Archives for category: Education Reform

 

Late on February 14,at the end of that terrible day, I posted David Berliner’s call for A National Day of Action to Protect Students Against Gun Violence. Over 70,000 readers responded. Plans are in the works. The day is likely to be April 20, to commemorate the mass slaughter at Columbine in 1999.

Stay tuned. I hope to have an announcement tomorrow.

We will not let this massacre fade and be forgotten, as has Columbine, Sandy Hook, and other carnages directed against our children and their educators.

We will act. We will mobilize families, students, and educators in common cause to protect our children.

 

Theresa Peña served as president of the Denver school board when reform began more than a decade ago.

She describes the promises and high hopes.

Now she admits that reform failed. 

The kids who lost were the poor black and Hispanic students, she says.

She writes:

Almost 11 years ago, when I served on the Denver Board of Education, the board and then-Superintendent Michael Bennet published a lengthy manifesto detailing how we planned to transform and radically improve public education in Denver.

They published their manifesto. They said:

“Ten years from now, let them say that Denver was the vanguard for reform in public education. Let them say, 10 years from now, that in Denver we saw what others could not, and laid down our adult burdens to lift up our children. Let them say that a spark flew in Denver that ignited a generation of educators, children, parents, and communities, and gave them courage to abandon the status quo for a shimmering future. We can do this in Denver; it is simply a matter of imagination and will.”

In 2007 our board believed we were starting a revolution. We were going to dramatically change outcomes for Denver students. We were going to construct a new educational system that served students first.

We believed that the goals in our strategic plan, known as the Denver Plan, would close the achievement gap and set a new path forward for all graduates of Denver Public Schools.

I am writing today to tell you that we failed. And, as a city and a school district we are still collectively failing our neediest students.

The Denver public school system is now a darling of the rightwing.

Last year, Betsy DeVos visited Denver twice; she praised the city for its charter efforts, but declared that it needed vouchers as well.

The Brookings Institution released its “Education Choice and Competition Index,” which ranked Denver first in the nation. The Index was created by Grover Whitehurst, who was George W. Bush’s choice to lead the Department of Education’s research division.

Charter champion David Osborne showered praise on Denver’s “portfolio” strategy in the rightwing journal Education Next.

Kevin Hesla of the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools raved about Denver’s commitment to the privatization agenda, again in the rightwing Education Next.

Denver is where Democrats gave up the fight for public education and invited the fox of privatization into the henhouse. The conservative media and think tanks love Denver.

Peña dissents. She writes:

My conclusion calls into question the conventional wisdom about Denver Public Schools. Over the past decade, under the leadership of Bennet and his successor, Tom Boasberg, DPS has gained a national reputation as a forward-thinking, even visionary school district, which welcomes high-quality charter schools and grants the most deserving of its own schools unprecedented degrees of autonomy from the district bureaucracy. Enrollment has grown and student achievement has improved.

While elements of that sterling national reputation are deserved, and some real gains have occurred, they have been far too slow and inequitable. On perhaps the most critical measure of success, literacy in early elementary schools, low-income and minority students have improved at a much slower rate than their Anglo and higher-income peers. This has caused Denver’s abysmal achievement gaps to grow even wider.

In 2017 64 percent of students who did not qualify for free or reduced lunch were reading and writing at grade level compared to 26 percent of students who qualified for free and reduced lunch, a 38 percent gap. And only one of three low-income third-graders read and write at grade level.

Our aspirations of a decade ago have not been realized. Until and unless Boasberg and the Board of Education take concrete steps to fundamentally change the district to serve its students and schools, real progress will remain elusive. Over time, I have come to doubt whether this is even possible.

The new reform board promised innovation, school autonomy, transparency, accountability, closer monitoring of results, and higher expectations.

She concludes:

We failed on all counts.

Teacher turnover and principal turnover remain large. Achievement gaps are as large as ever, possibly larger.

Denver, the shining model of reform by charters and test-based accountability, is no model at all.

So says one of the reform leaders who was there at the beginning.

Jeannie Kaplan was a school board member also during those heady years. She quickly became disillusioned with the disruptive tactics. She is not sure whether Theresa Peña means what she says or has something else in mind. But she has long believed that the “reforms” failed the neediest kids.

What say you, Senator Michael Bennett? What say you, Superintendent Tom Boasberg?

Why not focus on what works? Reduced class sizes; support and retention of teachers and principals; collaboration; school nurses and clinics. Talk about root causes of low academic performance and focus on changes that address the root causes.

 

 

Many readers have complained that their comments were blocked. I have complained repeatedly to WordPress, to no avail. The Happiness Engineers at WordPress (really!) proposed that you contact them directly for support:

https://akismet.com/contact/

They told me that I had a long list of banned words on my blacklist (e.g., porn, Nike [a regular spam item], etc.), that it might have stopped innocent comments. Like if you commented on your favorite porn or Nikes or clock parts.

I have eliminated the blacklist altogether, so now the onus is on them to find out why some comments never get posted.

 

 

 

 

Parents and education activists in Louisville are very upset about a quiet coup taking place behind closed door. A group of about 80 of the city’s business leaders has been meeting to decide how to solve the city’s problems, and one of them is the public schools. Needless to say, they do not trust democracy and are looking to the Republican leadership in the state to take over. The elitists are called LA SCALA, “the Steering Committee for Action on Louisville’s Agenda.” Others call them the Louminati, a reference to the Illuminati, a secretive group of power brokers.

Here is a summary:

Comedy, Tragedy at La SCALA
…behind the curtain of powerbrokers’ group

By Chris Kolb 

La Scala theater in Milan was founded by the Empress Maria Theresa and paid for by 90 wealthy Italians in exchange for luxurious boxes where they could enjoy the world’s finest artistic performances, including comic and tragic operas.

There is much about Louisville’s own SCALA that is comic. For instance, David Jones — Elder and Younger — and 70 of the most wealthy people in town have been brainstorming for months about how to solve all our problems. Here’s what they came up with: a Wal-Mart in West Louisville, more direct flights to the coasts and giving our barely functioning state government control over our schools.

In a city with over 100 homicides in 2017, more than 6,000 homeless children in public schools, and horrible air quality — to name a few bleak realities — what really makes Elder Jones see red is low-income citizens coming together to ask Wal-Mart to make a few minor changes to its proposed store design. I suspect Jones isn’t really upset about Wal-Mart but about normal people taking collective action to challenge corporate power. Imagine the hit to the pocketbook he might take if we all came together to fight for quality, affordable healthcare. Elder Jones also brought together Louisville’s self-professed powerbrokers to address the humanitarian crisis of the layovers he has to endure when flying to California wine country for the weekend. Satire really does write itself sometimes.

And then we come to education, which is where comic blends into tragic. Like Macbeth spurred on by his wife who is willing to throw all of Scotland into chaos in the naked pursuit of power, Younger Jones — spurred on by his father — is willing to throw our public schools and our children’s lives into the roiling tempest that is Kentucky state government. This is the same government that is unlikely to even pass a budget, has no current House Speaker due to a sex scandal, and has a governor so blinded by hatred of public schools that he tries to change the laws of mathematics to challenge the fiscal qualifications of the democratically-elected School Board. There’s a reason we continue to perform classics such as Macbeth: We remain plagued by a power-hungry nobility who will sacrifice the common good in seeking to rule over us plebeians.

Returning to comedy, Jones the Younger’s logic for a state takeover of JCPS is reminiscent of Sigmund Freud’s case of the man accused of damaging a kettle he borrowed from his neighbor. The man gives three reasons he is not responsible for the damage: He returned the kettle undamaged; it was already damaged when he borrowed it; and he had never borrowed the kettle at all. By completely contradicting each other the three reasons reveal the truth: It was indeed the neighbor who damaged the kettle.

Likewise, Younger Jones first says that academic achievement is largely determined by where you live, how much money your parents make and your race. I’m not optimistic that this state government is going to end segregation, poverty and institutional racism in Louisville if it takes over JCPS.

Second, Jones says that SCALA members are concerned about education from a workforce perspective. Is the real issue that corporate heads want more worker bees to generate additional wealth for them to capture (while wages remain stagnant)?

Third, Jones says the real problem is that state laws make it difficult for school boards to govern. I’ve been on the School Board for 13 months and, while there are always bureaucratic annoyances in any organization, we’ve been able to make significant progress in that short time. This includes cleaning up the many messes left by the Jones-Hargens-Hudson trio.

Like the neighbor who gave contradictory reasons for the damaged kettle, Younger Jones accidentally reveals the truth in blaming everything but himself: Jones found JCPS ungovernable because Jones himself is very bad at governing. We shouldn’t really be surprised. Many among the wealthy are used to making colossal messes, refusing to accept responsibility, and leaving the clean up to others. The ancient Greeks gave us a word for this level of arrogance so astounding it offends the gods themselves: hubris.

Thankfully, my colleagues and I have made tremendous strides to clean up the mess. Though much work remains, we will soon be able to turn our full attention to ensuring that every child has access to innovative, meaningful, challenging, and rewarding learning and professional experiences no matter their zip code, race, gender or native country. Anytime Louisville’s nobility wants to actually assist JCPS, I’d be happy to help them find ways to do so. Of course, first they’d have to invite at least one public education professional to a secret SCALA meeting, which doesn’t look like it’s happening anytime soon. •

Chris Kolb represents District 2 on the Jefferson County Public Schools Board of Education and is a professor of anthropology and urban studies at Spalding University. He may be reached at: chris@kolbforschoolboard.com

The article is followed by one defending LA SCALA as a perfectly appropriate exercise of civic duty.

It’s important to appreciate how SCALA began — not in some diabolical, smoke-filled vault as our critics would suggest, but with PNC Bank President Chuck Denny and Humana cofounder David Jones, Sr. seeing the need for such a group here in Louisville. They began the process of forming SCALA by hosting a group of 12 business and religious leaders in March 2017 and asking them if they believed such a group should exist in Louisville. The response was unanimous, and the 12 attendees were tasked with informally nominating other potential members who were either CEOs or the lead decision maker within their organizations.

The organizational meeting of the larger group was held in April 2017 and the committee members were charged with listing what they personally believed are the top issues facing Louisville needing to be addressed, with the top responses being education, public safety, improved and increased non-stop commercial air service, pension reform, and tax reform. Subcommittees were formed, and members were invited to participate in various subcommittees or simply participate in the broader committee by learning more about the critical issues impacting our community.

Here is the bottom line: If the purpose of LA SCALA is to eliminate democratic control of public schools, then it deserves all the opprobrium directed its way. If it instead opposes privatization and lobbies the Legislature for greater resources and stronger public schools, then it is a civic boon. The decision belongs to LA SCALA. Stand with democracy or against it. Your choice.

 

It’s true. I am reducing my blogging. But the folllowing is a worthy exception.

I like to read obituaries in the New York Times. Not for macabre reasons, but because it’s a way to learn about people. The Times recently wrote about Gene Sharp. I didn’t know anything about him. It turns out he was the guru of nonviolent resistance in his generation. Not on religious grounds but on pragmatic grounds. He was widely read and admired around the world.

Here is the key takeaway:

“His philosophy could be reduced to two axioms:

“First, autocracies are vulnerable to being undermined because “dictators are never as strong as they tell you they are,” he said in Mr. Arrow’s film, “and people are never as weak as they think they are.”

“Second, while limited violence against dictatorial governments may sometimes be inevitable, violence provokes more violence, a strategy that gives dictators an advantage.”

Please remember these words as you resist unjust policies:

The strong ”are never as strong as they tell you they are and people are never as weak as they think they are.”

 

I write this post with a mixture of joy and sadness. And exhilaration!

I have been blogging every day for five years. I post whatever interests me and whatever I think will interest you. I confess to being compulsive because I blog with passion and zeal. I have blogged in elevators and taxis, while waiting on a line or in the middle of the night. I have written nearly 20,000 posts, and you have sent me nearly half a million comments.

I won’t stop blogging, but I will try to limit myself to no more than one post a day. I will post every day at 9. I will have the best of the best (in my opinion) every day. If there is breaking or important news, I will post again. When there is a big event or election, I will post. I will post short items of importance,  just a link, when I must. I will keep tweeting.

When NPE endorses a candidate, you will hear from me. When one of the supporters of public education scores a win for democracy and the common good, you will hear from me. We have to keep winning elections.

I am not going anywhere but I will spend more time working on the book than blogging.

If I can encourage you to write a letter to the editor, run for office, speak out at a public meeting, you can bet I will. I will insist that you get out to vote and get your friends to vote too.

The reason I am stepping back is that I have a contract with my publisher, Knopf, the most distinguished publishing house in America, with the best editor in America, Victoria Wilson. Knopf published and Wilson edited my last, most important book, Reign of Error: The Hoax of the Privatization Movement  and the Danger to Our Public Schools. I am going to write a new book about the growing and powerful resistance to privatization. I will rely on what I have learned from you —as I have traveled, as I have blogged, as I have read your comments here, as I have followed your work on behalf of the common good.

Of course, I will write about the BATS, Journey for Justice, the SOS groups, the battling unions, the legal battles, the electoral victories, the battles by parents against data mining, Class Size Matters, the historic defeat of Question 2 in Massachusetts last November, the historic court decision in the Vergara Case, the Pastors for Texas Children, the NAACP, the fight against vouchers, the resistance in many, many states by brave parents and teachers. And of course, the Network for Public Education, which was created five years ago by Anthony Cody and me to build and support the resistance. (Speaking of which, plan to join us at the NPE Annual Conference in Indiana on October 20-21. There will be more details on the NPE website.)

I’m not signing off. You will hear from me less often.  You will get fewer posts. You will get shorter posts.

This is what I need from you: tell me what is happening in your state to fight for public education. Tell me which groups are fighting back against the malefactors of wealth and the peddlers of privatization. Tell me about your wins.

The fight continues. I have a strong sense that the tide is turning. I am not giving up, and neither should you. There is much good news to share. Books reflect the world and books can change the world. All of us acting together are changing it right now. I have never been more hopeful about the future. I want to gather the hope and inspiration that you have generated and use it to inspire even greater activism to defeat the stale and dying status quo.

Help me write this important next book. Share your stories. Help me stop the privatization train, which ran off the rails long ago. I recall being told repeatedly a few years ago that it was useless to resist because the train had left the station. When they said that, they never said  where the train was heading. Not a good place. Maybe to a steep cliff. Trump and DeVos know. They tell us. The Koch brothers tell us. They want to destroy public schools. They are the “low hanging fruit.” They are driving the train to nowhere, and the “low hanging fruit” are our children.

Friends, together we are telling them that their plan to destroy our public schools is not going to happen.

It. Is. NOT. Going. To. Happen. We will show them what democracy looks like.

Keep me informed about your community, your state. They have money. We have numbers. Together, we will save our schools, our children, and our democracy.

 

This just in:

 

Saint Paul Educators Set February 13 Strike Date

Union Says District Unwilling to Meet Student Needs in Negotiations

SAINT PAUL, MINN. – The Saint Paul Federation of Teachers (SPFT) announced tonight that educators will strike beginning February 13, 2018 if no settlement is reached in ongoing contract talks with the Saint Paul Public Schools (SPPS).

“Our union’s executive board voted to set the February 13 strike date,” said Erica Schatzlein, SPFT Vice President and a teacher at Nokomis Montessori. “This is not an action we take lightly. As educators, we want to be in the classroom with our students. If leaders in Saint Paul Public Schools are unwilling to prioritize our students’ needs , teachers are going to stand up for our students.”

Schatzlein pointed to the district position on providing adequate services to students who are English Learners (EL) as an example of the SPPS’ unwillingness to address students’ needs. The union has called for more educators to work with EL students to bring the district into compliance with the Minnesota Department of Education.

Other unresolved issues at the bargaining table include union proposals to lower class sizes, add staff to support students enrolled in special education programs, and expand restorative practices.

Today’s strike date announcement follows last week’s overwhelming vote by SPFT members to authorize a strike if a settlement has not been reached. Over 85% of SPFT members participating voted to strike. Members of all three of SPFT’s bargaining units will strike if an agreement is not reached.

Bargaining will continue through the the end of the week between SPFT and SPPS with a state appointed mediator. SPFT has also let the district know we are willing to continue meeting over the weekend.

“We know this school district can find money when they want to,” said SPFT President Nick Faber, referencing the school district’s recent decision to buy the Crosswinds Middle School in Woodbury for $15 million. “We need them to find money to fund programs for our English Learners and special education students so we can provide the education our students deserve.”

Earlier this week, with the possibility of interruptions in the public school schedule looming, SPFT members began planning Safe Sites to serve students in the event schools are not available. The goal is to make sure that students have safe, warm, and appropriate alternatives if schools are closed.

Plans include identifying locations, arranging food for children at each site, arranging transportation, and assigning SPFT volunteers. In addition, subcommittees are putting together an array of activities for students, and looking at how any medical issues will be addressed.

###

 

Rob Porter was one of the key members of Trump’s White House staff. He wrote most of Trump’s State of the Union address; he often travels with Trump. He is a Harvard graduate, Rhodes scholar, and former aide to Senator Orrin Hatch, and close ally of John Kelly. When allegations of spousal abuse emerged, Hatch and Kelly urged him not to resign. When his first wife released a photo of her face with a black eye, he resigned.

He asked his second wife to remove this Blog Post. She didn’t. 

Every woman who has been physically or emotionally abused can relate to this statement.

Why do some very smart, powerful men do this?

 

Peter Greene, like Steven Singer, is unimpressed by Sarah Cohodes’ claim that no-excuses charter schools have solved the problem of low scoring students. Discipline! SLANT! No excuses! Look at the teacher! Walk in a straight line! Thats what the black and brown kids need.

“Cohodes opens with a quick recap of charter history, then lays out the problem with measuring charter effects– selection bias because charter students have chosen the charter. But good news– the selection bias problem is completely solved by charter school lotteries. Except (she acknowledges) not everybody chooses to enter the lottery. And the lottery only applies when schools are over-subscribed. But maybe we can find comparable groups of non-charter students to compare charter students to. Which is hard. Cohodes seems to conclude this kind of research is really hard to design well. So she used some lottery studies and some observational studies in her research. And, having scanned the research, she drops this right in this intro section:

“The best estimates find that attending a charter school has no impact compared to attending a traditional public school….

”Let’s go to the headline material. Essentially, she finds that No Excuses charters set up in neighborhood served by very struggling public schools show a big gain in test scores. But here I will get into specifics, because she cites in particular the KIPP schools and the charters of Boston. Yet Boston charters have been found to come up very short in sending students on to complete college.

“The No Excuses practices that Cohodes zeros in on are ” intensive teacher observation and training, data-driven instruction, increased instructional time, intensive tutoring, and a culture of high expectations.” Not being able to narrow the list down is a problem– if I tell you that my athletic program gets great results by having athletes exercise for two hours daily, drink high protein shakes, breathe air regularly, and sacrifice toads under a full moon, it will be easy to follow my “research” to some unwarranted conclusions. Cohodes’ list is likewise a hugely mixed bag.

“Longer school day and school year is obvious. More time in school = getting more schooling done. A culture of high expectations is meaningless argle bargle. And the teacher training and “data-driven” instruction boils down to the same old news– if you spend a lot of time on test prep, your test results get better.

“Cohodes also notes that the worse the “fallback” school results, the greater the charter “improvement.” In other words, the lower you set the baseline, the more your results will surpass it.

“She doubles back to look at how charters relate to the surrounding public schools, again kicking the tires on the research to test reliability.

“She notes that there are two ways for lottery charters to cream the best students from the community. One is to manipulate the lottery, which she doesn’t think happens (for what it’s worth, neither do I, mostly because it’s not necessary). The second is to push out the students the school doesn’t want. But she is missing two more– make the lottery system prohibitively challenging, so that only the most motivated families can navigate it. And advertising allows charters to send a clear message about which students are welcome at their school. And nobody works those creaming tricks like No Excuses schools, with their highly regimented and oppressive treatment of students….

”And the criticism that I found myself leveling at very page finally surfaces here:

Given that the overall distribution of charter school effects is very similar to that of traditional public schools, expanding charter schools without regard to their effectiveness at increasing test scores would do little to narrow achievement gaps in the United States. But expanding successful, urban, high-quality charter schools—or using some of their practices in traditional schools—may be a way to do so.

Emphasis mine. If you think that closing the achievement gap is nothing but raising test scores, you are wasting my time. It’s almost two decades into this reform swamp, and still I don’t believe there’s a person anywhere sayin, “I was able to escape poverty because I got a high PARCC score.” Using the Big Standardized Test score as a proxy for student achievement is still an unproven slice of baloney, the policy equivalent of the drunk who looks for his car keys under the lights, not because he lost them there, but because it’s easier to look there.

It’s really not that hard to raise test scores– just devote every moment of the day to intensive test preparation. What’s hard is to raise test scores while pretending that you’re really doing something else.

Let’s consider a thought experiment in which further expansion focuses on high-quality charters. What would happen to the achievement gap in the United States if all of those new charter schools were opened in urban areas serving low-income children, had no excuses policies, and had large impacts on test scores like Boston, New York, Denver, and KIPP charters?

Yes, I want to say, and let’s consider a thought experiment in which pigs fly out of my butt. However, she continues

Expanding charters in this way certainly could transform the educational trajectories of the students who attend. But if we consider the US achievement gap as a whole, it would have a negligible effect.

What she wants to see is an expansion of charter practices expanded to public schools, and she sees ESSA as a policy tool to do it. But what practices? Expanded school time? That would take too much money for policy makers to support. Relentless test prep at the expense of broader education? No thanks. High expectations in the form of heavy regimentation, speak-only-when-spoken-to, treatment? Pretend that student socio-economic background and the opportunity gap are not really factors? That seems just foolishly wrong. Besides the questionable morality of such an approach, a vast number of parents simply wouldn’t stand for it. And how would we replace the mission of public education– to educate all students– with the mission of No Excuse charters– to educate only those students who are a “good fit.”

 

 

 

 

Laura Chapman writes:

 

“I think that charters, along with public schools are becoming captives of the tech industry with online education misrepresented as personalized. There is an effort to deschool education altogether by making everything a matter of choice from a menu of options leaving brick and mortar schools at the margins. Among other tools for moving in this direction are per-pupil cost analyses that include proportionate costs of buildings, maintenance, transportation and so on for specific grades, subjects, and levels of staffing. One conclusion: outsourcing music education is cheaper than offering it in school, so too for foreign languages, and AP courses.

“Charter schools, except for those operating as online schools, are too much like public schools insofar as they require investments in brick and mortar schools and land. That is one reason why so many charter operators are actually more attracted to land deals than education. Even with evidence of massive frauds, online education is marketable as the best way to do education reform with the advantage of being a big cost saver and “personalized.”

“Now add to the opportunities of deschooling education the proliferation of education dollars packaged as scholarships, vouchers, tax deductions or education savings accounts. Amazon is serving as a prototype for thinking about the parent/caregiver/student payments for educational products and services a la carte. Authorized providers would be listed in menus so purchasers see options and prices for “approved” products and service providers. Customers might view recommended interventions for specific students based on big data, prior purchases, and the (dubious) mindset of an artificial intelligence system.

“Of course, no one is talking about who approves the online catalog and the surveillance systems required to conjure recommendations. No one is talking about ways of rigging the whole system as is the case in Ohio’s ECOT online scam, or as Facebook and Amazon are known to do for a fee. No one is talking about the convergence of marketing spaces and platforms into one authorized site for spending the money in education savings accounts. Among those websites just shy of fitting the emerging view of Click it education is Great Schools (leases data to Zillow and others), and TeachThought (pays users of “Affiliate” tech products a fee).

“Florida is rolling out an online payment system for education savings accounts this year. The platform, called MyScholarShop™, will resemble Amazon, complete with parent/caregiver reviews of the authorized fare. The press release says parents: “will simply go online to the pre-approved catalog and ‘Pick It, Click It, Ship It.” The cost will be taken directly from their education savings account. Supplies, if ordered, will be delivered to customer-provided address.

“This project has been in the works with Step Up For Students, the Florida agency that distributes state money earmarked for Gardiner Scholarships for special education—nearly 10,000 students (autism spectrum disorder, muscular dystrophy, cerebral palsy and spina bifida) who, on average, are allocated $10,000 each per year. These approved services include private school tuition and fees, private tutoring, occupational therapy, instructional materials and other services.

“Step Up For Students also manages the income-based Florida Tax Credit Scholarship Program. Students qualify if they participate in the national free or reduced-price lunch program or if they are homeless, in foster or out-of-home care. These scholarships can offset the transportation cost to an out-of-district public school or for help pay for private school tuition. In 2017-2018, the MyScholarShop™ direct-pay platform will serve about 115,000 students

”The system will include a product and service-provider rating system “ so families can assist each other in making appropriate selections for their children.”

“The MyScholarShop™ platform is described as a Partnership with SAP Ariba and Premikati. SAP Ariba is a cloud-based system of business management, with analytics that track inventory (supplier information), performance (sales), and create digital invoices. Features of SAP Arib are available in four pricing tiers. All tiers have transaction fees, based on the volume of annual financial transactions with customers. All tiers also have a subscription fee, based on the number of documents in annual transactions with customers, and use of the technology. SAP Arib is designed to help “suppliers connect with profitable customers’ among other business services (provided in 190 countries, with three million companies).

“Premikati, Inc. provides services that cut red tape for users of the SAP Arib platform (e.g., planning, financial, contract management, legal). According to the website, Premikati has a new line of business, a national Group Purchasing Organization (GPO) for K-12 education and for non-profits.

“A GPO is designed to secure discounts with select vendors by leveraging the collective purchasing power of its members.

“Betsy Devos, Jeb Bush, and self-proclaimed gurus of disruptive innovation who love edtech are darlings of an industry estimated to be worth $365 billion dollars. Eliminating brick and mortar schools as a social, educational, and a communal asset is part of the new GERM–Global Education Reform Movement. The movement is aided by much talk about the emerging gig ( or jobless) economy where a major function of brick and mortar schools is not needed–child and adolescent care during a typical work day. That function, say entrepreneurs, will be diminished or vanish as child-care is seamlessly integrated into family friendly work facilities. WeWork in NYC is one example, and being planned for a world wide scale up by (you guessed it) an entrepreneurial billionaire.”