Archives for category: Los Angeles

It has been three years since the passage of “parent trigger” legislation in California, and the law has produced nothing but strife among parents, teachers, and administrators. Corporate reformers backed by billionaires like to say that “kids can’t wait,” but the hostile “trigger” creates strife and the illusion of change, not better schools.

Good schools have a strong collaborative spirit among administrators, teachers, parents, and students. All work together towards a common goal of educating the children. Whatever strengthens the spirit of teamwork strengthens the school and builds its capacity.

The “parent trigger” by definition is a hostile act. It creates division and conflict. It sets parents against parents. It sets parents against teachers. It sets parents against administrators. It is a “trigger” and triggers kill.

In the latest “victory” for Parent Revolution, the organization that has received millions from the Walton, Gates, and Broad Foundations, the principal of Wiegand Elementary School in Los Angeles was ousted. Now parents are holding counter-demonstrations, and accusations are flying.

It is noteworthy that when Parent Revolution tried and failed to convert McKinley Elementary School in Compton, California, to a charter, the charter opened nearby, but few of the McKinley parents transferred their children to it. Parent Revolution’s only “success” thus far was in Adelanto, where they gathered enough signatures to convert Desert Trails Elementary to a charter; when parents tried to remove their signatures from the petition, saying they had been duped, a judge denied them the right to do so. One of the parent leaders in Adelanto is now an employee of Parent Revolution. Many of those who signed the petition no longer have children in the school.

The legislature should scrap this pernicious law. To begin with, public schools don’t belong to the parents of children now enrolled. They belong to the public, whose taxes built them and maintain them. Only duly elected and appointed officials should be empowered to privatize public property or to fire the school’s leader. The law as presently written is vigilante justice, which is seldom just. It allows Parent Revolution to sign parents up through deceitful tactics and force changes that cripple school communities. It is no accident that the “trigger” idea has been embraced by the reactionary group ALEC, which would like to eliminate public education altogether.

The Red Queen in LA offers a brief tutorial on the meaning of the astonishing electoral victory of Monica Ratliff—and before that, the remarkable upset win of Steve Zimmer.

Both ran against a barrage of out-of-state millions. Zimmer had the support of UTLA, Ratliff did not.

No one thought that either had a chance. Ratliff raised about $50,000 in small donations. Her opponent had millions.

Both won by the same 52-48 margin.

What does it mean?

It means the board has a majority that will rein in John Deasy. It may mean the board will slow down or stop the wildfire growth of unaccountable charters. It may mean a careful review of teacher evaluation methods.

It certainly means that the board will slow down the rush to privatize public education in LA.

That’s great news.

This comment came from a member of UTLA:

“I think we all can celebrate. that Monica Ratliff won that election. The efforts of many UTLA members helped in that effort, and may have played a major role in her election.

“It is interesting though, to look at the article at utla.net about Monica’s victory–http://www.utla.net/ratliff

“Here is a quote in it from UTLA president Warren Fletcher:

“We are overjoyed that a working classroom teacher will be part of the School Board,” UTLA President Warren Fletcher said. “She has on-the-ground knowledge of the harmful policies and destructive mismanagement that have hurt our schools, and she will bring a perspective that is sorely needed.”

“I totally agree with everything he said above. But I have to wonder about that robocall from Fletcher we received on Monday, that spoke of “two fine candidates” for that school board election, implying that there was no difference between the two, and that both were equally good, when the facts were exactly the opposite.

“I also have to wonder about both Fletcher and UTLA Secretary David Lyell attending the David Sanchez (Ratliff’s opponent) “victory” party Tuesday night. https://twitter.com/LASchoolReport/status/337061961772716032

“I also have to wonder about a union president (Fletcher) who when appealed to personally by Diane Ravitch to fully support Monica Ratliff, never responded to her e-mail, and continued an absolutely ridiculous policy of “dual endorsement”.

“Another quote from that article:

“Monica Ratliff’s win continues a solid streak of success for UTLA-endorsed candidates.”

“What gall for UTLA leadership to take credit for the Ratliff win! (Many UTLA members deserve credit for helping Ratliff to win, but certainly not UTLA leadership, not one iota.) Do they so underestimate the intelligence of UTLA members, that they “endorse” both candidates in a two-way race so that they can claim “victory” no matter which of the two wins against the other? (I am sure they would also be claiming “victory” if Sanchez had won, although that would have been a great loss for the teachers and students of this school district..)

“Although most UTLA members are like myself, very happy with the Ratliff win, I don’t think we should therefore excuse the inexcusable behavior of UTLA leadership in this race. I think there should be an independent investigation of this, leading to a possible impeachment, recall, or vote of no confidence in some or all of current UTLA officers.

“I think their actions in this race were cowardly, dishonest, corrupt, and irresponsible.”

Howard Blume has a terrific article
explaining how Monica Ratliff beat Antonio Sanchez and his multi-million $$$ campaign fund.

Sanchez had millions of dollars, a large staff, the endorsement of the LA Democratic Party (thanks, Mayor Villarigosa), and major labor unions.

Monica raised $52,000, had no paid staff, and taught her class every day. She never told her students that she was running for office.

Howard neglected to mention the contributions that came to Monica from teachers across America–in denominations of $10, $25, $50, and the endorsement by the Network for Public Education.

Monica Ratliff won by the same margin of victory as Steve Zimmer, 52-48.

Zimmer had the full support of the UTLA.

Ratliff did not.

UTLA gave her a contribution of $1,000, but endorsed both candidates.

On election night, UTLA leaders were seen at Sanchez headquarters.

What gives?

How do you spell “egg on your face?”

Monica Ratliff just emailed to thank all of us for our help. She was rushing off to teach her fifth grade class. She never stopped teaching while running for office.

Dear friends, your contributions made a difference. Together we will turn the tide and restore American education to focus on children and learning and collaboration, not data and profits and budget cuts.

Thank you, Monica, for the lessons you taught us all: people matter more than money. Experience and knowledge count. Courage in the face of overwhelming odds is essential. Teaching is an honorable profession, and teachers must be heard and involved in decisions about schooling.

For your courage and Integrity, I add you to our honor roll as a champion of American education. And a Giant Slayer.

Monica Ratliff won a historic upset in Los Angeles!

She won with 52% of the vote!

She had less than $50,000 in small contributions.

Her opponent Antonio Sanchez had the support of billionaire Eli Broad, billionaire Michael Bloomberg, and organized labor groups.

People power beat money power!!!

I am holding my breath. In the early returns in the Los Angeles school board race, underdog Monica Ratliff is slightly ahead of Antonio Sanchez.

With only one-quarter of the precincts reporting, Monica had about 51% of the vote to Sanchez’ 49%. This could easily go the other way.

Monica is a teacher. Sanchez is launching his political career.

Monica raised about $42,000. Sanchez collected about $3 million from the usual gang of billionaires and millionaires who want more charter schools and test-based teacher evaluations.

UTLA endorsed both candidates, which means it stayed neutral (to their shame).

If Monica’s lead holds, it would be the biggest upset of the year.

I am holding my breath.

UPDATE: with 42% of the precincts counted, midnight in LA:

LA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
District 6 23,046
Monica Ratliff 11,859 51.46%
Antonio Sanchez 11,187 48.54%

UPDATE:

With 30,000 votes counted, Monica retains her slim lead with 51.58% of the vote.

The run-off for Los Angeles school board is Tuesday May 21.

As Howard Blume’s excellent overview in the Los Angeles Times shows, Monica Ratliff is clearly the better candidate. She is an experienced teacher who understands the needs of children and the schools.

She has raised $42,000.

Her opponent has great political contacts. He worked for Mayor Villaraigosa. His qualifications to sit on the city school board are nil, although it is true that he was once a student.

He has raised, with the help of the Mayor, more than $3 million.

Will money decide the election?

The choice is clear.

If you live in their district, please take the time to vote for Monica.

For reasons I don’t understand, the UTLA endorsed both Monica Ratliff, a teacher, and her opponent Antonio Sanchez. Sanchez has almost $4 million from the billionaires. Monica has raised $42,000.

A music teacher in Los Angeles wrote this appeal;

Dear Teachers,

 

I am sending this to a few LAUSD teacher e-mail addresses that I have. I do not have many, so please forward to others.

 

There is a totally crucial school board race on this Tuesday’s ballot, in LAUSD district 6, between Teacher Monica Ratliff, and lawyer-wannabe politician Antonio Sanchez.

 

You probably have heard that UTLA is endorsing both candidates, which is effectively the same as neutrality, endorsing neither. They are totally wrong in doing so, which I think at least some of UTLA leadership realizes, but they say that they cannot change their endorsement now, due to UTLA rules.

 

It is totally crucial that Monica Ratliff win that race, although she is being outspent 100 to 1 by her opponent. If you live in District 6, make sure to vote for her, and let your neighbors know about the race. No matter where you live, you can help by volunteering in her campaign in these last couple days, or at least make a donation.  Please keep reading for more information.

 

Monica Ratliff is an excellent experienced 5th grade teacher in LAUSD, with many good ideas about education. She is a UTLA member, and was elected delegate to the UTLA House of Representatives. She is endorsed by Diane Ravitch, current LAUSD board members Bennett Kayser and Marguerite LaMotte, former board member David Tokofsky, both the LA Times and LA Daily News, AALA, and others.

 

Her opponent, Antonio Sanchez, a lawyer and former aide to Mayor Villaraigosa, with no experience in education (but who seems to want to launch a political career via the LAUSD school board), is being heavily funded, hundreds of thousands of dollars worth, by the worst foes of teachers—Michelle Rhee, Eli Broad, Bill Gates, Michael Bloomberg, Rupert Murdoch, the Walton family, etc. (You can bet that these donors have a reason for putting so much money into Sanchez, and expect something in return from their bought candidate. If Sanchez wins, he is likely to be the most reliable ally on the board of John Deasy and Monica Garcia.) (This is really a crucial race, and it is tragic that UTLA is not putting its full weight behind Ratliff.)

 

Below this e-mail is one from Brent Smiley, an unofficial UTLA organizer for the Monica Ratliff campaign, with information  on how you can help in her campaign. (I think Smiley may have once been chairman of PACE.)

 

Before the Smiley e-mail, I will include some links that I would suggest you read, related to this race:

 

Monica Ratliff is fully endorsed by the new PAC of Diane Ravitch, “Network for Public Education” , as their first endorsement. (Please read about that endorsement here.) (I would suggest too, you join and contribute to Diane Ravitch’s PAC, to help fight off the big money poured into the coffers of anti-teacher candidates from the likes of Bloomberg, Gates, Broad, etc.)

 

Please read this article about a $350,000 donation to Sanchez from Bloomberg, via Villaraigosa’s school PAC.) (In case anyone reading cannot access that article in the LA Times, I will paste the article at the bottom of this e-mail, after the Smiley e-mail.)

 

Please read A post by Monica Ratliff to Diane Ravitch’s blog, prefaced by Diane Ravitch.

 

An appeal by Diane Ravitch to UTLA

 

Tweets by David Tokofsky, former LAUSD board member.

 

Monica Ratliff campaign web site

 

Daily Kos

 

LA Daily News Endorsement

 

LA Times Endorsement

 

Please do all you can to help elect Monica Ratliff to the LAUSD School Board this Tuesday. Please share this information with others who did not get it.

 

See the Brent Smiley e-mail directly below. (The first LA Times article linked to aboveappears below that.)

 

Have a nice weekend,

Mike

 

 

 


 

 

From: laeducators@yahoogroups.com [mailto:laeducators@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Brent Smiley
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 6:02 PM
To: laeducators@yahoogroups.com; peac_group@googlegroups.com; LASUBS@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [laeducators] MONICA RATLIFF GOTV

 

 

 

Friends!

 

This weekend is the LAST weekend before the election and it is imperative that we hit the streets to Get Out The Vote!

 

Monica Ratliff is a 5th grade classroom teacher at San Pedro Elementary who graduatedColumbia University and Columbia Law.  When Law wasn’t enough to satisfy the hunger to help, she turned to education and graduated from UCLA to take her role in the ranks of classroom teachers.

 

For the past decade she has been in the classroom, dealing with the same issues each of us face, every single day. 

 

How are we supposed to get these kids what they need to succeed? 

 

That question keeps us up at night, we think about how we would change things if we could.  Well, we can.

 

This is Monica Ratliff’s perspective, the classroom,  and right now we have an opportunity to elect her to the LAUSD School Board. 

 

This campaign is for real, despite being outspent over 100 to 1, they forced a runoff.  Teams in the field are being met almost universally with receptive audiences.  They have committed to vote for Monica but need to be reminded to vote. 

 

That will not happen with just good tidings and cheer.

 

HELP

 

Your time or your dime.

 

We need you desperately right now.  This election will be decided by a couple of hundred votes and people are voting right now. 

A teacher, Right Now, at the doorstep or on the phone will swing that vote almost 100% of the time.

 

Come be that teacher!  Come make some phone calls or join us for a friendly precinct walk as we remind voters to vote for Monica Ratliff. 

Time to Get Out The Vote.

 

 

This campaign is like no other in recent memory, it has been positive, uplifting, a message of hope and change,

of the ability of a fifth grade classroom teacher from an inner-city school to share a vision about what a real classroom looks like.

 

GOTV

 

We will meet on Lindley just north of Victory on Saturday at 10am.  This is Reseda High School.  Or if you can’t make it this Saturday, how about Sunday.  Same place, same time.  Or if you can’t do that, how about phone banking with Sean Abajian on Thursday (see below).  Or, if you can’t make it this week, can you make a donation to the campaign? https://monicaratliff2013.nationbuilder.com/donate  Any amount helps.

 

This campaign can succeed if the teachers that this message is reaching will take just a moment to help. 

Help comes in many forms, but on the School Board help comes with Four Votes.

 

Please help today.

 

Brent Smiley

Teacher

Lawrence Middle School

 

 

 

See LA Times article about Bloomberg contribution to Sanchez below………

 

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-school-board-money-20130425,0,6967603.story   

 

 

 

Michael Bloomberg donates $350,000 toL.A. school board race

The New York City mayor’s contribution to a political action committee led by L.A. Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa will benefit board candidate Antonio Sanchez.

By Howard Blume, Los Angeles Times

April 24, 2013, 10:30 p.m.

New York City Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg donated $350,000 to the Los Angeles school board campaign this week, records show.

Bloomberg’s contribution, which was filed Tuesday, will enlarge the already sizable war chest of the Coalition for School Reform, a political action committee led by Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa. The goal of the coalition is to back candidates who will support the policies of L.A. schools Supt. John Deasy and pledge to keep him on the job.

Before the March primary, Bloomberg contributed $1 million for the three board races — the largest contribution ever made in an L.A. school board campaign. Bloomberg also gave a sizable donation of an undisclosed amount to the advocacy arm for the California Charter Schools Assn. That group spent close to $400,000 to support candidates in the election.

The beneficiary of the latest donation is Antonio Sanchez, 31, a former Villaraigosa aide. He is facing teacher and former attorney Monica Ratliff, 42, in a May 21 runoff to represent the east San Fernando Valley on the Board of Education.

The March primary yielded mixed results for the coalition, which spent about $3.8 million. One of its endorsed candidates won and another lost. In the loss, the coalition tried unsuccessfully to defeat incumbent Steve Zimmer, who was backed by employees’ unions. Zimmer, a frequent swing vote, said he has not targeted Deasy for dismissal, and it’s not clear that Deasy’s job is on the line in the contest over the remaining seat.

But Deasy’s supporters are taking no chances. Even before Bloomberg’s latest donation, the coalition had put together more than $600,000 for the second round of a campaign on Sanchez’s behalf. This total included $250,000 from local philanthropist Eli Broad, who had already donated $250,000 for the first round. And StudentsFirst, the Sacramento-based advocacy group headed by former District of Columbia schools Chancellor Michelle Rhee, gave $100,000 — after an earlier contribution of $250,000.

In the primary, money spent by or for Sanchez outpaced Ratliff’s spending by a ratio of about 84 to 1.

So far, Ratliff has reported raising $7,297 for the runoff. Sanchez has reported raising $14,880.

United Teachers Los Angeles endorsed all the candidates in the race but did not provide any financial backing in the primary. For the runoff, the union gave $1,000 to Ratliff.

howard.blume@latimes.com

 

 

Click here for the endorsement of Monica Ratliff by Diane Ravitch’s new PAC.