Oliver Darcy, media journalist, wrote in his blog Status about the events leading ABC to indefinitely cancel Jimmy Kimmel’s late night show. If you care about the state of our democracy, it’s a scary story. Who will be silenced next?
The concept of free speech, enshrined in the First Amendment to the Constitution, is in jeopardy. The Trump administration celebrates every triumph in their ongoing campaign to censor speech that they don’t like. They have made clear that they would like to stifle all criticism and dissent.
Trump issued an executive order on his first day in office, January 20, 2025, ordering the protection of free speech and an end to federal government censorship. The order was titled “Restoring Freedom Of Speech And Ending Federal Censorship.” Hahaha. The joke’s on us.
The point of guaranteeing freedom of speech is not to protect uncontroversial speech. Such speech needs no protection. It’s to protect speech that offends someone, speech that is unpopular, speech that is despised by the powerful.
Please join me and write to the chairman of Disney, which owns ABC: Robert.Iger@Disney.com
Darcy writes:
Inside ABC, emergency meetings were convened after the FCC chair’s Jimmy Kimmel threat, with the late-night host ready to respond on-air—but Disney brass ultimately decided to bench the marquee talent instead.
On Wednesday, Federal Communications Commission Chairman Brendan Carr dropped in via webcam for an appearance on far-right personality Benny Johnson’s program. That the FCC chairman would sit down with Johnson at all was remarkable in itself. Johnson has built his brand trafficking in MAGA memes, misinformation, and cultural outrage; not typically the type of programming a government official would want to lend their credibility to. In any case, it wasn’t the venue alone that raised eyebrows. It was what Carr said once the program started taping.
Speaking to Johnson’s audience, Carr lashed out at ABC late-night host Jimmy Kimmel over a remark the comedian made during his Monday monologue. Kimmel had said, “We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them, and doing everything they can to score political points from it.” The day after Kimmel’s comment, authorities released the suspected killer’s messages, which showed he held disdain for the “hate” Kirk espoused. Notably, Kimmel never stated that the suspect was on the right, but that is how many interpreted the remarks.
Indeed, Carr took significant issue with the comment, first dismissing Kimmel as “frankly talentless” on Johnson’s show. He then went further, delivering a naked threat aimed at Disney, ABC’s parent company: “This is a very, very serious issue right now for Disney,” he said. “We can do this the easy way or the hard way. These companies can find ways to take action on Kimmel or there is going to be additional work for the FCC ahead.” It was an extraordinary moment: a sitting FCC chairman openly pressuring a network to silence one of its marquee talents.
Carr’s appearance set off an immediate cascade of events inside ABC. According to people familiar with the matter, the network held a series of emergency meetings to discuss how to respond. Kimmel wanted to address the situation on his program Wednesday night. In fact, I’m told that he had even written a script about how he could respond to the controversy—but ultimately Disney brass wasn’t comfortable with it. Amid the meetings, Nexstar, the largest owner of local television stations in the country, decided it would decline to air “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” for the “foreseeable future.” Ultimately, Disney boss Bob Iger and Disney Entertainment chief Dana Walden, among others, made the decision to pull the program from the network while it determined next steps.
ABC then issued a seven-word statement: “‘Jimmy Kimmel Live!’ will be preempted indefinitely,” a spokesperson said, declining to elaborate on the shock decision. For an acclaimed late-night show long considered a staple of the network’s entertainment offerings, the sudden removal was stunning, even though I’m told the hope is that Kimmel will eventually return.
Donald Trump was also quick to celebrate the announcement, writing on his social platform: “Great News for America: The ratings challenged Jimmy Kimmel Show is CANCELLED. Congratulations to ABC for finally having the courage to do what had to be done. Kimmel has ZERO talent, and worse ratings than even Colbert, if that’s possible.” The emboldened Trump also sent a clear message to Comcast and NBCUniversalbrass: “That leaves Jimmy and Seth, two total losers, on Fake News NBC. Their ratings are also horrible. Do it NBC!!!”
Carr, of course, was also delighted by the outcome. Reached by Status via text on Wednesday evening, he responded to a request for comment with a smiling emoji: “😀.” When pressed for words rather than symbols, Carr shot back that Status “has plenty of room for emojis.” He also singled out Nexstar on social media for praise, commending the company for “doing the right thing” by refusing to carry Kimmel’s program. The reaction would normally be considered inappropriate gloating from a regulator whose remarks had, in the span of hours, helped trigger the cancellation of one of network television’s best-known shows.
Nevertheless, the implications are seismic. Iger blinked, capitulating to political pressure from the Trump administration. The move sent shockwaves through the entertainment industry, where executives and talent agents privately expressed alarm about what it signaled for creatives moving forward. “Clients are texting me scared,” one prominent agent told me in the hours after the announcement, describing a climate of growing unease and concern over what could be next. “This one is really bad,” another media executive texted me, adding that it “feels like an inflection point.” Anna Gomez, the lone Democratic commissioner at the FCC, noted that the Trump administration “is increasingly using the weight of government power to suppress lawful expression.”
Of course, lurking beneath the surface are transactional calculations. Nexstar is working to merge with TEGNA, in a deal that requires FCC approval. Meanwhile, Disney’s decision comes as the company is working to complete a high-stakes deal with the NFL, one that is crucial to the future of ESPN. Securing those rights requires federal regulatory approval, and the company can hardly afford to pick a fight with Trump’s Washingtonwhile the deal hangs in the balance. By sidelining Kimmel, Iger may have protected Disney’s larger business interests. But the cost is a frightening message to the creative community and a major blow to free expression.
To a degree, what we’re also seeing is media executives reckoning with the reality that in 2025, with the country so polarized and in various information silos, there is no way to please everyone. Iger’s decision has sparked fierce backlash from the left and moderates, who are rightly outraged by Disney’s capitulation, even as Trump’s supporters cheer the move as a victory. Once upon a time, companies like Disney prided themselves on speaking to the whole country. That is no longer possible.
It goes without saying, but the Kimmel episode represents yet another example of a major media corporation bending the knee to Trump—and it comes at a time that the president appears more emboldened to target speech he dislikes. Earlier this week, Attorney General Pam Bondi bluntly threatened that the administration would “absolutely target” those engaging in what she described as “hate speech,” in the wake of Kirk’s killing. She quickly attempted to walk it back, but Trump himself then threatened ABC directly, singling out journalist Jonathan Karl as a possible target.
The irony, of course, can’t be missed. For years, Republicans cast themselves as the party of free speech, railing against what they derided as “cancel culture” from the left. Yet what we are witnessing now is a full-scale cancel campaign led from the right, with the force of federal government power behind it. The same voices that once claimed to defend open expression are now actively weaponizing regulatory threats to silence critics.
And Kimmel is hardly the only casualty. Paramount abruptly canceled Stephen Colbert’s program earlier this year, citing financial concerns, but the decision—coming against one of Trump’s sharpest critics—was obviously related to his politics. Now Disney has benched Kimmel. The result is a media landscape where critics of the president are vanishing from broadcast television one by one, not because audiences have turned away, but because executives fear government retribution. The message is chilling: in Trump’s America, even the most powerful media companies will silence their own talent if it keeps them in the administration’s good graces. It is a remarkable, and deeply alarming, moment for free speech.
The right-wing Sinclair Broadcast Group, the owner of dozens of ABC affiliates, issued a press release calling on Jimmy Kimmel to make a “direct apology” and donate to Charlie Kirk’s family and Turning Point USA. It also plans to air a “special in remembrance” of Kirk on Friday in the “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” time slot. [BusinessWire]
The Writers Guild of America issued this statement:
WGA Statement on ABC’s Decision to
Pull Jimmy Kimmel Live!
The right to speak our minds and to disagree with each other – to disturb, even – is at the very heart of what it means to be a free people. It is not to be denied. Not by violence, not by the abuse of governmental power, nor by acts of corporate cowardice.
As a Guild, we stand united in opposition to anyone who uses their power and influence to silence the voices of writers, or anyone who speaks in dissent. If free speech applied only to ideas we like, we needn’t have bothered to write it into the Constitution. What we have signed on to – painful as it may be at times – is the freeing agreement to disagree.
Shame on those in government who forget this founding truth. As for our employers, our words have made you rich.
Silencing us impoverishes the whole world.
The WGA stands with Jimmy Kimmel and his writers.

When our government fails to enforce antitrust laws, it isn’t just bad for consumers — it’s dangerous for democracy. Media consolidation concentrates power in fewer hands, making it easier for a single political faction or ideology to dominate the public narrative. History shows that fascist regimes relied on precisely this kind of control. Without strong antitrust action, we leave the door wide open for authoritarianism to walk in.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Authoritarianism has already walked through the door, and is now trying to build an indestructible bunker.
LikeLiked by 1 person
We are witnessing the death of free speech and free expression in this country because of the thin skinned person in the White House. Trump has made it clear that he is going after the remaining late night hosts who have mocked him or criticized him. These wealthy TV corporations have no guts whatsoever and will fold immediately to whatever Trump demands from them. I guess the TV news programs will only broadcast good news about Trump, bad news or the simple truth will not be allowed. Seth Myers and Jimmy Fallon are next on Trump’s hit list, there’s no reason to think that NBC will do anything different from ABC or CBS.
LikeLike
The ratings for Kimmel’s show were very low, just like the Colbert show. It’s a safe bet that both shows were huge money losers. For business purposes alone they were no longer viable. One reason for the low ratings is that those shows had become the Diane Ravitch Blog on late night TV: fanatically partisan, repetitive and boring, the same things over and over again.
Trump should have acted like a mature adult and stayed quiet. He is allowing low-information partisans to think that these cancellations were done because of political pressures placed on the networks. That’s not the reason: late night partisan shows like this are not close to being profitable. Broadcast TV evening news shows are next on the chopping block within ten years as the Baby Boomers die off.
LikeLike
Geez, if partisan blogs are so boring (to a Trumper like you), why does Heather Cox Richardson have 2.6 million subscribers?
Sorry you find it impossible to defend the First Amendment. What other parts of the Constitution are you unwilling to defend?
LikeLike
Try reading for comprehension. I clearly stated that the real reason for canceling these shows is the low ratings. The Colbert show is losing $40-$50 million per year because of low ratings, so it’s likely that the Kimmel show is doing likewise.
A genuine Trumper doesn’t write like I did: “Trump should have acted like a mature adult and stayed quiet. He is allowing low-information partisans to think that these cancellations were done because of political pressures placed on the networks.” I did not vote for Trump largely because he always acts like this.
I give you credit for admitting that Heather Cox Richardson is partisan, a left-wing activist and a non-historian like you now are. Her readers go to her Substack to have their far Left opinions reinforced – never challenged, just like this blog. She wrote the following a few days ago:
“But in fact, the alleged shooter was not someone on the left. The alleged killer, Tyler Robinson, is a young white man from a Republican, gun enthusiast family, who appears to have embraced the far right, disliking Kirk for being insufficiently radical.“
She had no basis whatever for making that statement; it just fit her preferred narative. That statement has been proven beyond all doubt to be false. She has not had the integrity to admit that she was wrong.
“https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/brain-worms-stuff-substack-most-170234837.html
LikeLike
What a crock of shite! Do you really think that all these shows suddenly became too unprofitable right at this exact time the Putin puppet started targeting them? Please do better troll. What did your kid-diddling insurrectionist mean when he said “Seth and Jimmy (Fallon) are next”? Is he talking to their accountant? Sounds like you’re just ashamed you support a Nazi-loving traitor to the Constitution. Take your horse pills, clutch your pearls and put Hannity back on. It’s all you’re good for.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Seriously? The network announced it was because of Kimmels comments. It had nothing to do with low ratings. And if you read the text of the monolog, the joke was about tRump, NOT Charlie Kirk. Kimmel had sent a message on his socal media after the shooting denouncing the violence and sending his families prayers and support to Kirks wife and kids.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Clown troll.
LikeLike
Republicans who complain about cancel culture cancel shows they don’t like. Now that is real cancel culture.
LikeLiked by 4 people
Trumpers are hyper-whiners and crybabies.
LikeLiked by 3 people
I am missing ABC and it’s affiliates. They had some go-to local news coverage not to mention network shows I/we enjoyed. No more. I guess I was really naive to think that corporate America would be willing to stand up for democracy and the Constitution. Didn’t those things used to be what Republicans claimed as values central to their beliefs. They were way back when I was still a Republican. No more. I hope NBC doesn’t have some deal they need the FCC to approve. MAGA land is a small fraction of the country. I guess viewers aren’t important enough; many more of us are moderates and progressives. Carr has made it clear he bends over for Trump. It’s sickening.
LikeLike
Anti-facists are the targets on his agenda now as well. See: “Trump says he’s designating Antifa as a terrorist organization”: https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/17/politics/antifa-terrorist-designation-trump
(Up is down and down is up, just because he says so.)
LikeLike
To be clear, I do not condone violence. I am very concerned about the indicators demonstrating that our country is becoming fascist though, so I do believe in non-violent anti-fascism approaches.
From what I’ve read, “Antifa has no central leadership structure or formal membership. Instead, a dispersed network coordinates anti-racist activism on an ad hoc basis” https://archive.ph/20200902121629/https://www.wsj.com/articles/q-a-what-is-antifa-11598985917#selection-259.0-259.144
“Research suggests that most antifa action is nonviolent [25][26][27]” and THAT is what I support.
LikeLiked by 1 person
What is being lost in all this reporting – especially the lousy job most of the so-called liberal media has done – is actually watching the video to see the entirety of Kimmel’s monologue.
Jimmy Kimmel’s statement was about the MAGA gang – not about Tyler Richardson and not about Charlie Kirk.
Oliver Darcy does point it out:
“Kimmel had said, “We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them, and doing everything they can to score political points from it.” The day after Kimmel’s comment, authorities released the suspected killer’s messages, which showed he held disdain for the “hate” Kirk espoused. Notably, Kimmel never stated that the suspect was on the right, but that is how many interpreted the remarks.“
I watched that monologue and I didn’t interpret Kimmel’s remarks as Kimmel stating that the suspect was on the right. Because Kimmel did not say that the suspect was on the right. But I can see how those who are okay with Trump shooting someone on Fifth Avenue would decide that he did because they were outraged at what came after that – Kimmel showing a clip of Trump mourning Kirk’s death by reminding reporters of how the ballroom he was building was going to be the greatest ballroom ever.
Any fair-minded person would acknowledge that Kimmel’s statement about the MAGA mob was 100% true — because the MAGA mob was speculating about Tyler being trans, about Tyler being a radical leftist, being antifa, being a democrat, without an iota of evidence as to what Tyler was. But they never once speculated that Tyler was MAGA. He was showing the MAGA gang’s hypocrisy – that they didn’t care about evidence, they cared about demonizing their enemy regardless of whether it was true.
Notably, Kimmel said: “We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them“
Kimmel did not say “We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to MIS-CHARACTERIZE this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them“
Kimmel never said Tyler Robinson was MAGA. And while I concede that some people could interpret it that way, it’s an ambiguous sentence that in no way states that Tyler Robinson was MAGA. What isn’t ambiguous is that Kimmel was stating clearly that the MAGA gang was perfectly fine stating falsehoods about Tyler Robinson’s motives – but they did not extend their willingness to tell falsehoods to saying that he was MAGA. They are hypocrites.
And just as hypocritical is the nonsensical view that Jimmy Kimmel must be canceled for supposedly saying that Kirk’s killer was MAGA, but all those MAGAs on tv who said that Kirk’s killer was trans or antifa or a lib, or ANYTHING ELSE should not be cancelled. Because at this time, we don’t know what Tyler Robinson is, and all the MAGA folks who implied he was anything other than MAGA need to be cancelled, too.
But then again, we live in an Orwellian society led by the co-opted NYT, Washington Post, and cowardly liberal media. And the far right could not have done it without them.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Great America. Enough with tariffs and convoluted tax bills and unresolvable peace treaties – it’s getting to the mission: Greatness. Again.
“Great” oozes with nostalgia AND evokes revenge and disdain.
Nostalgia for the good old days of WWII heroes and parades, housing explosion, jobs and the GI Bill, – all good stuff – AND the opinionated strict male dominated household, McCarthy dominating the airwaves, and segregation. Mob bosses. MadMen culture. Disdain. Revenge.
They want to bring back their version of the ‘40s and ‘50s. And they tripped over how! Declare war on America.
Declare war on America and Americans.
LikeLiked by 1 person
People Okay With Murder Outraged By TV Show Cancellation
U.S.·Sep 18, 2025 · BabylonBee.com
U.S. — Recent events in American society indicated that the very same people who are okay with murder are also outraged by the cancellation of a TV show.
Current American societal trends showed that the exact same people who were willing to condone or even celebrate the brutal, public murder of a free speech advocate were also inconsolably infuriated by the cancellation of a late-night talk show.
“How dare the right extremists cancel Jimmy Kimmel?” howled one left-wing political commentator. “It is literally violence to force him into silence just because he lied about an assassination. What is this, the Third Reich?”
Sources said that free speech to say things that support Democratic positions must be protected at all costs.
“All speech is free, but some speech is freer than other speech,” said one journalist. “For instance, the touching, beautiful love notes between an assassin and his trans lover or the late-night hilarity of that national treasure, Jimmy Kimmel, are perfectly good examples of free speech, which should be protected at all costs. On the other hand, engaging logically, calmly, and publicly in conversation with people who disagree with you politically is basically fascism, and we cannot tolerate fascists. I’m fully onboard with violently murdering anyone who would dare violate free speech by calling for civil public discourse and a reasoned exchange of ideas.”
At publishing time, several leftists had decided that the only rational way to deal with the cancellation of Kimmel’s show was to call for more political violence.
LikeLike
Robin,
You are new here. You probably don’t know that NO ONE on this blog–not me, not any readers–celebrated Charlie’s death. Everyone expressed their shock and sorrow about his senseless murder.
Are you not outraged that the FCC and ABC censored a late-night host?
Have you ever read the First Amendment to the Constitution? Do you think it should be voided?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Free speech absolutists.
LikeLike
What does that even mean?
LikeLike
Sticks And Stones May Break Our Bones
But Late Night Comedians Scare The
Bejeezus Out Of These Folks
LikeLiked by 1 person
LikeLike
I hope Jimmy Kimmel tells them where to shove it.
LikeLiked by 3 people
How weak and insecure does Trump have to be to be terrified of what a comedian has to say about him?
LikeLiked by 2 people
Trump said today that he would like to see all his critics removed from TV.
How insecure is he?
He’s used to adulation.
As Harry S Truman said, “If you can’t stand the heat, stay out of the kitchen.”
LikeLiked by 3 people
Bullies can’t stand being laughed at.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Thank God we have Diane Ravitch, who will NOT be silenced.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Thanks, John. I wish I had a bigger megaphone.
LikeLike
I think that it is important to note that our rights to free speech do not require that people are given a television show to platform their speech. Much more important are the people who are exercising their right to free speech in public and have been sanctioned by universities for their speech. See https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3DgWPUW-PRVJ0&ved=2ahUKEwjX34nE9-OPAxU9weYEHZESPUwQtwJ6BAglEAI&usg=AOvVaw0flT5rcerWr3Edn_JThZNK among others.
LikeLike
I abhor political violence. I was stunned and upset by Kirk’s death. Just as I was when JFK, RFK, and MLK were murdered.
But I don’t approve of punishing people who don’t react as I did. Firing professors and expelling students is wrong.
LikeLiked by 3 people
There is no need to prioritize. Govt suppression of free speech is equally abhorrent wherever it crops up. When the fed govt via FCC pressures a media outlet to fire a late-night comedian for views a fed official considers offensive, that is a breach of 1st Amendment. Ditto when a public U admin expels a student for expressing views in public of which they disapprove—which reflects red-state-govt ditto-head interpretation of Trump policy.
No, our rights to free speech do not require that people are given a television show to platform their speech. But public censorship/ firing of an MSM comedian/ show host as a result of fed govt pressure has a message with broad public impact [unlike the expelled public U student – also victim of a branch of govt– whose fate was broadcast on local Austin TV & probably in few other venues].
Trump admin has been attacking the freedom of speech of universities [and their students] and law firms for many months. He has been using his bully pulpit to attack district and appeals court decisions/ judges. Now he is going after the media. These are all equally illegal attacks on our Constitution and our democracy. One is not more important than another.
The rapid-fire attacks on these 3 institutions, coupled with massive layoffs of govt employees– and the cumulative effect during his 2-yr period of slim but supine Congressional majority– are calculated to cow the public into helplessness/ acceptance of his authoritarianism.
LikeLike
According to ‘Common Dreams’ the right wing leadership is using Charlie Kirk’s murder to attack the left in order to set the stage to declare left wing supporters terrorists and silence them in the name of the “law.” Kimmel is a token sacrificial lamb in their preconceived agenda. NYC Parent asserts correctly that Kimmel mentioned MAGA, but he didn’t overtly attack them. Even Disney admitted that Kimmel’s remarks were not inflammatory. Disney is bending the knee because the FCC is threatening them with the revocation of their FCC license. There is a rumor that the right will be going after “The View” next. As J.B. Pritzker noted there is no appeasing fascism once they know you can be intimidated.https://www.commondreams.org/news/antifa-protest
LikeLiked by 1 person
Retired teacher, you may have missed the post a few days ago, where I compared the assassination of Kirk to Horst Wessel
LikeLike
Yes, I see the parallel with Horst Wessel. This resonates with me personally: my 1st husband was a student of German history and lived with a German family as an exchange student in the mid-1960’s. We spent time with that family on our travels in Europe after wedding: he often challenged their WWII upbringing/ Hitler youth history etc; his exchange-family parents would explain what it was like for them then. When traveling in S Germany later on, at a big beer hall, he heard some group in the back singing the Horst Wessel song [this was in 1970], & confronted them. They were quickly silenced.
Despite all the very apt parallels with Trump admin policies & many books depicting how post-1989 nations have become authoritarian by starting as democratic, then hollowing out democratic institutions from within, I see a difference that gives me hope, when comparing US history to many nations who have experienced dictatorships. Germany, e.g., was not even an official “nation” until 1871, and had a grand total of 14 yrs of democracy before Hitler became Chancellor in 1933.
There are many parallel stories. Italy became a unified nation in 1861, and had very limited democracy under monarchy, before Mussolini took over in 1922. Spain’s democratic experience: 8 years—then 36 yrs of dictatorship before transition to democracy by 1978. Argentina had 18 yrs of imperfect democracy before their first military dictatorship which began in 1930 (and 5 more after that). Hungary had a stable democracy for only 20 yrs before Orban won election in 2010 & began its democratic backsliding. China has never had a sustained period of liberal, multi-party democracy, just a few brief historical experiments with democratic processes. Ditto Russia: a couple of very brief experiments with democracy between czars and dictators.
England, US, and France are the only nations which have avoided authoritarian regimes through ever-expanding degrees of democracy. Attained (measuring from full male suffrage): US and France since 1870 [155 yrs] and England since 1918 [107 yrs].
LikeLike
We are two elections away from expelling the Trump malignancy
LikeLiked by 1 person