Whatever westerners think about the bombing of Iran and the death of its leader, people in Teheran were dancing in the streets, according to The New York Times. Please open the link to see video of joyous crowds.
The Times reported:
Large crowds of Iranians poured into the streets of Tehran and other cities across Iran overnight, celebrating the news that Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, had been killed during a day of coordinated U.S. and Israeli attacks.
The ayatollah’s death, after nearly 40 years of authoritarian rule, represented a historic shift for Iran’s theocratic regime. Many Iranians, inside and outside the country, rejoiced, even as the threat of more attacks by U.S. and Israeli forces cast a pall over some celebrations.
Landlines and cellphone service were down across Iran, making it difficult to gauge public sentiment in the nation of more than 90 million people as U.S. and Israeli forces struck targets for a second day. Early reports of the death toll in Iran suggested that more than 100 people had been killed in the first wave of strikes.
But in neighborhoods across Tehran, the capital, pockets of exuberance emerged. In video calls with The New York Times, three residents of Tehran showed the scenes unfolding in their neighborhoods: Large crowds of men and women dancing and cheering, shouting, “Woohoo, hurrah.” Drivers passing by honked their car horns. Fireworks lit up the sky and loud Persian dance music filled the streets. Many residents, from their windows and balconies, joined in a chant of “freedom, freedom.”
Sara, a 53-year-old resident of Tehran, who like others interviewed asked that her last name not be used for fear of retaliation, said in a phone call that when she heard on the news that Ayatollah Khamenei had been killed, she let out a scream and jumped up and down. Her husband started pacing and they hugged, she said.
“Then we bolted outside and shouted from the top of our lungs and laughed and danced with our neighbors,” Sara said. Just a month ago, she, her husband and daughter were among protesters who took to the streets in an uprising against the government. Security forces beat her and her husband with batons and sprayed tear gas in their eyes, she said.
For Iranian supporters of Ayatollah Khamenei who considered him a revered religious figure, watching the celebrations was difficult, they said on social media. But they were noticeably absent from the streets.
Ayatollah Khamenei, who had the final say in all government decisions in Iran, personally ordered security forces to use lethal force against protesters in January, leading to a massacre that rights groups say killed at least 7,000 people, with numbers expected to rise.
“Khamenei went to hell,” one man shouted from his rooftop on Saturday, according to a video posted on BBC Persian.
For families whose loved ones were killed or jailed under Ayatollah Khamenei, the news felt cathartic, many said. Dr. Mohsen Assadi Lari, a former senior official in the Iranian Ministry of Health, lost his son and daughter, both in their early 20s, when Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps shot down a Ukrainian Airlines passenger plane in 2020. On Saturday, he posted photographs of his children on his social media page with a message about freedom: “We will endure the winter, spring is near.”
In Abdanan, a Kurdish city in western Iran where the crackdown on protests was intense, young men and women cruised the streets after the announcement of the supreme leader’s death. They hung out of their car windows, showing victory signs and cheering.
“Tonight, Feb. 28, congratulations for our freedom,” said a voice narrating a video of the celebrations, which was verified by The Times. Parts of the video were already blurred.
“Am I dreaming?” screamed a man in another video, also verified by The Times. “Ah! Hello to the new world. Ah!” The footage shows people tearing down a monument bearing a man’s silhouette, possibly Ayatollah Khamenei’s, at a roundabout in Galleh Dar, in Fars Province, as fires burned around them.
People in Shiraz, a major Iranian city, were abandoning their cars for an impromptu dance party, whistling, cheering, clapping and screaming with joy. In many videos, celebrants joined together in a cheer that is typically reserved for weddings, symbolizing pure joy.
A video from Isfahan, another major city, in the south of Iran, shows at least a hundred people celebrating, many with their arms raised and waving white cloths. Cars can be heard honking their horns amid loud, jubilant cheering.
Iranians living abroad joined their families back home through video calls. Many sobbed from relief and happiness. Homayoun, an Iranian living in Paris, popped a bottle of champagne. Shadi, in Los Angeles, did shots with friends. Shirin, in Maryland, danced wildly at home to loud music.
“I am so happy,” Shirin said. “I don’t know what to do with myself. Is this real? Thank God I am alive to see this day.”
It remained unclear what would come next after Ayatollah Khamenei’s nearly four decades in power, whether a new system of government would take over or power would be transferred to successors as he had instructed before his death.

Will the ends, will the means. This blog has opposed the only plausible means to end the Iranian theocracy: American military action. This posting is risible.
LikeLike
What a bizarre response. The post above supports the recent action. You might actually try reading posts before responding to them.
LikeLike
Foreign bots can read???
LikeLike
Nowhere has Diane Ravitch written that she explicitly supports Trump’s decision to attack Iran. At most she has implied ambivalence. Read previous posts to inform yourself.
LikeLike
See DR’s reply to Jack Burgess from last night:
“So there’s no mistake, I opposed Trump’s kidnapping of Maduro, and I oppose his lawless attack on Iran.”
I’m a forgiving person, so post your retraction and all will be good.
LikeLike
Risible— 100% spot on. Not only that, it’s most deplorable and revealing. Wow-
LikeLike
There’s a piece in the New Yorker by a jailed Iranian dissident who is not dancing in the street. Reads better than the NYT.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I understand why some people are cheering in the streets in Iran, but I can’t share that feeling. The celebration after Muammar Gaddafi’s death was followed by years of chaos and suffering in Libya. That history makes it hard for me to cheer regime change without worrying about what comes next.
LikeLike
An appalling post. Context-free. Of course people who suffered under the regime would be grateful. Same as with the toppling of Saddam. But in both cases, the regime being changed is that of America as much as Middle-Eastern, oil-rich dictatorships. And the change is one of anti-democracy.
LikeLike
Diane — Be careful about drawing any conclusions at this point about what’s going on in Iran. As you pointed out, landlines and cell phone communications are cut off throughout Iran. So, ask yourself: How are these “reports” getting out?
Chas Freeman, former United States Assistant Secretary of Defense and former U.S. Ambassador to Saudi Arabia says that Israeli agents smuggled in 50,000 Starlink sets into Iran and distributed them to opponents of the Iranian regime. All the videos of “demonstrations” against the regime and all the reports of the regime’s crackdown have come from these Iranians who were selected by Israeli intelligence to report what Netanyahu and Trump want things to look like.
We also don’t know from our own major media what’s going on because (1) all the information and video about the situation is coming out through Israeli filters, and (2) U.S. media are fearful of reporting anything negative because the FCC will pounce on them.
Freeman, who is an expert on the region and on Iran, points out that it’s far more likely that the average Iranian is angry at the United States because all the hardships they have been suffering are the result of the sanctions that Trump imposed on Iran and that throughout the region the average person in the entire region is furious that current U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee said in a recent interview with Tucker Carlson that it “would be fine if [Israel] took it all,” referring to a biblically described area of land that includes major regions throughout the Middle East.
How stupid…yet it genuinely reflects the perspective of Trump’s White House advisors, especially Stephen Miller.
Freeman, who has met with the now deceased Ayatollah Khamenei, also points out that Khamenei has been a staunch opponent of Iran developing nuclear weapons. Now with Khamenei out of the picture, the rabid anti-Israel/anti-Trump Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) has free rein to go that direction.
And Freeman points out that the IRGC has a ready supplier of nuclear missiles in its ally North Korea. China and Russia are also both allies.
What happens if North Korea begins shipping missiles and nuclear technology to Iran? Will Trump attack North Korea which already has nuclear missiles that can reach cities throughout America?
And if Trump attacks North Korea which has China as an ally, what happens then?
The problem — a breath-stopping problem — is that there is NO END-GAME to what Trump has set in motion. Should U.S. cities begin oiling their air raid sirens and putting up signs directing people to the nearest underground air raid shelter?
Actually, according to former ambassador Freeman, it was Israel that set all this uncertainty in motion: Like Trump with the Epstein papers, Netanyahu is facing criminal charges and needed a huge distraction to give a lift to his sagging popularity. He doesn’t much care about what follows because in his perspective the United States is now on the hook to try to finish what he wanted started. Netanyahu is more interested in his political survival than in the consequences of launching what could — and will likely be, according to Freeman who knows the region’s dynamics very well — a rolling and expanding conflict throughout the region and whose directions and consequences are wholly unpredictable.
Retired CIA analyst for the region, Lawrence Johnson, says that the conflict could spread rapidly because Iran has an estimated 10,000 ballistic missiles in its stockpile. As the Pentagon pointed out in trying to dissuade Trump from launching this attack, that number of ballistic missiles far exceeds America’s and Israel’s COMBINED stockpile of anti-missile weapons. That puts not only Israel and Saudi Arabia at risk, it puts the entire U.S. Navy fleet at risk. Remember, the far-less sophisticated and less well-armed Houtis drove the U.S. Navy out of the region with far less deadly missiles because the fleet ran out of defensive weapons.
So, don’t go dancing around about how great this war is for the Iranian people because not only do we not actually know the percentage of Iranians who are happy about it, we also know that there are far bigger considerations now at play in this very vague picture — and some of those factors can do our nation and our people great harm.
LikeLike
How can we cheer that our Ayatollah killed their Ayatollah? This is madness! Kidnapping leaders. Killing leaders. Where do we get that right? And why do we not suppose some young Iranian is now planning for the day when he can crash a plane into an American tower? We started the modern disruption of Iran by overthrowing their socialist government in ’54. Do we really imagine that Donald Trump cares one whit about anyone in Iran? Or Venezuela? We built the UN. Let’s use it. Iran had previously agreed to not do nukes. C’mon, folks. Don’t cheer on our despot!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jack,
So there’s no mistake, I opposed Trump’s kidnapping of Maduro, and I oppose his lawless attack on Iran.
The War Powers Act says only Congress can authorize an act of war. Trump went to war without going to Congress. Trump broke the law. He is acting like a King, who needs no one’s permission to do whatever he wants. He is a dangerous man, who thinks he is above the law.
Congress, including the Republicans, should censure him.
But that doesn’t change the fact that the Ayatollah was a brutal oppressor. When women sought the right to take off their head coverings, they were imprisoned and many were murdered.
When opponents of the regime protested in January, the Ayatollah crushed their uprising. Thousands died–the estimates ranged from 3,000 to 30,000.
I can understand Iranians reacting with joy.
I fear it will be short-lived because Trump will betray them.
LikeLike
Diane—
Ok. Fair points. All fair points. The Ayatollah wasn’t elected. Protests were crushed. People were murdered. The Iranian people haven’t had a real choice in 46 years. Good. True. Important.
Now here’s my question for you: What the f*ck did we do about it…?
We backed the Shah. We overthrew Mossadegh in ’53 when they actually did choose a leader. We installed a dictator who tortured people for us. Then we acted surprised when they turned to religion. Then we called them crazy.
You want to know why I sound ‘haughty’? Because I’m tired of Americans discovering oppression in other countries every 15 minutes like it’s breaking news. ‘Did you know Iran has a theocracy?’
Uhh, well… we did help build it.
Again this cited 3,000 to 30,000 dead protestors— is there a source you could post for me to look at? Taken at face value that’s horrifying. Genuinely. And our government response is what? Sanctions that hurt ordinary people? Drone strikes? Incessant tweeting?
I’m not supporting the mullahs
(not sure what I said that would suggest that?). I’m supporting the idea that the Iranian people might know their own situation better than a gaggle of folks who’ve just discovered regime change is complicated.
You hope they get to choose their leaders. Me too. But they won’t choose them because we choose for them. Like we have the last 46 years. And until we reckon with that— with the CIA, with the coup, with the decades of ‘help’— it’ll be more of the very same thing… kinda like Bill Murray in Groundhog Day.
PS: Trump left Maduro alone because Maduro wasn’t selling oil (at the time) to our enemies. But when it’s convenient, we’ll ‘care’ again.
LikeLike
We did nothing. There are terrible autocracies and dictatorships around the world.
What have we done to free the people of North Korea? The people of Russia?
Nothing.
We should not have gone to war. Period.
But I would be very happy if the people of Iran could be free and choose their leaders and their form of government.
LikeLike
It’s true that Khamenei is someone that a lot of Iranians won’t miss. As for dancing in the streets, I’m not convinced. First, millions of dollars has been spent on social media disinformation (https://www.bostonreview.net/articles/our-man-for-tehran/). And second, Washington told people to stay in their homes, and some people are afraid to even go out for groceries.
Don’t cheer for death and destruction.
LikeLiked by 1 person
There are Khamenei-wannabes waiting in the wings, who he designated to take over and that are still alive, including his grandson –just like there would be a lot of Trump-wannabes if they retaliated and killed him, including many MAGAts (and probably Jr). So it’s far from over, as can be seen here: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-03-01/us-and-israel-have-struck-iran-who-has-been-killed/106401908
LikeLike
Ding dong the witch is dead….. Or is it warlock? & what comes next?
LikeLike
I agree the leader of Iran was despicable but Trump should have gone to Congress with a plan. He just does what ever he wants and Congress is the biggest enabler!! They all need to re replaced so we have checks and balances!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Agreed.
LikeLike
we aren’t at war. It’s a series of strikes. Completely legal. In fact I can give you a list of strikes where democrats didn’t go to congress.
libya
kosovo
somalia
Benghazi
What’s your point… they set precedence and it’s totally legal.
And for the plan after, clearly no one if following this closely. Or maybe you just began?
the Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi has a democratic plan including immunity, human rights, elections, and a constitution
not every Iranian who is anti regime is pro Pahlavi but in 2024 64% of 94 million people showed favor to him. This was before the lion and the sun revolution.
LikeLike
Democrats doing illegal things doesn’t make illegal things legal. It just means that both parties are a bunch of warmonger chickenhawks.
LikeLiked by 1 person
We are at war. Did you happen to listen to the press conferences today? They are preparing to send in ground troops…I believe that qualifies for war!
LikeLike
Trump ran as an anti-war candidate. He lied.
This year alone, he has bombed seven countries.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I just checked out the conference. As of right now we are not sending in troops. He said he’s not opposed to it if needed.
why can’t you just write facts instead of BS
and Diane this isn’t to your post. It’s to the person who said we are now deploying troops.
I have no problem at all with taking out the regime. It’s for Iran and it’s for the USA and the globe bc they’re a root cause in terrorism. Period.
Javid Shah
LikeLike
BBC.com – US to send 1500 extra troops to Middle East to counter the “ongoing threat posed by Iranian forces”, the acting defense secretary says.
LikeLike
no I didn’t
LikeLike
more like situations changed.
I didn’t vote for the guy but we are carrying on over legal behavior for a strike.
I’m having trouble with this platform and responding to comments.
but I didn’t say the democrats were wrong. I said what they did was legal.
and my problem is that you only call out the folks you hate for certain behaviors and not everyone else who exhibited the same behavior.
LikeLike
An impulsive action from a man whose goal above all is escaping justice for his crimes — that is not a prescription for a successful mission — even apart from the sheer incompetence of the people he placed to carry it out.
LikeLike
When Trump does anything, it never ends well, except for Trump.
LikeLike
Apologies. I posted to the wrong conversation that was intended for here.
Diane—
Ok. Fair points. All fair points. The Ayatollah wasn’t elected. Protests were crushed. People were murdered. The Iranian people haven’t had a real choice in 46 years. Good. True. Important.
Now here’s my question for you: What the f*ck did we do about it…?
We backed the Shah. We overthrew Mossadegh in ’53 when they actually did choose a leader. We installed a dictator who tortured people for us. Then we acted surprised when they turned to religion. Then we called them crazy.
You want to know why I sound ‘haughty’? Because I’m tired of Americans discovering oppression in other countries every 15 minutes like it’s breaking news. ‘Did you know Iran has a theocracy?’
Uhh, well… we did help build it.
Again this cited 3,000 to 30,000 dead protestors— is there a source you could post for me to look at? Taken at face value that’s horrifying. Genuinely. And our government response is what? Sanctions that hurt ordinary people? Drone strikes? Incessant tweeting?
I’m not supporting the mullahs
(not sure what I said that would suggest that?). I’m supporting the idea that the Iranian people might know their own situation better than a gaggle of folks who’ve just discovered regime change is complicated.
You hope they get to choose their leaders. Me too. But they won’t choose them because we choose for them. Like we have the last 46 years. And until we reckon with that— with the CIA, with the coup, with the decades of ‘help’— it’ll be more of the very same thing… kinda like Bill Murray in Groundhog Day.
PS: Trump left Maduro alone because Maduro wasn’t selling oil (at the time) to our enemies. But when it’s convenient, we’ll ‘care’ again.
LikeLike
Iran has a population of 90 million. Of course you can find a few videos of people cheering. That doesn’t mean the majority of the country is cheering. What kind of sickos cheer when 153 school girls and their teachers were slaughtered? Anyway, most Iranians are too terrified to be cheering. Again, only a sicko cheers when their country is bombed. This is grotesque and not representative of Iran as a whole, where there is certainly not “joy”. Sick!
LikeLiked by 1 person
phew. Load of projection in this post. Keep up with reality
LikeLike
Surely this won’t be deemed as projection…
https://youtube.com/shorts/2zjKhGlprwo?si=xUeuMzMHt8OqtFGa
LikeLike
So you think it’s okay to strip women of all rights and force them to cover their heads?
No elections in nearly half a century?
I think that Trump’s war is stupid because there is no plan for the people to get their freedom.
But I hope that by some miracle the prone of Iran can cast off the brutal theocrats who rule them by force and terror.
LikeLike
Yeah, women are liberated from their hijabs now, woo hoo!
They’re also liberated from their bodies, but I guess it’s all okay because freedumb!
Do you really think it’s okay to drop bombs on people to liberate them? Has any country the U.S. has liberated since WWII been better off? SMDH.
LikeLike
I don’t like war.
I oppose Trump’s decision to go to war.
I’m sorry you don’t care about women’s rights or human rights.
You don’t care about Outin’s war on Ukraine, so it’s strange that you oppose Trump’s war on the theocracy of Iran.
I wish the people of Iran, North Korea, Russia, and China were free to choose their own leaders and form of government.
Oh yeah, the people of Russia are free to elect Putin. But only Putin. Anyone who challenges him does.
LikeLike
You do like war. You support it every time. You think diplomacy is weakness and cooperation is capitulation. The only other alternative is war. If Ukraine didn’t want war, they shouldn’t have parked their soldiers on Russia’s border and killed their people. Putin tried to negotiate. The U.S. – including you – laughed at him.
LikeLike
Dienne,
You are ridiculous. I have never said that I like war. I have never said that diplomacy is weakness.
You are incapable of admitting that Putin invaded Ukraine. Ukraine did not invade Russia. Ukraine has negotiated in good faith. Putin never negotiated in good faith.
I didn’t laugh at Putin. I despise him. He is a mass murderer. A dictator. A megalomaniac.
The war in Ukraine would be over instantly if Putin stopped bombarding Ukraine with missiles and drones. The war ends when Putin ends his aggression against the men, women, and children of Ukraine.
LikeLike
It’s no secret that I am no fan of King Donald the Wurst. But I am furious at the tepid Democratic response to the action we have taken to topple the Iranian regime. The great people of this great country have suffered far, far too long under the repressive, murderous Iranian fundamentalist regime. And especially, young people and women and academics and artists have suffered. This evil regime murdered tens of thousands of its own young citizens in the past couple months alone. It is LONG PAST TIME for the West to intervene to end the repression of this people, the perversion of Iranian culture, and, notably, the terrorism across the region and the world instigated and funded and supplied by the Iranian fundamentalists. I detest Donald Trump, but I thoroughly support this action. My sole fear is that the administration, in response to criticism at home, will not take this far enough. We must take the action necessary to ensure regime change–the emergence of a progressive, secular government in that country. And its really important that we not make the mistake that the Bush Jr. administration made in Iraq–that we create mechanisms by which former supporters of the regime, including in the IRGC, can come over to the new secular government. OK. You can pile onto me now.
LikeLike
I agree with you. Great post. I’m so disheartened at the democratic response.
25 years ago we’d all be celebrating in the streets if we knocked out khamenei then.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This action in Iran is long overdue.
LikeLike
My longer post on this topic disappeared. I’ve had no end of trouble with WordPress lately. Hoping this one goes through.
The Iranian people have suffered far, far too long under this repressive regime. In particular, women, young people, scholars, and creatives have suffered. This great people deserves better, and it is far, far, far past time for the rest of the world to come to its rescue and end the Iranian fundamentalists’ repression at home and sponsorship of terrorism throughout the region and, indeed, the world. In the past couple months alone, the evil regime has killed thousands of its citizens, many of them young people at the very beginnings of their adult lives, for daring to speak against it.
I am sickened by the Democratic response to this. As most here know, I am no fan of King Donald the Wurst, but I entirely support what he just did here. My greatest fear is that there will not be sufficient and appropriate follow-through. In particular, we need to create mechanisms by which people in the preceding regime, and particularly in the IRCG, can come over to the new government. In other words, we need to avoid the horrific mistake that the Shrub administration made in Iraq.
LikeLike
Bob,
I agree completely. Trump is no fan of democracy. But the Iranian people have suffered under totalitarian rule since 1979. I remember when the Shah was overthrown. He was a harsh ruler but nowhere as cruel as the mullahs. I have Iranian friends. They remember what it was like before the Ayatollah. My fear is that Trump will betray them again.
LikeLiked by 1 person
same hear. May words like yours awaken out slumbering politicians to the dire need right now of responsible action to ensure a reasonable transition in Iran to a secular government. This will require creating an interim government, creating a mechanism for elections, creating mechanisms for members of the old ruling party and of the IRGC to switch their allegiance to the new government, and making it very clear to those considering not switching their allegiance that failing to do so would be personally quite dangerous. This won’t be easy. It requires a real plan. And preferably one involving our European allies. A Marshall Plan for Iran.
The protests have been partially due to economic problems. These have to be addressed as part of the plan for the future of the country.
LikeLike
Same here. LOL
LikeLike
You do understand that it was the people who overthrew the Shah, right? Please read the history of Iran. Learn who Mossadegh was and what the U.S. did to him and how the Shah thanked them for it. Life was certainly not better under the Shah.
Anyway, you don’t have Iranian friends. Your friends are Iranian ex-pats who were among the few elites who benefited from the Shah’s reign of terror and who, hence had to flee the country.
I’m no fan of theocracy in any form, but it’s a fact that Islam was the one force that was strong enough to rally the people against U.S. abuses and keep the country united to prevent a repeat (which they’re now going to get anyway.
You clearly buy into the propaganda for every war the U.S. sells us (I’m convinced you supported Iraq too). Don’t pretend that you hate war. You like being on the giving end of it. I think you might feel differently if it were your hospitals and elementary schools getting bombed. Saying that what Trump did here is odious. You don’t even hate Trump, do you? You don’t disapprove of anything he actually does, you just wish he’d do it in a more statesmanlike manner like Bush, Obama and Biden.
LikeLike
Dienne,
The Shah was deposed in 1979. At the time, I–like many young liberals–thought it was a wonderful thing.
Turns out it was not a wonderful thing.
Women’s rights disappeared. Only one religion was tolerated. If you like theocracy, Ayatollah Kohmeini was your guy.
The Iranians I know in the U.S. fled for their lives. They did not want their children to live in a brutally repressive dictatorship. They wanted their daughters to experience freedom, not repression.
The young women of Iran resisted oppression a few years ago and were met with repression and death.
In January, tens of thousands of Iranians risked their lives by openly rebelling against the austere and cruel dictatorship of the mullahs. Thousands days ago were slaughtered.
The Iranian people above rose up against the Shah in 1979.
In January, the Iranian people rose up against the vicious regime.
Unfortunately, they count on Trump to help them. He doesn’t care about them.
LikeLike
You say, ‘come to its rescue’.
Do you know what ‘come to its rescue’ means in American English? Bombs. It means bombs. Followed by stabilization efforts, nation-building, unforeseen consequences, and yadda-yadda. Followed by ‘who could have predicted this?’
You call the Iranian regime straight-up evil, like a cartoon villain. With no complexity, no history, no context—just evil. You know who else uses language like that? People who want to sell you a war.
‘This evil regime has killed thousands of its citizens in the past couple months alone.’
Thousands!? In a couple months!?That’s specifically a lot numbers. How do you know that? Do you have sources on the ground, in Iran, counting bodies?
Do you really believe what you’re saying or is it something else?
You’re ‘sickened by the Democratics’ (maybe it’s about the Democrats?). A statement like this makes it seem like your point is also tracking some other kind of score at home. Which would make the Iranian protesters kinda like game pieces, maybe?
King Donald the Wurst
(like a German sausage) is clever. It’s kinda 2016 tho. And you’re so busy being clever that you miss the point: YOU’RE ENDORSING THE EXACT SAME FOREIGN POLICY AS EVERY PRESIDENT TO-DATE. And like every regime change before, we’ll clear their path with some ‘rescue bombs’.
You say your greatest fear is that won’t be ‘sufficient and appropriate follow-through.’
Your greatest fear won’t be that thousands will die? Or that the region will burn? Not that we’ll stumble into another endless war? Your greatest fear is ‘insufficient follow-through’? Here’s an irrefutable fact— a country can’t commit war crimes that destabilize an entire country… IF THEY DON’T GO.
And finally you say we need to ‘avoid the horrific mistake that the Shrub administration made in Iraq.’
Shrub (more cute than clever). But here’s the thing— the ‘horrific mistake’ wasn’t that they disbanded the army. The horrific mistake was the entire war. The lies. The deaths. The trillions of dollars. The creation of ISIS. The destruction of a country that never threatened us.
You’re literally talking about this like it was a management error of a logistical hiccup.
Really, what the Iranian people need us to do is get out of their way and stop propping up dictators when it’s convenient for oil companies. They need us to stop overthrowing their governments when they elect the wrong people.
Basically they need us to stop ‘rescuing’ them.
But that doesn’t make you feel morally superior and that’s where your point of view departs from reality.
Here is some more reality. Trump doesn’t care about them. Biden doesn’t care about them. The Democrats don’t care about them. The Republicans don’t care about them. The only people who care about them are them. The Iranian people. I wonder if you’ve considered what the thoughts are of the Iranian people?
LikeLike
Ken,
That’s a very haughty letter.
Who elected the Ayatollah?
When did the Iranian people ever have a chance to choose their leaders?
You may recall that there was a woman’s protest movement against the brutal treatment of women. It was crushed.
Perhaps you noticed a rebellion just last January against a theocracy that rules with an iron fist.
The clerics crushed the dissidents.
I have seen estimates of 3,000-30,000 protestors murdered.
Is this the regime you are supporting.
The Iranian people didn’t choose them.
I agree that bombing Iran won’t create a chance for the Iranian people to choose their leaders.
I feel sure that Trump would be happy to leave the mullahs in charge, as he left the Maduro regime in charge in Venezuela.
But the tone of your letter implies you think the people of Iran are satisfied with their leaders.
If they were, the mullahs would have permitted an election in the past 46 years.
They have not.
I hope that the Iranian people have the chance to choose their leaders.
LikeLike