Archives for category: International

I wrote earlier that the governor of Maine was angry about the rejection of four of five charter applications by the state authorizing committee. He said he wished they would just “go away.” Two of those rejected charters were for-profit online corporations that have hired well-connected lobbyists, their usual method of operation. A third was a Gulen charter, here described by Sharon Higgins, who runs a website called “Charter School Scandals” and follows the expansion of the Gulen network.

Sharon writes:

“One of the rejected schools, Queen City Academy Charter School, was a Gulen charter school. It did not take long after Maine established its charter school law for Gulenists to try to open one of their charter schools.

Click to access QueenCityAcademyCharterSchool.pdf

The Gulen movement advanced their US activities into Maine last year. They hosted their first state capitol event for politicians last spring and have already taken at least one group of Maine lawmakers (plus spouses) to Turkey for their standard dog and pony show — a complementary trip that delivers a sustained dose of biased information delivery, concentrated lobbying, and constant ingratiation mixed with sightseeing and periodic visits to Gulenist institutions.
http://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/index.php?topic=Portal+News&id=368790&v=article2011
http://tinyurl.com/anw59r9

The lead applicant for the QCA charter school was also the outreach coordinator for the organization that sponsored the capitol event and who met with Governor LePage last spring. Other QCA founders have been involved with a Gulen charter school in Massachusetts for the past six years. There are lots and lots of the usual Gulen movement “web of organization” connections.

Very, very heavy marketing on behalf of Turkey and Turkish culture has been taking place all across the US for the past 13 years or so (including at the Gulen charter schools). It is definitely not by happenstance and is not being done by just any group, nor by any random assortment of Turkish people. It is the coordinated work of individuals who are Fethullah Gulen “inspired.”
http://turkishinvitations.weebly.com/gulenist-non-profits.html

Members of the Gulen movement are heavily involved with trying to help advance Fethullah Gulen’s vision of Turkey becoming a powerful global figure once again. One of Lesley Stahl’s interview subjects in her 60 Minutes report — and the only Gulen movement observer/critic in Turkey who wasn’t too afraid to be interviewed — assessed this group as a personality cult.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18560_162-57433131/u.s-charter-schools-tied-to-powerful-turkish-imam/?tag=contentMain;cbsCarousel

Whichever way the Gulen movement should be most accurately classified, at the very least it is a group which is widely acknowledged to be secretive as well as extremely controversial in Turkey. Oh yeah, and it is operating the largest network of charter schools in the United States with taxpayers’ money (over $400M/year at this point). If efforts in Maine and Virginia are eventually successful, two more states will be added to the 26 where Gulen charter schools are operating. Hizmet (how members refer to themselves) constantly talks about the importance of “dialogue” but it will NOT engage in a frank one with the American public. A broader exposure, full recognition, and a solid grasp of this situation, along with a heightened level of discussion and analysis, is needed asap!”

The Daily Howler is a tough marker.

He reports on how the media reports on events.

He was not happy with the PBS show about Rhee.

He thought it was dated and failed to ask important questions.

By the way, if you haven’t seen The Daily Howler reports on how the media fumbled the latest international test scores, you should. See here. And here. And here.

There is a connection. Rhee loves to carry on about how horrible American schools are, how dreadful our teachers are, how far down we are in international tests. But if you read the links above, you will learn that our scores on international tests are not so bad. StudentsFirst will have to rewrite a lot of its documents, maybe even retire that insulting video where SF showed a US athlete in the Olympics who pranced around and stumbled pathetically, a man doing a female-only sport. When I recall that awful commercial (shown on national television), it makes my blood boil. What is it with this woman? Why does she want to humiliate the U.S. in the eyes of the world? Why does she have such contempt for our teachers, our schools, and our students?

 

Pasi Sahlberg of Finland (author of Finnish Lessons) refers to the obsession with testing, accountability and choice as the Global Educational Reform Movement or GERM. Finland has thus far managed to avoid catching the GERM and places its bets on teacher professionalism, a strong safety net for children, and child-centered education.

Eduardo Andere of Mexico has studied world systems of education. He here describes how Mexico has fallen for GERM:

Here in Mexico we are going frantic into this frenetic world testing. A new National Constitutional amendment is on its way to create a National testing and assessment agency with unlimited power for assessment and education policy. All federal and state governmental agencies will have to follow the guidelines issued by this new-to-be-agency. And a new teaching professional civil service, will be set up to assess teachers under standardized tests for entering into teaching or rewarding their performance, based mainly on their pupils’ tests results. And the problem here, with a very centralized education and very powerful oriented political system, what one person thinks is what all people do.

If you are bad, we are worse. This is why we have consistently performed at the bottom among all OECD’s PISA contesters; compared to Finland that has consistently played at the top. Finland and Mexico are the two opposites. The study of both make extraordinary lessons for all in a shocking contrasting way! But our policy makers are so influenced by the US federal policy makers and the OECD’s policy transmitters, that there is no way that we from the academia, or the more scientific means of looking at things, can teach them otherwise. They of course are joined by influential and “successful” businesspeople, who think that schools can be run the same way as car or gadget factories.

Students are not gadgets. And teachers are not robots. 

This request was posted. Please feel welcome to post your comments and help our friends in Spain.

Dear Mrs. Ravitch,

My name is Amadeu Sanz and I am the publishing coordinator of STEPV, a union of teachers in Valencia (Spain).

In Spain, just as in the US, there’s a heated debate on the results of public schools in international assessment tests such as PISA, and our Minister of Education (José Ignacio Wert) wants to impose a reform of the educational system that advocates the de-regulation of the system to favor complete freedom of school choice and the introduction of the principles of accountability and competition among all kinds of schools (public, private and charter ones). this reform hasn’t been passed in our parliament yet, but we fear that the absolute majority that the party in government has will approve of it, even though there is a wide refusal towards it in all spheres of education (teachers and students unions, parents’ associations, prominent scholars…).

In addition to this, the economic and debt crisis in this country is a perfect excuse to significantly cut education budgets, fire teachers, reduce their salaries and increase the ratio of students per classroom.

The situation is becoming really awful, to the extent that we consider this reform and these cuts the biggest attack against the public school system that has been developed after the death of Franco and the transition to democracy in Spain.
As a response to this situation, STEPV, along with two other unions –STEi, from the Balearic Islands, and USTEC, from Catalonia, with whom we share the same language, Catalan- are developing an opposition campaign to the reform designed by our minister.

In order to enrich our arguments and proposals, we are planning to publish a critical analysis of the reform and we want to illustrate how similar proposals to these from minister Wert have worked out in other countries, being yours a very valuable example.

Because many ideas come from the U.S. and because we’re absolute fans of some of your books and videos, we would be really pleased if you would like to contribute to our critical analysis issue by writing an article about the effects of school choice and accountability on education.

Best regards,

Amadeu Sanz

Here is a website in Australia that keeps watch on the damage done to Australian education by bad ideas imported from the USA.

The question is why Australia–which ranks above the US on those international tests–should be copying the methods of the US.

The Treehorn Express
Treehorn is the hero of an easy-to-read, sad children’s book, “The Shrinking of Treehorn” by Florence Heidi Parry. She cleverly exposes adults’ couldn’t-care-less attitude towards the needs of children, even when the circumstances of mal-treatment of children are patently obvious…vomiting, sleeplessness, crying etc. Treehorn found that parents, teachers and principals only pretend to care. What do you think? Were his experiences typical of our attitude to children?
naplanhasfailednaplanhasfailednaplanhasfailednaplanhasfailednaplanhasfailednaplanhasfailed
NASA called a meeting at Cape Canaveral of plumbers, footballers, band leaders and lawyers, as you do when you want advice on the best way to send a rocket to Mars. At the same time, a meeting of measurers, IT experts, testucators and politicians met in Canberra on the best way to get better scores on NAPLAN tests.
naplaniscruelnaplaniscruelnaplaniscruelnaplaniscruelnaplaniscruelnaplaniscruelnaplaniscruelnaplaniscruelnaplaniscruel
The Methodology of Mediocrity
In the sequacious pursuit of fear-based kleinism and zombic functionalism, there is a quixotic determination amongst Australian politicians, measurers and testucators to establish and maintain a test-based school culture at any cost. It’s so true. These discrete, identifiable groups seem to believe that the more you test children and frighten them with the consequences of failure, the more that school children will want to learn …. better and harder. These control freaks spend millions to make sure that the stakeholders in learning – teachers, pupils and parents in particular – will do as they are told. They take advantage of the present era of a fading democracy, of the support and controlled silence of the brotherhood of media interests and of the ease with which good people can be ‘milgramed’ to perform deeds that are quite contrary to their basic beliefs and ethics. At this point in time, these ‘buz baz’ showmen are confident that they have manufactured sufficient consent for their mission to succeed, so they are prepared to spend an enormous amount of tax-payers’ dollars to stream-line the process on-line.
The ultimate mission is to make sure that measurers, on behalf of the test publishing industry, eventually flood schools with test-coping equipment, ipads and high-tech test-preparation programs as well as test-oriented curriculum programs. There is no sincere learning base to the mission. There is no compassion for the feelings of children nor any effort to encourage and extend the basic love of learning.
These Australian schadenfreudes gathered in early December, 2012 to ignore serious research, to flee from the advice from international authorities where achievement is enjoyed, celebrated and applauded, as they continue their cruel assault on the enjoyment of learning. They support the maintenance of mediocrity because they don’t know any better; and they prefer not to deal with issues of LEARNING. Measurement pundits’ backgrounds are so limited that they advocate that fundamentals of literacy and numeracy have to be parroted and practised before any form of learnacy can be undertaken.
They know, all too well, that most school children suffer from some forms of High-stakes Naplan Testing Disorder [HSNTD]. Manifest in every home of a Year 3,5,7,9 pupil and in every school during the April-May period each year, the condition is widely known and is deliberately Treehorned by these test-freaks. They just don’t care. One has to wonder about them.
Let’s take a few examples of how public ignorance is maintained and how they control proffered cognitive, expert teacher advice in their pursuit of mediocrity’s one-size-fits-all credo…..
1. The impact of NAPLAN on the wellbeing of students and their families was researched by the University of Melbourne and published by the Whitlam Institute at the University of Western Sydney http://www.whitlam.org/the_program/high_stakes_testing in November, 2012.
8353 teacher stake-holders who operate at the sharp end of the testing program reveal that NAPLAN testing has resulted in [1] a narrowing of teaching strategies; [2] a narrowing of the curriculum; [3] damage to children’s health and well-being; [4] negative impact on staff morale and school reputations. In an open democracy, that’s sufficient evidence for a halt to be called. But…
On 30-11-12, a debate was conducted on Melbourne Radio about the limits of NAPLAN testing, during which the CEO of ACARA [Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority], expert measurer, Robert Randall was asked: “This study finds that children are sick, stressed and sleepless because of the tests. How concerned are you by that finding.”
Mr. Randall responded : “One answer I’m going to say, you know, we’re concerned about it. We welcome this report and others for us to have a look at, to get information so we take that information on in order to improve our program.
But equally we will challenge, if you like, the methodology and some of the information. [We know more than they do] ….it’s some students and in some circumstances and we need to work those things through, but we need to be careful that this is not a claim about the whole populous, the participation.”
MoM:- The floggings will continue until teacher morale improves. We testucators don’t like the way that teachers volunteer their observations.
2. Following an intensive survey of international research into high-stakes testing, Greg Thompson of Murdoch University obtained responses from 961 teachers from WA and SA. about their expert opinion of the effects of NAPLAN. It was published in October, 2012. http://effectsofnaplan.edu.au/wp-contents/uploads . The findings were “consistent with international research about the effects of high-stakes testing.”
The overwhelming concerns were obvious: [1] “High-stakes testing creates incentives for teachers to narrow the curriculum, adopt teacher-centred pedagogies and teach to the test. These strategies are detrimental to literacy and numeracy learning.” [2] “The majority of teachers do not see NAPLAN as improving literacy and numeracy.” [3] “Stress makes learning more difficuIt, not more likely. Trying to improve education outcomes through NAPLAN at the same time as it increases the stress of those involved, would appear to be a self-defeating strategy.” [4] “Only a minority of teachers perceive NAPLAN has had some positives.”
MoM:- Make sure that the word does not get out. Constituents might become alarmed about the effects. Make sure the press does not mention it. It didn’t say a word. The tactic worked.
3 There has been a “Big Increase in Students Withdrawn from NAPLAN Tests” according to Trevor Cobbold. His Research Paper of November, 2012 http://saveourschools.com.au demonstrates that “there has been a four-to-five-fold increase across Australia since 2008 in the percentage of children withdrawn from the numeracy tests.” “Certainly more and more parents are becoming aware that NAPLAN is not compulsory despite the efforts of education authorities to suggest they are mandatory.” and “…the rapid growth poses a threat to the reliability of NAPLAN results for inter-school comparisons, inter-jurisdictional comparison and trends of student achievement.”
MoM:- Again: “not a word to Bessie”. The press managed to protect its readership from information of this kind as it has done on other important issues during the year.
naplancausesstressnaplancausesstressnaplancausesstressnaplancausesstress
Remember? http:ed/treehornexpress.wordpress.com/2012/11/ of 3 Nov. lists in “The Zone of Silence” other instances such as the comments of especially important educator visitors to Australia like Jounni Vakijarvi and Pasi Sahlberg of Finland education; Professor Robin Alexander, chairman of most comprehensive report on primary education [6 years of collective integrated study] ever compiled – The Cambridge Report; Yong Zhao ex-China now U. of Oregon; Andy Hargreaves of Boston; Kishore Mahbubani of Singapore . None rated a mention. Not a single solitary word in the more prestigious media outlets.
Nor did the deliberations of the APPA-NZPF Conference on ‘Leading Learning’ get a mention. Nor did the announcement on 11 September that there would be a Senate Inquiry. Nor did….who knows?
The maintenance of high-stakes testing is deceitful. Until our undemocratic, testucating leaders concentrate on child learning – the loving [YES – LOVING] development of each child and its learning talents, no matter what they are – we are stuck forever on mediocrity. Present processes guarantee it.
There is little doubt that NAPLANISM just gets stupider and stupider. ACARA measurers, their political buddies and all those testucators, who are victims of the Milgram hypothesis, just have to ‘think children’, admit to a billion dollar mistake, and find ways to lead learning the proper way. ‘THINKING CHILDREN’ [not testing] is critical.
testucatororeducatortestucatororeducatortestucatproreducatortestucatororeducation
“It is now to the point where I think the EQ ship is way off course and too close to the rocks. It’s full of people who don’t know that they don’t know, and there are too many in leadership roles that simply don’t want to know. Sadly their eyes seem to be fixed on the next rung of the ladder.The premature roll-out of the Australian Curriculum which saw pedagogically questionable materials full of grammar and spelling errors unleashed on an unsuspecting student population,has been a debacle and totally compromising for any of us who were directed to implement it. No wonder our kids are falling behind.We are SO MUCH BETTER than this. Teachers are a fine bunch and it takes a lot for them to stay the course. We just need good and smart leaders – scholars not managers. And it would be heartening if our school leaders had at least a Master of Education degree. Like Finland??” On my frequent trips to international educational conferences in Asia, the stiff competition we face in this region is evident. But without pedagogy drawn from evidence-based research and without strong leadership to see it through, I fear we’re sunk. Perhaps our mantra should be UP WITH WHICH WE WILL NOT PUT! Time to get EQ and the Australian education system ship=shape again.”
A SCHOOL TEACHER
top5by25top5by25top5by25top5by25top5by25top5by25to5by25top5by25top5by25top5by25top5by25top5by25top5by25top5by25top5by2
LINKS :-
Phil Cullen AM FACE FACEL FQIEL
Gold Medal : ACEL
Life Member : CCEAM, QSPPA, QSPSSA
Classroom Teacher : 17 years
Primary Principal : 22 years
State Administrator: 19 years
Author
Grandfather
41 Cominan Avenue
Banora Point 2486
07 5524 6443

Categories Education Reform, International

The Belly of the Beast

This article, published in The Times Educational Supplement (London), is an in-depth explanation of how the Global Educational Reform Movement (GERM) took shape and became powerful. Here you will meet Sir Michael Barber, who coined the idea of “deliverology,” and learn about his rapid ascent from trade union activist to Tony Blair advisor to McKinsey guru to Pearson strategist.

You will learn about the fierce struggle among advanced nations to have the highest test scores and be #1 on PISA and TIMSS.

You will watch as an ideology of struggle and compete takes over the minds of educators responsible for the care and nurturing of children.

It is an instructive and scary article.

Categories Accountability, Corporate Reformers, Education Industry, For-Profit, International, Privatization, Race to the Top

Andere: Who Wins Nobel Prizes?

Eduardo Andere is one of Mexico’s leading education researchers. Here, he comments on a post by Stephen Krashen about the PISA results.

Well, maybe Mr. Krashen is right! The analysis below may help to buttress many people’s view why American education isn’t so bad after all:

The education of Nobel Prize winners

By Eduardo Andere M .

The 2012 Nobel Prize edition is over. Most Nobel awards throughout history have been assigned to people of a country, whose pre-university education is deemed, by the fans of league tables, mediocre or deficient.

In the international league table OECD’s PISA game, the US is located at around the mean result. For example, in the latest published PISA results, 15 to 16 years old American students ranked somewhere between the 21 and 29 position in mathematics out of 34 OECD countries. Mexico and Chile are tied at the bottom. Finland and South Korea, meanwhile, top the list. So, the U.S. is closer to the bottom than it is to the top.

Most disappointing is the fact—the critique goes—that US pre-university education is among the most expensive in the world. While Americans spent in 2007 (latest published data) $ 129,000 per elementary, middle and high school student, the Finns spent 87 000, and the South Koreans 80 000 (OECD 2010). This makes each PISA point cost the U.S., $87, while Finland and South Korea pay 53 and 49 respectively.

Let’s see what happens at the other end of the educational and knowledge pyramid. The Nobel Prize is one epitome of the educational, scientific and technological apparatus. The award is given in five categories: physics, chemistry, medicine, literature, economics and peace. In many cases an award is given to several winners, so there are more winners than prizes. In 2012, for example, there are 10 winners and five awards: two in physics, two in chemistry, two in medicine, two in economics, one in literature and one, peace award, to the European Union.

Of the nine human-recipient awards, five are American by birth, one is Moroccan, one Japanese, one British, and one more, Chinese (literature). And of the eight who have university affiliation (because the literature prize has not so) six are affiliated to U.S. universities.

Historically, from 1901 through 2012, 555 awards have been granted to 863 people, of which 246 are US nationals. From a total of 620 university-related laureates 321 are affiliated to US universities. And if one looks at the top ten universities with Nobel laureates nine of them are American.

China, whose Shanghai province and the Special Administrative Region of Hong Kong, obtained outstanding results in PISA 2009, has a total of 10 Nobel winners in history. Finland, South Korea and Singapore, the top countries in basic and high school education, have earned three, one and zero Nobel Prizes.

If one delves deeper into science, technology and innovation, the United States shines with most of the production in all three areas. And within the realm of business success in the knowledge era, all, or almost all star companies in the 21st century, which permeate the lives of all of us, such as Google, Apple, Amazon, Intel, Facebook, Dell, Yahoo, Microsoft, Wikipedia, YouTube, PayPal, and Twitter, among others, are of U.S. origin.

So, what is going on? If the Nobel contest is the point of a knowledge iceberg, the so-called quality education assessment of students, schools and teachers is missing something. How come the shooting stars of basic education pale in higher leagues?

http://eduardoandere.net/english/publications-in-english/articles/the_nobel_prize_winners.pdf

Categories International

Lessons from Finland

If you want to know why Finnish schools are so admired, consider the following:

Finnish schools do not have standardized testing until college entry. Admission to teacher education is highly selective. Teaching is a prestigious career. Child poverty is very low. Finnish schools emphasize the arts, physical activity, and a broad curriculum.

If you can’t visit Finland, read Pasi Sahlberg’s book Finnish Lessons, which is now being read around the world.

Pasi Sahlberg just won the Grawemeyer Award for 2013 for this major book. Please send a copy to President Obama so he can learn about the ingredients of great education policy.

If you don’t have time to read the book (you should make time!), read LynNell Hancock’s article in the Smithsonian magazine about her visit to Finland. Hancock was education editor for Newsweek and now teaches at the Columbia School of Journalism.

Categories International

Edweek Questions Finnish Success

Education Week reports that there was no significant difference between the performance of eighth grade students in Finland and the US in mathematics on the TIMSS.

Four American states had higher scores in eighth grade mathematics on TIMSS than Finland: Massachusetts, Minnesota, North Carolina, and Indiana.

This is not what you hear in the media, nor what you hear from the corporate reformers in these states, who are still crying wolf about the “crisis” in public education and the need to turn public schools over to private management as soon as possible.

Finland excels on the PISA exams, which tests have students use their learning to solve real-life problems. The TIMSS exams are aligned with the curriculum. Take your pick.

As I have written before and will write again, we should forget the horse race.

Once a nation reaches a certain level of economic and social development, the test scores predict nothing and are of far less importance than income inequality, poverty, and the physical and mental health of its people.

Categories International, Testing

On TIMSS: Black Students in Mass. Do as Well as Finland!

The Daily Howler is all over the media for its sour reporting about the latest international test (TIMSS). He finds that they reverted to their “doom and gloom” scenario without bothering to dig into the data.

He dug into the data and found lots to cheer about.

In this post, Bob Somerby parses the data and discovers that black students in Massachusetts did as well as students in Finland on the eighth grade math test.

Surely that is newsworthy, isn’t it? I mean, if the media wants to find headlines, this ought to be one. But it was not, because they can’t break free of their customary lens.

Hello, New York Times! Hello, newspaper of record!

Categories International, Testing