Archives for category: Bloomberg, Michael

Arthur Goldstein is a high school teacher in New York City. He blogs at New York City Educator.

The New York State Legislature gave Mayor Bloomberg control of the New York City public schools in 2002. Here is Arthur Goldstein’s assessment of Mayor Bloomberg’s decade of near-total control:

When Michael Bloomberg came into office, there was quite a lot of talk about mayoral control. After all, as always, the schools were in crisis. Op-eds warned end of the world was imminent if we did not address this crisis immediately. Mayor Bloomberg’s predecessor, Rudolph Giuliani, had attempted to procure control, but was frequently preoccupied with lawsuits (like the one demanding the right to bring his mistress into the home he shared with his wife and young children).

Bloomberg had a vision, a vision in which our Board of Education was replaced with a Panel for Educational Policy. In order to give some semblance of democracy to this vision, each borough president was allowed to select a representative. But Mayor Bloomberg would get 8 of the 13 votes, and any borough that stood in his way could go to hell. Also, any mayoral rep that voted against Bloomberg’s wishes, or contemplated doing so, would be fired. Thus, we learned much about Michael Bloomberg’s interpretation of democracy.

Also, to fix the supposed problem of educators presuming to run schools, Bloomberg would do away with the quaint notion of a master educator becoming principal, traditionally short for “principal teacher.” Instead, he’d get more business-oriented types to whip teachers into shape. I’ve only met one Leadership Academy grad, but I was amazed at his ability to speak jargon and slogans in lieu of English. Most teachers, like me, would much rather place their faith in someone who spent at least a good decade in the classroom.

To improve education, Bloomberg would close schools, and their problems were to magically disappear with their names. Large Neighborhood High School would become four schools, the International School of Niceness, the Michael Bloomberg School of Basket Weaving, or what have you. Only by the time the school opened, the Niceness principal was replaced with a Leadership Academy principal, and the basket-weaving principal would be replaced by someone who couldn’t tell a basket from a bucket.

New York City’s neediest kids, like the ESL students I serve, failed to disappear as planned and continued to pull down test scores, apparently the only thing Mayor Bloomberg cared about. No matter how many schools he closed, kids who didn’t speak English persisted in answering questions incorrectly. Being a lowly teacher, incapable of thinking out of the box, my instinct would have been to teach them English. But Mayor Bloomberg deemed it more productive to close more of their schools. As he closed schools in their neighborhoods, high-needs kids moved to nearby schools, which would soon close as well.

But Mayor Bloomberg (after getting Christine Quinn to help revoke a term-limit regulation twice affirmed by voters) had good news while purchasing term three. Miraculously, state scores had gone up! Diane Ravitch examined NY State’s NAEP scores and said it was too good to be true. And after she endured much criticism from Bloomberg and his minions, it turned out she was right.

Sadly, after having elected Mayor Bloomberg for yet another term, his much-vaunted accomplishments melted right before our eyes. Yet he was determined to stay the course, and went right on closing schools. I attended hearings at Jamaica High School where virtually the entire community got out and no one was in favor of its closing. UFT chapter leader James Eterno made a very persuasive case that the closing was based on false statistics. Yet Eterno, and indeed Jamaica’s entire community were ignored as the PEP rubber-stamped its closing (as it does for every closing).

More recently, Mayor Bloomberg tried one of President Obama’s initiatives, the turnaround model, for some schools. This, apparently, would draw funding and give kids who don’t speak English a chance to pass tests (or something). However, he was displeased when the UFT failed to agree with how to use junk science to evaluate teachers, and thus planned to close dozens of schools instead.

When the UFT finally agreed on a junk science framework, Bloomberg was horrified that 13% of poorly rated teachers could get impartial hearings, and decided to close the so-called turnarounds anyway. An arbitrator ruled against that. Though the mayor decided that the arbitration he’d agreed to was unfair, having not gone his way, he was shut down in court.

Even now, Mayor Bloomberg is still not satisfied the new junk science plan will realize his long-cherished wish of firing teachers arbitrarily and capriciously. That’s why he shot down the plan his DOE agreed upon on the last day it could’ve save $250 million, or 1% of NYC’s education budget. (Not much coverage was given to the fact that Mayor Bloomberg had already cut 14% of the budget, all by himself, since 2007.)

I have been teaching in a trailer for most of the time Mayor Bloomberg has been in office. Mayor Bloomberg promised to get rid of them by 2012. In 2007, there were about 400 trailers. Now, there are about 400 trailers.

That’s symbolic of Mayor Bloomberg’s educational progress. A less visible symbol is the disappearing neighborhood school. To me, a school anchors a neighborhood much better than, say, a department store, or even a Moskowitz charter school. Francis Lewis High School, for my money the best neighborhood high school still standing, is one of the few large high schools Bloomberg has spared. Our neighborhood, our students, and our staff are better off for that. Nonetheless, we survive despite how the mayor treats us, not because of it.

And since Mayor Bloomberg does not believe in satisfactory or unsatisfactory ratings, I’ve devised a new one just for him—completely ineffective. I’m quite sure history will vindicate that rating, if only Michael Bloomberg is not paying the salary of whoever writes the history book.

Just when you thought politics could not get weirder, we learn that a public relations guy is running a campaign against President Obama’s pick for Defense Secretary, Chuck Hagel.

Turns out the campaign is run by Bradley Tusk, who has the following connections: Former Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich, Mayor Michael Bloomberg, Michelle Rhee’s StudentsFirst, and Eva Moskowitz’s Success Academy. He also ran the NY campaign to lift the cap on charters, paid for by the Wall Street crowd and Mayor Bloomberg.

This is one of the strangest set of links in politics today.

Remember when decisions about schools were made by the superintendent and the principals? And when teachers closed their door and their classroom was their domain? That was long, long ago.

Well, that’s the question raised by Michael Powell, a political reporter for the New York Times.

There are bigger problems than this that will mar the mayor’s legacy.

He has closed dozens of schools, opened hundreds of schools, destabilized communities, handed out hundreds of millions in no-bid contracts, had a huge technology scandal (Citytime, which cost the city $600 million or so), and public support for mayoral control is about 18%.

Juan Gonzalez says that Mayor Bloomberg wants to drive down the cost of bus drivers’ salaries, but they are not the reason that the city spends more than $1 billion on school buses. Bus drivers are paid about $40,000 a year.

Read his analysis here.

New York Commissioner of Education has warned New York City that if the union and the mayor don’t reach a deal on teacher evaluation, he will withhold over $1 billion, in addition to the $250 million already at stake in Race to the Top funding.

He is holding the children and their education hostage unless the parties submit to his will.

With his long (two year) history in a charter school, he knows all there is to know about how to evaluate teachers. His Uncommon Schools charter is known for incredible suspension rates. Does that affect evaluations? He doesn’t say.

How dare he cripple the education of 1.1 million students unless the teachers do as he tells them. Revolutions have happened for less.

New York City is now in the midst of a school bus strike, stranding more than 100,000 students.

As usual, each side blames the other for intransigence.

But there are a few facts that should be remembered for context.

The Bloomberg administration has had complete control of the school system since 2002 and negotiated all existing contracts.

In 2006, then Chancellor Joel Klein gave a contract for $15.8 million to business turnaround consultants Alvarez & Marsal to reorganize the transportation program. Some of the executives were paid $500 an hour (plus expenses). On January 31, 2007, the buses adopted the A&M schedule for the first time. It was the coldest day of the year. Thousands of children were left stranded on bitter-cold corners. It was chaos.

Chancellor Klein defended the choice of A&M, saying they had saved the city at least $50 million.

Presumably, this is the system that the mayor now finds intolerable and outrageously expensive.

Alvarez & Marsal were previously known for its work in St. Louis, where they ran the district like a business for one year, collected $5 million, and left, shortly before the state declared the district o be in such bad shape that the state took control.

A&M’s last school assignment was in DC, where Chancellor Kaya Henderson hired them to review test security procedures, though they had no experience doing that.

Leonie Haimson, head of Class Size Matters in New York City, explains why the teacher evaluation pact failed.

Apparently it was Mayor Bloomberg who scuttled talks between the city and the unions. The unions wanted a sunset clause, the mayor demanded no sunset clause.

According to Ernest Logan of the supervisors’ union, most districts have a sunset clause:

““The CSA and the DOE were closing in on a final agreement on January 16, just before midnight. However, moments later, the Mayor intervened, demanding an agreement for an indefinite period of time,” Logan said.

“It is important to know that the overwhelming majority of school systems throughout the state have reached a one-year agreement in order to evaluate and modify it later to better serve our children. The state law provides for a one-year evaluation plan and the mayor supported the enactment of this legislation,” he added in a statement.”

Apparently the mayor and the union in NYC did not reach a deal on teacher evaluation.

Too bad. VAM Is junk science. It should not be legislated or imposed anywhere.

Here is the UFT press release. Count on seeing the mayor blame the union for not accepting a lousy scheme that has no basis in evidence or experience.

STATEMENT BY UFT PRESIDENT MICHAEL MULGREW:

I am sorry to announce that I have notified Governor Cuomo and other state officials that — despite long nights of negotiation and a willingness on the part of teachers to meet the DOE halfway – the intransigence of the Bloomberg administration on key issues has made it impossible to reach agreement on a new teacher evaluation system.

It is particularly painful to make this announcement because last night our negotiators had reached agreement – but Mayor Bloomberg blew the deal up in the early hours today, and despite the involvement of state officials we could not put it back together.

Thousands of parents have gotten a lesson this week, as the Mayor’s “my way or the highway” approach has left thousands of schoolchildren stranded at curbs across the city by the school bus strike. That same stubborn attitude on the Mayor’s part now means that our schools will suffer a loss of millions of dollars in state aid.

When Mayor Bloomberg was elected in 2001, his first priority was to gain control of the schools. At the time, the schools had a central board with seven members, two appointed by the mayor. Now the mayor appoints a majority and they serve at his pleasure.

In the last decade, the city’s schools have Ben subject to four major reorganizations and three chancellors. One of them lasted only 90 days, a record of sorts.

Now, voters and NYC public school parents oppose mayoral control. In a new poll, only 18% want the mayor to control them.

This is what the Quinnipiac poll showed:

“New York City’s next mayor should share control of the public schools, 63 percent of voters say, with 18 percent who want the mayor to keep control and 13 percent say the mayor should give up all control. Parents of children in public schools share those opinions. In fact, no group supports continuing mayoral control of the schools.

By a 53 – 35 percent margin, voter trust the teachers’ union more than Bloomberg to protect the interests of public school students.

Voters approve 45 – 34 percent of the job Schools Chancellor Dennis Walcott is doing, his highest approval rating so far. Parents of public school children approve 51 – 34 percent.

“New Yorkers don’t like Bloomberg’s take-over of the schools. Most favor shared control,” Carroll said. “And never forget: it’s a labor town. Despite all the outcry against the teachers union, New Yorkers believe the union would do a better job protecting kids than Bloomberg.”