Archives for category: Massachusetts

EduShyster here tells the heartwarming story of how DFER tried to elect one of their own in Boston (white, privileged, no experience or knowledge of public schools necessary) and lost.

If you recall, the California Democratic Party called out DFER as a front for Republican and corporate interests.

Here are the key paragraphs of the resolution:

“Whereas, the political action committee, entitled Democrats for Education Reform is funded by corporations, Republican operatives and wealthy individuals dedicated to privatization and anti-educator initiatives, and not grassroots democrats or classroom educators; and

“Whereas, the billionaires funding Students First and Democrats for Education Reform are supporting candidates and local programs that would dismantle a free public education for every student in California and replace it with company run charter schools, non-credentialed teachers and unproven untested so-called “reforms”;

“THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the California Democratic Party reaffirms its commitment to free accessible public schools for all which offer a fair, substantive opportunity to learn with educators who have the right to be represented by their union, bargain collectively and have a voice in the policies which affect their schools, classrooms and their students…”

Beware, this might be a hoax.

I hope it is true.

If it is true, please share at once with your legislators. Send it to Arne Duncan. Share it with corporate leaders.

A principal of an elementary school in Massachusetts fired the security guards and expanded the school’s arts programs. Everyone and everything got better.

Call Ripley. Tell “Believe It or Not.”

This comment was posted by a teacher in Boston who couldn’t tolerate what was happening to her school, her students, her profession.

She writes:

“Dear Dr. Ravitch,

I am a newly-resigned, 15-year veteran in the Boston Public Schools.

I had to get out; I spent years obsessing over the internet trying to make sense of what was happening & why I was continuing to let it. All my research did was leave me feeling more confused, & thinking I could spend forever trying to make sense of nonsense.

On 4/1 I resigned.

On 4/5 I was testifying before the Joint Committee on Education in support of some MCAS bills. I hope my testimony was powerful.

On 5/7 I plan to do the same; this time it’ll be on charter schools.

I plan to testify at as many hearings as possible until it makes a difference.

I’ve reached out to the directors at Citizens for Public Schools (Massachusetts’s advocacy group) & am very much looking forward to working with them in any capacity that they need.

I’ve already grown impatient with how time-consuming the whole legislative process is; what’s happening within our schools is a CRISIS, & each passing day brings new evidence supporting that claim. There’s NO QUESTION high-stakes tests are BAD; teaching to the test is BAD; businessmen making decisions about non-business related matters, especially when children are involved, are BAD. & we hope someday legislation makes things GOOD again, but the legislative process isn’t exactly efficient, so in the meantime…what? We just continue along as expected, regardless of the damage?

I resigned from the BPS because I couldn’t justify doing what I was doing each day by complying with malevolent mandates and stupid sanctions while knowing the harm it would cause. This was NOT what I was put on this earth to be doing; this was HARMING children, including my OWN!

I could never explain to myself WHY I was continuing to do it; all I knew was that as long as i was in the BPS, I’d be doing it. Refusing to comply all by myself wouldn’t be effective, & I longed to sleep at night again, so I left. I am the single mother to a 6, 7, & 8 year old boy, & I left my only source of income behind when I did. THAT’S how bad things are.

Today my priority is doing whatever i can to help undo this corporate takeover and get the schools back on track. But again, the legislative process is a slow one, & the harm’s been already overwhelming & substantial enough. I believe drastic measures are in order, at this point. & I believe it has to come from within the schools…the teachers are the only real ones who have any say in what is going on in the classrooms, so why aren’t they uniting to do something about it? In MA, at least, it’s starting to already feel too late…

There is not a teacher in America who SUPPORTS this corporate reform. Individually, we all vehemently oppose it; our blood boils because of it; we know it’s toxic. Collectively, however, we DO support it. We support it each & every day, no matter how it contradicts our entire pedagogy. No matter how much it sucks to live life like that…going against the core of who we are, we obey the rules. WHY? WHY ARE WE CONTINUING TO BE EVER-SO-OBEDIENT?

I spent over 2 years desperately seeking that answer to that very question; only to become more & more unable to – & that’s why i resigned.

& one of the many intense emotions that came with making that decision was Anger. Anger towards the teachers for making this happen. Anger towards myself as a teacher for making it happen.
I believe if the teachers come together & have some conversation, change will happen. The faster we do that, & the more teachers we reach out to include, the faster the change will come.

Someone just needs to gather up all the teachers now. I would; I feel like I’ve been only thinking about doing so all month. I just don’t know how. So I decided to reach out here, thinking you could help.

I may live in fantasyland to some degree, & I’ve realized this past month how shamefully little I knew of the policy & procedure & logistics of “this” side of Ed Reform – the external side. & I don’t know realistically what the teachers could even do or how it’d work, but I feel like a conversation needs to happen. & I also think the best way to start the conversation would be to ask every teacher to answer the following question:

“Why do you continue to comply with malevolent mandates & stupid sanctions that you KNOW only serve to HARM your students, your schools, your VOCATIONS?”

& for those who, like me on 4/1, respond with, “I don’t know”, the follow-up question is, then,
“Why do you continue to do it, then?”

It was asking that of myself that made me realize, I can’t.
& the only way I knew how to stop was to walk away.

But what happens when each teacher refuses to comply anymore IN SOLIDARITY with one another?

The answer, it seems, is obvious.

So why haven’t we done that yet?

How bad does it really have to get before we do???

At the beginning of March, I came across this quote from Rethinking Schools,

“At the most basic level, national corporate school reform
agenda REQUIRES teacher’s compliance. Regardless of
individual motives, when a group of teachers COLLECTIVELY
& publicly says NO, that represents a fundamental challenge
to those pursuing that elite agenda.”

The logic behind that assertion is indisputable. That statement is obvious.

So what are we waiting for??”

Have you heard about the latest miracle school? Have you heard about the school that graduate all students regardless of zip codes? Want to learn more about their success?

EduShyster explains it here.

EduShyster here shares a video of a teacher who thought she had found her dream job teaching performing arts in a charter school in Massachusetts. But then she learned what mattered most: testing.

What is an “eduttante”?

Here is EduShyster’s definition:

“Eduttante: /ˌedjuˈtänt/
A shill or paid spokesperson advocating strict no-excuses charters for the urban communities in which he or she does not live. Related terms: educolonialist, whiteousness.”

The eduttante raves about the virtues of a strict, military-style school for “other people’s children.”

He or she would never send one’s own child to such a rigid, punitive school.

EduShyster points out that the leading advocate of lifting the cap on charters sends his own child to a private school where there is no standardized testing.

Be sure to read the comment at the end of her post.

 

PS: Thanks to readers for pointing out that (once again) I forgot the link. Thanks to Jeff Bryant for supplying it.

Nearly 150 professors at universities in Massachusetts issued a statement in opposition to high-stakes testing.

As the national movement against the misuse and abuse of standardized tests grows, the mainstream media is starting to take note and report on it.

More than 800 school boards in Texas; prominent superintendents like Joshua Starr and Heath Morrison; teachers at Garfield High in Seattle; students in Portland, Oregon, and Providence, RI.

Every day, the reaction against high-stakes testing gets stronger and louder.

State Senator Barry Finegold has thrown in his lot with the powerful charter school industry.

Some charters get high test scores; some get low test scores.

Some skim off the best students in the poorest communities. Some have few or no disabled students, and few or no ELLs.

What is Senator Finegold doing to support public education, where 90% of the children are enrolled? Does he know that the public schools in Massachusetts will have a disproportionate number of the children with the greatest needs as charters proliferate?

Knowing that Massachusetts is the #1 state in the nation on NAEP, why mess with success?

Please, Senator Finegold, explain your logic. Are you following the ALEC playbook and you don’t know it?

EduShyster continues to set the gold standard for reformy humor.

In this post, she describes the annual campaign by charter operators in Massachusetts to pressure the state legislature to lift the cap so they can open more charter schools.

She notes that the students most involved in demanding more charter schools are already enrolled in one. She notes that they are bused to hearings and miss school to demand more charters.

This happens often in New York City. When there are hearings about school closings, there are usually bus loads of charter students and parents in identical tee-shirts, demanding more closings of public schools and more charters.

When I first saw this, I was puzzled. Why would they want more charters if they already attend one? How many schools can one student attend? Would a public school principal be allowed to hire buses to take students to a public hearing? Or to do it during school hours? Of course not. He or she would be fired.

Hari Sevugan, the ex-Obama spokesman and ex-StudentsFirst spokesman, has twice commented on this blog in defense of charters and high-stakes testing. In his comments yesterday, he pointed to Florida as a model of excellence, while putting down Massachusetts as not all that it claims to be. In my response, I compared Florida’s NAEP scores to those of Massachusetts. Massachusetts is consistently #1, while Florida ranks about average among the 50 states. I assume that Hari was promoting Glorida because Michelle Rhee ranked it at the top of her personal report card. It is certainly way ahead of Massachusetts in authorizing charter schools, for-profit charters, vouchers, high-stakes testing, and stripping teachers of tenure.

Today, I received a letter from a teacher in Nashville, who asked me to post the following questions to Hari. If he answers, I will post his reply.

“I am a teacher in Nashville Public Schools, who has been teaching for 14 years. I have to be honest that since I have been working on a Masters in Educational Leadership, current reform policies have been gaining my interest. I read Hari’s response on your message board, and I would like to ask him why he would slam Massachusetts’s NAEP results and in the same response hold TIMSS and PIRLS results for Florida as a progressing miracle.

“The same studies that he and the likes of him quote to put schools down and compare us to higher achieving nations are the same tests he uses to hold up academic progress for states that are using the current GERM model. I am fascinated with his spin and ability to turn the student achievement of a state rejecting (for the most part) GERM and yet in the same breath hold up a state that does not perform near Massachusetts as a model for reform.

“Please, have him explain his answer as to why bashing the progress of Massachusetts yet holding up Florida and Louisiana as the proof reform is working. In this country it is so hard to measure which reform is working due to all of the different reforms taking place. But, I do not believe Hari’s and StudentsFirst type of reform will give us sustainable results. So, this letter is really directed to Hari, I just don’t know how to get it to him.

“I hope all is well with you and the rest of your readers and please continue the good fight. The future of public education is relying on this conversation.”