Archives for category: Budget Cuts

John White is pulling some fast tricks with public school funding in Louisiana. Fortunately the state has smart bloggers who protect the public interest and blow the whistle.

There is no end to White and Jindal’s efforts to transfer public dollars into private hands. He wants to eliminate a requirement that high schools have one guidance counselor for every 450 students. He says they can hire private vendors or whatever. He calls it “flexibility.”

This guy has a creative idea almost every day to strip resources and personnel fro the public schools.

Mike Deshotels reports on what is happening in the Louisiana legislature.

Bear in mind that Governor Bobby Jindal proposed to “reform” taxes by eliminating the personal income tax and the corporate income tax, shifting the entire tax burden to the sales tax. This is a very unpopular proposal, which appears to have driven his poll numbers down into the mid-30s. It will also hurt the state’s public schools, as you will see in this post.

Jindal also plans to fund the voucher schools by taking money from the state’s Minimum Foundation budget for public schools, even though a state court has already declared it unconstitutional. Same for Jindal’s plan to pay for-profit course choice providers, also found unconstitutional but still in the governor’s budget. And predictably, Jindal’s allies will return with new ways to strike down teacher tenure, which was struck down by a state court a few months ago because the law addressed too many issues in the same bill.

Here is Mike Deshotel’s report:

From: Michael Deshotels
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 9:01 AM
Subject: Legislative update
Governor Jindal is kicking off the 2013 legislative session today at 12 noon and I am happy to report that it looks like his big tax reform proposal is in big trouble. The governor’s new tax proposal greatly increases state sales taxes and could end up depriving local school boards of a vital source of sales tax when local voters fail to renew local sales taxes to try to offset the high state sales tax. I hope that trouble spills over to the education area so that we will have a chance of stopping his destruction of public education.
The MFP: Several of you asked that I give you more details about why the legislature should reject the new MFP. Some of you have since supplied me with critical information including the changes to special education funding. So I hope the following gives you plenty of information about why we want the MFP rejected by the legislature and sent back to be reenegotiated with the stakeholders so that a more acceptable formula can be proposed.
1. The new MFP would remove the automatic growth factor in the MFP. Because of huge unfunded mandates in recent years, it is critical that the growth factor be reinstituted. Meanwhile many charter schools are exempted from paying their share of mandated costs such as the increased costs for retirement contributions. Just the increase in retirement contribution for unfunded accrued liability is a crippling drain on local school system. To add insult to injury, our DOE is forcing local systems to upgrade local computers and internet access just to take care of more state tests that are making the testing companies rich and are reducing student instruction time. (Remember the Governor refused the federal money for upgrading internet services because his favored private companies may not get the contracts)
2. The new MFP still provides funding for vouchers and the new course choice programs even though this has been ruled unconstitutional. Thecourse choice program allows out of state companies to raid the MFP while the student testing scores still go to their local home schools. These private companies can get paid even if the students do not attend regularly or learn nothing!
3. The new MFP begins a change to a new weighted formula for special education that is strongly opposed by all special education stakeholders because it may not provide adequately for some students individual plans and may penalize gifted and talented programs based on as yet untried tests.
Bills: Jindal’s allies in the legislature have filed bills that would find a way around the recent court rulings stiking down Acts 1 and 2 of last year. I will send more details on this later but for now I want to point out just a few important bills. You can read the bills just by clicking on the highlighted bill numbers.
SB 89 by Appel: Please ask your Senators to defeat this bill if it is brought up because it destroys all teacher due process and makes many teachers’ fate rely on a very innacurate evaluation system.
HB 160 by Reynolds: Please ask your representative to support this bill which will put off the evaluation system until the VAM can be reworked. (I hope VAM can be done away with because in my opinion it can never be accurate for all circumstances)
SB 41 by Kostelka: I am hoping we can support this bill because it will allow a vote of the people to make the State Superintendent an elected position. As it stands now, the Governor totally controls both the State Superintendent and the majority of BESE. The present system does not have checks and balances and allows a radical like Jindal who has other motivations to practically destroy public education. Again this would just let the general public vote on a constitutional amendment to make the position elected.
Please go to the Louisiana Legislature web site and click on the name of your Representative and Senator so you can get his/her local office phone number where you can leave him/her messages with his legislative assistant, or send an email. Just introduce yourself and make sure they know you live in their district and that you want their support on education issues.
Thanks in advance for your efforts,
Mike Deshotels
____________________________________

Watch this video of Newark high school students.

They know what is happening to their schools.

They are fighting back with the only tool they have: Not with millions conferred by the Walton Family Foundation or the Gates Foundation or Mark Zuckerberg or Democrats for Education Reform.

With a student-made Youtube.

Student power can stop the attacks on public education.

Thank you, Newark Student Union.

A reader offers this comment about the education marketplace:

Better and cheaper aren’t even issues in the disruptive Educational marketing game. Only profit matters. Especially if you capture regulatory control, you can degrade quality to reduce cost, then mandate public funding to maximize profits. There’s no public sector, and no free market, to stop you.

I’ll quote again from Farrell:
“Christensen’s theory of innovation showed how “true revolutions occur, creating new markets and wreaking havoc within industries. Think: the PC, the MP3, the transistor radio.”

The wheel is still spinning on applications of internet and satellite “technology” in education. I’m a visionary and innovator myself, but in our classrooms, profit seekers are trying to freeze out wondrous real advances for their own advantage. Don’t confuse innovation with mean-minded little schemes to curtail and monetize other people’s inventions. The emperor is naked, and has no actual innovations to offer.

If you want to think more deeply than opportunistic market manipulation, here’s Anil Dash’s magnificent rumination on the internet, The Web We Lost:
http://dashes.com/anil/2012/12/the-web-we-lost.html

He also understands the wheels are still spinning, and proposes ways to bring the internet back into the commons, where (like public education) it belongs.

When ALEC and its faithful friends in think tanks and state legislatures promote “choice,” what do they really mean? When the Walton family and their family foundation attack public sector institutions and advocate choice, what do they really want? When they push the Parent Trigger and call it “empowerment,” who do they want to empower?

This reader left a comment in which he sees a strategy and a goal in the laws and policies pushed by ALEC, the Waltons and others intent on privatizing the public sector.

He writes:

“It is a tenet of ALEC that charter schools should be completely unregulated, unsupervised, and unaccountable. The goal is choice, not accountability or results.”

“Diane, I think the real goal is the capture of democratic government by corporations–the institution of corporatism in place of democracy. Everything ALEC wants is actually well regulated–but by and for the corporations, who co-opt government police and tax collection functions to their profit; this is often referred to as “corporatism” as used by the Italian proto-Fascists at the turn of the last century, or corporate nationalism.

“The real goal is corporate power; choice is just a canard.

“From everything we’ve seen “choice” is not the goal of these groups, it’s quite the opposite. The corporatist strategy is to convince the public to abandon traditional government services by offering a false “choice” in favor of their corporate counterparts. The choice is false, because political machinations are used to destroy the funding base for public services and the public’s faith in the ability of government to provide these services in order to drive the public to “choose” the corporatist vision. By undermining the government, corporatists like ALEC can then install their vision by claiming that the public demands a “choice” between the failed “socialist” government and the “competitive, efficient, effective free market”.

“But the reality is not that at all. The reality is a corporate-controlled governmental behemoth that looks and functions much like the old Soviet government, with corrupt corporate and government apparatchiks leeching the vast wealth of the nation while the public suffers without any recourse.”

Jere Hochman, superintendent of the Bedford Central School District, describes the outrageous pressure on schools. Governor Cuomo put a 2% cap on new taxes, and it requires a super-majority of 60% to lift the tax cap. Many schools are cutting the budget, cutting programs, laying off librarians. More mandates keep coming from the state and federal government.

Do “reformers” protest the budget cuts? Do they protest when class sizes go up or librarians are laid off?

As long as they get more testing, Common Core, and value-added assessment, the reformers are satisfied.

Libraries and librarians are on the chopping block in some districts in Maryland.

This is personal for me.

I love libraries.

I always loved browsing the stacks and finding a new book, a new author, a new topic. For me, the library was a place of reverence, a place of quiet contemplation, a quiet place to read and think.

Yes, I know we have computers. But computers give you what you ask for. They may have all the information in the world, but you can’t browse a computer.

Please support school libraries and your public library.

This arrived in my email from a librarian I met last June at a conference in Annapolis:

Libraries Under Attack? Again?

“Why do the children need books? They will all have tablets…”

Here in one of Maryland’s largest school districts, our libraries may be on the chopping block and with them, more than 100 dedicated and hard-working teacher-librarians who are required to have certification in library media/instructional technology. According to current board policy librarians are considered teachers, and as such partner with classroom teachers to collaboratively teach information literacy and research strategies to students K-12. Our supervisor has been nationally recognized for her initiatives connecting librarians to curriculum and instruction. Parents are supportive of libraries because they see the relationship to increased student achievement. Does our new and quite young superintendent support libraries? Will he continue to support our roles?

First, let’s travel back in time. In the early 1990s a new superintendent, while cutting staffing, declared librarians optional and libraries soon fell into disrepair. Parent volunteers checked out books and the collections suffered without trained media specialists to maintain them. Students did not receive instruction in information literacy or literature. The district supervisor of Library Services lobbied hard to turn the trend around, successfully leading the movement to rebuild the sorely neglected collections and put trained librarians back into schools by influencing the district to set policy that mandated a librarian position in each school. Further, she worked tirelessly to secure 10.4 million dollars in funding to rebuild collections, and helped create an initiative with the local university that resulted in a “Library Media Cohort”, a partnership between the district and the local university that offered masters’ degrees in Library Media and Instructional Technology to teachers in the district. The commitment that the district made resulted in investing heavily in the rebuilding of our libraries. The cohort initiative is currently active and has produced to date more than 150 highly trained certificated library media specialists. In our rapidly urbanizing and large district, our library media specialists are trained to meet the needs of our diverse population of over 100,000 students.

When the funds were disbursed more than a decade ago, the county executive, who at the time saw the value of a quality library program, told the district administration, “Don’t let this happen again. Don’t come back asking for more money. Maintain the libraries.”

How quickly we forget our history. Once again, there is a new superintendent in town and libraries may be under attack. The BOE is about to strike language from the policy that defines the commitment to place libraries and media specialists’ roles as critical to student achievement. When this was presented at the February 19th BOE meeting no one from the Library Office was present because no one from that office was informed or invited. Since all BOE meetings are video recorded and archived on the public website, we were able to discover the proposed change by a BOE member who questioned the intent. The decision was tabled until the March 5th BOE meeting.

At an earlier BOE meeting, a reorganization was discussed which made clear that beginning next year libraries will fall under the auspices of the Technology department and no longer under Curriculum and Instruction. In the reorganization, the supervisor of the Library Office’s position has been eliminated. We will be losing our strongest advocate and most vocal supporter.

Saddest of all, rumor has it that someone very close to the top in the district’s administration made the comment, “Why do the children need books? They will all have tablets…”

Yes, the children need books and tablets too.

The school board in Lansing, Michigan, reached a deal with its teachers union to slash the budget. The district will eliminate teachers of the arts, music, and physical education in elementary schools. That is a cut of 87 teachers in a staff of 915. The teachers also accepted a pay freeze.

What kind of state and nation can’t afford arts and physical education for its young children?

Good news for Wall Street! More school closings!

Does Wall Street think it would be a good idea to close down all public schools? Think of the savings to municipalities if we just stopped offering free public education!

A reader writes:

And Bloomberg reports this about Philadelphia school closures:

Closing 12% of Philadelphia Schools Creates Winners: Muni Credit

from Bloomberg


“The nation’s fifth-largest city anticipates saving $24.5 million a year by shutting 29 of its 249 buildings in June. The average building is 64 years old, according to a financial audit. More than 82 percent of students are “economically disadvantaged,” meaning they receive free or reduced-price lunches, school data show.


“It’s very likely” more schools would be closed over the next five years, said Fernando Gallard, a district spokesman, who said he couldn’t estimate how many.
 “We are wasting money maintaining empty seats and empty space in our buildings,” Gallard said. “There is a better use for that money.”
 Bond buyers view officials as trying to get a handle on their finances, said John Donaldson, director of fixed income at Radnor, Pennsylvania-based Haverford Trust Co., who manages $750 million in munis.


http://tinyurl.com/cgynj3t

Joy Resmovits reports on Huffington Post that Moody’s rating service is happy about the school closures in Philadelphia. She writes;0:

“School Closures: Good For Wall Street? Philadelphia recently voted to close 23 schools, and a Moody’s analyst thinks that the move, which frees up privately-run charter organizations to set up shop, is a good thing financially. Why? The analyst writes that it shows the district is willing to cut costs even when faced with tremendous opposition. “The SRC has introduced deep expenditure cuts over the past 18 months, reducing a fiscal 2012 deficit of $720 million to $20.5 million through a variety of revenue and expenditure measures that included a 16.7% staff reduction and salary and benefit cuts that generated a combined $466 million in savings,” the analyst writes in a report for bond investors.”

“But as a source notes, the closures and cuts don’t mean that these schools are driving the savings — the district says its plan would save $25 million, just a fraction of the $700 million deficit reduction. So why does the market care about closures?”

Here is a link to the Moody’s story.

What is remarkable is that the discussion is purely about cutting costs and privatization. Not a word about the impact of closings on children, education, families, communities.

Our nation is in deep trouble. All the talk about “reform ” is really about cutting costs while pretending it is “for the kids,” “children first.” At least Moody’s makes no pretense about caring about the kids. Their honesty is refreshing, if cynical.