increase the number of itsschools in the city and more than double its enrollment, from 1,770 to 4,400 students. Current plans call the growth of K-12 networks of KIPP schools. Apparently, the KIPP Network will accept students in the early grades but not in middle school or high school. KIPP wants to create its “culture” and not sully it by admitting latecomers. This is not the way public schools work.

Critics complain that some KIPP schools have no better performance than public schools that are being closed. Yet KIPP grows.

“Overall, activists argue, charters may benefit some students, but that comes at the expense of many more students whose District-run schools lack needed services. This argument has been adopted by the NAACP, which has come out against charter expansion for that reason.”

The Philadelphia Schools are run by a state-controlled board called the School Reform Commission. The SRC has overseen the dismantling of public education in the city and encouraged private operators to open for business. At the same time, the state legislature has consistently underfunded the public schools, abetting the dissolution of the public school system. Historic buildings sit empty, schools are stripped of everything but bare necessities. Yet the charters thrive, favored as they are by outside philanthropy.

As the linked article shows, KIPP has had weak academic performance in its middle schools, yet it boasts that it gets a higher proportion of students into college. One reason: KIPP has college counselors but the defunded public high schools have lost their college counselors. This is a classic case of a “manufactured crisis.” KIPP grows while the public schools die.

“KIPP’s CEO, Marc Mannella, has acknowledged publicly that some of its academic indicators have been disappointing. But KIPP officials cite evidence that its schools have had success in steering students to college.

“Specifically, they say, the first 8th-grade class from KIPP’s original middle school, which graduated in 2007, boasted 35 percent of students obtaining four-year college degrees 10 years later, compared to a 9 percent rate for low-income students nationally. The result is for a cohort of 35 graduates.

“This is significant news,” said Steve Mancini, KIPP national public affairs director.

“At the time, 85 percent of KIPP’s students qualified as low income. For the two KIPP schools with available data today, 59 percent are low-income.

“He emphasized that the KIPP Through College initiative offers all its 8th-grade graduates personalized counseling and support in preparing for college and that the assistance persists through at least the first year.

“This is a big attraction for parents,” said Mancini, especially in a school district where counselors have felt the budget ax.”

So, KIPP offers college counseling but the college counselors in public schools fell to the budget ax. Any connection?

The original class in fifth grade had 86 fifth-graders in 2003-04. By eighth grade, only 33 were left (not 35). Twelve of the original 85 graduated college, a rate of 13% of the original cohort (thank you, Gary Rubinstein, for tracking down the numbers).

KIPP will receive a huge management fee–12%–which enables it to provide the services that have been stripped from public schools.

“KIPP Philadelphia’s own management fee is 12 percent of all state and local revenue designated for the school, according to the Charter Schools Office’s evaluation. That would start at more than $307,000, then balloon to more than $1.3 million annually by year five, when KIPP Parkside is expected to be at full enrollment. The charter office called this fee “high in comparison to other Philadelphia [Charter Management Organizations].” Typical charter management fees range from 8 to 10 percent.

“The fee paid to KIPP Philadelphia goes to support services such as “recruiting and training new teachers, developing and implementing curriculum, overseeing instruction, creating and analyzing student assessments, finding and maintaining school facilities.”

The public schools of Philadelphia have been starved of funding and victimized by state control. An elected board would feel accountable to the vast majority of parents, rather than curtsy to private contractors and give them whatever they want, at the expense of the majority of students whose schools have been raided of funding.

For many years, the public schools of Philadelphia have been drastically underfunded by the state of Pennsylvania. This created a series of fiscal crises, which should have produced equitable funding, but instead gave cause for a state takeover, thus blaming the city for the state’s failures. The state established the appointed School Reform Commission in 2001. The SRC appointed Paul Vallas to run the district, and he launched the nation’s largest experiment (to that date) in privatized schooling, handing over some 40 schools to private, for-profit, and university management. The experiment was an expensive failure, and he left the city with a large deficit, bound for New Orleans to push an even bigger experiment in school privatization.

The SRC has continued the Vallas tradition, closing public schools, opening charter schools, and leaving public schools in desperate straits.

To sum it up, state control has been a disaster for the children of Philadelphia.

Lisa Haver wrote an article in the Philadelphia Daily News outlining the secrecy that surrounds the deliberations of the School Reform Commission. Even the budget is hidden from public view until the SRC has made all its decisions, without considering the voices of parents or teachers.

She asks and answers questions about the role and lack of transparency of the SRC.

She concludes like this:

“Should the SRC schedule a meeting in which it plans to decide on renewals of 23 charter schools with less than a week’s notice?

“The district’s budget shows that it will spend $894 million — about one-third of the budget — on charters next year. Shouldn’t the SRC allow enough time for those paying the tab to read the reports? They may want to ask why schools that have met none of the standards are being recommended for renewal.

“Should the SRC publicly deliberate before voting on significant financial, academic and policy resolutions?

“The SRC approved contracts totaling $149.2 million at its February meeting; it spent $173.1 million in March. Resolutions are voted on in batches of 10 or 15, with little explanation of why.

“How do we reform the School Reform Commission? By abolishing it. Philadelphians have the right, as all other Pennsylvanians do, to decide who will represent them on an elected school board.”

I am delighted to share with you that Helen Gym won the Emily’s List “Rising Star” contest.

Helen has fought for the children and public schools of Philadelphia, first as a parent leader, now as a member of the City Council.

Helen is smart, fearless, eloquent, and dedicated. She is a tireless fighter for justice and the common good.

This was part of the Emily’s List description of Helen:

“Helen is a progressive champion for the people of Philadelphia,” said Stephanie Schriock, president of EMILY’s List. “Her support for quality public education, immigrant rights, and sustainable investments in neighborhoods shows her deep commitment to improving the overall quality of life in her city. EMILY’s List is proud to recognize Helen’s dedication to public service as the EMILY’s List community nominates her for the Gabrielle Giffords Rising Star Award.”

Elected in 2015, Helen Gym became Philadelphia’s first Asian American woman elected to city council. She won her at-large seat after 20 years of grassroots organizing on behalf of Philadelphia’s public education system and immigrant communities. In her first year, she won historic investments toward universal pre-K and youth homelessness, and expanded resources for public schools. Helen is now leading the charge nationally around sanctuary cities and immigrant rights – and becoming a leading voice for cities resisting and winning with a progressive agenda.

Thanks to all who voted for this wonderful, courageous leader.

Congratulations, Helen!

I am adding Helen to the Honor Roll of this blog!

Helen Gym is a parent activist in Philadelphia who recently won a seat on the City Council, where she advocates on behalf of the city’s beleaguered and underfunded public schools.

In this article in The Nation, Gym explains that Philadelphia parents and activists have developed a successful way to fight back against the DeVos agenda.

DeVos, she notes, was confirmed in a Senate vote that was humiliating; the resistance to the billionaire voucher advocate was so intense that it required the vice-president to cast a tie-breaking vote.

Philadelphia was stripped bare by greedy reformers. But the public organized.

In 2002, the state of Pennsylvania took over Philadelphia’s public schools, stripping away local control, massively expanding charters, and starving existing public schools of funding and resources. Then, in 2013, thanks to a GOP-led state austerity budget that cut almost a billion dollars from public education, Philadelphia’s state-controlled school system closed down 24 public schools and lost thousands of school staff in the name of cost savings, then expanded thousands of new charter spots at nearly the same cost.

In response, Philadelphians took to the streets and organized. Parents, educators, students, and community members built coalitions among labor, clergy, business, and civic organizations. We fought against an agenda of disinvestment, consolidation, and neglect, and instead pressed forward with a commitment to establishing a baseline level of staffing and resources for every school.

Parents forged a legal strategy for ensuring adequate programs and a quality curriculum. After the massive budget cuts hit, parents filed more than 800 complaints with the state’s Department of Education about overcrowding and curriculum deficiencies and then won a court order, effectively forcing the state to investigate the problems and fix any violations of state code.

Meanwhile, years of organizing efforts by high-school students made strides towards ending zero-tolerance policies and improving school climate. A long-sought change in the student code of conduct in 2012 limited the use of suspensions and was accompanied by new, district-wide efforts to implement restorative practices. More recently, new district policies further restricted the use of suspensions with young children in response to dress-code violations.

Faced with continued austerity, we marched, took over school-board meetings, and lobbied City Council offices. And we started to win more victories: City officials began to acknowledge they could do more and boosted their financial support for the struggling school system. We drew on our networks to find allies in other communities across the state suffering from similar circumstances.

This is the coalition that helped throw out a one-term GOP governor in 2014 and installed Tom Wolf, a governor who centered his campaign on fair and equitable education funding. And this is the coalition that the following year elected Jim Kenney, a pro–public education mayor, and boosted me, a mother of three kids and longtime education activist, into a seat on Philadelphia’s City Council.

We’ve already shifted the narrative in our city away from austerity and back to real investments that restore essential services to our schools. With a more unified political leadership, and with the help of boosts in state and local funding, we’re putting hundreds of nurses and counselors back into school buildings that had been stripped of these vital personnel. We’re also protecting immigrant students, ensuring water access and safety, expanding the teaching force, and re-embracing in-district models of improving schools rather than outsourcing interventions to unreliable education-management organizations.

Gym writes that Philadelphians are developing a new agenda, one that rebuffs the entrepreneurs and DeVos followers, one that invests in the city’s children rather than profit centers. It CAN be done, she writes, and Philadelphia is doing it.

Carol Burris writes here about the struggle between the parents of the John Wister Elementary School in Philadelphia and the rich, powerful Mastery Charter Chain, which longed to take control of Wister.

Philadelphia has been under the control of a “School Reform Commission” since 2001; three of its five members are controlled by the governor. Its superintendent is a graduate of the unaccredited Eli Broad academy. It is worth your time to read the timeline of the state takeover of Philadelphia. The state took over because the district’s finances were in poor shape and its test scores are low. Guess what: 16 years laters, its finances are in poor shape (due to state underfunding) and its test scores are low.

In years past, parents had the right to vote on whether to go charter. But that right was taken away because parents didn’t always vote yes.

The parents organized to fight off Mastery, which is run by a non-educator and which practices stern discipline, the “no-excuses” philosophy.

The Mastery Charter School chain, known for its tough discipline and “no-excuses” philosophy, was already running more than 10 schools in the city. CEO Scott Gordon’s background was in business. He founded a home health-care company and marketed cereal before starting Mastery. Just the kind of guy who should be running schools, right?

The parents resisted. For a brief moment, they got a reprieve.

Then the big money kicked in along with the political connections, and Wister was handed over to Mastery.

Charter schools are not public schools. The charter industry is rapacious and greedy. It is never satisfied. It wants more. Arne Duncan was on its side; John King, who founded his own no-excuses charter school, was on its side. Betsy DeVos is its champion.

Do you want to know what is wrong with American education? Look no further than Philadelphia. The city public schools have been a plaything for the city’s rich and powerful. The students are mainly black and poor. The schools are underfunded. Charter schools are thriving. Public schools have been closed to make way for privately managed charters. The city schools have not had democratic control of years. It is run by a School Reform Commission appointed by the governor and the mayor. The SRC does not have a clue about how to “reform” the schools.

 

Consequence: The city’s public schools have eight full-time librarians for 220 schools and 134,000 students. 

 

As Philadelphia school budgets have shrunk, librarians have grown rarer, almost to the point of extinction. In 1991, the school system employed 176 certified librarians. Now, the librarians are only at Anderson, Elkin, Greenberg, Penn Alexander, Roosevelt, and Sullivan elementaries and Central and South Philadelphia High Schools.

 

In addition to the librarian-staffed libraries, 13 libraries are kept open by 128 volunteers from the West Philadelphia Alliance for Children, according to the district.

 

What a disgrace for the nation’s fifth largest city!

 

When I went to the Houston public schools in the 1950s, my public schools had fully staffed libraries. Are we poorer now than then?

A man who was principal of a charter high school in Philadelphia for five years alleged that the charter chain had misappropriated $1.2 million in public funds. He filed suit in federal court as a whistle-blower. When the Justice Department declined to join his suit, he dropped out.

 

Meanwhile the city’s charter office has recommended not renewing the charters of this chain because of poor academic performance.

 

Aspira, a nonprofit that focuses on Latino youth and education, has been fighting to retain control of both schools for months. The district’s charter office has recommended that the SRC not renew the agreements because the schools are entangled in a web of financial transactions with Aspira and have not achieved the academic improvements the organization promised.

 

Lajara’s complaint said that while he was principal of Stetson, federal funds were misused, including to pay off Aspira’s debt on other properties. Aspira has five charter schools.

 

He said the U.S. Department of Education awarded Aspira a grant totaling nearly $400,000 over two years for classroom furniture and technology at Stetson. Aspira said it would use $230,000 to buy four mobile laptop labs in 2010-11 and nine the next year..

 

Lajara said that no laptops were purchased while he was principal and that the only computers at Stetson were donated refurbished ones.

 

Nothing to see here. Move on.

Will Bunch,  a journalist in Philadelphia, foresees disaster for his city’s public schools, which have been under siege by privatizers for a decade and are barely scraping by.

 

http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/attytood/Trumps-new-ed-chief-is-a-disaster-for-Philly.html?mobi=true

 

“Betsy DeVos, the right-wing billionaire school choice advocate tapped today by President-elect Donald Trump to run the U.S. Education Department, is definitely good at some things. Arguably, she’s displayed great skill in practicing the dark arts of big-money politics, using her family’s vast Amway forture to woo state legislatures through lobbying and obscure political-action committees and impose a vast empire of charter schools from Michigan to Louisiana.

 

“Her biggest failure, though, is a pretty huge one: Failing to do a damn thing to educate America’s children, especially in the nation’s poorest zip codes.

 

“Take a look at Detroit — Ground Zero for education reform in DeVos’ home state of Michigan, where the heiress has pumped millions into the political system to boost what advocates call “school choice.” The result is a broken urban school system where charter-school privateers have made big profits — aided by the failure of an charter oversight bill that the DeVos family spent $1.45 million to fight — and low student achievement has been locked in. Federal auditors discovered last year that an “unreasonably high” number of charters were among Michigan’s worst 5 percent of schools.
“Now. as Trump’s pick for Education Secretary, DeVos — with no governmental experience unless you count running the Michigan Republican Party — will be in a position to push her unregulated brand of the charter-school grift with the full force of the federal government. And public school advocates in Philadelphia are horrified.”

 

Read on.

 

Be sure to watch this excerpt from Backpack Full of Cash, narrated by Matt Damon.

It is a powerful presentation about the corporate reform movement and the damage it has done in one of America’s greatest cities: Philadelphia, where public schools starve while charter schools are awash in cash.