Archives for category: Louisiana

A reader tells me that Mitt Romney will be speaking at the Press Club in Baton Rouge on Monday.

I hope that journalists in Louisiana are ready to ask him some tough questions.

Ask him if he approves of using taxpayer dollars to send children to religious schools.

Ask him if he approves of spending public money to send kids to schools that teach creationism, not evolution.

Ask him if he knows that New Orleans is the next to the lowest scoring district in the state.

Ask him if he knows that 79% of the charters in New Orleans were graded either with a D or an F by the state.

Ask him if he knows that online for-profit charter schools get terrible test scores, low graduation rates, and have a high dropout rate.

Ask him if he thinks that the funding for vouchers and charters and online schools and for-profit vendors should come right out of the minimum funding for public schools.

Ask him if he has any ideas about how to help public schools, where the vast majority of children are students, because Governor Jindal does not.

And while you are at it, ask him if he knows that the NAEP test scores in reading and math for American children are the highest in American history, for every group, white, black, Hispanic, and Asian.

And be sure to ask him what he plans to do to help reduce the high cost of college (his answer: nothing, other than to hand student loans over to private banks).

Have you ever wondered what would happen if a state offered vouchers to more than half its students?

The Louisiana Department of Education just learned the answer to that question. It made the offer to 450,000 students. Not quite 9,000 students applied to enroll in the voucher program that begins in September. That’s 2% of the eligibles.

That means that 98% of the 450,000 students who were eligible declined to apply.

Not exactly a stampede for the exits. No big rush to enroll in the little church schools that are supposedly better than the public schools that John White supervises.

The State Department of Education tried to spin it differently. At first, they said that 10,000 applied, which far exceeded their expectations. But it turned out that 1,000 of the applicants already had vouchers in New Orleans. As usual, they were playing the media for headlines.

To date, the nonpublic schools of the state have offered to enroll only 5,000 students, so some decisions will have to be made about how to handle the mismatch.

Meanwhile Commissioner White announced some loose regulations about enrollment and financial reporting that will apply to the voucher schools, but nothing about academic expectations. According to the story in the New Orleans Times-Picayune, the statewide voucher program is supposed to be modeled along the lines of a New Orleans pilot program that has been running since 2008, with varied results:

“As originally envisioned in legislation championed by Gov. Bobby Jindal, the statewide expansion of vouchers this year would have mirrored the pilot program that’s been up  and running in New Orleans since 2008. In the pilot, students on vouchers take the state’s LEAP exams, but, unlike charter schools, they don’t face any particular consequences for poor results. Test scores at the roughly two dozen private schools already in the program have varied widely.”

It is not clear whether the private and religious schools that accept public money will be required to meet academic standards set by the state, whether the voucher students will take the state tests, and whether there will be “any particular consequences for poor results.”

One of the prime movers of the “reform” movement in Louisiana, Leslie Jacobs, complained a year ago that the voucher schools in New Orleans were getting poor results. She called for performance standards for the voucher schools. But it doesn’t seem likely to happen on a state level. The governor and the commissioner don’t want to interfere in the private schools, other than to send money. They want to hold the public schools accountable to standards, but allow students leave for nonpublic schools with no standards or accountability.

It is also unclear whether the state will expect the voucher schools to teach modern science or will be content to see thousands of public school students taught Creationism.

Judge Tim Kelly turned down a request to block the implementation of Governor Bobby Jindal’s voucher plan.

The judge said that Commissioner John White and Commissioner of Administration both said in affidavits that an injection would blow a $3.4 billion deficit in the state budget. So the case will proceed as will the vouchers, charters, cyber charters and every other kind of raid on the minimum foundation funding for Louisiana public schools.

According to local sources, Judge Kelly just happens to be the spouse of the former Commissioner of Administration (Angele Davis) in the Jindal administration.

Lucky break for the Governor!

A blogger in Louisiana calls out State Rep. Valerie Hodges for expressing shock about the possibility that voucher funds might go to Islamic schools.

I have already done that in an earlier post and won’t do it again here.

I repost this commentary because it lists many of the Christian academies that will be getting vouchers from the state of Louisiana in September. It is a reminder that the state is sending children from schools with a low grade (a grade established by the state of Louisiana) to religious schools that have NO grade. Are they better schools than the schools the children are leaving? These are schools that teach a specific religious doctrine; many will not teach modern science or history.

These schools are free to teach whatever they want, but let’s be clear. The state of Louisiana is sending students to religious schools of unknown quality and taking the funding out of the minimum foundation budget for public schools. The state constitution says that public funds must be used to support public education. Education in religious schools is not public education.

Lest we forget, Governor Jindal’s regressive legislation was hailed by the conservative group called Chiefs for Change, which includes the state education commissioners of Rhode Island and Indiana.

We will learn in the months to come whether Louisiana has an independent judiciary.

Whenever vouchers have been put to a state referendum, they have lost. The American public does not want to cross the line that separates church and state. They want to protect both public schools and religious freedom.

Governor Jindal doesn’t understand that basic tenet of American education. He may end up destroying both in Louisiana.

A Louisiana legislator who voted for Governor Bobby Jindal’s “reform” legislation is shocked to learn that students will be able to take their state vouchers to Muslim schools. She voted for the voucher plan on the assumption that students could take them only to Christian schools. Now, she is worried. She had “no idea” that taxpayer dollars would go to non-Christian schools. She wanted to help children learn about the religion of the Founding Fathers.

Meanwhile, twenty school districts are suing to overturn the law, saying that it violates the state constitution. The state constitution says that “state funding for public education shall be equitably allocated to public school systems.” Of 125 schools that have been okayed to receive vouchers, 124 apparently are religious schools.

UPDATE: although the article says that 124 of the 125 voucher schools are faith-based, friends in Louisiana tell me that it is more likely 118 of the 125 that are religious schools.

When John White was appointed to run the Recovery School District in New Orleans, Secretary of Education Arne Duncan called him a “visionary school leader.”

Now John White is doing the bidding of a Tea Party governor and leading the most reactionary drive in the nation to dismantle public education; to take money away from the minimum foundation budget for public schools and give it to voucher schools and charter schools; to give public money to small religious schools that don’t teach evolution; to strip teachers of all protection of their academic freedom; to allow anyone to teach, without any credentials, in charter schools; to welcome for-profit vendors of education to take their slice out of the funding for public schools.

I wonder if Arne Duncan still considers him a “visionary leader”?

I wonder what Arne Duncan thinks of the Louisiana legislation. I wonder why he has not spoken out against any part of it. I wonder why he is silent when Tea Party governors like Chris Christie attack the teachers of their state and try to take away whatever rights they may have won over the years. I wonder if he agreed or disagreed with the Chiefs for Change–the rightwing state superintendents–when they saluted Louisiana’s regressive legislation to take money from public schools and hand it over to private sector interests.

I wonder why he never went to Madison, Wisconsin, to speak out for public sector workers there when it mattered. I wonder what he thinks of the emergency manager legislation in Michigan, where state-appointed emergency managers have closed down public education in two districts and handed it off to charter operators. I wonder what he thinks about the Boston Consulting Group’s plan in Memphis to increase the proportion of students in privately managed charters from 4% to 19%. I wonder what he thinks about the Boston Consulting Group’s plan to privatize up to 40% of Philadelphia’s schools. I wonder what he thinks about the rollback of collective bargaining rights in various states or the removal of job protections for teachers. I wonder what he thinks about ALEC’s coordinated plan to destroy public education. I wonder what he thinks of the emerging for-profit industry that is moving into K-12 education.

He has many opportunities to express his views about the escalation of the war against public education and the ongoing attacks on teachers and their unions.

Why is he silent?

Just wondering.

I received an email from an educator in New Orleans who read my post about the proposal by a management consultant to require low-performing charter schools to  post their grades on the wall and on their clothing. The informant said  that the proposal to the Algiers Charter Schools Association was not merely theoretical. It was already imposed at the McDonogh #32 charter school. He or she sent me two photographs: One showed the school’s letterhead, declaring it has a grade of F, the other showed a public banner with the school’s F grade and its goals for improvement boldly displayed.

I think most educators would consider this practice of public shaming to be a barbaric remnant of another century, not even the 20th century.

What next? Dunce caps for the children? Public dunking for the teachers? Enforced silence for all? No breakfast or lunch until the scores go up? Or will the educators–teachers and administrators–have the school grade tattooed on their foreheads?

To think this came from a management consultant firm. I wonder where they have been successful in the past. Which corporations have they “turned around” with their strategy of public humiliation? Or is it reserved only for educators and schools?

Apparently, humiliating students is not all that unusual. A New Orleans contact sent me this 2007 story about a charter school where students are handed a sign that says “YET,” meaning they have not yet met expectations; for three days, they must wear the sign around their neck, are not allowed to talk to other students and must eat lunch alone. Apparently, shaming works.

Is this something that white college graduates do to poor black children? I can’t imagine that these teachers were treated this way when they went to school. I would not tolerate these techniques for a minute if it were my children or grandchildren.

I have received a copy of this story from about 15 different people, all of whom live in Louisiana. The story tells about emails showing that John White, the commissioner of education in Louisiana, hatched a strategy to mislead the media and divert attention from the botched voucher program. After a local newspaper revealed that some of the schools accepting vouchers were little denominational schools that have neither facilities nor teachers, the commissioner had to find a way to change the story from his incompetence to something else.

I guess people send me the story thinking that I will be shocked by the idea of manipulating the media. But living in New York City, I can’t be shocked because we have a Department of Education that has done this sort of thing for the past ten years. They know how to play the press. They put out a blizzard of press releases boasting of their progress, their new programs, their slogans, their latest gimmick. If something goes wrong, they put out another blizzard of self-congratulatory releases. They “muddy the narrative,” as John White put it in one of his emails that were released. They change the conversation. The press falls for it.

This is old news to those of us who live in New York City. John White learned his tricks from the best.

UPDATE:

The Louisiana press is onto the game, thanks to the released emails. The Shreveport Times writes:

Now, we’re looking at legislators who were duped, an education superintendent who’s making it up as he goes along, and a governor who’s traveling the country nonstop running for vice president.

In all of this, we’re wondering — who is really concerned about our children?

Down in New Orleans, which corporate reformers treat as a model for the nation, there’s trouble.

One of the charter groups, called the Algiers Charter Schools Association, is in hot water with parents. Algiers has eight charters, enrolling over 5,000 students. It recently lost its CEO and hired an interim chief academic officer, Aamir Raza, from New York City to implement changes. Raza is a management consultant (not an educator, needless to say) who had worked for the New York City Department of Education charter office.

Algiers has this problem: Some of its charters are high-flying (a 93-97% pass rate on the state tests) and some do very poorly (a 7% pass rate on the same test). Critics in New Orleans attribute the disparity to a conscious policy by the Algiers leadership to use certain schools as “dumping grounds” for low-performing students so the others look like miracle schools.

Raza, who is on a 90-day contract at $16,000 a month, decided to shake things up. He fired the central office staff and announced his intention to move the principals from the high-performing schools to the low-performing schools. This caused a ruckus.

Parents were furious. They held meetings to express their rage; they did not want to lose their principal, and they were outraged by the lack of transparency of Raza’s decisions.

When the Algiers association held its board meeting, the parents turned out by the hundreds to express their anger. The president of the Algiers Neighborhood Presidents’ Council said, “”I am unfortunately going to advise you that in the opinion of all 16 neighborhood presidents, Mr. Raza exhibited the utmost lack of respect, extreme arrogance and uncompromising demeanor.” Of course, Raza was doing only what he saw school leaders in New York City do for the past ten years, that is, whatever they wanted.

But this time, for once, maybe for the first time ever in charter school history, the voices of the parents were heard. The board backed down. The board put a hold on Raza’s proposal.

Perhaps the most outrageous idea from Raza never got past the memo phase.

A leaked memo from Raza’s office revealed details of a plan to shame the administrators and teachers at one of the lowest performing schools. The head of the Algiers association told a reporter from the New Orleans Times-Picayune that this idea would not be implemented.

But here it is:

“The document, with a heading from Raza’s firm, the Raza Consulting Group, includes a list of suggested motivational methods, including “Order Eisenhower Charter School shirts for all teachers and administrators with Eisenhower Charter School on the back and Grade D on the front.”

“It is recommended that the principal wear the Grade D shirt every day as a reminder to the school staff after enrollment drive is over,” the document continues. “Declare Friday as dress down day only for those teachers and administrators who will wear the D grade shirt.”

Referring to the state-issued school performance scores based largely on standardized test scores, the Raza report also calls to, “Display the school’s current letter grade (as determined by SPS scores) in teacher lounge and all other areas of the school once the enrollment drive is over.”

And it says, “Place the Grade D in large font on top of each internal communication and memos to the school staff.”

Really, you can’t make this stuff up.

This confirms my belief that the corporate reform agenda is not 21st century thinking. It is actually 19th century thinking, taking us back to the days when children were told to wear a dunce cap and sit in the corner. Only now it is the teachers who will wear the dunce cap and a big letter D.

I wonder if Raza, whose group consults for business, has made similar proposals to major corporations to motivate their employees? Can you imagine a corporate headquarters where every employee is required to wear a D on his or her suit?

This parent in Louisiana noticed that the state insists that only trained professionals can trim his shrubs.

And only licensed florists can sell flowers to him.

But under Bobby Jindal, the children of Louisiana can be taught by anyone who wants to teach, even if they have less training than a shrub technician or a licensed florist.

And that’s why Louisiana is now an international joke.