For a change, good news from Texas. Needless to say, the good news comes a judge, not the odious legislature, which is firmly controlled by Governor Greg Abbott. Judge Fred Biery blocked a law requiring the posting of the Ten Commandments in every classroom. State Attorney General Ken Paxton urged schools to ignore Judge Biery’s decision. The Appeals Court for the Fifth Circuit has already knocked down a similar law from Louisiana.
A federal judge has issued a temporary injunction blocking a Texas law that would have mandated the display of the Ten Commandments in every public school classroom across the state.
In his ruling on Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Fred Biery in San Antonio temporarily prohibited 11 Texas school districts from displaying the Ten Commandments.
The Clinton appointee said a lawsuit filed by a coalition of Dallas-area families, faith leaders and civil liberties advocates raised questions about the constitutionality of Senate Bill 10, which would have required the displays in schools statewide starting September 1.
The decision marks the third time a federal court has struck down such a state-level requirement, following similar rulings in Louisiana and Kentucky.
Biery’s 55-page ruling emphasized the potential impact on students and teachers, noting that “even though the Ten Commandments would not be affirmatively taught, the captive audience of students likely would have questions, which teachers would feel compelled to answer. That is what they do.”
He maintained that such displays could lead to unintended religious discussions, placing educators in the difficult position of navigating complex theological issues in a public school setting, potentially infringing on students’ rights to a secular education.
As an example, the judge offered a fictional account of a similar law in Hamtramck, Michigan, where the majority Muslim community “decreed” that the Quran should be taught in public schools. As part of the example, Biery quoted directly from the Quran.
“While ‘We the people’ rule by a majority, the Bill of Rights protects the minority Christians in Hamtramck and those 33 percent of Texans who do not adhere to any of the Christian denominations,” the judge wrote.
He also cited the biblical accounts of Abraham leaving the land of Ur to proclaim, as the judge wrote in quotations, “the one true God.” Naming Moses, Jesus and Mohammed as the “triad of the ‘desert religions,'” the judge said elsewhere other belief systems were formed, including “those which have come to exist in the American experience.”
Claiming that humans “evolved over several million years to be the only species which knows it will die,” Biery attributed the rise of human religion to people “not wanting their existence to end.”
Quoting everything from Stephen Hawking to Sonny and Cher, the judge also quoted from John 11:35, saying Jesus — who he called the “cousin” of Moses and Mohammed — would have wept if he saw the “blood spilled by their followers against each other.”
Writing that SB 10 “officially favors Christian dominations over others” and “crosses the line from exposure to coercion,” Biery expressed concern that public displays of the Ten Commandments “are likely to send an exclusionary and spiritually burdensome message” that would identify the plaintiff families as “the other.”
“The displays are likely to pressure the child-Plaintiffs into religious observance, meditation on, veneration, and adoption of the State’s favored religious scripture, and into suppressing expression of their own religious or nonreligious backgrounds and beliefs while at school,” the judge wrote.
In his closing statement, Biery — a 77-year-old known for using puns and colorful language in his rulings — appeared to suggest Christians might resort to violence in response to his ruling. He offered a “prayer” using the New Testament phrase “grace and peace” and concluding with “Amen.”
“For those who disagree with the Court’s decision and who would do so with threats, vulgarities, and violence, Grace and Peace unto you,” he wrote. “May humankind of all faiths, beliefs and non-beliefs be reconciled one to another. Amen.”
The suit names 11 of some of the state’s biggest school districts, including Houston ISD, Austin ISD, and Plano ISD, but notably excludes Dallas ISD. The plaintiffs contend that the law passed by the Texas Legislature in 2024 violates the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause, which ensures the separation of church and state, and the Free Exercise Clause, which protects individuals’ rights to practice their religion freely.
The case is expected to move to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which ruled against a similar Louisiana law in June, before potentially advancing to the Supreme Court, where a 6-3 conservative majority could redefine the boundaries of church-state separation.

How many laws written by Republicans should be declared unconstitutional before Americans realize they are the enemy of the people. This is the danger presented.
LikeLike
Wonderful ruling and great comments were made by the judge, but if it was explained why Dallas was excluded, I missed it.
LikeLike
perhaps man is not the only being that contemplates his own mortality?
LikeLike
Can you name another living creature that can? Some animals mourn loved ones who have died, like elephants and dogs when they see the dead body, but does that mean they can extrapolate it to understanding that someday it’s probably going to happen to themselves, too?
LikeLike
Just doing some poetic wondering, my friend.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s definitely well worth wondering about, my friend! I’ve often pondered it myself as well. Ultimately though, I think the judge was very insightful and right on target. Other beings don’t seem to plan out their lives based on that knowledge the way humans do –especially when we reach old age and know that our death may be just around the corner. Personally, I highly doubt any other living creatures can see that coming even then.
LikeLike
Too bad Texas Judge Biery is not on The Supreme Court. All the rationales this judge used to support his decision could also apply against the overturning of Roe v. Wade. The Supreme Court’s decision is an example of religious overreach as it imposes the religious beliefs of a subset of Christians on the population as large. It is wreaking havoc with the health and well-being of so many young women of various religious backgrounds. The overturning of Roe v. Wade makes women of child bearing age second class citizens. Why should a religious minority be able to impose their beliefs on those that do not share those beliefs? The secular government envisioned by the founders should remain secular in public schools and over women’s bodies.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank god for this wise decision!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Someone tell the religious zealots in Texas that “secular” does not mean “anti-religious,” but only that the religious is DISTINCT from the political, and that the political order can hold things together in a way that a religious state cannot–whereas a religious state must have everyone on the same religious page to avoid conflict–and that’s a prescription for constant war and even for genocide. BTW, this is a lesson everyone in a democracy should learn by the time they are done with the fourth grade.
LikeLike
“BTW, this is a lesson everyone in a democracy should learn by the time they are done with the fourth grade.”
This reminds me, during the Cold War, my 4th grade teacher told our class, “In America, anyone can be anything they want.” At the time, we were subjected to frequent “duck and cover” air raids, which meant hiding under our desks (so I wished very strongly that we had an underground air raid shelter). I had watched the hearings with Joe McCarthy on TV years before that, too, so I said, “You can’t be a Communist.” She had to agree.
LikeLike
What many people don’t rea;ize is there are two slightly different versions in the Bible. The numbering and order are different. Why is this important? Because Jews and Protestant use one while Catholics use the Other. Which ever one then shows a religious preference and a religious discrimination for the other religious persuasion.
LikeLike
There are three different versions of the Ten Commandments in the Bible.
See:
https://bam.sites.uiowa.edu/trivia/ba-trivia-how-many-times-do-ten-commandments-appear-hebrew-bible
LikeLike
There are actually 613 commandments. Most people don’t know about them, including many Jews –except for the Ultra Orthodox, whose daily life is devoted to adhering to all of them.
https://www.jewfaq.org/613_commandments
LikeLike
After I returned home from living in Israel, where I studied Hebrew for the first time, I read the 10 Commandments that were hung on the wall in our synagogue and I suddenly realized that what they actually say is a whole lot of No this, No that. There are 7 “No” commandments, saying what not to do, and just 3 commandments saying what we can do!
I had been working with kids for several years by then and immediately realized how contrary that is to best practices in education. This is because the best way to get through to people, especially children, is to teach them how to behave by focusing on what they are allowed to do, and minimizing the the focus on what they should not do! I guess Moses et al did not know people all that well in those days.
https://www.clker.com/cliparts/R/t/6/N/5/D/ten-commandments-in-hebrew-md.png
LikeLike
BTW, this why you will typically hear well trained teachers often say things like, “You need to walk” instead of “Don’t run,” especially in Early Childhood Education, but to older kids as well, since all need to know what they are supposed to do, not just what they can’t do.
LikeLike
My point was which ever they do, it screams bias.
LikeLike
I get it and agree. My point is that kids need developmentally appropriate classroom Do Rules, not biblical Don’t Rules.
LikeLike
There is only one true bible, the Catholic one. . . at least for those brought up Catholic. . . the rest are imitations and only heathens use them.
LikeLike
So what if Texas chooses the Jewish/Protestant version? Is it really valid? They are both in every Bible, it is just that the different versions use different ones making choosing the other one showing bias against the other religious group.
Br the way many Southern Baptists, who are strong in Texas would say the same nut in reverse against any of the Catholic translations,
I suggest doing what surprised me while sitting at the funeral of a colleague in a synagogue up on the wall were two wooden tablets like the traditional view of the tablets Moses brought down from Mt. Sinai. but in Hebrew. And while it might take 12 point type to fit the English version on these in Hebrew they werte just 2 words in Giant Hebrew Characters all starting with “Lo…” which means No in Hebrew. No Adultery’s, No Killing, No idols. Why not just post then in the original Hebrew — might motivate the smarter kids to to learn some foreign language or just ignore them as likely be the case in Texas.
LikeLike
The Roman Catholic Church is the TRUE church.
Can you say sarcasm?
Or as I am wont to say: To hell with all churches. . . except of course Pastafarianism.
LikeLike
Sarcasm is hard to see in print. I always add ;^) a wink and tongue in cheek.
LikeLiked by 1 person
These are laws written to lose.
Texas lawmakers knew exactly what they were doing when they passed the law. The Supreme Court struck down an almost identical law in Stone more than 40 years ago. The state’s own lawyers could not plausibly claim that this measure would survive judicial review.
So why do it? One answer is it’s a coordinated, multistate campaign to push Christian religious doctrine into public schools, hoping that a friendlier Supreme Court might take the bait and revisit its precedents. These bills are as much political theater as policy, designed to rally certain voters and provoke legal fights rather than solve real problems in education.
The cost is not just in wasted legislative time and legal fees. Laws like this force parents and students — often from minority faiths or no faith at all — into court to defend their rights. They create needless division in school communities and undermine the principle that public schools must serve all children equally, regardless of belief.
If lawmakers want to test constitutional limits, they should be honest with constituents about the risks and costs. Passing measures they know will be struck down (or paused in this case) may serve a political narrative, but it does nothing to improve education — and it erodes respect for both lawmaking and the Constitution.
LikeLiked by 1 person
To hell with any religious faith belief propaganda (in other words ALL religious faith beliefs) being forced down the throats of innocent children.
LikeLike
WHOSE TEN COMMANDMENTS? The official Catholic Ten Commandments are documented in The Catholic Catechism is different from the Ten Commandments in the Bible because it doesn’t condemn the presence of “graven images” in Catholic churches.
If Protestant Ten Commandments are posted in schools, Catholic children could become the objects of taunting and ridicule by their classmates as idol worshipers.
The Catholic perspective is based on the plain fact that in the Hebrew language in which the Ten Commandments were written in the Bible, the word used to refer to “graven images” is “pesel”, which means carvings or images that ARE SPECIFICALLY CREATED TO BE WORSHIPED. On the other hand, the Hebrew word “matzevah” which also means “graven images” is used to refer to carvings and images to commemorate the memory of people who are loved or honored for their good qualities.
The carvings and images in Catholic churches are “matzevah” and are not worshiped, but only serve to commemorate Mary, the Apostles, and Saints for their holy qualities.
Catholics don’t “pray to” Mary, the Apostles, and Saints any more than everyday people “pray” to their friends and relatives when they ask those friends and relatives to pray to God on their behalf. The popular “Hail, Mary” prayer is an example; it begins with: “Hail, Mary, full of grace [the biblical words of the angel who told Mary she would be the mother of Jesus]” and goes on to request “pray for us sinners.”
So — whose Ten Commandments will be posted in schools?
And whose interpretation of the Bible will be taught? Because Catholics, Episcopalians, Lutherans, United Presbyterians, Methodists, and other Christian denominations all share dogma that says that the stories of creation in Genesis 1 and Genesis 2 are not to be taken literally and that evolution is how the human body was formed.
So — whose interpretation of the Bible will be taught?
Plus, the Catholic Bible contains different “books” than the Protestant Bible. Whose Bible will be taught? Will they all be taught? If so, children will end up asking questions about whose Bible is the “right” one. That’s not what those who wrote these laws intended to have happen.
Will public school districts be forced to pay to send Catholic students to parochial schools because Catholic students become targets of ridicule by other students?
There are going to be a great many lawsuits over whose Ten Commandments and whose Bible is taught.
THAT’S the kind of fighting between Americans that our Founding Fathers intended to avoid when they wrote our Constitution with its prohibitions against government involvement in religion.
LikeLike