In the midst of an article about Jackson Hole, Wyoming, a favorite retreat for the super-rich, we learned about the expansion of America’s billionaires.
That so much wealth could co-exist with so much poverty is no accident. It is a consequence of policy.
Here is an excerpt from the article:
A New York Times analysis shows the stunning velocity at which the fortunes of the 1 percent have increased across the country since President Trump first took office in 2017. The richest Americans saw their net worth soar 120 percent between 2017 and 2025, a colossal leap from the 45 percent growth they had seen over the previous nine years.
The number of U.S. billionaires jumped 50 percent by some estimates between 2017 and 2025, to more than 900 people.
More and more billionaires
The United States added new billionaires in 20 out of the last 25 years, as fortunes grew.

Source: New York Times analysis of the Forbes billionaires list.
Karl Russell/The New York Times
The list includes Elon Musk, who could become a trillionaire, and celebrities like Arnold Schwarzenegger, Tiger Woods, Bruce Springsteen and Jerry Seinfeld. But it also includes a number of people who are largely unknown to most Americans, people whose fortunes were lifted by investments and assets whose values have skyrocketed.
The minting of dozens of new billionaires occurred in the immediate wake of the 2017 tax cuts championed by Mr. Trump at the beginning of his first term, the nation’s biggest tax overhaul since 1986. The legislation, which slashed personal income taxes and doubled the estate tax exemption, was billed by Mr. Trump as “tax cuts for American families.” But the Times analysis, backed up by a range of new studies, shows that it disproportionately benefited wealthier taxpayers.
Most important, it cut the corporate tax rate and laid the groundwork for a surge in stock prices — creating a phenomenal accretion of wealth. The coronavirus pandemic intensified the dynamic. Tech prices soared as employees geared up to work at home and inflation tripled, weighing on the middle class and devastating the poor.
While the rich have been getting richer at a fairly steady pace over the years, the analysis shows that the net worths of those who were already billionaires experienced a pronounced shift after the tax cuts were signed into law, growing by 49 percent over eight years.
The irony in this significant u crease in billionaires is that it started with Trump’s tax cuts in 2017 and expanded with his tax cuts in 2025. And all the while, he was elected and re-elected by people who got the short end of the stick. MAGA was a front for the super-rich. It did nothing for Trump’s loyal base. He played them.
It worked.
Giving credit where it’s due: Andrew Tobias brought this article to my attention in his newsletter.

Trump has always been an advocate for the ultra-wealthy, but his cult refuses to see it. He is no “man of the people,” and those that believe him vote against their own self-interest. How is it possible that according to Real Clear Polls, his job approval rating remains at 43.8%? The only explanation is that much his cult remains intact despite his policies that create more billionaires and undermine American families, or the polls are bunk.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Trump is a salesman. He could sell ice to people in Iceland. He sold half the American people on the absurd idea that he was on their side, when in reality he is fleecing them.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Not half. Maybe close to a third. Harris sold slightly fewer and the rest weren’t buying either one of them.
LikeLike
I don’t know how it works today, but if I could say that my education failed me when I was in school it would be because I was never required to take a course in Economics. I don’t recall there being such courses in the schools I attended in lower education, and while they no doubt existed in the higher education schools that I attended, none were required courses.
45 years ago, I realized that I was psychology addicted to marijuana and I loved my job as a Kindergarten teacher then so much that I didn’t want to put it at risk, so I gave up everything I owned and put myself in a halfway house for treatment, where I lived for almost a year. They required that everyone attend classes in Finances, which they provided there. After that, my goal was to return to college in 5 years, so I did and I earned 3 more college degrees.
The closest I ever came to studying about Economics were those Finances classes though, where I learned mostly about budgeting (the very low minimum wage that I was paid back then). It was something, but clearly, it wasn’t much or enough. Unfortunately, it never occurred to me that I should take Economics as an elective in college, so now I’m as poor as a lot of people with just a high school diploma. I learned very little about economics at home because, I was told, my (nonexistent) husband would take care of that one day.
I think Economics should have been required in at least one of the schools that I attended, because then maybe lot more of us would be wealthier today. Does anyone know where at least one course in Economics is required anywhere today for everyone in lower ed or higher ed schools?
LikeLike
Oops! I just remembered reading, “The Rich and the Super-Rich: A Study in the Power of Money Today – January 1, 1968 by Ferdinand Lundberg, “A study focusing on the political and economic power of the five hundred super-millionaire families who control American life”
That book was recommended to me in 1970 by a brilliant college English teacher. I didn’t take any courses of his but I travelled to Europe with him during my first year in college and I learned a lot about many things from him.
It was a very powerful book –a real eye-opener for me. The only reason I forgot about it is because it was among the many books I had to leave behind (including a complete set of the Great Books of the Western World!) one of the times in my life that I had to give up everything I owned.
I recommend reading it today, too, because those are the roots of what’s been occurring recently in our country. The paperback came out in 1973 and is here: https://www.amazon.com/Rich-Super-rich-Ferdinand-Lundberg/dp/0553100289/
LikeLike
if you go back further, you can see that the massive cuts that began under Reagan has had the same effect.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes, Roy, you are right about Reagan. Ugh! That occurred when I was in Grad School where, in education courses, I did learn about how the business model was being adopted in Education and Social Services.
That had a dominoes effect and subsequently it happened at several places where I worked, so it impacted me personally. I wanted to understand what was happening and I studied it independently –which meant focusing on both politics and economics. That’s because following Reagan, under Clinton’s “New Democrats” and Obama, Milton Friedman’s neoliberal economic policies were adopted.
So along with with privatization, the hiring of unqualified TFA recruits and business people to run schools, long-time effective programs got cut and suddenly full time teachers were hired as Independent Contractors (including me). So they came off as being much more like Republicans than Democrats.
LikeLike
This is great news! I’m sure if I’m just patient, my turn will come up. I can hardly wait!😃💲
LikeLiked by 1 person
Glad to see your optimism, Lenny! I’d have to win the lottery to become a thousandaire or even a hundredaire. (Last week I was thrilled to win just $28!)
LikeLike
Lenny,
I predict you will be a billionaire in precisely 172 years. Be patient!
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s marked on my calendar!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Either Apple or WordPress keeps deleting my comments the last few days instead of posting them, I assume because the AI was programmed to disappear the most biting dissent of the status quo, so let’s put away my sharpened teeth and try something new:
Rich people are awesome. They’re so smart, what with their jets and submarines and surveillance bracelets. Let’s just keep in mind that they are gods. We must offer up unblemished sacrifices of pleasing aromas to them. All hail the elite!
LikeLike
LCT,
I will check spam for your lost comments.
Can you fill us in about what’s happening with Carvalho?
LikeLike
Carvahlo seems to be hiding. UTLA on Friday:
“We still don’t know what allegations, if any, the FBI is bringing against Carvalho following last week’s raids of his home and office. But the focus remains clear: LAUSD is draining money from our classrooms to shift billions of public dollars to contracts with private companies...
In the first three years under Carvalho, LAUSD committed $6.7 billion to private multi-year contracts with $1.6 billion promised to ed tech companies like AllHere and iReady. Meanwhile, the average LAUSD salary places in the bottom 25% of 21 comparable school districts.“
On March 18, UTLA will rally with SEIU and the admin union, AALA.
LikeLike
He’s suspended with pay indefinitely, doesn’t seem to me to be fit to ever return, and in my opinion should not be receiving $400K a year for much longer. But, firing LAUSD superintendents is a tricky endeavor, even with just cause for damage to the district.
LikeLike
Also, I heard from someone on the inside that there’s a rumor going around. Right before the raids, Carvalho was threatening to lay off vast swaths of our IT department (while hiring outside contractors to do the tech work). The rumor is that he is now trying to blame the IT department for his troubles.
LikeLike
And while I was talking about Carvalho yesterday, he finally issued a statement through his attorneys https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2026-03-10/alberto-carvalho-superintendent-of-lausd-breaks-silence-on-fbi-raid-on-home-office, and the school board denied a Green Dot charter renewal for a while (until the county renews them) https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2026-03-10/carvalho-probe-looms-over-lausd-meeting-as-labor-talks-charter-schools-demand-attention.
LikeLike
I read that NYT article and it’s so disgusting that these people who have more money than they could ever spend just want more money and have no interest in contributing in any way to these communities.
LikeLike
This really is off topic (although maybe not–I suppose she’s a billionaire!), but has anyone else noticed that the music accompanying the promo/trailer for Melania sounds like a Russian dirge (if that’s the right word)? (Don’t know if the music’s the same in the doc–even though it’s free on Prime Video, I have no intention of watching it.) Anyway…weird (but maybe appropriate) music.
LikeLike